Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening in Colorectal Cancer: A 5-Year Experience of a Portuguese Pathology Department.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a prevalent genetic condition associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). Accurate identification of LS patients is challenging, and a universal tumor screening approach has been recommended. We present the methodology and results of universal LS screening in our hospital's Pathology Department. This retrospective study analyzed CRC tumors from a 5-year period (2017-2021). Immunohistochemistry was used to assess MMR protein expression, followed by BRAF V600E analysis and MLH1 promoter methylation. Statistical analysis examined associations between clinicopathologic variables MMR status and LS-suspected tumors. The study analyzed 939 colorectal carcinomas, with 8.7% exhibiting mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, significantly lower than previous research. After applying the algorithm, 24 LS-suspected cases were identified, accounting for 2.6% of tested patients and 29.3% of MMR-deficient tumors. Our study establishes the feasibility of universal testing for all new cases of CRC in detecting individuals at risk for LS, even in the absence of clinical information. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the MMR status in our population, further investigations are warranted.

Bridging the Gap between Intuition and Theory: A Comparison of Different Approaches to Implementation Strategy Development for Improving Lynch Syndrome Detection.

INTRODUCTION: Despite growing calls for the explicit application of theory when designing behaviour change interventions, limited empirical evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of these methods compared to non-theoretical approaches. A cluster randomized controlled trial (Hide and Seek Project - HaSP) tested two implementation approaches for improving hereditary cancer referral practices with one key distinction: implementation strategies were designed based explicitly on psychological theory or based on stakeholder intuition. This study presents the detailed methods and resources used to facilitate this comparison, whilst examining the strategies generated through both approaches. METHODS: Across seven Australian hospitals, clinical stakeholders attended focus groups to co-design site-specific strategies for improving Lynch syndrome referral. Co-design methods differed according to trial arm. Implementation strategy content was examined, with intuitively derived strategies retrospectively coded to determine theoretical alignment. RESULTS: Fifty-one strategies were proposed across all sites (theory-based arm = 32, intuition-based arm = 19). Overall, nine behaviour change technique (BCT) categories were used on 77 occasions. In the theory-based trial arm, eight BCT categories were identified on 53 occasions; and five BCT categories on 24 occasions in the intuition-based arm. BCT categories were largely similar across both arms. After retrospectively coding intuitively derived strategies, 42% contained mechanistic links, thereby demonstrating theoretical alignment. CONCLUSION: Methods facilitated robust comparison of theoretical and intuitive approaches to implementation strategy design. Recognizing the known benefits of theory for enhancing scientific learning, applying these methods on a larger scale may provide definitive evidence about the comparative effectiveness of theoretical approaches.

Adherence to national Lynch syndrome testing guidelines for colorectal cancer in an Aotearoa New Zealand hospital-based population.

AIM: Lynch syndrome (LS) is estimated to affect 1-3.9% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Testing for LS is important in determining management and establishing surveillance for "Lynch families". Previous studies have identified poor rates of testing for LS in CRC patients. This study aimed to describe adherence to guidelines for testing of newly diagnosed CRC for LS. METHODS: A single institution cohort study of patients over 18 years with colorectal adenocarcinoma from 2018-2022 in Te Tai Tokerau, Aotearoa New Zealand was conducted. Rates of baseline immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, further testing for MLH1-deficient cases and rates of germline mutational analysis were audited to determine adherence to national guidelines. The rate of LS in newly diagnosed CRC was estimated. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty patients were eligible for universal testing for LS, of which 84% (n=553) completed initial IHC testing. MMR deficiency was reported in 20% (n=114) cases. Eighty-nine percent (n=101) was attributable to MLH1 deficiency, of which 99% (n=100) were appropriately tested for BRAF-V600E mutation. Sixty-four percent (4/11) patients indicated for hypermethylation testing were appropriately tested. Seventeen patients had an indication for germline mutational analysis, of which only 29% (n=5) were tested. The estimated incidence of LS in newly diagnosed CRC was 0.7-3.8%. CONCLUSION: Compliance with initial IHC testing was good. However, there is a need to improve rates of confirmation genetic testing. The incidence of confirmed LS in this study is 0.7%, however this may be as high as 3.9%.

[Gender-specific differences in the development of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients-A systematic review]. / Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede in der Entwicklung kolorektaler Karzinome bei Lynch-Syndrom-Betroffenen ­ ein systematisches Review.

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most frequent hereditary tumor syndrome and is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). While gene-specific and age-specific differences are considered in patient surveillance, gender-specific risks in the development of CRC have been reported in many studies but are not consistently documented. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to investigate gender-specific differences in CRC development among LS patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search following PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted in the PubMed, Ovid, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. A total of 688 studies were screened, and 41 met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Men have a higher risk of CRC and develop CRC earlier compared to women. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate gender-specific differences in the risk of CRC among LS patients, although they do not currently justify separate surveillance strategies.

Estimating cancer risk in carriers of Lynch syndrome variants in UK Biobank.

BackgroundLynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome caused by genetic variants affecting DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 Cancer risk in LS is estimated from cohorts of individuals ascertained by individual or family history of cancer, which may upwardly bias estimates. METHODS: 830 carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic (path_MMR) MMR gene variants classified by InSiGHT were identified in 454 756 UK Biobank (UKB) participants using whole-exome sequence. Nelson-Aalen survival analysis was used to estimate cumulative incidence of colorectal, endometrial and breast cancer (BC). RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of colorectal and endometrial cancer (EC) by age 70 years was elevated in path_MMR carriers compared with non-carriers (colorectal: 11.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.5% to 14.6%) vs 1.7% (95% CI: 1.6% to 1.7%), endometrial: 13.4% (95% CI: 10.2% to 17.6%) vs 1.0% (95% CI: 0.9% to 1.0%)), but the magnitude of this increase differed between genes. Cumulative BC incidence by age 70 years was not elevated in path_MMR carriers compared with non-carriers (8.9% (95% CI: 6.3% to 12.4%) vs 7.5% (95% CI: 7.4% to 7.6%)). Cumulative cancer incidence estimates in UKB were similar to estimates from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database for all genes and cancers, except there was no evidence for elevated EC risk in carriers of pathogenic PMS2 variants in UKB. CONCLUSION: These results support offering incidentally identified carriers of any path_MMR surveillance to manage colorectal cancer risk. Incidentally identified carriers of pathogenic variants in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 would also benefit from interventions to reduce EC risk. The results suggest that BC is not an LS-related cancer.

An artificial intelligence-assisted system versus white light endoscopy alone for adenoma detection in individuals with Lynch syndrome (TIMELY): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems for colonoscopy have been shown to increase small polyp detection during colonoscopy in the general population. People with Lynch syndrome represent an ideal target population for CADe-assisted colonoscopy because adenomas, the primary cancer precursor lesions, are characterised by their small size and higher likelihood of showing advanced histology. We aimed to evaluate the performance of CADe-assisted colonoscopy in detecting adenomas in individuals with Lynch syndrome. METHODS: TIMELY was an international, multicentre, parallel, randomised controlled trial done in 11 academic centres and six community centres in Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Spain. We enrolled individuals aged 18 years or older with pathogenic or likely pathogenic MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or EPCAM variants. Participants were consecutively randomly assigned (1:1) to either CADe (GI Genius) assisted white light endoscopy (WLE) or WLE alone. A centre-stratified randomisation sequence was generated through a computer-generated system with a separate randomisation list for each centre according to block-permuted randomisation (block size 26 patients per centre). Allocation was automatically provided by the online AEG-REDCap database. Participants were masked to the random assignment but endoscopists were not. The primary outcome was the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, calculated by dividing the total number of adenomas detected by the total number of colonoscopies and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04909671. FINDINGS: Between Sept 13, 2021, and April 6, 2023, 456 participants were screened for eligibility, 430 of whom were randomly assigned to receive CADe-assisted colonoscopy (n=214) or WLE (n=216). 256 (60%) participants were female and 174 (40%) were male. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy was 0·64 (SD 1·57) in the CADe group and 0·64 (1·17) in the WLE group (adjusted rate ratio 1·03 [95% CI 0·72-1·47); p=0·87). No adverse events were reported during the trial. INTERPRETATION: In this multicentre international trial, CADe did not improve the detection of adenomas in individuals with Lynch syndrome. High-quality procedures and thorough inspection and exposure of the colonic mucosa remain the cornerstone in surveillance of Lynch syndrome. FUNDING: Spanish Gastroenterology Association, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Societat Catalana de Digestologia, Instituto Carlos III, Beca de la Marato de TV3 2020. Co-funded by the European Union.

A REVIEW TO HONOR THE HISTORICAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF PAULINE GROSS, ALDRED WARTHIN, AND HENRY LYNCH IN THE DESCRIPTION AND RECOGNITION OF INHERITANCE IN COLORECTAL CANCER.

The present manuscript aimed to review the historical development and most important contributions regarding Lynch Syndrome since its first description, more than a century ago. In 1895, a reputed pathologist from Michigan University, Dr. Aldred Scott Warthin, got intrigued by the family history of a local seamstress called Pauline Gross. According to her prevision, she would present an early death due to cancer, which actually happened (from the uterus). Historically, her family was designated "Family G", comprising a group recognized as the longest and most detailed cancer genealogy that has ever been studied. Warthin concluded that its members had genetic susceptibility for cancer, and they are, nowadays, considered the first reported Lynch Syndrome family. At that time, however, the medical cancer community was far less receptive to the association between heredity and cancer, despite the description of other families with similar heredograms. Unfortunately, this historical fact remained somewhat dormant until another investigator inaugurated a new era in the understanding of family cancer clusters. After reports and studies from this family and many others, the condition initially called Cancer Family Syndrome was changed to the eponym Lynch Syndrome. This was a recognition of the extensive and dedicated work developed by Dr. Henry Lynch in describing various characteristics of the disease, and his efforts to establish the correct recommendations for its diagnosis and treatment. Although the future announces there is still far to go for a complete understanding of Lynch Syndrome, the remarkable contributions of Pauline's intuition, Warthin's perseverance, and Lynch's work consistency must never be forgotten by those who already have or will still benefit from this knowledge.

Exome Sequencing Identifies Carriers of the Autosomal Dominant Cancer Predisposition Disorders Beyond Current Practice Guideline Recommendations.

PURPOSE: The autosomal dominant cancer predisposition disorders hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS) are genetic conditions for which early identification and intervention have a positive effect on the individual and public health. The goals of this study were to determine whether germline genetic screening using exome sequencing could be used to efficiently identify carriers of HBOC and LS. METHODS: Participants were recruited from three geographically and racially diverse sites in the United States (Rochester, MN; Phoenix, AZ; Jacksonville, FL). Participants underwent Exome+ sequencing (Helix Inc, San Mateo, CA) and return of results for specific genetic findings: HBOC (BRCA1 and BRCA1) and LS (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM). Chart review was performed to collect demographics and personal and family cancer history. RESULTS: To date, 44,306 participants have enrolled in Tapestry. Annotation and interpretation of all variants in genes for HBOC and LS resulted in the identification of 550 carriers (prevalence, 1.24%), which included 387 with HBOC (27.2% BRCA1, 42.8% BRCA2) and 163 with LS (12.3% MSH6, 8.8% PMS2, 4.5% MLH1, 3.8% MSH2, and 0.2% EPCAM). More than half of these participants (52.1%) were newly diagnosed carriers with HBOC and LS. In all, 39.2% of HBOC/LS carriers did not satisfy National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for genetic evaluation. NCCN criteria were less commonly met in underrepresented minority populations versus self-reported White race (51.5% v 37.5%, P = .028). CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the need for wider utilization of germline genetic sequencing for enhanced screening and detection of individuals who have LS and HBOC cancer predisposition syndromes.

[Clinicopathological features and prognosis of sporadic mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer].

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of sporadic mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer. Methods: A total of 120 cases of sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer from July 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively collected in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Patients with Lynch syndrome; synchronous multiple colorectal cancers; preoperative anti-tumor treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy; and those with incomplete follow-up information were excluded based on family history and next-generation sequencing (NGS) test results. Immunohistochemical stains were used to detect the expression of mismatch repair proteins, methylation-specific PCR for methylation testing, and fluorescent PCR for BRAF V600E gene mutation detection. The clinical and pathological data, and gene mutation status were analyzed. Follow-up was done to assess survival and prognosis including progression-free survival and overall survival rate. Results: Sporadic dMMR colorectal cancer occurred more frequently in the right side of the colon, in females, and in the elderly. Morphologically, it was mostly moderately-differentiated, and most patients had low-grade tumor budding. In terms of immunohistochemical expression, MLH1 and PMS2 loss were dominant, and there were age and location-specificities in protein expression. MLH1 methylation was commonly detected in elderly female patients and rare in young male patients; while MLH1 and PMS2 deficiency, and BRAF V600E mutation occurred more often on the right side (P<0.05). The 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 90.7% and 88.7% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.8% and 90.7% respectively. Tumor budding status was an independent risk factor affecting patient recurrence (hazard ratio=3.375, 95% confidence interval: 1.060-10.741, P=0.039), patients with low-grade tumor budding had better prognosis, and those with medium or high-grade tumor budding had poor prognosis. Conclusion: For dMMR colorectal cancer patients, tumor budding status is an independent risk factor for recurrence.

Lynch Syndrome and Thyroid Nodules: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a genetic disease with increased risk of colorectal cancer and other malignancies. There are few reported cases of thyroid cancer in LS patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the presence of thyroid nodules in LS patients and to explore their association with the genetic features of the disease. METHODS: A retrospective and descriptive analysis was conducted to include all LS patients followed at the CEMAD (Centro Malattie Apparato Digerente) of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS. The characteristics of LS disease, gene mutations, and previous history of thyroid disease were evaluated. Majority of patients underwent thyroid ultrasound (US), and nodule cytology was performed when needed. RESULTS: Of a total of 139 patients with LS, 110 patients were included in the study. A total of 103 patients (74%) underwent thyroid ultrasound examinations, and 7 patients (5%) had a previous history of thyroid disease (cancer or multinodular goiter). The mean age was 51.9 years. Thyroid nodules were found in 62 patients (60%) who underwent US, and 9 of them (14%) had suspicious features of malignancy, inducing a fine-needle aspiration biopsy. A cytologic analysis classified 7 of 9 cases (78%) as TIR2 and 2 (22%) as TIR3a. Between patients with nodular thyroid disease (single nodule, multinodular goiter, and cancer), most of them (25 patients, 36% of total) were carriers of the MSH6 mutation, while 22 (32%), 17 (24%), and 5 (7%) had MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2 mutations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of thyroid nodules was found in patients with LS, especially in MSH6-carrying patients. Performing at least one thyroid ultrasound examination is suggested for the detection of nodular thyroid disease in LS patients. Systematic investigations are needed to estimate their prevalence, features, and risk of malignant transformation.

The impact of hysterectomy on subsequent colonoscopy in women with Lynch Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Women with Lynch Syndrome (LS) have a high risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer. They are recommended regular colonoscopies, and some choose prophylactic hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of hysterectomy on subsequent colonoscopy in these women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 219 LS women >30 years of age registered in the clinical registry at Section for Hereditary Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, were included. Data included hysterectomy status, other abdominal surgeries, and time of surgery. For colonoscopies, data were collected on cecal intubation rate, challenges, and level of pain. Observations in women with and without hysterectomy, and pre- and post-hysterectomy were compared. RESULTS: Cecal intubation rate was lower in women with hysterectomy than in those without (119/126 = 94.4% vs 88/88 = 100%, p = 0.025). Multivariate regression analysis showed an increased risk of challenging colonoscopies (OR,3.58; CI: 1.52-8.43; p = 0.003), and indicated a higher risk of painful colonoscopy (OR, 3.00; 95%CI: 0.99-17.44, p = 0.052), in women with hysterectomy compared with no hysterectomy. Comparing colonoscopy before and after hysterectomy, we also found higher rates of reported challenging colonoscopies post-hysterectomy (6/69 = 8.7% vs 23/69 = 33.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women with hysterectomy had a lower cecal intubation rate and a higher number of reported challenging colonoscopy than women with no hysterectomy. However, completion rate in the hysterectomy group was still as high as 94.4%. Thus, LS women who consider hysterectomy should not be advised against it.

Clinical Updates and Surveillance Recommendations for DNA Replication Repair Deficiency Syndromes in Children and Young Adults.

Replication repair deficiency (RRD) is a pan-cancer mechanism characterized by abnormalities in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system due to pathogenic variants in the PMS2, MSH6, MSH2, or MLH1 genes, and/or in the polymerase-proofreading genes POLE and POLD1. RRD predisposition syndromes (constitutional MMR deficiency, Lynch, and polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis) share overlapping phenotypic and biological characteristics. Moreover, cancers stemming from germline defects of one mechanism can acquire somatic defects in another, leading to complete RRD. Here we describe the recent advances in the diagnostics, surveillance, and clinical management for children with RRD syndromes. For patients with constitutional MMR deficiency, new data combining clinical insights and cancer genomics have revealed genotype-phenotype associations and helped in the development of novel functional assays, diagnostic guidelines, and surveillance recommendations. Recognition of non-gastrointestinal/genitourinary malignancies, particularly aggressive brain tumors, in select children with Lynch and polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis syndromes harboring an RRD biology have led to new management considerations. Additionally, universal hypermutation and microsatellite instability have allowed immunotherapy to be a paradigm shift in the treatment of RRD cancers independent of their germline etiology. These advances have also stimulated a need for expert recommendations about genetic counseling for these patients and their families. Future collaborative work will focus on newer technologies such as quantitative measurement of circulating tumor DNA and functional genomics to tailor surveillance and clinical care, improving immune surveillance; develop prevention strategies; and deliver these novel discoveries to resource-limited settings to maximize benefits for patients globally.

Colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma characteristics according to causative mismatch repair gene variant in Japanese colorectal surveillance for Lynch syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The optimal interval of colonoscopy (CS) surveillance in cases with Lynch syndrome (LS), and stratification according to the causative mismatch repair gene mutation, has received much attention. To verify a feasible and effective CS surveillance strategy, we investigated the colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence at different intervals and the characteristics of precancerous colorectal lesions of LS cases. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study was conducted in Japan. CRCs and advanced adenomas (AAs) in 316 LS cases with germline pathogenic variants (path_) were analyzed according to the data of 1,756 registered CS. RESULTS: The mean time interval for advanced CRCs (ACs) detected via CS surveillance was 28.7 months (95% confidence interval: 13.8-43.5). The rate of AC detection within (2.1%) and beyond 2 years (8.7%) differed significantly (p = 0.0003). AAs accounted for 43%, 46%, and 41% of lesions < 10 mm in size in the MLH1-, MSH2-, and MSH6-groups, respectively. The lifetime incidence of metachronous CRCs requiring intestinal resection for path_MLH1, path_MSH2, and path_MSH6 cases was 34%, 23%, and 14% in these cases, respectively. The cumulative CRC incidence showed a trend towards a 10-year delay for path_MSH6 cases as compared with that for path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In cases with path_MLH1, path_MSH2, and path_MSH6, maintaining an appropriate CS surveillance interval of within 2 years is advisable to detect of the colorectal lesion amenable to endoscopic treatment. path_MSH6 cases could be stratified with path_MLH1 and MSH2 cases in terms of risk of metachronous CRC and age of onset.

Mono- and Biallelic Replication-Coupled Gene Editing Discriminates Dominant-Negative and Loss-of-Function Variants of DNA Mismatch Repair Genes.

Replication-coupled gene editing using locked nucleic acid-modified single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides (LMOs) can genetically engineer mammalian cells with high precision at single nucleotide resolution. Based on this method, oligonucleotide-directed mutation screening (ODMS) was developed to determine whether variants of uncertain clinical significance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes can cause Lynch syndrome. In ODMS, the appearance of 6-thioguanine-resistant colonies upon introduction of the variant is indicative for defective MMR and hence pathogenicity. Whereas mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) hemizygous for MMR genes were used previously, we now show that ODMS can also be applied in wild-type mESCs carrying two functional alleles of each MMR gene. 6-Thioguanine resistance can result from two possible events: first, the mutation is present in only one allele, which is indicative for dominant-negative activity of the variant; and second, both alleles contain the planned modification, which is indicative for a regular loss-of-function variant. Thus, ODMS in wild-type mESCs can discriminate fully disruptive and dominant-negative MMR variants. The feasibility of biallelic targeting suggests that the efficiency of LMO-mediated gene targeting at a nonselectable locus may be enriched in cells that had undergone a simultaneous selectable LMO targeting event. This turned out to be the case and provided a protocol to improve recovery of LMO-mediated gene modification events.

Variant Detection in 3' Exons of PMS2 Using Exome Sequencing Data.

PMS2 is one of the DNA-mismatch repair genes included in routine genetic testing for Lynch syndrome and colorectal, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. PMS2 is also included in the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics' List of Secondary Findings Genes in the context of clinical exome and genome sequencing. However, sequencing of PMS2 by short-read-based next-generation sequencing technologies is complicated by the presence of the pseudogene PMS2CL, and is often supplemented by long-range-based approaches, such as long-range PCR or long-read-based next-generation sequencing, which increases the complexity and cost. This article describes a bioinformatics homology triage workflow that can eliminate the need for long-read-based testing for PMS2 in the vast majority of patients undergoing exome sequencing, thus simplifying PMS2 testing and reducing the associated cost.

Perception about benefits and risks related to combined hormonal contraceptives use in women with Lynch syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary condition associated with an increased risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of women with LS regarding combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) use compared to a control group of healthy women. METHODS: Pre-menopausal women with LS (n = 43) and an age-matched control group of healthy women (n = 128) participated in this prospective, cross-sectional study (NCT05909410). Participants completed an electronic questionnaire evaluating perceptions of CHC use and its impact on various cancers, medical conditions, and symptoms. Statistical analysis compared responses between the two groups, with reported p-values. RESULTS: Women with LS were less likely to use CHCs compared to the control group (p = 0.03) and had a more negative perception of CHCs' impact on colorectal cancer (p = 0.023) and endometrial cancer (p = 0.028). Limited knowledge was observed in both groups regarding the protective effects of CHCs against colorectal and ovarian cancer. Perceptions of CHC use and its impact on symptoms and chronic diseases did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05). CHC use was not associated with greater awareness of the protective effect against colorectal (p = 0.89) and endometrial cancer (p = 0.47), but it was associated with a desire for contraception (OR 21.25; 95% CI 1.16 to 388.21; p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: This study highlights contrasting perceptions of CHCs and their implications in oncology between women with LS and healthy women. Tailored counselling and support strategies are crucial for empowering women with LS to make informed decisions about their gynaecologic health.

This study illuminates divergent perceptions of combined hormonal contraceptives and their oncological implications between women with Lynch syndrome and healthy women.Tailored counseling and supportive strategies are essential for empowering women with Lynch syndrome to make informed decisions regarding their gynecologic health.

EPM2AIP1 immunohistochemistry is inadequate as a surrogate marker for MLH1 promoter hypermethylation testing in colorectal cancer.

MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MPH) analysis is an essential step in the universal tumor testing algorithm for Lynch syndrome, the most common inherited predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC). MPH usually indicates sporadic CRC. EPM2AIP1 gene shares the same promoter as MLH1, therefore MPH should also silence EPM2AIP1 transcription leading to loss of protein expression on immunohistochemistry (IHC). It has been previously reported that EPM2AIP1 IHC can be used as a surrogate for MPH in endometrial cancer. Our goal was to evaluate the feasibility of EPM2AIP1 IHC as a surrogate for MPH in CRC. 101 microsatellite instable CRC cases were selected, including 19 cases from whole tumor sections and 82 cases from tissue microarrays. 74 cases were with MPH and 27 without MPH. All 74 cases with MPH showed absent MLH1 by IHC, but only 47 (64%) exhibited loss of expression of EPM2AIP1. Of the 27 cases without MPH, 9 (33%) cases had unexpected loss of EPM2AIP1 expression. Of note, 10 cases were MLH1-mutated Lynch syndrome without MPH, and 2 of these cases showed unexpected loss of EPM2AIP1 staining. Of the 6 cases with double somatic mutations of MLH1 gene (without MPH), only 4 cases demonstrated intact expression of EPM2AIP1 as expected. Taken together, EPM2AIP1 loss was 64% sensitive and 67% specific for MPH, with an accuracy of 64%. We conclude that, unless stain quality improves with different clones or platforms, EPM2AIP1 IHC will likely not be useful as a surrogate test for MPH in CRC.

What Is Lynch Syndrome?

This JAMA Patient Page describes Lynch syndrome, its risk factors and diagnosis, and its association with colorectal cancer and other specific cancers.