Treatment strategies for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery remains a standard of care for resectable esophageal cancer (EC), and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is an alternative for unresectable diseases. However, it is controversial for the use of the two aggressive regimens in elderly patients. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases for studies comparing overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) between dCRT and surgery (nCRT + surgery or surgery alone) or between dCRT and radiotherapy (RT) alone in elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) until March 28, 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects model. RESULTS: Fourty-five studies with 33,729 patients were included. dCRT significantly prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.70) and PFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.60-0.76) compared to RT alone for unresectable EC, and resulted in a worse OS compared to surgery for resectable cases (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.23-1.45). Similar results of OS were also observed when the multivariate-adjusted HRs were used as the measure of effect (dCRT vs. RT alone: HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58-0.73; dCRT vs. surgery: HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.28-1.74). Subgroup analyses according to age group (≥ 70, ≥ 75, or ≥ 80 years), study design, study region, histological type, radiation field, chemotherapy regimen revealed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: nCRT + surgery is likely a preferred strategy for elderly patients with good physiological conditions; and dCRT is a better alternative for unresectable cases. Advanced age alone does not appear to be a key predictor for the tolerability of the two aggressive treatments.

Vasculogenic mimicry triggers early recidivation and resistance to adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and postoperative adjuvant therapy on the prognosis and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), as well as to assess whether VM affects the clinical benefit of postoperative adjuvant therapy. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis included patients who underwent radical surgery for ESCC, which was documented in the medical record system. The presence or absence of VM in surgical specimens was determined using double staining with PAS/CD31. Stratification was applied based on adjuvant therapy and VM status. Survival curves and COX modeling were used to analyze the impact of the presence or absence of VM on the benefit of adjuvant therapy and the survival prognosis of patients. RESULTS: VM-positive patients were more prone to postoperative recurrence and metastasis. VM was identified as an independent risk factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001, 95% CI:1.809-3.852) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001, 95% CI:1.603-2.786) in postoperative ESCC. Postoperative adjuvant therapy significantly prolonged PFS (p = 0.008) and OS time (p < 0.001) in patients with stage II and III ESCC, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy being the most effective. However, the presence of VM significantly reduced the benefits of postoperative adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: VM negatively impacts the prognosis of postoperative ESCC patients and reduces the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Tumor cells (TC) participate in tumor progression by altering the immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. However, the clinical relevance and prognostic effect of PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interactions and clinical significance of PD-L1 expression and TILs in ESCC. METHODS: Tissue specimens were collected from 126 patients with ESCC who underwent curative esophagectomy. Immunohistochemical analysis and multiplex immunofluorescence for CD4, CD8, CD25, FOXP3, and PD-L1 in the tumor were used to identify multiple tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIIC), Tregs, and TC. RESULTS: PD-L1 was expressed in tumor cells (PD-L1 TC). PD-L1 TIIC and PD-L1 TC affected the biological behavior of TC. The positive expression rate of PD-L1 TC and CD8+ TILs was 27.8% (35/126) and 31.7% (40/126), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that overall survival (OS) was significantly associated with decreased CD8+ TILs and PD-L1 TC-positive expression, which promote ESCC progression and metastasis. CONCLUSION: Tumor depth, CD8, and PD-L1 TC were independent prognostic factors in ESCC, and a predictive nomogram with these three risk factors improved the accuracy of predicting OS in patients with ESCC after surgical resection. The conjoint analysis of multiple immune-related factors is beneficial for stratifying patient survival risk.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus pembrolizumab for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with high risk of recurrence following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a single-arm phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant nivolumab reduces recurrence in patients with locoregional esophageal cancer who had pathological residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and R0 resection. However, the efficacy of adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in patients at higher risk of recurrence remains unclear. METHODS: This phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03322267) enrolled patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy but still had various risk factors for recurrence, such as involved or close margins (≤ 1 mm), extranodal extension of the involved lymph nodes, and the ypN2-3 stage. Patients received adjuvant therapy composed of a course of cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and pembrolizumab (200 mg, IV every 3 weeks) for 18 cycles. The primary endpoint was 1-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The risk factors were tumor margins of ≤ 1 mm (18 patients), extranodal extension of the involved lymph nodes (9 patients), and the ypN2-3 stage (9 patients). The median follow-up duration was 21.6 months (95% CI: 18.7-33.2). The rate of 1-year RFS was 60.0%. The median duration of RFS and overall survival was 14.3 (95% CI: 9.0-19.5) and 21.6 (95% CI: 0.0-45.5) months, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade and those of ≥ 3 grade occurred in 56% and 8% of all patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and in 79.2% and 12.5% of those receiving pembrolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab is feasible and may be associated with improved 1-year RFS rate in patients at high risk of recurrence after trimodality therapy for locally advanced ESCC. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT03322267).

Postoperative Radiotherapy in Curatively Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Occult Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Lymph Node Metastasis.

OBJECTIVES: Surgery is the mainstream treatment for early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and occult recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis (RLNM) is not uncommon among those with R0 resection. The clinical value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with RLNM only is still controversial. METHODS: Consecutive patients with early-stage ESCC treated with R0 resection and pathologically confirmed RLNM only from June 2012 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. PORT, covering the supraclavicular and superior mediastinum area (small T-field) at a dose of 50.4 Gy for 28 fractions, was performed in some patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the baseline characteristics between patients with or without PORT. Pattern of failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Among the 189 patients identified, 69 (35.5%) received PORT and the other 120 (63.5%) did not. After PSM, 154 patients were included in the matched cohort, including 62 in the PORT group and 92 in the non-PORT group. With a median follow-up of 48 (95% CI: 40.3-55.7) months, 69 patients developed their initial disease recurrence in the whole population and PORT significantly decreased the frequency of local recurrence (61.2% vs 21.4%) among those with recurrent disease. Additionally, in the PSM matched cohort, PORT significantly prolonged patients' DFS (HR 0.393, P = 0.002) and OS (HR 0.462, P = 0.020). Moreover, PORT remained as the independent factor associated with improved DFS (HR 0.360, P = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.451, P = 0.021) after multivariate Cox analyses. In addition, tumor location and pathological TNM stage were found to be independent prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: PORT is associated with improved DFS and OS in ESCC patients with R0 resection and RLNM only, which warrants future validation.

Oncologic Outcome of Patients With Pathologic T0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the oncologic outcomes of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor (ypT0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). METHODS: Patients with thoracic ESCC who underwent scheduled NCRT followed by surgery at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients with ypT0 disease were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were ultimately enrolled in this study. Ninety-two patients achieved pCR in the primary tumor and lymph nodes (ypT0N0), while 26 patients had residual metastatic disease in 52 lymph nodes (ypT0N+). Forty-five of the 52 lymph nodes with residual tumors were abdominal lymph nodes. Positive lymph nodes were more often observed in patients with tumors located in the lower third of the esophagus. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for the entire study group were 96.5%, 79.5%, and 77.1%, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 90.5%, 76.8%, and 69.0%, respectively. According to multivariate analyses, pN classification was an independent predictor of both OS and DFS (P < 0.05), while sex and cT classification were also found to be independent prognostic factors for DFS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Residual nodal metastatic disease in patients with ypT0 ESCC after NCRT was more often found in the abdominal lymph nodes. pN classification was an independent predictor of both OS and DFS for ypT0 ESCC patients after NCRT.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and lymphocyte subset predictors in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized therapeutic potential of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), their role in neoadjuvant therapy and reliable efficacy biomarkers remain elusive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent surgery following a 2-cycle platinum and paclitaxel-based treatment, with or without PD-1 inhibitors (January 2020-March 2023). We assessed peripheral blood indexes and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) density to evaluate their impact on pathological response and prognosis, leading to a clinical prediction model for treatment efficacy and survival. RESULTS: Of the 157 patients recruited, 106 received immunochemotherapy (ICT) and 51 received chemotherapy (CT) alone. The ICT group demonstrated a superior pathological response rate (PRR) (47.2% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.034) with comparable adverse events and postoperative complications. The ICT group also showed a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 39.8 months, unattained by the CT group. The 1-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 73% and 91% for the ICT group, and 68% and 81% for the CT group, respectively. We found higher baseline activated T cells, lower baseline Treg cells, and a decreased posttreatment total lymphocyte and CD4+/CD8+ ratio predicted an enhanced PRR. Reduced posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio and increased NK cells were associated with prolonged survival, while higher TLS density indicated poorer prognosis. Among ICT group, a lower posttreatment CD4+/CD8+ ratio indicated longer DFS and reduced posttreatment B cells indicated longer OS. A nomogram integrating these predictors was developed to forecast treatment efficacy and survival. CONCLUSION: The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy appears promising for locally advanced ESCC. Evaluating the differentiation status and dynamic changes of peripheral blood immune cells may provide valuable predictive insights into treatment efficacy and prognosis.

Thromboprophylaxis in oesophageal cancer patients-a study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial (TOP-RCT).

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to examine if prolonged thromboprophylaxis decreases the risk of thrombosis after intended curative surgery for oesophageal cancer. Study results are expected to inform a guideline for thromboprophylaxis after oesophageal cancer surgery. The perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this critically ill patient group. Thrombosis is the second-most common cause of cancer death after the cancer itself. The risk of thrombosis depends on the cancer type, and upper gastrointestinal cancers are considered high risk. This risk is further increased when patients undergo surgery. However, only few studies have investigated the peri- and postoperative coagulation profile in oesophageal cancer patients. Due to this lack of knowledge, prophylaxis is currently restricted to 5000 IU (international units) low-molecular weight heparin daily from surgery until discharge from hospital (approximately 10 days), whereas patients with gastric cancer receive 30 days of treatment. The present study examines whether a 30-day treatment is superior and safe, compared with the current standard treatment. METHODS: The study is a randomised controlled trial. Inclusion is ongoing, and we aim to include 100 patients. Blood samples are drawn before and after surgery, and the coagulation is extensively examined. The primary endpoint is the difference in plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) 30 days after surgery between the intervention and the standard group. Furthermore, patients are examined with ultrasound to screen for asymptomatic venous thrombotic events (VTE). Secondary endpoints are incidence of bleeding, symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE and mortality 30 days 1 one year after surgery. DISCUSSION: The study will provide valuable information on the perioperative coagulation profile and VTE risk of oesophageal cancer patients. The study seeks to aid in optimising the postoperative thromboprophylaxis, and the perspective is to reduce morbidity and mortality in this at-risk patient population. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at the EU Clinical Trials Register with ID 2021-001335-24 on 30 June 2021 and at ClinicalTrials.gov with study identifier NCT05067153.

Is postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy necessary for patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? An analysis based on the SEER database.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). METHODS: The data of EC patients who received adjuvant therapy after NCRT between 2004 to 2019 was retrieved from the SEER database. The patients were split into the adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT±CT) and the adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) groups. The process of propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. RESULTS: Following PSM, 157 patients in total were recruited in each treatment group. There were no significant variations in either overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the RT±CT and CT groups (median OS: 28 months versus. 51 months, p=0.063; median CSS: 31 months versus. 52 months, p=0.16). Within the CT group, patients with ypI/II or cI/II tumor stage, positive lymph node ratio (LNR) ≤0.1, and tumor size ≥50 mm (p<0.05) had higher OS compared to the RT±CT groups. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging group, the OS and CSS were significantly greater for those underwent RT±CT as opposed to the CT group (5-year OS:56.6% versus 19.4%, p=0.042; 5-year CSS:67.9% versus. 19.4%, p=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the tumor histology grade as an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy-based adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve the prognosis of EC patients after NCRT, although it may provide a survival benefit for patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging.

Predictive factors for intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer resection.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is currently one of the high-risk malignant tumors worldwide, posing a serious threat to human health. This study aimed to analyse the causes of postoperative mortality and intrathoracic anastomotic leakage(IAL) after esophagectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients with esophageal cancer resection and focused on the preoperative and postoperative indicators. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affected IAL and evaluated the potential factors on postoperative mortality. The Kaplan-Meier curve was applied to evaluate the effect of leakage on postoperative mortality after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that infection and high BMI were significant risk factors for IAL, patients with BMI over 24 kg/m2 in IAL group was two times higher than that of the group without IAL (95% CI = 1.01-6.38; P = 0.048). When patients were infected, the hazard ratios(HRs) of anastomotic leakage was twice that of patients without infection (95% CI = 1.22-4.70; P = 0.011). On the other hand, IAL was a significant cause of postoperative mortality, the 40-day postoperative mortality rate in the leakage group was significantly higher than the non leakage group (28.95% in leakage group vs. 7.46% in non leakage group, P<0.01). After propensity score matching, IAL still significantly affected postoperative mortality. The total length of hospital stay of the leakage group was inevitably longer than that of the non leakage group (22.19 ± 10.79 vs. 15.27 ± 8.59). CONCLUSION: IAL was a significant cause of death in patients underwent esophageal cancer resection. Patients with high BMI over 24 kg/m2 and infection may be more prone to developing IAL after esophagectomy. IAL inevitably prolonged the length of hospital stay and increased postoperative mortality.

Semaphorin 3F (SEMA3F) influences patient survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

In esophageal adenocarcinoma, the presence of lymph node metastases predicts patients' survival even after curative resection. Currently, there is no highly accurate marker for detecting the presence of lymph node metastasis. The SEMA3F/NRP2 axis was initially characterized in axon guidance and recent evidence has revealed its significant involvement in lymphangiogenesis, angiogenesis, and carcinogenesis. Hence, the objective of this study was to elucidate the roles of SEMA3F and its receptor NRP2 in esophageal adenocarcinoma. We conducted an immunohistochemical evaluation of SEMA3F and NRP2 protein expression in 776 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at the University Hospital of Cologne. Total and positive cancer cell counts were digitally analyzed using QuPath and verified by experienced pathologists to ensure accuracy. Positive expression was determined as a cell percentage exceeding the 50th percentile threshold. In our cohort, patients exhibiting SEMA3F positive expression experience significantly lower pT- and pN-stages. In contrast, positive NRP2 expression is associated with the presence of lymph node metastases. Survival analyses showed that the expression status of NRP2 had no impact on patient survival. However, SEMA3F positivity was associated with a favorable patient survival outcome (median OS: 38.9 vs. 26.5 months). Furthermore, SEMA3F could be confirmed as an independent factor for better patient survival in patients with early tumor stage (pT1N0-3: HR = 0.505, p = 0.014, pT1-4N0: HR = 0.664, p = 0.024, pT1N0: HR = 0.483, p = 0.040). In summary, SEMA3F emerges as an independent predictor for a favorable prognosis in patients with early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma. Additionally, NRP2 expression is linked to a higher risk of lymph node metastases occurrence. We hypothesize that low SEMA3F expression could identify patients with early-stage tumors who might benefit from more aggressive treatment options or intensified follow-up. Furthermore, SEMA3F and its associated pathways should be explored as potential tumor-suppressing agents.

Construction of a nomogram with IrAE and clinic character to predict the survival of advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients undergoing anti-PD-1 treatment.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a survival prediction model and nomogram to predict survival in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma undergoing treatment with anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1). This model incorporates immune-related adverse events (irAEs) alongside common clinical characteristics as predictive factors. Method: A dataset comprising 255 adult patients diagnosed with advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma was assembled. The irAEs affecting overall survival (OS) to a significant degree were identified and integrated as a candidate variable, together with 12 other candidate variables. These included gender, age, Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS) score, tumor stage, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression status, presence of peritoneal and liver metastases, year and line of anti-PD-1 treatment, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). To mitigate timing bias related to irAEs, landmark analysis was employed. Variable selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to pinpoint significant predictors, and the variance inflation factor was applied to address multicollinearity. Subsequently, a Cox regression analysis utilizing the forward likelihood ratio method was conducted to develop a survival prediction model, excluding variables that failed to satisfy the proportional hazards (PH) assumption. The model was developed using the entire dataset, then internally validated through bootstrap resampling and externally validated with a cohort from another Hospital. Furthermore, a nomogram was created to delineate the predictive model. Results: After consolidating irAEs from the skin and endocrine systems into a single protective irAE category and applying landmark analysis, variable selection was conducted for the prognostic prediction model along with other candidate variables. The finalized model comprised seven variables: ECOG PS score, tumor stage, HER2 expression status in tumor tissue, first-line anti-PD-1 treatment, peritoneal metastasis, CONUT score, and protective irAE. The overall concordance index for the model was 0.66. Calibration analysis verified the model's accuracy in aligning predicted outcomes with actual results. Clinical decision curve analysis indicated that utilizing this model for treatment decisions could enhance the net benefit regarding 1- and 2-year survival rates for patients. Conclusion: This study developed a prognostic prediction model by integrating common clinical characteristics of irAEs and G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. This model exhibits good clinical practicality and possesses accurate predictive ability for overall survival OS in patients with advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy is effective in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. This study aims to evaluate the clinical effect of first-line immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy for advanced G/GEJ cancer. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from the inception of the databases to December 2021. Randomized trials comparing ICI plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer were included. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Analyses were performed in Stata 14.0 software. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022300907. Results: Five trials were included for analysis, involving 2, 814 patients. ICI plus chemotherapy can significantly improve OS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.94; P = .002), PFS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; P ＜ .001) and ORR (relative ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% CI 1.11-1.30; P < .001). In safety analyses, there were no significant differences in incidence of all AEs, treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), TRAE of grade 3 or higher, serious TRAE and TRAE leading to death between two arms (P > .05). Conclusions: ICI plus chemotherapy is more effective first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer in contrast to chemotherapy regrading to improving OS, PFS and ORR, without increasing TRAE risk. This study will redefine the role of ICI in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line setting for G/GEJ cancer, and provide reference for clinical treatment.

Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery on prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: The time interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery is 6 weeks for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but whether delayed surgery affects prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: Clinical data of locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022 were collected. The surgery outcomes and prognosis were compared between short-interval (time to surgery ≤ 6 weeks) and long-interval groups (time to surgery > 6 weeks). RESULTS: 152 patients were enrolled totally, with a ratio of 91:61 between short-interval and long-interval groups. The rate of pathological complete response in the short-interval and long-interval groups were 34.1% and 24.6% (P = 0.257). Delayed surgery did not have a significantly impact on the number of lymph node dissections (P = 0.133), operative duration (P = 0.689), blood loss (P = 0.837), hospitalization duration (P = 0.293), chest drainage duration (P = 0.886) and postoperative complications (P > 0.050). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) rates were 85.10% in the short-interval group, and 82.07% in the long-interval group (P = 0.435). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.41% and 70.86% in the two groups (P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy (tumor regression grade 0) exhibited inferior 3-year OS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 51.85% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.035) and DFS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 47.40% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.014) in the long-interval group. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not further improve pathological response; instead, it resulted in a poorer DFS. Especially for patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy, delayed surgery increases the risk of mortality and recurrence.

First-line treatment with KN046, chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an open-label, dose escalation, and dose expansion phase Ib trial.

There is growing evidence to suggest that radiotherapy might enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. This study aimed to assess the possibility of KN046, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4, combined with chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this open-label, phase Ib trial, patients with advanced ESCC were administered chemotherapy with palliative radiotherapy, and KN046 in the predefined escalation dosages of 1, 3, or 5 mg/kg (every 3 weeks during chemotherapy cycles and every 2 weeks during KN046 maintenance). The chemotherapy regimen constituted cisplatin (75 mg/m2 i.v., d1) and paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m2 ivgtt., d1). Radiotherapy specifics, including site, timing, dose, and fragmentation pattern, were at the investigator's discretion. The primary outcome was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). From May 2019 to April 2021, 25 patients were enrolled across the dosage groups: 3 in 1 mg/kg, 12 in 3 mg/kg, and 10 in 5 mg/kg. No DLT was observed during the dose escalation. The objective response rate was 41.7% (95%CI 22.1-63.4), while the disease control rate was 87.5% (95%CI 67.6-97.3). At a median follow-up of 11.8 months, the median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (95%CI 5.2-9.7) and median overall survival was 15.9 months (95%CI 8.4-NE). Serious adverse events were reported in 48.0% of patients, predominantly leukopenia (16%), immune-mediated enterocolitis (12%), immune-mediated pneumonitis (8%), and neutropenia (8%). Combining KN046 with chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy might be feasible, showing a favorable safety profile and notable efficacy in advanced ESCC patients.

Radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for postoperative recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with postoperative recurrence remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effects of radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on postoperative recurrence in ESCC patients. METHODS: Recurrence ESCC patients who received salvage RT and CRT from January 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) and prognostic factors were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed based on pathological lymph node (LN) status (negative/positive) to evaluate the differences in salvage treatments and toxic reaction. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years (range 43-77). No significant difference was found in the median PRS between the salvage RT and CRT groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that TNM stage III and IV, macroscopic medullary type, and distant metastasis recurrence pattern were independent prognostic factors (all p < 0.05) for PRS. Salvage treatment was not associated with PRS (p = 0.897). However, in patients with negative LN, CRT was associated with prolonged survival (p = 0.043) and had no significant differences in toxic reactions compared to RT (p = 0.924). In addition, RT showed better prognoses (p = 0.020) and lower toxic reactions (p = 0.030) than CRT in patients with positive LNs. CONCLUSIONS: Based on prognosis and toxic reactions, ESCC recurrence patients with negative LNs could benefit from CRT, but RT should be recommended for patients with positive LNs.

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy and radiotherapy for treatment-naive advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial.

This single-arm phase 2 trial (ChiCTR2100046715) examined previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received four cycles of paclitaxel with carboplatin every 3 weeks. Toripalimab was infused intravenously every 3 weeks for 12 months, or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Radiotherapy that encompassed the primary lesions and metastases commenced in the third cycle. The median progression-free survival time was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-not estimable) in the intent-to-treat population, failing to meet the pre-specified primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included an objective response rate of 45.5%, a disease control rate of 57.6%, and a median duration of response of 11.5 months (interquartile range, 6.4-15.0). The 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 41.9% (95% CI: 27.7-63.5) and 69.7% (95% CI: 55.7-87.3), respectively. Lymphopenia was the most frequent grade ≥3 adverse event (82%), and an esophageal fistula developed in three patients (9.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. In prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis, higher densities of CD8 + T cells, CD11c+ dendritic cells, and CD68+ macrophages correlated with improved tumor response and prognosis. Radiotherapy supplementation to first-line chemo-immunotherapy for treatment-naive advanced ESCC demonstrated some antitumor activity and manageable safety profiles, warranting further randomized controlled trials.

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was associated with better short-term survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The chemotherapy and immunotherapy combination is currently the primary strategy to treat metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT) is being intensively investigated for treating locally advanced ESCC. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of NCIT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) to treat locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: We included 214 locally advanced ESCC patients who were administered neoadjuvant therapy from May 2014 to April 2022. The patients were grouped according to two neoadjuvant protocols (NCIT and NCRT) routinely used at our institution. Perioperative findings, pathological results, and survival data were compared between the two groups by conducting unmatched and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analyses. RESULTS: Following 1:1 PSM analysis of the confounders, 66 patients were allocated to each of the two groups. Time span between neoadjuvant therapy completion and esophagectomy was significantly longer after NCRT than that after NCIT (47.1 ± 13.2 days vs. 34.7 ± 8.8 days; p < 0.001). The NCIT group exhibited significantly greater number of harvested lymph nodes than the NCRT group (33.6 ± 12.7 vs. 21.7 ± 10.2; p < 0.001). The pathological complete response and major pathological response rates were similar between the two groups [NCIT group: 25.8% (17/66) and 62.1% (41/66), respectively; NCRT group: 27.3% (18/66) and 56.1% (37/66), respectively (p > 0.05)]. The overall incidence of pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, or postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 2-year cumulative overall survival rates and the 2-year disease-free survival rates of the NCIT and NCRT groups were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively (p = 0.029) and 70.0% and 50.8%, respectively (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: In locally advanced ESCC patients, short-term survival after NCIT is superior to that after NCRT, with similar perioperative and pathological outcomes.

Clinical impact of postoperative changes in body composition on long-term outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the temporal changes in body composition following esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer using bioelectrical impedance analysis and to assess the prognostic implications of these changes. METHODS: Our study included 528 patients who underwent esophagectomy and preoperative body composition measurements between January 2013 and June 2020. Postoperative body composition was measured in 493 patients at discharge as follows: 184 at 1 month, 144 at 2 months, 143 at 3 months, 103 at 6 months, 58 at 9 months, and 78 at 12 months. RESULTS: Body weight (BW) continuously decreased until the 6 postoperative months (POMs), reaching -11.5% compared with preoperative levels. Subsequently, almost no change was observed at 12 POMs. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) decreased until 3 POMs but gradually recovered after 3 POMs. Conversely, body fat mass (BFM) consistently decreased over time post-esophagectomy. The patients were categorized into moderate (>-10%) and severe (≤-10%) groups based on % BW, % SMM, and % BFM losses at 3 POMs. Severe SMM loss at 3 POMs correlated with reduced overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: 85.9% in moderate vs. 75.1% in severe, p = 0.035). BFM loss was associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (3-year RFS: 83.3% in moderate vs. 62.0% in severe, p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis identified pStages Ⅲ and Ⅳ, % SMM loss ≤ -10%, and % BFM loss ≤ -10% as independent factors for worse OS. CONCLUSION: Post-esophagectomy, distinct temporal changes in BW, SMM, and BFM are observed. Significant reductions in SMM and BFM 3 POMs indicate a poor long-term prognosis.