Risk Scoring System to Predict Mortality in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has a particularly unfavorable prognosis. This limited survival raises doubts about which factors confer an extremely worse outcome and which patients could benefit from more aggressive treatments, in an attempt to improve survival and better control the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with PC due to GC and develop a prognostic score to predict 6-month mortality. We performed an analysis of clinical stage IV GC with PC. Scores were assigned to risk factors and calculated for each patient from nine variables. Among 326 IVB GC, 211 (64.7%) had PC and were included. After calculating the score, 136 (64.5%) GCs were classified as a low-risk group and 75 (35.5%) as a high-risk group. Median OS was 7.9 and 1.9 months for low- and high-risk patients (p < 0.001). In the high-risk group, 77.3% of the patients died in <6 mo (p < 0.001). Palliative surgery and chemotherapy were associated with better survival, and the prognostic groups maintained statistical significance even when the same type of treatment was performed. In conclusion, the scoring system developed with variables related to patient performance status and clinical data was able to distinguish GC with PC with a high risk of 6-month mortality. Accordingly, verifying and validating our findings in a large cohort of patients is necessary to confirm and guarantee the external validation of the results.

Starting a peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment program in a developing country: A prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become a valuable treatment strategy for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). In Chile, it is an emerging technique. The aim of this study is to describe our protocol and report our perioperative results. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database for patients undergoing exploratory surgery for PC was reviewed. Eligible patients were selected using the peritoneal cancer index in correlation with the primary tumor. Patients underwent HIPEC using mitomycin C. Clinical data and postoperative results were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients underwent exploratory surgery. Most patients were female (55%) with a median age of 62 years (range, 25-83). Complete CRS and HIPEC were achieved in 53 patients. The most frequent primary tumor site was colon-rectum (49%). The median number of resected organs was 4 (range, 1-13). Overall 90-day incidence of major complications was 26%. After a median follow-up of 26 months, 44 patients (83%) in the resected group were alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: The PC treatment program at our institution has been established in a safe manner, with acceptable morbidity comparable to high-volume centers. A comprehensive preoperative evaluation, careful patient selection, and a cohesive team are necessary for successful results.

Extended intraoperative peritoneal lavage as prophylactic peritoneal recurrence for locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: To demonstrate whether extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) could yield better results in overall survival and less recurrence, regardless of peritoneal cytology, compared to standard peritoneal lavage (SPL). METHODS: A prospective randomised multicenter study including 94 patients (47 per arm) to detect a 20% difference in 3-year overall survival in patients with locally advanced tumours without peritoneal carcinomatosis. Three samples of peritoneal fluid were obtained (at the beginning, the end of procedure and after the assigned peritoneal lavage). Clinicopathological and surgical data were analysed by group. Postoperative complications, location of recurrence and surgical approach were evaluated. Overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the uni/multivariate analysis for prognostic factors was carried out using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were analysed (4 excluded per group). No statistical differences were observed in clinicopathological or surgical data between groups, considering both groups well-balanced for analysis. Overall survival at 3 years was 64.3% for SPL vs. 62.3% for EIPL (p 0.421). Only three patients had at least one positive peritoneal cytology (1:2). There were no differences regarding postoperative complications (SPL: 37.2% vs. EIPL: 32.5%, p 0.65) or between location of recurrence and number of recurrences. The number of recurrences did not differ between surgical approaches, but locoregional and peritoneal recurrences were fewer with the laparoscopic approach (p 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The regular use of extensive peritoneal lavage in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, regardless of peritoneal cytology, has not been effective as prophylaxis of peritoneal recurrence or better survival.

Survival outcomes in patients aged 75 years and over with peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): multicenter study of the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery (GECOP).

BACKGROUND: The attitude toward cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC in peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study is to report the perioperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC in patients ≥ 75 years. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study collected the data the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery. Thirty-six patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer met the selection criteria for the study. Morbidity, mortality, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Morbidity (grade III-IV) was 17% and 2 patients died of complications related to the procedure (5.4%). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16 months. DFS at 1 and 3 years was 81% and 42%, respectively. Overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 96% and 75%. In the univariate analysis, preoperative comorbidities (p = 0.01), liver metastases (p = 0.02), blood transfusion (p = 0.001) and postoperative complications (p = 0.001); and in the multivariate analysis, perioperative blood transfusion (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.95-6.24, p = 0.03) and postoperative complications (OR 3.25, 95% CI 2.35-7.56, p = 0.02) were associated with a lower overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Age is not an absolute contraindication to perform cytoreduction surgery with HIPEC in highly selected elderly patients with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis.

The use of cisplatin plus doxorubicin or paclitaxel in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: Our main aim is to analyze the survival results in women operated on for advanced ovarian cancer with two different HIPEC regimens (cisplatin plus doxorubicin versus paclitaxel). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer operated on with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC, from October-2008 to February-2016, was retrospectively analyzed. The two drugs used, cisplatin/doxorubicin (Group A) and paclitaxel (Group B), were compared. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC; 19 patients (46%) were in Group A and 22 (54%) were in Group B. The extent of peritoneal disease was comparable between groups (Peritoneal Cancer Index of 10 in Group A versus PCI of 12.5 in Group B). There were no differences in morbidity between groups, with a severe morbidity (Dindo-Clavien III or IV) of 36.8% versus 27.3%, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. Median follow-up was 39 months. Median overall survival was 79 months. Overall survival at 3 years in Group A was 66% versus 82.9% in Group B (p = 0.248). Incomplete cytoreduction (macroscopic residual tumour after surgery) was identified as the only independent factor that influenced overall survival (HR 12.30, 95% CI 1.28-118.33, p = 0.03). The cytostatic used in HIPEC had no influence in overall survival. CONCLUSION: The cytostatic used in HIPEC did not have a negative effect in the prognosis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from rectal or colonic adenocarcinoma treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): two different diseases.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) has poor survival. Multi-modal treatment including systemic chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be used in selected patients with curative intent. The majority published works consider PC of CRC origin as a homogenous disease. Aim of this study is to stress the different biological behaviors and survival of PC according to colonic or rectal origin. METHODS: Data of CRS and HIPEC procedures for PC of CRC origin performed at MD Anderson Cancer Center-Madrid (Spain) have been collected, dividing patients into two groups according to colonic or rectal PC. Clinical, operatory, and postoperatory variables of the two groups have been analyzed to compare survival-related rates and PC origin. RESULTS: In the years 2004-2015, 114 procedures of CRS followed by HIPEC for peritoneal metastasis of different origin have been performed; of these, 36 procedures were for colorectal PC (31 patients in colonic and 5 in rectal group). Two groups are homogenous after analysis of clinical, operatory, and follow-up data. Median survival (OS) is significantly higher in colonic compared to rectal group (47.83 vs. 22.0 months, p 0.008). 3- and 5-year survival rate is 74 and 50% in colonic group vs. 20 and 0% in rectal group. CONCLUSION: Rectal origin PC has a more aggressive behavior compared to colonic origin, reflecting in a worst prognosis of patients affected by rectal origin PC. According to our data and literature, indications of multi-modal treatment including CRS and HIPEC should be more restrictive for rectal cancer PC. Authors should differentiate colonic and rectal origin of PC when reporting cases in the literature.

Recovering missing mesothelioma deaths in death certificates using hospital records.

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, underreporting of mesothelioma and cancer of the pleura (MCP) is suspected to be high. Records from death certificates (SIM) and hospital registers (SIH-SUS) can be combined to recover missing data but only anonymous databases are available. This study shows how common data can be used for linkage and as an assessment of accuracy. METHODS: Mesothelioma (all sites, ICD-10 codes C45.0-C45.9) and cancer of the pleura (C38.4) were retrieved from both information systems and combined using a linkage algorithm. Accuracy was examined with non-anonymous databases, limited to the state of São Paulo. RESULTS: We found 775 cases in death certificates and 283 in hospital registers. The linkage matched 57 cases, all accurately paired. Three cases, 0.4% in SIM and 1.3% in SIH-SUS, could not be matched because of data inconsistencies. CONCLUSIONS: A computer linkage can recover MCP cases from hospital records not found in death certificates in Brazil.

Urological approach for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a clinical care center.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is associated with significant manipulation of the urinary tract (UT). We aim to describe the urological events and their management in patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: Clinical records of patients who underwent treatment between 2007 and 2015 were reviewed. Urological events and their multidisciplinary management were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included. Mean age was 51 years (SD ± 11.8). Mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 20.4 (SD ± 10.1). Primary tumors included appendicular (64%), gynecological (16%), colorectal (10%), and peritoneal mesotheliomas (9%). Ninety-three percent of patients had bilateral ureteral catheters inserted prior to surgery, without complications. Intraoperative UT injuries occurred in 7% of patients. In 5% of patients, tumor invasion of the bladder was evident at surgery and partial resection and primary repair of the bladder wall was performed. Urological complications included urinary tract infection (UTI) (21%) acute post-renal failure (4%), urinary fistulae (4%), and acute urinary retention (AUR) (1%). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, intraoperative UT events and postoperative complications, although not neglectable, were infrequent. Due to the high complexity of these cases, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory. However, randomized clinical trials are necessary to clarify current data on the need and efficacy of prophylactic ureteral catheterization in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

[Mesothelioma mortality in Argentina, 1980-2013]. / Mortalidad por mesotelioma en Argentina, 1980-2013.

Mesothelioma mortality and its socio-demographic and temporal patterns in Argentina from 1980 to 2013 were estimated using data from death certificates obtained from the Vital Statistics System of Argentina's National Ministry of Health. There were 3,259 mesothelioma deaths corresponding to an age-adjusted mortality of 3.1/1,000,000 in 1980 and 5.7/1,000,000 in 2013, an average increase of 84.1% in 34 years. This raising trend became clearer after 1997. Males had higher mortality estimates compared with women in every year of the series; these findings suggest past exposure to asbestos. It is plausible that the asbestos exposure was mostly occupational, which is more common among men. Actions related to reinforcing the asbestos ban already in place and strengthening health surveillance directed at workplaces, previously exposed workers, and the population in general are recommended.

Mortalidad por mesotelioma en Argentina, 1980-2013 / Mesothelioma mortality in Argentina, 1980-2013

RESUMEN Se estimó la tasa de mortalidad por mesotelioma y su distribución sociodemográfica y temporal en Argentina para el período 1980-2013 con datos del Sistema de Estadísticas Vitales del Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Se encontraron 3.259 defunciones por mesotelioma, lo que resulta en una tasa de mortalidad estandarizada por edad de 3,1/1.000.000 en 1980 y de 5,7/1.000.000 en 2013, con un aumento promedio del 84,1% en 34 años. El incremento de la tendencia fue más claro a partir de 1997. En todos los años, la tasa de mortalidad fue mayor en hombres que en mujeres. Los resultados sugieren antecedentes de exposición al asbesto en el pasado. Aparentemente, la exposición predominante fue la ocupacional, más común entre los hombres que concentraron los casos. Se recomiendan acciones dirigidas a hacer más efectiva la prohibición ya en vigor y la vigilancia en salud orientada a los ambientes de trabajo, trabajadores previamente expuestos y la población en general.

ABSTRACT Mesothelioma mortality and its socio-demographic and temporal patterns in Argentina from 1980 to 2013 were estimated using data from death certificates obtained from the Vital Statistics System of Argentina’s National Ministry of Health. There were 3,259 mesothelioma deaths corresponding to an age-adjusted mortality of 3.1/1,000,000 in 1980 and 5.7/1,000,000 in 2013, an average increase of 84.1% in 34 years. This raising trend became clearer after 1997. Males had higher mortality estimates compared with women in every year of the series; these findings suggest past exposure to asbestos. It is plausible that the asbestos exposure was mostly occupational, which is more common among men. Actions related to reinforcing the asbestos ban already in place and strengthening health surveillance directed at workplaces, previously exposed workers, and the population in general are recommended.

Safety and quality outcomes in peritoneal surface malignancy patients: developing a national center for excellence in Colombia.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is being used more frequently for the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. There are a paucity of data regarding safety and quality outcomes in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety events and quality measures in a group of patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC. METHODS: All patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC procedures between December 2007 and March 2014 were included. All safety-related events and quality outcomes were reviewed. Major events were defined as occurrences in which there was harm to patient or healthcare personnel. Minor events were defined as quality or safety events in which there was potential for damage. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included. The mean Peritoneal Cancer Index for the study group was 20.5. One hundred percent compliance for informed consent, patient identification and surgical site marking, and antibiotic and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines was identified. The incidence of major safety events was 37.5 %. Minor events occurred in 47.2 % of patients. There was a 2.78 % 30-day mortality in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: One in three patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC procedures experienced a major safety or quality event before, during, or after surgery. Adequate surgical care alone is not sufficient to prevent these occurrences. Active surveillance of safety events and quality leads to early detection and development of improvement plans. New CRS + HIPEC centers need to adhere to strict safety and quality guidelines to ensure excellent patient outcomes.

Randomized phase II study comparing paclitaxel with S-1 vs. S-1 as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel with S-1 (PS) vs. S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). METHODS: Eighty-two (82) patients were 1:1 randomly assigned to oral S-1 (daily for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks' cycle) or S-1 (daily for 2 weeks, every 4 weeks' cycle) plus paclitaxel (on day 1, 8 and 15 of a 4 weeks' cycle). S-1 was orally administered with a fixed quantity according to body surface area (BSA), while paclitaxel was given 60 mg/m(2) i.v. daily through an implanted catheter. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall responsible rates and safety. RESULTS: The median OS with PS versus S-1 monotherapy was 14.0 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.02), survival at 12 months was 61.0 % in the PS group and 46.3 % in the S-1 group. Median PFS was also significantly longer in the PS group (6.0 months) than in the S-1 group (4.0 months). The overall response rate was determined in 82 evaluable patients, and was significantly higher (P = 0.04) with PS (19 patients, 46.3 %) than with S-1 monotherapy (10 patients, 24.4 %). PS was well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths, all were grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicities, including anorexia, nausea, and diarrhea developed in less than 10 % of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy of paclitaxel with S-1 is well tolerated and active in AGC patients. Further investigation with comparative trials is needed for confirmation.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: initial experience in Oaxaca, Mexico.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has been traditionally considered a terminal disease with median survivals reported in the literature of 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are playing an ever increasing role in the treatment of these patients. Excellent results have been achieved in well-selected patients but there is a very steep learning curve when starting a new program. A program for peritoneal surface malignancies in which patients with PC of gastrointestinal or gynecological origin were treated using multimodality therapy with combinations of systemic therapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and HIPEC was initiated in December 2007 at "Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca," Mexico. We present the results of our initial experience. From December 2007 to February 2011, 26 patients were treated with CRS and HIPEC. There were 21 female patients. Most common indication (46%) was recurrent ovarian cancer. Mean duration of surgery was 260 minutes. Mean Peritoneal Cancer Index was 9. Twenty-three (88.5%) patients had a complete cytoreduction. Major morbidity and mortality rates were 19.5 and 3.8 per cent, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 8 days. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, median survival has not been reached. Rigorous preoperative workup, strict selection criteria, and mentoring from an experienced cytoreductive surgeon are mandatory and extremely important when starting a center for PC.

[Morbidity and mortality in a series of patients suffering from intraperitoneal neoplasia treated with peritoneal cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá Teaching Hospital (ONCOLGroup--ATIA study)]. / Morbilidad y mortalidad en una serie de pacientes con neoplasias del peritoneo, tratados con citorreducción peritoneal más quimioterapia hipertérmica intraperitoneal en el Hospital Universitario de la Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (ONCOLGroup--estudio ATIA).

BACKGROUND: The procedure of radical peritonectomy followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered the standard treatment for peritoneal cancers. AIMS: To evaluate various outcomes in a cohort of patients with peritoneal tumors treated with HIPEC. METHODS: Twenty-four patients consecutively treated with radical peritonectomy plus HIPEC within the time frame of November 2007 to July 2010 were enrolled; 15 (62%) had tumors of appendicular origin, 4 (16.7%) had primary peritoneal tumors, 2 had ovarian carcinomas and there was one case of colon cancer, one carcinosarcoma and one hemangioendothelioma. Mean age was 53 years (range: 26-68) and median follow-up was 14.2 months (range: 1-32). Demographic data, histology, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), surgical procedure characteristics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were all evaluated. Short-term morbidity and mortality were also determined. RESULTS: Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 18 patients (75%). Mean PCI was 15 (<10: 41% and >10: 58%), and the median (range) for surgery duration, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit, parenteral nutritional support, and hospital stay were 12,5 (7-20) hours, 11,4 (2-74) days, 13,8 (12-65) days, and 29,1 (10-90) days, respectively. One patient (4%) died 6 months after the procedure, due to multiple associated complications. Considerable morbidity was seen in 52% of cases, including thromboembolic events (41%), catheter-related bacteremia (29%), fistulas (29%), and nephrotoxicity (25%). Six patients (25%) recurred after a median of 21 months of RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC in well-selected patients presenting with tumors that affect the peritoneum is a procedure that can be carried out in Colombia with an adequate safety and effectiveness profile. Mortality was similar to that reported in the international literature.

Cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colonic origin: outcomes after 7 years' experience of a new centre for peritoneal surface malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a relatively frequent situation in the natural history of colorectal cancer and is associated with a dismal prognosis. Promising results have been shown after radical cytoreduction followed by intraperitoneal chemohyperthermic perfusion. The aim our study was to assess the outcomes after treating patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colonic origin by means of cytoreductive surgery and intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) followed by early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). METHODS: Tumour resection was performed in accordance with the guidelines for oncologic surgery. Selective peritonectomies and remnant nodule electroevaporation were performed with the aim of achieving a complete cytoreduction. Peritoneal perfusion was carried out according to the Coliseum technique at 0.5-1 L/min, and chemotherapy was administered at 42oC for 40-90 min. Mitomycin C 10-12.5 mg/m(2) or oxaliplatin 360 mg/m(2) was used. Postoperative intraperitoneally administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (650 mg/m(2) per day) was given for 5 consecutive days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated from 2001 to 2008. The mean peritoneal cancer index was 11 (range 2-39). Fifteen patients had undergone complete cytoreductive surgery. The morbidity was 40%. There was one case of death due to bone marrow aplasia. Ten patients had recurrence; five of them underwent salvage surgery. Two patients were treated with a second HIPEC. Actuarial overall survival and progression-free survival were 36% and 30% at 5 years, respectively, with a median follow-up of 18 (range 8-28) months. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC is a feasible technique that might increase patient survival. It represents a potential cure for selected patients who have no other alternatives.

Impacto da cirurgia comportamental no tratamento dos pacientes portadoresde sarcormas primários do retroperitônio

Racional: Tradicionalmente, o tratamento dos sarcomas retroperitoniais é cirúrgico e utilizando-se de uma estratégia transportada dos sarcomas de extremidade, a cirurgia compartimental, que no caso dos sarcomas retroperitoniais representa a ressecção dos órgãos em contato com o tumor mesmo sem estarem evidentemente invadidos. Esta atitude agrega morbidade e seu impacto na sobrevida destes pacientes, especialmente na população portadora de tumores com média superior a 20 cm de diâmetro é desconhecido. Objetivo: Este estudo visa determinar o impacto sobre a sobrevida e taxa de recidiva nos pacientes que realizaram a cirurgia compartimental com ressecção de órgãos em associação no tratamento dos pacientes portadores de sarcomas primários do retroperitônio operados no Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Secundariamente, foram estudados os indicadores de morbimortalidade pós-operatória e a identificação dos fatores prognósticos para sobrevida. Métodos: Foram avaliados por análise estatística retrospectiva 91 pacientes portadorees de sarcoma primário de retroperitônio, operados no INCA, no período de junho de 1992 a janeiro de 2008, divididos em cinco grupos, totalizando noventa e um pacientes: Grupo dos “Ressecados”, com todos os pacientes ressecados, Grupo “Compartimental Total”, contendoo aqules que sofreram cirurgia compartimental, Grupo “Compartimental Negativo”, com aqueles cujos órgãos ressecados não estavam invadidos, Grupo “Compartimental Positivo”, com aqueles cujos órgãos ressecados estavam invadidos e Grupo “Não Compartimental”, com os pacientes que não tiveram ressecção de órgão em associação. Determinando as diferenças e semelhanças entre eles e seu impacto na sobrevida e morbimortalidade do paciente. Seré calciulada as sobrevidas global e livre de doença para 2, 5 e 10 anos, além de uma análise uni e multivariada de Cox. Resultados: As queixas mais comuns foram massa e dor abdominal. A taxa de ressecabilidade foi de 83,5% e de radicalidade de 55,3%. Houve 6 óbitos pós-operatórios (6,6%) e 28 pacientes com complicações pós-operatórias (30,8%). Os leiomiossarcomas e os lipossarcomas foram os mais incidentes (totalizando 62,6%). O grau histológico mais freqüente foi o G3 (41,8%) e o diâmetro tumoral mediano foi de 20,5 cm. Houve 124 órgãos ressecados em associação, com somente 42 realmente invadidos na análise histológica. A sobrevida média dos ressecados estimada em 5 anos foi de 32,4% e a sobrevida livre de doença foi de 36,8%. Na analise univariada o grau de diferenciação histológica ([G1 + G2] X [G3 + GX]), a ressecção radical (R0) ou paliativa (R1+R2), a realização de hemotransfusão intraoperatória e a re-ressecção, mesmo que paliativa, nos casos de recorrência ou persistência de doença, foram significantes para sobrevida. A cirurgia compartimental NÃO teve impacto na sobrevida, mas aumentou a morbidade, tempo cirúrgico e a hemotransfusão. Conclusão: Fatores prognósticos clássicos como radicalidade, grau de diferenciação celular, hemotransfusão e re-ressecção foram validados. A cirurgia Compartimental, com ou sem invasão dos órgãos adjacentes não aumentou a sobrevida, mas a morbidade e não diminuiu a taxa de recidiva. Não encontramos vantagem em ressecar órgãos em associação por princípio devendo realizá-la por necessidade. Somente a ressecção completa de pequenos tumores, de baixo grau, evitando hemotransfusões intraoperatórias desnecessárias e realizando a re-ressecção em caso de recidiva ou persistência de doença se podererá garantir uma melhor sobrevida

Background: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors and radical surgical approach is still the only curative treatment. We aim to first estimate postoperative morbidity, mortality and identify significant prognostic factors for survival of patients with RPS and then secondly, to evaluate the influence of en bloc resection on survival. Methods: This was a retrospective follow-up study of 91 patients with RPS operated in the Section of Abdominopelvic Surgery of the National Cancer Institute-Brazil (INCA) between June 1992 and January 2008. Overall and 2-, 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were calculated and univariate and Cox multivariate analysis were performed. Results: The most common complaints were abdominal pain and mass. Resection was possible in 83.5% and curative resection in 55.3%. Six patients died within the postoperative period (mortality = 6.6%) and 28 had complications (30.8%). Leiomyosarcomas and liposarcomas predominated, as well as G3. The median tumor diameter was 20.5 cm. There were 124 organs resected in association, with only 42 proven invaded. The 5-year overall survival and disease free survival rates were 32.0% and 36.8%, respectively. Cell differentiation, curative or palliative resection, blood transfusion and re-resection were significant variables. Compartment surgery had no impact on survival, but increased the duration of surgery, the need for blood transfusion and overall morbidity. Conclusions: This study suggests that early diagnosis and curative resection can improve long-term survival. Adjacent organs with evidence of direct invasion must be removed en bloc; others should be spared

Predictors of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with gastric cancer treated at a single institution in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a common pattern of recurrence in gastric cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis. Determining predictive factors for peritoneal recurrence can help the selection of patients suitable for more aggressive treatment strategies. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 162 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer with no peritoneal carcinomatosis and treated at a single institution in Brazil from January 1994 to December 2004 was carried out. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient and tumor-related characteristics associated with the development of peritoneal metastasis. RESULTS: Twenty-three (14.2%) patients developed peritoneal carcinomatosis. Three independent factors associated with the development of peritoneal metastasis were identified by multivariate analysis: signet-ring cell histology (odds ratio [OR] = 4.9; P = 0.018), the presence of vascular invasion (OR = 4.8; P = 0.022), and the presence of visceral metastasis at diagnosis (OR = 5.1; P = 0.011). Tumor stages T3 or T4 showed a trend towards significance (P = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with gastric cancer presenting with signet-ring histology, vascular invasion, or visceral metastasis appear to be at higher risk for the development of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Factors correlated with peritoneal carcinomatosis and survival in patients with gastric cancer treated at a single institution in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of death due to cancer worldwide and is particularly prevalent in Brazil. Promising new therapeutic agents have already shown activity in some gastrointestinal malignancies and their role in gastric cancer will need to be evaluated. Determining the prognostic factors of survival for patients with gastric cancer can help in identifying patients with a worse prognosis after treatment with the current chemotherapeutic regimens. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 186 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and treated at a single institution in Brazil from January 1994 to December 2004 was carried out. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient- and tumor-related characteristics associated with peritoneal metastasis at diagnosis and with overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 186 patients, 76 were alive at the time of this analysis. The median survival for all patients was 30.1 months. Two independent factors associated with the presence of peritoneal metastasis at diagnosis were identified by multivariate analysis: signet-ring cell type (odds ratio [OR], 10.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1 to 37.5), and visceral metastasis (OR, 51.8; 95% CI, 12.4 to 215.4). The prognostic factors for poor survival were tumor stage T3 or T4 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.22) and visceral metastasis (HR, 4.98; 95% CI, 3.02 to 8.20). CONCLUSION: Two factors correlated with peritoneal metastasis and two prognostic factors for survival were identified. These findings may contribute to clinical decision-making, treatment tailoring, and the design of future trials.

Carcinomatosis peritoneal / Peritoneal carcinomatosis

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of the main causes of death in patients suffering adenocarcinoma of the colon, with a mean of survival of 5.2 months. The concept which is the base of the surgical treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis was designed by Sugarbaker and col. whom considered that if the only place of the tumor is the peritoneum, it should be assumed that the disease is a loco-regional relapse and not asystemic dissemination. The management of peritoneal surface malignancy with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, considering the well known action of the in vivo cytotoxicity that have the chemotherapic drugs for periotoneal carcinomatosis arising from colon adenocarcinoma. The results related with the postoperative morbi-mortality result acceptable, considering that it is a mortal disease in the short term.

Carcinomatosis peritoneal / Peritoneal carcinomatosis

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of the main causes of death in patients suffering adenocarcinoma of the colon, with a mean of survival of 5.2 months. The concept which is the base of the surgical treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis was designed by Sugarbaker and col. whom considered that if the only place of the tumor is the peritoneum, it should be assumed that the disease is a loco-regional relapse and not asystemic dissemination. The management of peritoneal surface malignancy with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, considering the well known action of the in vivo cytotoxicity that have the chemotherapic drugs for periotoneal carcinomatosis arising from colon adenocarcinoma. The results related with the postoperative morbi-mortality result acceptable, considering that it is a mortal disease in the short term.(AU)