ß-catenin nuclear translocation and WNT pathway mutations in ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma: A literature review and proposal of a new molecular-based classification "WNT pathway-altered malignant odontogenic tumor".

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) is defined as a rare type of odontogenic carcinoma that is characterized by ghost cells and occasional dentinoid. However, the current classification system based primarily on the presence of ghost cells has limitations in the diagnosis of GCOC and its histologic mimics including odontogenic carcinoma with dentinoid (OCD). This study reviewed previous studies on ß-catenin nuclear translocation and WNT pathway mutations in GCOC and OCD and discussed the potential utility of a new molecular-based classification "WNT pathway-altered malignant odontogenic tumor" for these rare odontogenic tumors.

Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst Demonstrates Recurrent WNT Pathway Mutations and So-Called Adenoid Ameloblastoma-Like Histology: Evidence Supporting Its Classification as a Neoplasm.

Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), once called calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor, is classified under the category of odontogenic cysts. However, the proliferative capacity of the lesional epithelium and consistent nuclear ß-catenin expression raise questions about its current classification. This study aimed to determine whether COC would be better classified as a neoplasm in the histologic and molecular context. Eleven odontogenic lesions diagnosed as COC or calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor were included in this study. The growth patterns of the lesional epithelium were analyzed histologically in all cases. ß-catenin immunohistochemistry and molecular profiling using Sanger sequencing and whole-exome sequencing were performed in 10 cases. Of the 11 cases studied, histologic features reminiscent of so-called adenoid ameloblastoma were observed in 72.7% (8/11), and small islands of clear cells extended into the wall in 36.4% (4/11). Intraluminal and/or mural epithelial proliferation was found in 72.7% of the cases (8/11). Nuclear ß-catenin expression was observed focally in all 10 cases studied, mainly highlighting epithelial cells forming morules and adjacent to dentinoid. CTNNB1 hotspot mutations were detected in 60.0% of the cases (6/10). All the remaining cases had frameshift mutations in tumor-suppressor genes involved in the WNT pathway, including APC and NEDD4L. Recurrent WNT pathway mutations leading to nuclear translocation of ß-catenin and distinct epithelial growth patterns found in COC are the neoplastic features shared by its solid counterpart, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, supporting its classification as a tumor rather than a cyst.

Recurrent central odontogenic fibroma in a patient with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: case report and in vitro analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Central odontogenic fibromas (COF) are rare, benign tumors derived from dental mesenchymal tissue that may occur in the maxilla or mandible. This report describes primary and recurrent COF in the mandible of a patient with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCCS). STUDY DESIGN: A 36-year-old African American male presented with a COF and its recurrence 17 months later. Tissue pieces were obtained from both occurrences with IRB-approved signed consent. Collected tissue pieces were dissected; one portion was formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, and the other was cultured for the isolation of cell populations from the primary (COdF-1) and recurrent (COdF-1a) tumors. Quantification real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, and DNA sequencing were used for gene and protein analysis of the primary tumor and cell populations. RESULTS: Histopathologic analysis of the tumor showed sparse odontogenic epithelial cords in fibrous connective tissue, and qRT-PCR analysis of tumor and cell populations (COdF-1 and COdF-1a) detected VIM, CK14, CD34, CD99 and ALPL mRNA expression. Protein expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. CD34 expression in primary tissues was higher than in tumor cells due to tumor vascularization. DNA sequencing indicated the patient had PTCH1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathology, mRNA, and protein expression indicate the rare occurrence of COF in a patient with mutated PTCH1 gene and NBCCS.

DNA content and clinicopathological features aid in distinguishing ameloblastic carcinoma from ameloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma are epithelial odontogenic tumors that can be morphologically similar. In the present study, we evaluated the DNA content and Ki-67 index in the two tumors. METHODS: The paraffin blocks of the tumors were selected to obtain sections for the immunohistochemical reactions and preparation of the cell suspension for acquisition in a flow cytometer. The Random Forest package of the R software was used to verify the contribution of each variable to classify lesions into ameloblastoma or ameloblastic carcinoma. RESULTS: Thirty-two ameloblastoma and five ameloblastic carcinoma were included in the study. In our sample, we did not find statistically significant differences in Ki-67 labeling rates. A higher fraction of cells in 2c (G1) was correlated with the diagnosis of ameloblastoma, whereas higher rates of 5c-exceeding rate (5cER) were correlated with ameloblastic carcinoma. The Random Forest model highlighted histopathological findings and parameters of DNA ploidy study as important features for distinguishing ameloblastoma from ameloblastic carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the parameters of the DNA ploidy study can be ancillary tools in the classification of ameloblastoma and ameloblastic carcinoma.

Comparison of diagnostic methods for detection of BRAFV600E mutation in ameloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Ameloblastoma is an aggressively growing, highly recurrent odontogenic jaw tumor. Its association with BRAFV600E mutation is an indication for BRAFV00E-inhibitor therapy The study objective was to identify a sensitive low-cost test for BRAFV600E-positive ameloblastoma. We hypothesized that immunohistochemical staining of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues for BRAFV600E mutation is a low-cost surrogate for BRAFV600E gene sequencing when laboratory resources are inadequate for molecular testing. METHODS: Tissues from 40 ameloblastoma samples were retrieved from either formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks, RNAlater™ stabilization solution or samples inadvertently pre-fixed in formalin before transfer to RNAlater™. BRAFV600E mutation was assessed by Direct Sanger sequencing, Amplification Refractory Mutation System-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: BRAFV600E mutation was detected by IHC, Amplification Refractory Mutation System-PCR and Direct Sanger sequencing in 93.33%, 52.5% and 30% of samples respectively. Considering Direct Sanger sequencing as standard BRAFV600E detection method, there was significant difference between the three detection methods (𝜒2 (2) = 31.34, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of IHC were 0.8 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.75-0.99) respectively, while positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) were 0.9 and 0.8 (Fischer's test, p < 0.0001) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of Amplification Refractory Mutation System-PCR detection method were 0.7 (95% CI: 0.53-0.80) and 0.9 (95% CI = 0.67-0.98) respectively, while PPV and NPV were 0.9 and 0.6 respectively (Fischer's test, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Low-cost and less vulnerability of IHC to tissue quality make it a viable surrogate test for BRAFV600E detection in ameloblastoma. Sequential dual IHC and molecular testing for BRAFV600E will reduce equivocal results that could exclude some patients from BRAFV600E-inhibitor therapies.

Carcinomas with clear cell features and EWSR1 rearrangements: a report of 3 cases.

Salivary gland and odontogenic neoplasms with extensive clear cell change are rare lesions but have been increasingly characterized over the past decade. Among this heterogeneous group of neoplasms, hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma (HCCC), clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC), and clear cell myoepithelial carcinoma (CCMC) share a monophasic clear cell morphology and an EWSR1 gene rearrangement. While HCCC is relatively well characterized, there are a limited number of EWSR1-reaarranged CCMC of salivary glands reported, and its clinicopathologic features in relation to HCCC and nonclear cell myoepithelial carcinoma (MC) have not been clarified. This report describes the clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic features of 3 carcinomas composed predominantly of clear cells and with EWSR1 rearrangements by fluorescence in situ hybridization. A comparative literature analysis suggests that HCCC, CCMC, and nonclear cell MC of salivary glands are clinically, histopathologically, and molecularly distinct.

Prevalence of BRAF p.V600E and Detection Methods in Benign Mixed and Malignant Odontogenic Tumors: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The BRAF p.V600E genetic variant facilitates the pathogenesis of various tumors by triggering tumor proliferation and progression. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of BRAF p.V600E in benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal and malignant odontogenic tumors. In addition, we discussed the different detection methods used to assess for aberrant BRAF. METHODS: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in Prospero (CRD42023445689). A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases was performed to answer the question "What is the prevalence of the BRAF p.V600E mutation in benign mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors?" The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the JBI's Critical Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Initially, 387 records were identified, but only 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 70 patients with benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal odontogenic tumors and 63 with malignant odontogenic tumors were included in the analysis. We found that the BRAF p.V600E mutation had a prevalence of 31.42% in mixed tumors and 26.98% in malignant odontogenic tumors. Moreover, immunohistochemistry showed high concordance with DNA-based molecular methods. CONCLUSION: In general, the BRAF p.V600E variant exhibited a prominent prevalence in mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors. However, most of the findings are based on small cohorts of patients and further studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Localization of beta catenin across the domain of odontogenic lesions: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: CTNNB1 gene encodes beta catenin, a transcriptional activator of Wnt pathway involved in the pathogenesis of odontogenic lesions. Though located intramembranously, its translocation into cytoplasm and nucleus could trigger cell proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, invasion and migration of the tumour cell. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five electronic databases including MEDLINE by PubMed, Google scholar, Scopus, Trip, Cochrane library and EMBASE until 1 January 2023 without period restriction were thoroughly searched. Those articles that identified CTNNB1 mutation and beta catenin in odontogenic lesions were included for review. Risk of bias was analysed for each study using QUADAS 2 tool and Review Manager 5.3 was used to output its result. RESULTS: Thirty four published articles were included for data synthesis. A total of 1092 cases of odontogenic lesions were assessed for both CTNNB1 mutation and beta catenin expression. CTNNB1 mutation was observed in ameloblastoma, calcifying odontogenic cyst, calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour and all malignant odontogenic tumours. The beta catenin expression (nuclear and cytoplasmic) was maximum in odontogenic keratocyst and calcifying odontogenic cyst. The expression was variable in ameloblastomas, membranous in odontomas, calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour and nuclear in all malignant tumours. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: High recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst and aggressiveness of solid ameloblastoma and malignant odontogenic tumours could be associated with the nuclear translocation of beta catenin. Disparity between CTNNB1 mutation and beta catenin expression within odontogenic lesions suggests alternate routes of beta catenin activation. The review results support the unique localisation of beta catenin as a helpful diagnostic factor in the pathogenesis of odontogenic lesions.

Metastasising ameloblastoma or ameloblastic carcinoma? A case report with mutation analyses.

BACKGROUND: Ameloblastic carcinoma and metastasising ameloblastoma are rare epithelial odontogenic tumours with aggressive features. Distinguishing between these two lesions is often clinically difficult but necessary to predict tumour behaviour or to plan future therapy. Here, we provide a brief review of the literature available on these two types of lesions and present a new case report of a young man with an ameloblastoma displaying metastatic features. We also use this case to illustrate the similarities and differences between these two types of tumours and the difficulties of their differential diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: Our histopathological analyses uncovered a metastasising tumour with features of ameloblastic carcinoma, which developed from the ameloblastoma. We profiled the gene expression of Wnt pathway members in ameloblastoma sample of this patient, because multiple molecules of this pathway are involved in the establishing of cell polarity, cell migration or for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumour metastasis to evaluate features of tumor behaviour. Indeed, we found upregulation of several cell migration-related genes in our patient. Moreover, we uncovered somatic mutation BRAF p.V600E with known pathological role in cancerogenesis and germline heterozygous FANCA p.S858R mutation, whose interpretation in this context has not been discussed yet. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we have uncovered a unique case of ameloblastic carcinoma associated with an alteration of Wnt signalling and the presence of BRAF mutation. Development of harmful state of our patient might be also supported by the germline mutation in one FANCA allele, however this has to be confirmed by further analyses.

Contribution of gene polymorphisms on 3p25 to salivary gland carcinoma, ameloblastoma, and odontogenic keratocyst in the Chinese Han population.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the contribution of gene polymorphisms in 3p25 to salivary gland carcinoma (SGC), ameloblastoma (AM), and odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) in the Chinese Han population. STUDY DESIGN: Sixteen tag-single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 5 genes (SYN2, TIMP4, PPARG, RAF1, and IQSEC1) in 3p25 were genotyped in 411 individuals with or without SGC, AM, and OKC. Genotype, clinical phenotype, and bioinformatics analyses were performed to evaluate the function of candidate SNPs. RESULTS: SYN2-rs3773364, TIMP4-rs3755724, PPARG-rs10865710, and PPARG-rs1175544 were related to decreased SGC susceptibility, whereas IQSEC1-rs2600322 and IQSEC1-rs2686742 decreased and increased AM risk, respectively. Stratification analysis revealed that the significance of the identified SNPs was stronger in females or individuals younger than 46 years in SGC. PPARG-rs10865710 and PPARG-rs1175544 were associated with lower lymph node metastasis. SYN2-rs3773364 and PPARG-rs1175544 were associated with favorable SGC patient survival. Functional assessments linked PPARG-rs1175544 to PPARG expression regulation. Linkage disequilibrium analysis revealed a haplotype (SYN2-rs3773364-A, TIMP4-rs3817004-A, and TIMP4-rs3755724-C) associated with decreased susceptibility to SGC. Generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis indicated the gene-gene interactions among IQSEC1, TIMP4, and PPARG in SGC, AM, and OKC progression. CONCLUSIONS: These variants play important roles in the progression of SGC, AM, and OKC in the Chinese Han population and may be considered biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis prediction.

Exuberant clear cell odontogenic carcinoma of the mandible harboring EWSR1 rearrangement: Report of a rare case and a literature review.

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare malignant odontogenic tumour (MOT) that mainly affects the mandible, with a slight female predominance in adult patients. In this study, we described an exuberant CCOC in mandible of a 22-year-female patient. On radiographic examination, a radiolucent lesion in the region of tooth 36 to 44 with tooth displacement and alveolar cortical resorption was observed. Histopathological study revealed a malignant neoplasm of the odontogenic epithelium, composed of PAS-positive clear cells and immunoreactivity for CK5, CK7, CK19, p63. The Ki-67 index was low (<10 %). Fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed EWSR1 gene rearrangement. The diagnosis of CCOC was established and the patient was referred for surgical treatment.

Significance of EGFR investigation in odontogenic keratocyst: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: The recent classification of odontogenic keratocysts (OKSs) recognized them as benign neoplasms, although previous findings have revealed their aggressive nature. Immunohistochemical and molecular analyses have investigated OKSs, but the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has not been fully investigated, despite the importance of this oncogene in the process of carcinogenesis in tumors of epithelial origin. The EGFR protein is usually overexpressed, and the EGFR gene is mutated or amplified. AIMS OF STUDY: This brief review aims to emphasize the importance of EGFR detection in these types of cysts. METHODS AND RESULTS: It was revealed that the majority of the studies examined EGFR protein expression using immunohistochemical methods; however, considering EGFR gene variants, mutations were less explored in the previous period from 1992 to 2023. Although EGFR gene polymorphisms are clinically important, they were not identified in the present study. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the current significance of EGFR variants, it would be beneficial to examine them in odontogenic lesions. This would enable resolving of discrepancies about their nature, and potentially enhance classifications OKCs in the future.

A proteomics study to explore differential proteins associated with the pathogenesis of ameloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Reports on the proteomic studies of ameloblastoma and other common odontogenic lesions are limited. We thus explored the differential proteins among ameloblastoma, odontogenic keratocyst, dentigerous cyst, and normal gingival tissue using proteomics and identified hub proteins involved in the local aggressiveness and recurrence of ameloblastoma. METHODS: Samples were obtained from 14 patients with ameloblastoma, 6 with odontogenic keratocyst, 9 with a dentigerous cyst, and 5 with normal gingival tissue. Proteins were then extracted, purified, quantified, and analysed using Easy-nLC chromatography and mass spectrometry. Further functional annotation and enrichment analyses were performed using Gene Ontology and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes on the target protein collection. Protein clustering and protein-protein interaction network analyses were used to screen the hub proteins. Proteins with significant interactions were screened according to their degree index. These results were verified by immunohistochemical staining. Proteins meeting the screening criteria of expression difference ploidy >1.2-fold (upregulation and downregulation) and p < 0.05 were considered differential proteins. RESULTS: In ameloblastoma, 808 differential proteins were upregulated and 505 were downregulated compared with those in odontogenic keratocyst; 309 were upregulated and 453 were downregulated compared with those in dentigerous cyst; and 2210 were upregulated and 829 were downregulated compared with those in normal gingival tissue. The three groups of differential proteins were associated with cellular exosomes, antigen binding, complement activation, human papillomavirus infection, focal adhesion, cell adhesion molecules, and metabolic pathways. CONCLUSION: CDH3 is associated with the local aggressiveness and recurrence of ameloblastoma and is a potential therapeutic target.

Adenoid Ameloblastoma with BRAF p.V600E Mutation Revealing Ameloblastomatous Origin: A First Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Adenoid ameloblastoma (AdAM) is a frequently recurrent tumor that shows hybrid histological features of both ameloblastoma and adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT). AdAM is expected to be classified as a new subtype of ameloblastoma in the next revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) odontogenic tumor classification. However, whether AdAM is a histologic variant of ameloblastoma or AOT remains unclear. To establish a new category, genetic evidence indicating the tumor category is necessary. METHODS: We present a case of a 23-year-old Japanese woman with AdAM who underwent genetic/DNA analysis for ameloblastoma-related mutation using immunohistochemical staining, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses with reliable clinicopathological evidence. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical expression of BRAF p.V600E was diffusely positive for both ameloblastoma- and AOT-like components. Sanger sequencing and NGS analyses showed missense mutations in BRAF p.V600E (c.1799T > A), a gene that is commonly altered in ameloblastomas but not in KRAS, another gene associated with AOT. CONCLUSION: This case report is the first to provide genetic evidence on the ameloblastomatous origin of AdAM with a BRAF p.V600E mutation. A larger series of AdAM groups' molecular testing is needed to aptly classify them and prognosticate the best treatment.

No NFATC2 fusion in simple bone cyst of the jaw.

AIMS: Simple Bone Cysts (SBCs) predominantly occur in long bones and 59% harbour NFATC2 rearrangements. Jaw SBC is rare and was previously referred to as traumatic bone cyst. It can rarely occur in association with cemento-osseous dysplasia (COD). To determine whether jaw SBCs represent the same entity as SBC of the long bones, or if they have a different molecular signature, we collected 48 jaw SBC cases of 47 patients to assess NFATC2 rearrangement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of the 48 cases, 36 could be used for fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), of which nine (two of which associated with COD) were successful using an NFATC2 split probe. The remaining cases failed to show adequate FISH signals. All nine cases lacked NFATC2 rearrangement and five of these showed no detectable gene fusions using Archer FusionPlex. CONCLUSION: In our study, NFATC2 rearrangement is absent in solitary jaw SBC (n = 7) and COD-associated SBC (n = 2). Our findings suggest that SBC presenting in the jaw is molecularly different from SBC in long bones. Future molecular studies may confirm the absence of clonal molecular aberrations in SBC of the jaw which would support a non-neoplastic, reactive origin.

Adenoid Ameloblastoma Shares Clinical, Histologic, and Molecular Features With Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor: The Histologic Spectrum of WNT Pathway-Altered Benign Odontogenic Tumors.

An epithelial odontogenic tumor called adenoid ameloblastoma (AA) has recently been included in the new WHO classification. However, AA has considerable overlapping features with a preexisting entity, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT). This study compared the clinical, histologic, and molecular characteristics of AA and DGCT. Eight cases of odontogenic tumors initially diagnosed as AA or DGCT were included in this study. Quantitative histologic analysis, ß-catenin immunohistochemistry, and molecular profiling using next generation sequencing were performed. Additionally, accumulated clinical data of AA and DGCT were statistically analyzed. Nuclear ß-catenin accumulation was detected in all cases in common, although the tumors studied histologically consisted of varying combinations of the AA-like phenotype, ghost cells, and dentinoid. However, CTNNB1 hotspot mutations were not found in any case. Instead, loss-of-function mutations in tumor suppressor genes involved in the WNT pathway, including the APC, SMURF1, and NEDD4L genes, were found regardless of histologic type. In addition, KRT13 mutations were detected in 2 cases with a high proportion of ghost cells. Finally, a literature analysis revealed clinical similarities between the previously reported cases of AA and DGCT. These findings suggest that from a clinical and molecular point of view, AA and DGCT represent a histologic spectrum of WNT pathway-altered benign odontogenic tumors rather than 2 distinct tumors. Moreover, previously unidentified keratin mutations may be associated with ghost cell formation found in specific types of odontogenic lesions.

Genetic heterogeneity and enrichment of variants in DNA-repair genes in ameloblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: Ameloblastomas are a group of relatively common odontogenic tumors that frequently originate from the dental epithelium. These tumors are aggressive in nature and present as slow-growing painless cortical expansion of the jaw. Histologically, the follicular and plexiform subtypes constitute two-thirds of solid/multicystic ameloblastomas. The objective of this study was to understand the genetic architecture of follicular and plexiform ameloblastomas using deep whole-exome sequencing. METHODS: Archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of follicular (n = 4) and plexiform (n = 6) ameloblastomas were retrieved and genomic DNAs were isolated from the tumor tissue dissected from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded block. The exomes were enriched using the Integrated DNA Technologies Exome Research Panel (IDT, Coralville, IA) and paired-end sequencing was completed on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 with an average output of 20 GB of data resulting in a mean coverage of 400×. Variant analysis was completed using custom-developed software: Rapid Understanding of Nucleotide variant Effect Software and variant integration and knowledge interpretation in genomes. RESULTS: Our analyses focused on examining somatic variants (gnomAD minor allele frequency ≤1%) in genes found on an Food and Drug Administration -approved clinical cancer sequencing panel (FoundationOne®CDx). In follicular tumors, variants (>20% of the reads) were identified in BRAF, KMT2D, and ABL1 genes. In plexiform tumors, variants (>20% of the reads) were identified in ALK, BRAF, KRAS, KMT2D, SMO, KMT2A, and BRCA2 genes. Enrichment analysis showed a significant role of DNA repair genes in the development of these tumors. CONCLUSION: The variants identified in follicular and plexiform ameloblastomas were enriched in DNA-repair genes. The observed genetic heterogeneity in these ameloblastomas may contribute to the aggressive nature and recurrence risk of these tumors.

Homeobox Genes in Odontogenic Lesions: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Homeobox genes play crucial roles in tooth morphogenesis and development and thus mutations in homeobox genes cause developmental disorders such as odontogenic lesions. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and compile available data from the literatures on the topic of homeobox gene expression in odontogenic lesions. METHOD: An electronic search to collate all the information on studies on homeobox gene expression in odontogenic lesions was carried out in four databases (PubMed, EBSCO host, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) with selected keywords. All papers which reported expression of homeobox genes in odontogenic lesions were considered. RESULTS: A total of eleven (11) papers describing expression of homeobox genes in odontogenic lesions were identified. Methods of studies included next generation sequencing, microarray analysis, RT-PCR, Western blotting, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. The homeobox reported in odontogenic lesions includes LHX8 and DLX3 in odontoma; PITX2, MSX1, MSX2, DLX, DLX2, DLX3, DLX4, DLX5, DLX6, ISL1, OCT4 and HOX C in ameloblastoma; OCT4 in adenomatoid odontogenic tumour; PITX2 and MSX2 in primordial odontogenic tumour; PAX9 and BARX1 in odontogenic keratocyst; PITX2, ZEB1 and MEIS2 in ameloblastic carcinoma while there is absence of DLX2, DLX3 and MSX2 in clear cell odontogenic carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: This paper summarized and reviews the possible link between homeobox gene expression in odontogenic lesions. Based on the current available data, there are insufficient evidence to support any definite role of homeobox gene in odontogenic lesions.

Maxillary clear cell odontogenic carcinoma with EWSR1-ATF1 fusion gene mimicking sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma: A case report and literature review.

Both clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) and sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma (SOC) are rare odontogenic malignancies. Here, we report a case of maxillary CCOC whose clinical and histologic features resembled those of SOC. Radiologically, the tumor presented as an ill-defined, expansile radiolucency with local bone destruction. Histologically, the tumor was comprised of thin cords or strands of odontogenic epithelium permeating through a sclerosed fibrous stroma with occasional clear cell foci. It damaged the cortical plates and invaded the adjacent soft tissue. Immunohistochemical expression of Pancytokeratin, Cytokeratin 19, p63, Cytokeratin 5/6, and Cytokeratin 14, as well as focal expression of Cytokeratin 7, demonstrated the epithelial nature of the tumor. Alcian Blue Periodic acid Schiff staining revealed a lack of intracellular mucin. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed Ewing sarcoma RNA binding protein 1 and activating transcription factor 1 gene translocation, further confirming the diagnosis of CCOC. Lastly, we contextualized the genetic analysis of our case to that of CCOC in the literature.