Introduction: The Spasticity-Plus Syndrome (SPS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) refers to a combination of spasticity and other signs/symptoms such as spasms, cramps, bladder dysfunction, tremor, sleep disorder, pain, and fatigue. The main purpose is to develop a user-friendly tool that could help neurologists to detect SPS in MS patients as soon as possible. Methods: A survey research based on a conjoint analysis approach was used. An orthogonal factorial design was employed to form 12 patient profiles combining, at random, the eight principal SPS signs/symptoms. Expert neurologists evaluated in a survey and a logistic regression model determined the weight of each SPS sign/symptom, classifying profiles as SPS or not. Results: 72 neurologists participated in the survey answering the conjoint exercise. Logistic regression results of the survey showed the relative contribution of each sign/symptom to the classification as SPS. Spasticity was the most influential sign, followed by spasms, tremor, cramps, and bladder dysfunction. The goodness of fit of the model was appropriate (AUC = 0.816). Concordance between the experts' evaluation vs. model estimation showed strong Pearson's (r = 0.936) and Spearman's (r = 0.893) correlation coefficients. The application of the algorithm provides with a probability of showing SPS and the following ranges are proposed to interpret the results: high (> 60%), moderate (30-60%), or low (< 30%) probability of SPS. Discussion: This study offers an algorithmic tool to help healthcare professionals to identify SPS in MS patients. The use of this tool could simplify the management of SPS, reducing side effects related with polypharmacotherapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: disease-modifying treatments (DMT) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have expanded in recent years making the shared-decision process challenging. Moreover, no head-to-head studies are available within the first-line options. Our aim is to compare therapeutic persistence within first-line DMT: teriflunomide (TER), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and injectable drugs (INJ) in a real-world setting. METHODS: Retrospective observational study analyzing diagnosed with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) who started DMT between January 2015 and April 2022 (TER=117, DMF=117, INJ=123). Clinical, radiological, and demographic variables were collected. The primary outcome was the median time to discontinuation of any DMT. Dropout was defined as discontinuation for 6 months for any reason. RESULTS: Of the total of 357 patients, 155 withdraw with a median time-to-discontinuation of 1.427 years (IQR 2.410). The discontinuation rate was higher in the injectable group, 49.6%; compared to teriflunomide 40.2%, and dimethyl fumarate 39.8% (p = 0.201). The most frequent reason of discontinuation differs within groups (lack of efficacy in TER, 63.8%, and adverse effects in DMF and INJ (40.4% and 40.9% respectively). No difference in persistence was observed between DMT (p = 0.30). After 2018 there has been a tendency to treat in a quick and early manner (lower EDSS; relapse rate and number of naïve patients), statistically significant for TER (p = 0.005, p = 0.010, and p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated no differences in persistence between the actual first-line DMT in a real-world setting, although a trend to favor oral-DMT was seen. Reasons for discontinuation differs within groups.
In the last years, therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS) have become challenging due to expanded options with different treatment profiles attending to efficacy, safety, and route and frequency of administration. Moreover, patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) increasingly wish to be involved in their therapeutic decision process. Therefore, a new, patient-centric shared decision model (SDM), is gaining relevance. However, validated scales oriented to assess the quality of the process itself are lacking. The AGA-25 scale is a fit-for-purpose 25-item scale based on two validated scales in MS (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) and Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)). The aim of this work is to develop and validate the AGAS-25 in Spanish. Two hundred and three PwMS (aged 17 to 67; 155 [76.4%] females) undergoing stable disease modifying treatment in the last 6 months were consecutively recruited. The Principal Component Analysis suggested a four-factor structure for the 25-item version of the questionnaire: 1) satisfaction with the SDM process 2) adverse events with the DMT, 3) convenience of the chosen-DMT and 4) information reliability. The internal consistency of the measurement was adequate (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Our results support the use of the AGAS-25 scale to assist SDM in Spanish-speaking PwMS.
Multiple Sclerosis , Female , Humans , Male , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Patients , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
In the last decade, attention has become greater to the relationship between neurodegeneration and abnormal insulin signaling in the central nervous system, as insulin in the brain is implicated in neuronal survival, plasticity, oxidative stress and neuroinflammation. Diabetes mellitus and Parkinson's disease are both aging-associated diseases that are turning into epidemics worldwide. Diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance not only increase the possibility of developing Parkinson's disease but can also determine the prognosis and progression of Parkinsonian symptoms. Today, there are no available curative or disease modifying treatments for Parkinson's disease, but the role of insulin and antidiabetic medications in neurodegeneration opens a door to treatment repurposing to fight against Parkinson's disease, both in diabetic and nondiabetic Parkinsonian patients. Furthermore, it is essential to comprehend how a frequent and treatable disease such as diabetes can influence the progression of neurodegeneration in a challenging disease such as Parkinson's disease. Here, we review the present evidence on the connection between Parkinson's disease and diabetes and the consequential implications of the existing antidiabetic molecules in the severity and development of Parkinsonism, with a particular focus on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.
Objetivo. La estimulación magnética transcraneal repetitiva podría ser útil como tratamiento no farmacológico para la espasticidad. El objetivo de este estudio es reevaluar el efecto clínico y los cambios neurofisiológicos que produce la estimulación theta-burst intermitente (ETBi) sobre la espasticidad de las extremidades inferiores en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple recurrente en un ensayo aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo. Pacientes y métodos. Diecisiete pacientes en la fase remitente de la enfermedad fueron aleatoriamente asignados al grupo placebo o al grupo de tratamiento activo mediante estimulación magnética transcraneal repetitiva con protocolo ETBi sobre la corteza motora contralateral de la pierna más afectada. El procedimiento consistió en 10 sesiones diarias durante dos semanas. Cada sesión consistió en 10 ráfagas que contenían tres pulsos a 50 Hz repetidos a intervalos de 200 ms (5 Hz) cada 10 s para un total de 600 estímulos. El efecto de ETBi se evaluó mediante el uso de parámetros clínicos (como la escala de Ashworth modificada) y neurofisiológicos (ratio de amplitud H/M y duración del período cortical silente). Resultados. Dos semanas de ETBi sobre la corteza motora de la pierna más afectada no produjeron ningún efecto clínico significativo sobre la espasticidad en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple recurrente. Sin embargo, aunque de forma no significativa, se observó disminución de la ratio de amplitud H/M y un aumento de la duración del período cortical silente. Conclusión. El protocolo de estimulación utilizado en este estudio no parece tener un efecto terapéutico significativo. Sin embargo, recomendamos estudios adicionales, ya que los cambios neurofisiológicos fueron evidentes
Aim. It has been suggested that the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could be useful as a non-pharmacological treatment for spasticity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and neurophysiological effects of high-frequency intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on lower limb spasticity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis in a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial. Patients and methods. Seventeen patients in the remitting phase of the disease were randomly allocated to sham or magnetic therapy group and underwent iTBS over contralateral motor cortex of the most affected leg once a day for two weeks. Each session consisted of 10 bursts containing three pulses at 50 Hz repeated at 200 ms intervals (5 Hz) every 10 s for a total of 600 stimuli. The iTBS effect was assessed by using clinical (such as the Modified Ashworth Scale) and neurophysiological (H/M amplitude ratio and cortical silent period duration) parameters. Results. Two-week iTBS over motor cortex of the most affected leg did not produce any significant clinical effect on spasticity. However, it decreases the H/M amplitude ratio and increases duration of cortical silent period but not significantly, in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION. The stimulation protocol used in this study does not have significant therapeutic effect. Therefore, we do recommend further studies as neurophysiological changes were evident
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/therapy , Muscle Spasticity/therapy , Double-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
BACKGROUND: Platelets from untreated periodontitis patients are hyper-reactive and form more platelet-leukocyte complexes compared to cells from individuals without periodontitis. It is not known whether the improvement of the periodontal condition achievable by therapy has beneficial effects on the platelet function. We aimed to assess the effects of periodontal therapy on platelet reactivity. METHODS: Patients with periodontitis (n = 25) but unaffected by any other medical condition or medication were included and donated blood before and after periodontal therapy. Reactivity to ADP or oral bacteria was assessed by flow cytometric analysis of membrane markers (binding of PAC-1, P-selectin, CD63) and platelet-leukocyte complex formation. Reactivity values were expressed as ratio between the stimulated and unstimulated sample. Plasma levels of soluble (s) P-selectin were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Binding of PAC-1, the expression of P-selectin and CD63 in response to the oral bacterium P. gingivalis were lower at recall (1.4 ± 1.1, 1.5 ± 1.2, and 1.0 ± 0.1) than at baseline (2.7 ± 4.1, P = 0.026, 6.0 ± 12.5, P = 0.045, and 2.7 ± 6.7, P = 0.042, respectively). Formation of platelet-leukocyte complexes in response to P. gingivalis was also reduced at recall compared to baseline (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 11.4 ± 50.5, P = 0.045). sP-selectin levels were significantly increased post-therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In periodontitis patients, the improvement of the periodontal condition is paralleled by a reduction in platelet hyper-reactivity. We suggest that periodontal therapy, as an intervention for improved oral health, can facilitate the management of thrombotic risk, and on the long term can contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients at risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials identifier ISRCTN36043780. Retrospectively registered 25 September 2013.
