Central contrast sensitivity perimetry discriminates between glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes.

Background: Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy which causes irreversible vision loss. Standard perimetry, which is essential for glaucoma diagnosis, can only detect glaucomatous visual filed loss when considerable structural damage has occurred. Contrast sensitivity is one of the visual function tests that is reduced in eyes with glaucoma. It is known to be affected in pre-perimetric stages of glaucoma. Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the discriminating ability of central contrast sensitivity perimetry in eyes with and without glaucoma. Design: The study employed a cross-sectional study design. Methods: The study participants were made of two groups; eyes diagnosed with glaucoma by an ophthalmologist based on visual field test and optical coherence tomography (OCT) and age- and sex-matched controls who were declared free from glaucoma. Static contrast sensitivity (CS) was measured in the central 10° of visual field using a custom psychophysical test. Results: There were 45 eyes with glaucoma and 45 age- and sex-matched controls in this study. The static CS in the glaucoma group was significantly reduced in 9 out of the 13 tested locations in the central 10° of the visual field. The mean static CS at 5°, 10°, superior hemifield and inferior hemifield were all significantly reduced in the glaucoma patients compared to the controls. Conclusion: Static CS measurement is a sensitive approach that can be utilized to aid in the detection of glaucoma. The use of static CS can be adopted in the development of a cost-effective yet sensitive screening tool for the detection of glaucoma.

The effect of filters and varying illumination on contrast sensitivity in eyes with moderate to severe visual impairment.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of filters and illumination on contrast sensitivity in persons with cataract, pseudophakia, maculopathy and glaucoma to provide a guide for eye care providers in low vision rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A within-subjects experimental design with a counter-balanced presentation technique was employed in this study. The contrast sensitivity of eyes with cataract, pseudophakia, maculopathy and glaucoma was measured with filters (no filter, yellow, pink and orange) combined with increasing illumination levels (100 lx, 300 lx, 700 lx and 1000 lx) using the SpotChecks™ contrast sensitivity chart. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The yellow filter at 100 lx significantly improved contrast sensitivity in the maculopathy group. There were no significant improvements with either intervention in the rest of the groups. There was, however, a significant interaction between filters and illumination in the cataract group. CONCLUSION: There were small improvements in contrast sensitivity at low illumination levels with the yellow filter in the maculopathy group, and this could be considered in clinical practice and low vision rehabilitation. Overall, filters at most illumination levels did not benefit most groups.

Assessment of four validated questionnaires for screening of dry eye disease in an African cohort.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 5-item dry eye questionnaire (DEQ-5) for measurement precision and unidimensionality, and assess the ability of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), McMonnies Dry Eye Questionnaire (MQ), Ocular Comfort Index questionnaires (OCI), and DEQ to predict clinical measures of DED in an African population. METHOD: Participants (n = 113; mean age 24.7 ± 5.4 years) completed all four questionnaires administered in a randomized order. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the instruments were assessed. A masked examiner performed clinical dry eye tests in both eyes of participants and the results used to classify into either "dry" or "non-dry" groups. The diagnostic criteria for dry eye disease were tear break up time (TBUT) < 10 s plus at least one of Schirmer <15 mm in 5 min., > 5 corneal staining spot, or > 9 conjunctival staining spots. Rasch analysis was performed to assess the DEQ for unidimensionality and measurement precision, and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was used to assess the ability of the four questionnaires to predict clinical measures of DED. RESULTS: The responses from the DEQ-5 met the Rasch analysis criterion of unidimensionality with infit and outfit values of between 0.74-1.43 mean-square and 0.69-1.49 mean-square, respectively, and measurement precision of 2.33. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of each test was high, with Cronbach alpha >0.70 for the questionnaire and their respective subscales but internal consistency reliability of the MQ was poor (Cronbach's alpha = 0 .29-0 0.52). Each test segregated the "dry" and "non-dry" groups with moderate (all AUC 0.70-0.80) and similar accuracy (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The DEQ -5 demonstrated adequate measurement precision and unidimensionality. Each of the four questionnaires showed psychometric validity for clinical use in the African population, and modest and similar accuracy when screening for dry eye signs but the performance of the McMonnies questionnaire was limited in terms of internal consistency reliability.

Contact Lens- and Patient-related Factors Associated with Contact Lens Discomfort among Contact Lens Wearers in an African Cohort.

SIGNIFICANCE: No information is available on contact lens discomfort in any African population. Such information may be helpful in developing the scope and priorities for intervention. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to examine contact lens- and patient-related factors associated with contact lens discomfort among wearers in Ghana. METHODS: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, contact lens wearers 18 years and older were recruited. The Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 and a standardized scripted interview were administered to 72 contact lens wearers at five clinical sites, and 40 participants' lens storage cases were collected and cultured. A variety of patient- and contact lens-related factors were examined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to assess risk factors associated with contact lens discomfort. RESULTS: Seventy-two contact lens wearers aged 18 to 45 years completed the study. The mean age was 27.5 ± 6.4 years, 65.3% of them were females, 86.1% wore soft contact lens, and 13.9% wore rigid gas-permeable lens. Contact lens discomfort was reported by 66.7% of the subjects. Most frequent lens storage cases isolates were Bacillus species (40%) and fungi (31.1%). Significant association was found between disinfecting with tap water (5.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 29.27; P = .03), heavy visual display terminal use (3.39; 95% CI, 1.01 to 11.34; P = .05), high water content (1.16; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.33; P = .03), and contact lens discomfort. Demographic factors, wear modality, and care solutions were not significant (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In considering the use of contact lenses for refractive correction in this population, strategies for preventing contact lens discomfort that should be targeted include use of low-water-content lenses, disinfecting with multipurpose solutions, and reducing the time spent daily on visual display terminal use.

Accuracy of Noncycloplegic Refraction for Detecting Refractive Errors in School-aged African Children.

SIGNIFICANCE: Cycloplegia is often restricted in screening settings. Previous studies have evaluated noncycloplegic refraction for screening, but their data are not fully applicable to school-aged African children. This article adds to the literature by investigating this in school-aged African children. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of noncycloplegic autorefraction (NCA) and noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR) to detect refractive errors in school-aged African children and quantify differences between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction measures. METHODS: Autorefraction and retinoscopy were performed on 150 children aged 6 to 15 years before and after cyclopentolate cycloplegia. Subjective refraction was performed by the same examiner after cycloplegia. Noncycloplegic and cycloplegic measurements were compared, and the data were assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: With the exception of cylindrical vector J0 (P = .17) and J45 (P = .08) obtained with NCR, all mean measures of NCA and NCR significantly differed from mean cycloplegic subjective refraction measurements by -0.71 ± 0.67 (P ≤ .001; 95% confidence interval, -2.02 to +0.60) and -0.75 ± 0.68 (P ≤ .001; 95% confidence interval, -2.08 to +0.58), respectively. Mean spherical power between the two tests did not differ (NCA -NCR, mean bias of -0.037 ± 0.675 and 95% limits of agreement of -1.36 to 1.286; P = .51). The sensitivities for detecting any refractive error for NCR and NCA were 86.8 and 82.9%, respectively, and the specificities were 82.0% for NCR and 82.4% for NCA. Performance of both tests was excellent for myopia (area under the curve, >0.90; sensitivity, ≥90%) and similar (P = .13), but the specificities for detecting hyperopia were 78.0% for NCR and 80.0% for NCA. CONCLUSIONS: Noncycloplegic refraction may accurately detect astigmatism and myopia in this population but may elicit higher myopic values and lower hyperopic values than using cycloplegic refraction.