Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Public Health ; 68: 1606049, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37822565

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to describe the change in knowledge, attitudes, concerns, perceptions, preventive practices, and vaccination intention at two key time points of the COVID-19 pandemic and to assess whether these changes varied by level of pandemic fatigue. Methods: Data included in this study came from the third and the ninth round of the COSMO-Spain cross-sectional study. A general linear model was used to investigate the interaction terms between rounds and levels of pandemic fatigue. Results: Changes between rounds were observed in knowledge, attitudes, concerns, perceptions, behaviours, and vaccination intention. Significant interactions between rounds indicated that those with low levels of pandemic fatigue had a greater increase in knowledge, lower decrease in concerns, greater decrease in agreement with the decisions made, and lower increase in vaccination intention compared with those with high pandemic fatigue. Conclusion: As a pandemic evolves, it becomes necessary to consider the level of pandemic fatigue of the population and how this affects knowledge, concerns, and agreement with the measures adopted, as they influence the population's adherence to public health recommendations aimed at controlling infections and protecting the most vulnerable.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intention , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Fatigue , Vaccination
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36901053

ABSTRACT

The objective was to determine the prevalence of oesophageal atresia (OA) and describe the characteristics of OA cases diagnosed before the first year of life, born between 2007 and 2019, and residents in the Valencian Region (VR), Spain. Live births (LB), stillbirths (SB), and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) diagnosed with OA were selected from the Congenital Anomalies population-based Registry of VR (RPAC-CV). The prevalence of OA per 10,000 births with 95% confidence interval was calculated, and socio-demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. A total of 146 OA cases were identified. The overall prevalence was 2.4/10,000 births, and prevalence by type of pregnancy ending was 2.3 in LB and 0.03 in both SB and TOPFA. A mortality rate of 0.03/1000 LB was observed. A relationship was found between case mortality and birth weight (p-value < 0.05). OA was primarily diagnosed at birth (58.2%) and 71.2% of the cases were associated with another congenital anomaly, mainly congenital heart defects. Significant variations in the prevalence of OA in the VR were detected throughout the study period. In conclusion, a lower prevalence in SB and TOPFA was identified compared to EUROCAT data. As several studies have identified, an association between OA cases and birth weight was found.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Atresia , Heart Defects, Congenital , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Spain , Prevalence , Birth Weight , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Registries
3.
Vaccine ; 40(28): 3818-3820, 2022 06 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643563

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish Society of Immunology recently warned that a history of past COVID-19 could result in a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) related to vaccination. We set out to analyze whether there were any differences in AEs between healthcare workers vaccinated for COVID-19 (either after the first or second dose) who had had a prior diagnosis SARS-CoV-2 infection at any time compared to those who had not had COVID-19 before vaccination. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in a population of healthcare workers. AEs related to the first and second doses of the Pfizer vaccine were recorded. We compared the incidence of AEs and compared individuals with 0-3 different AEs to those with 4 or more AEs. The relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Past infection was associated with having more AEs after the first dose (p < 0.001), but not the second one (p = 0.476), as well as a higher incidence of AEs (p < 0.001). Common AEs that were statistically associated with past COVID infection included arthralgia, asthenia, fever, chills, headache, and myalgia (p ≤ 0.001). The RR for having an increased absolute number of different AEs was 1.18 (95 %CI [1.05, 1.33]) after the first dose and 1.05 (95 %CI [0.96, 1.14]) after the second dose. The maximum number of days between past infection and vaccination was 306. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the incidence of AEs was higher in individuals with a history of prior COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 , Health Personnel , BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
4.
Front Public Health ; 9: 747791, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34869165

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 epidemic has been a great challenge to health systems and especially hospitals. A prospective observational epidemiological study was planned as of February 26, 2020 in a tertiary hospital in the Valencia region. The total number of patients followed up with complete information during the first year was 2,448. Among other variables, the comorbidities of the patients were collected (and grouped in the Charson index), the stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), the co-infections, and the colonizations. Data on nosocomial infections due to said virus were also collected. The median days from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis were 4 + 4.6, while an additional 4.4 days had to pass for the patients to be admitted to the ICU. The factors associated with a higher risk of death were those with coinfection, especially with Candida auris [odds ratio (OR): 4.6], a situation that also occurred in the ICU (OR: 3.18). Charlson Index comorbidity and C. auris colonization were also very important both in general hospitalization and in the ICU.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Inpatients , Candida auris , Humans , Intensive Care Units , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...