Effect of Preoperative Recombinant Human Erythropoietin on the Need for Blood Transfusion and Surgical Outcomes in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.

This study aimed to examine the value of preoperative recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) administration to adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rhEPO plus standard treatment versus standard treatment only. Primary outcomes were the need for and volume of homologous blood transfusion (HBT). Secondary outcomes were the lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and the incidence of major adverse events. There was very low certainty that rhEPO is associated with a reduction in the need for HBT, with a number needed to treat of 5.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-12.5), and low certainty that it is associated with a moderate reduction in HBT volume (Hedges g = -0.55; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.32). Meta-regression revealed that studies with a higher proportion of females or older patients demonstrated less benefit of rhEPO in terms of reduced consumption of HBT. Trial sequential analysis showed that rhEPO was superior to standard treatment only for reducing the need for and volume of HBT. Regarding secondary outcomes, there was moderate certainty that rhEPO is associated with a limited reduction in the length of ICU (Hedges g = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.01) and hospital stay (Hedges g = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.25 to -0.02), and low certainty for increased risk of myocardial infarction, with a number needed to harm of 36.1 (95% CI, 17.9-127.4). More well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are needed to draw conclusions regarding the value of rhEPO.

Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The combination of ketamine with propofol and dexmedetomidine has gained popularity for sedation and general anesthesia in different populations. In our meta-nalysis, we helped the anesthesiologists to know the efficiency and the efficacy of both combinations in adult and pediatric patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to August 1, 2023. Our outcome parameters for efficacy were recovery time, pain score, and physician satisfaction while for safety were the related cardiorespiratory, neurological, and gastrointestinal adverse events. RECENT FINDINGS: Twenty-two trials were included with a total of 1429 patients. We found a significantly longer recovery time in the ketadex group of 7.59 min (95% CI, 4.92, 10.26; I2 = 94%) and a significantly less pain score of - 0.72 (95% CI, - 1.10, - 0.34; I2 = 0%). Adults had a significantly better physician satisfaction score with the ketofol group, odds ratio of 0.29 (95% CI, 0.12, 0.71; I2 = 0%). Recovery agitations were higher in the ketofol group with an odds ratio of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24, 0.98; I2 = 36%). Furthermore, we found a significant difference between the combinations with a higher incidence in the ketadex group with pooled odds ratio of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.06, 2.88; I2 = 15%). Ketadex was associated with lower pain scores, hypoxic events and airway obstruction, and emergence agitation. At the same time, ketofol had much more clinician satisfaction which might be attributed to the shorter recovery time and lower incidence of nausea and vomiting. Therefore, we suppose that ketadex is the better combination in periprocedural sedation for both adult and pediatric patients who are not at greater risk for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Efficacy of Perioperative Infusion of N(2)-L-alanyl-L-glutamine in Glycemic Control for Patients With Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus Presented for Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative glutamine infusion in reducing insulin requirements in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, defined as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >7%, undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: At Ain Shams University Hospital, Cardiothoracic Academy. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-three patients (of both sexes) with uncontrolled diabetes presenting for urgent CABG were categorized into 2 groups. INTERVENTIONS: The dipeptiven group (n = 46) was given an infusion of dipeptiven 1.5 mL/kg body weight dissolved in normal saline (200 mL) over 3 hours before surgery. The control group (n = 47) received a normal saline infusion (200 mL). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The dipeptiven group demonstrated statistically significant lower intraoperative (173.74 ± 19.97 mg/dL v 198.22 ±14.64 mg/dL) and postoperative (162.36 ±13.11 mg/dL v 176.13 ±14.86 mg/dL) mean blood glucose levels. In addition, dipeptiven infusion was found to reduce mean total insulin requirements intraoperatively by 3.64 ± 0.56 units/h and postoperatively by 37.109 ± 4.30 units/24 h in comparison to placebo (50.98 ± 16.55 units/24 h and 5.10 ± 2.28 units/h, respectively). CONCLUSION: A preoperative infusion of dipeptiven can contribute to ameliorating stress hyperglycemia in uncontrolled diabetic patients undergoing urgent CABG.