Sex-Related Differences in Utilization and Outcomes of Extracorporeal Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Cardiac Arrest.

Sparse data exist on sex-related differences in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for refractory cardiac arrest (rCA). We explored the role of sex on the utilization and outcomes of ECPR for rCA by retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) International Registry. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Exploratory outcomes were discharge disposition and occurrence of any specific extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) complications. From 1992 to 2020, a total of 7,460 adults with ECPR were identified: 30.5% women; 69.5% men; 55.9% Whites, 23.7% Asians, 8.9% Blacks, and 3.8% Hispanics. Women's age was 50.4 ± 16.9 years (mean ± standard deviation) and men's 54.7 ± 14.1 (p < 0.001). Ischemic heart disease occurred in 14.6% women vs. 18.5% men (p < 0.001). Overall, 28.5% survived at discharge, 30% women vs. 27.8% men (p = 0.138). In the adjusted analysis, sex was not associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93 [confidence interval {CI} = 0.80-1.08]; p = 0.374). Female sex was associated with decreased odds of neurologic, cardiovascular, and renal complications. Despite being younger and having fewer complications during ECMO, women had in-hospital mortality similar to men. Whether these findings are driven by biologic factors or disparities in health care warrants further investigation.

Focused update to guidelines for endovascular therapy for emergent large vessel occlusion: basilar artery occlusion patients.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) dramatically improves clinical outcomes for patients with anterior circulation emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) strokes. With recent publication of two randomized controlled trials in favor of EVT for basilar artery occlusions, the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) Standards and Guidelines Committee provides this focused update for the existing SNIS guideline, 'Current endovascular strategies for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke.' METHODS: A structured literature review and analysis of studies related to posterior circulation large vessel occlusion (basilar or vertebral artery) strokes treated by EVT was performed. Based on the strength and quality of the evidence, recommendations were made by consensus of the writing committee, with additional input from the full SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee and the SNIS Board of Directors. RESULTS: Based on the results of the most recent randomized, controlled trials on EVT for basilar or vertebral artery occlusion, the expert panel agreed on the following recommendations. For patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke due to an acute basilar or vertebral artery occlusion confirmed on CT angiography, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥6, posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (PC-ASPECTS) ≥6, and age 18-89 years: (1) thrombectomy is indicated within 12 hours since last known well (class I, level B-R); (2) thrombectomy is reasonable within 12-24 hours from the last known well (class IIa, level B-R); (3) thrombectomy may be considered on a case by case basis for patients presenting beyond 24 hours since last known well (class IIb, level C-EO). In addition, thrombectomy may be considered on a case by case basis for patients aged <18 years or >89 years on a case by case basis (class IIb, level C-EO). CONCLUSIONS: The indications for EVT of ELVO strokes continue to expand and now include patients with basilar artery occlusion. Further prospective, randomized controlled trials are warranted to elucidate the efficacy and safety of EVT in populations not included in this set of recommendations, and to confirm long term outcomes.

Endovascular therapy for anterior circulation emergent large vessel occlusion stroke in patients with large ischemic cores: a report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee.

BACKGROUND: Early clinical trials validating endovascular therapy (EVT) for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation initially focused on patients with small or absent completed infarctions (ischemic cores) to maximize the probability of detecting a clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit of EVT. Subsequently, real-world experience suggested that patients with large core ischemic strokes (LCS) at presentation may also benefit from EVT. Several large, retrospective, and prospective randomized clinical trials have recently been published that further validate this approach. These guidelines aim to provide an update for endovascular treatment of LCS. METHODS: A structured literature review of LCS studies available since 2019 and grading the strength and quality of the evidence was performed. Recommendations were made based on these new data by consensus of the authors, with additional input from the full SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee and the SNIS Board of Directors. RESULTS: The management of ELVO strokes with large ischemic cores continues to evolve. The expert panel agreed on several recommendations: Recommendation 1: In patients with anterior circulation ELVO who present within 24 hours of last known normal with large infarct core (70-149 mL or ASPECTS 3-5) and meet other criteria of RESCUE-Japan LIMIT, SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, TESLA, TENSION, or LASTE trials, thrombectomy is indicated (Class I, Level A). Recommendations 2-7 flow directly from recommendation 1. Recommendation 2: EVT in patients with LCS aged 18-85 years is beneficial (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 3: EVT in patients with LCS >85 years of age may be beneficial (Class I, Level B-R). Recommendation 4: Patients with LCS and NIHSS score 6-30 benefit from EVT in LCS (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 5: Patients with LCS and NIHSS score <6 and >30 may benefit from EVT in LCS (Class IIa, Level A). Recommendation 6: Patients with LCS and low baseline mRS (0-1) benefit from EVT (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 7: Patients with LCS and time of last known well 0-24 hours benefit from EVT (Class I, Level A). Recommendation 8: It is recommended that patients with ELVO LCS who also meet the criteria for on-label or guideline-directed use of IV thrombolysis receive IV thrombolysis, irrespective of whether endovascular treatments are being considered (Class I, Level B-NR). CONCLUSIONS: The indications for endovascular treatment of ELVO strokes continue to expand and now include patients with large ischemic cores on presentation. Further prospective randomized studies, including follow-up to assess the population-based efficacy of treating patients with LCS, are warranted.