ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Doxorubicin (DOX) causes cognitive impairment (chemobrain) in patients with cancer. While DOX damages the cholinergic system, few studies have focused on the protective effects of cholinergic function on chemobrain. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor galantamine (GAL) demonstrates neuroprotective properties. We investigated the mechanisms associated with DOX-induced cognitive impairments and the potential protective role of GAL in preventing chemobrain. MAIN METHODS: Female Wistar rats were divided into control, DOX, GAL, and DOX + GAL groups. The rats in the DOX group were administered DOX (5 mg/kg intraperitoneally twice weekly for two weeks), while those in the GAL group were orally administered GAL (2.5 mg/kg) via oral gavage once daily for 15 days. The combination group (DOX + GAL) received GAL (once daily) and DOX (two times per week) concurrently. The body weights and survival rates were monitored daily. The animals were subjected to behavioral tests to assess the memory function followed by the biochemical estimation of inflammatory markers, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukine-1ß (IL-1ß), and interleukine-6 (IL-6) in rat brain tissue and RT-qPCR. KEY FINDINGS: DOX caused a reduction in the body weight and survival rate, which was alleviated by GAL concomitant treatment with DOX (DOX + GAL). These groups had reduced body weights and survival rates. DOX-treated animals exhibited an impairment of short-term spatial working memory, manifested as a behavioral alteration in the Y-maze test, the novel object recognition (NOR) test, and the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test. Concurrent treatment with GAL (DOX + GAL) showed improved memory function, as evidenced by an increase in the number of entries and time spent in the novel arm, the time spent exploring the novel object, and the transfer latency in the Y-maze, NOR test, and EPM test, respectively. These findings were also supported by biochemical observations showing the reversal of DOX-induced changes in IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α, as well as their relative expression of mRNA in brain tissue following concurrent GAL treatment. CONCLUSION: GAL appeared to be a neuroprotective agent against neuroinflammation caused by DOX by reducing inflammatory markers in the brain.
ABSTRACT
Background: To authors' knowledge, in Saudi Arabia, information regarding patients' knowledge about their medications is lacking. Objectives: This study aimed to fill this literature gap by assessing patients' knowledge and perceptions about their medications. Design: To achieve the objective of the study, a cross-sectional survey was conducted outside community pharmacies in Qassim region through an exit interview with patients after getting their prescriptions filled or refilled. Methods: A convenient sample of patients was chosen based on acceptance to participate. A form was prepared based on the core and complementary medicines use indicators for evaluation of medicines use in healthcare settings developed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Results: Four hundred forty-three forms were completed. A total of 70% of the indicators of patients' knowledge about their medications were found to be satisfactory, and a total of 89% of the patients were found to have positive perceptions about safety and effectiveness of their medications. Conclusion: Overall, patients' knowledge about their medications was found to be reasonable with exception of the area "information about precautions and possible side effects" which had shown poor patients' knowledge.
ABSTRACT
Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist, is known to have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects on the brain, and its clinical potential in the treatment of cognitive impairment in diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson disease (PD) is currently being explored. This review focused on the reported beneficial effects of pioglitazone on cognitive dysfunction and summarized the associated mechanisms associated with pioglitazone-induced improvement in cognitive dysfunction. Our review of the relevant literature indicated that there is conclusive evidence of the effect of pioglitazone on improving cognitive impairment via its agonistic effect on PPAR-γ. Further, several mechanisms of action have been reported, and these include enhanced NF-kB and p38 activity; regulation of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α; inhibition of Aß production; alterations in the levels of mitochondrial proteins such as mitoNEET; regulation of protein kinases such as CDK5 and JNK; regulation of ROS and MDA levels and the levels of the antioxidant proteins TRX1 and PON2; and increased expression of thyroid hormone receptors. Despite these promising findings, pioglitazone treatment is also associated with cardiovascular risks, such as weight gain and edema, which subsequently increase the risk of mortality. Further, it has been documented that pioglitazone may be unable to cross the blood-brain barrier when administered in certain forms, and it can also cause cell death when administered at high concentrations. Therefore, further research is required to explore the effects of acute and chronic pioglitazone treatment on memory function and the associated risks, in order to determine its clinical applicability in the treatment of cognitive disorders. Nonetheless, the current literature does demonstrate that pioglitazone promotes the function of PPAR receptors in ameliorating inflammation, oxidative stress, amyloidogenesis, and hypothyroidism, and enhancing neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and mitochondrial function. Therefore, these mechanisms of PPAR receptors warrant further investigation in order to establish the clinical applicability of pioglitazone in the treatment of cognitive disorders, such as PD and AD, and neuronal impairment in conditions such as diabetes.
