ABSTRACT
The advent of immunological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of solid and haematological cancers over the last decade. Licensed therapies which activate the immune system to target cancer cells can be broadly divided into two classes. The first class are antibodies that inhibit immune checkpoint signalling, known as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The second class are cell-based immune therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocyte (CAR-T) cell therapies, natural killer (NK) cell therapies, and tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies. The clinical efficacy of all these treatments generally outweighs the risks, but there is a high rate of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are often unpredictable in timing with clinical sequalae ranging from mild (e.g. rash) to severe or even fatal (e.g. myocarditis, cytokine release syndrome) and reversible to permanent (e.g. endocrinopathies).The mechanisms underpinning irAE pathology vary across different irAE complications and syndromes, reflecting the broad clinical phenotypes observed and the variability of different individual immune responses, and are poorly understood overall. Immune-related cardiovascular toxicities have emerged, and our understanding has evolved from focussing initially on rare but fatal ICI-related myocarditis with cardiogenic shock to more common complications including less severe ICI-related myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, including conduction system disease and heart block, non-inflammatory heart failure, takotsubo syndrome and coronary artery disease. In this scientific statement on the cardiovascular toxicities of immune therapies for cancer, we summarize the pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of ICI, CAR-T, NK, and TIL therapies. We also highlight gaps in the literature and where future research should focus.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Worsening Heart Failure (WHF) is associated with adverse prognosis. Identifying novel prognostic markers in WHF is crucial. Gait speed (GS), a validated frailty index, is an easily obtainable parameter that may aid in reclassifying the risk of HF patients. We assessed the independent prognostic role of GS in WHF patients. METHODS: We studied 171 patients with chronic HF with worsening congestion symptoms and inadequate response to standard therapies, requiring intravenous diuretic treatment. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization. We assessed the association and the incremental value of GS, as compared to other clinical confounders, with the primary outcome. RESULTS: The mean age was 76±11 years, 66 % were male, median BNP was 481 pg/ml, and median ejection fraction was 40 %. Over a median follow-up of 11.3 months, 71 events occurred. Lower GS was significantly associated with a higher risk of events (HR of 4.03, 95 % CI 2.25-7.21), along with neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, BNP, QRS duration, natremia, and previous myocardial infarction. When added to the MAGGIC risk score and the other significant confounders identified, GS significantly enhanced the model risk prediction (Harrell's C-index 0.75 vs 0.71, p < 0.001). At Classification And Regression Tree analysis, GS≤0.8 m/s was the first parameter to be considered to risk stratify the population. CONCLUSIONS: GS, an easily obtainable marker of frailty, may contribute to improve the risk stratification of patients with WHF.
ABSTRACT
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent cardiovascular (CV) comorbidity in cancer. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine clinical characteristics and contemporary management of patients with AF and cancer with a specific focus on antithrombotic treatments. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with a recent cancer diagnosis and electrocardiographically confirmed AF (the BLITZ-AF Cancer Registry). CHA2DS2VASc scores were calculated for study participants. Results: Overall, 1,514 individuals were enrolled from June 2019 to September 2021 (mean age 74 ± 9 years, 47.5% of participants >75 years of age; 63.5% males). CV diseases were common: 20.9% had heart failure, 18.1% had coronary artery disease, 38.5% had valvular heart disease, and 9.8% had peripheral artery disease. Previous thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events occurred in 13.9% and 10.4% of subjects, respectively. The most common cancer types were lung (14.9%), colorectal (14.1%), prostate (8.8%), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (8.1%). In total, 41.5% of the patients had a CHA2DS2VASc score ≥4. Before admission or prior to cardiologist consultation, 16.6% of subjects were not taking any antithrombotic therapy and 22.7% were receiving antiplatelet agents and/or low-molecular-weight heparin. At discharge or after cardiologic assessment, these percentages dropped to 7.7% and 16.6%, respectively. This trend was paralleled by an increase in the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulant, while the proportion of vitamin K antagonist declined. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that there is underuse of appropriate antithrombotic therapy for AF in cancer patients highlighting the need to integrate early CV assessment in the management of these patients. (Non-interventional Study on Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer [BLITZ-AF Cancer]; NCT03909386).
ABSTRACT
Although the epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ErbB2) and Notch1 signaling pathways have both significant roles in regulating cardiac biology, their interplay in the heart remains poorly investigated. Here, we present evidence of a crosstalk between ErbB2 and Notch1 in cardiac cells, with effects on autophagy and proliferation. Overexpression of ErbB2 in H9c2 cardiomyoblasts induced Notch1 activation in a post-transcriptional, p38-dependent manner, while ErbB2 inhibition with the specific inhibitor, lapatinib, reduced Notch1 activation. Moreover, incubation of H9c2 cells with lapatinib resulted in stalled autophagic flux and decreased proliferation, consistent with the established cardiotoxicity of this and other ErbB2-targeting drugs. Confirming the findings in H9c2 cells, exposure of primary neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes to exogenous neuregulin-1, which engages ErbB2, stimulated proliferation, and this effect was abrogated by concomitant inhibition of the enzyme responsible for Notch1 activation. Furthermore, the hearts of transgenic mice specifically overexpressing ErbB2 in cardiomyocytes had increased levels of active Notch1 and of Notch-related genes. These data expand the knowledge of ErbB2 and Notch1 functions in the heart and may allow better understanding the mechanisms of the cardiotoxicity of ErbB2-targeting cancer treatments.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: The use of loop diuretics in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is less frequent compared with heart failure. The clinical and prognostic characteristics of PAH patients according to loop diuretic use remain unexplored. In this study, we retrospectively analysed the characteristics and survival of PAH patients requiring different doses of loop diuretics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with PAH between 2001 and 2022 at seven European centres for the management of PAH. According to the median equivalent dose of furosemide in the overall cohort, patients were divided into two subgroups: no/low-dose loop diuretic and high-dose loop diuretic. Primary outcome was 5 year all-cause mortality. Among the 397 patients included, 227 (57%) were treated with loop diuretics. Median daily furosemide equivalent dose was 25 mg, and accordingly patients were divided in no/low dose (i.e. ≤25 mg, n = 257, 65%) vs. high dose (i.e. >25 mg, n = 140, 35%). Patients in the high-dose group were older, more likely to have comorbidities, and had a more severe disease according to the ESC/ERS risk category. Crude 5 year survival was significantly shorter in patients in the high-dose group, but after adjustment for age, sex, and risk category, high loop diuretic dose was not significantly associated with the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Use of high dose of loop diuretics in PAH is associated with a higher burden of comorbidities, more severe disease, and worse survival. However, in PAH, the need of high loop diuretic dose is a marker of disease severity and not an independent prognostic factor.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) remain often undertreated for multiple reasons, including treatment inertia, contraindications, and intolerance. The OPTIimal PHARMacological therapy for patients with Heart Failure (OPTIPHARM-HF) registry is designed to evaluate the prevalence of evidence-based medical treatment prescription and titration, as well as the causes of its underuse, in a broad real-world population of consecutive patients with HF across the whole ejection fraction spectrum and among different clinical phenotypes. METHODS: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry (NCT06192524) is a prospective, multicenter, observational, national study of adult patients with symptomatic HF, as defined by current international guidelines, regardless of ejection fraction. Both outpatients and inpatients with chronic and acute decompensated HF will be recruited. The study will enroll up to 2500 patients with chronic HF at approximately 35 Italian HF centres. Patients will be followed for a maximum duration of 24 months. The primary objective of the OPTIPHARM-HF registry is to assess prescription and adherence to evidence-based guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with HF. The primary outcome is to describe the prevalence of GDMT use according to target guideline recommendation. Secondary objectives include implementation of comorbidity treatment, evaluation of sequence of treatment introduction and up-titration, description of GDMT implementation in the specific HF population, main causes of GDMT underuse, and assessment of cumulative rate of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry will provide important implications for improving patient care and adoption of recommended medical therapy into clinical practice among HF patients.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Drug Therapy, Combination , Echocardiography , Phenotype , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension , Humans , Female , Male , Italy , Middle Aged , Echocardiography/methods , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/drug therapy , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/physiopathology , Aged , Hypertension, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Administration, OralABSTRACT
AIM: To obtain real-world evidence about the features and risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with a left heart disease (LHD) phenotype (PAH-LHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: By reviewing the records of consecutive incident PAH patients at 7 tertiary centers from 2001 to 2021, we selected 286 subjects with all parameters needed to determine risk of death at baseline and at first follow-up with COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 scores. Fifty seven (20%) had PAH-LHD according to the AMBITION definition. Compared with no-LHD ones, they were older, had higher BMI, more cardiovascular comorbidities, higher E/e' ratio and left atrial area, but lower BNP concentrations and better right ventricular function and pulmonary hemodynamics. Survival was comparable between PAH-LHD and no-LHD patients, although the former were less commonly treated with dual PAH therapy. Both COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 discriminated all-cause mortality risk of PAH-LHD at follow-up, but not at baseline. Risk profile significantly improved during follow-up only when assessed by COMPERA 2.0. At multivariable analysis with low-risk status as reference, intermediate-high and high-risk, but not LHD phenotype, were associated with higher hazard of all-cause mortality. Results were comparable in secondary analyses including patients in the last 10 years and atrial fibrillation and echocardiographic abnormalities as additional criteria for PAH-LHD. CONCLUSIONS: In real life, PAH-LHD patients are frequent, have less severe disease and are less likely treated with PAH drug combinations than no-LHD. The COMPERA 2.0 model may be more appropriate to evaluate their mortality risk during follow-up and how it is modulated by therapy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer is an important condition associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The objectives of the BLITZ-AF Cancer study were to collect real-life information on the clinical profile and use of antithrombotic drugs in patients with AF and cancer to improve clinical management, as well as the evaluation of the association between different antithrombotic treatments (or their absence) and the main clinical events. METHODS: European multinational, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional study conducted in patients with AF (electrocardiographically confirmed) and cancer occurring within 3 years. The CHA2DS2-VASc and the HAS-BLED scores were calculated in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: From June 2019 to July 2021, 1514 patients were enrolled, 36.5% women, from 112 cardiology departments in 6 European countries (Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and Ireland). Italy enrolled 971 patients in 77 centers. Average age of patients was 74 ± 9 years, of which 20.9% affected by heart failure, 18.1% by ischemic heart disease, 9.8% by peripheral arterial disease and 38.5% by valvular diseases; 41.5% of patients had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥4. The most represented cancer sites were lung (14.9%), colorectal tract (14.1%), prostate (8.8%), or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (8.1%). Before enrollment, 16.6% of patients were not taking antithrombotic therapy, while 22.7% were on therapy with antiplatelet agents and/or low molecular weight heparin. After enrollment these percentages decreased to 7.7% and 16.6%, respectively and, at the same time, the percentage of patients on direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy increased from 48.4% to 68.4%, also to the detriment of those on vitamin K antagonist therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The BLITZ-AF Cancer study, which enrolled patients diagnosed with AF and cancer, highlights that the use of DOACs by cardiologists in this clinical context has increased, even though the guidelines on AF do not give accurate indications about oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Neoplasms , Stroke , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Anticoagulants , Neoplasms/complications , Stroke/complications , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with left heart failure (LHF) (PH-LHF) is one of the most common causes of PH. It directly contributes to symptoms and reduced functional capacity and negatively affects right heart function, ultimately leading to a poor prognosis. There are no specific treatments for PH-LHF, despite the high number of drugs tested so far. This scientific document addresses the main knowledge gaps in PH-LHF with emphasis on pathophysiology and clinical trials. Key identified issues include better understanding of the role of pulmonary venous versus arteriolar remodelling, multidimensional phenotyping to recognize patient subgroups positioned to respond to different therapies, and conduct of rigorous pre-clinical studies combining small and large animal models. Advancements in these areas are expected to better inform the design of clinical trials and extend treatment options beyond those effective in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Enrichment strategies, endpoint assessments, and thorough haemodynamic studies, both at rest and during exercise, are proposed to play primary roles to optimize early-stage development of candidate therapies for PH-LHF.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Hypertension, Pulmonary , Pulmonary Circulation , Ventricular Function, Right , Humans , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/therapy , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/therapy , Ventricular Function, Right/physiology , Pulmonary Circulation/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It has been postulated that cancer hampers the delivery of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF). However, few data are available in this regard. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis from the HF Outpatient Clinic of the IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino in Genova, Italy. All HF patients evaluated between 2010 and 2019, with a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% and at least two visits ≥3 months apart with complete information about GDMT were included in the study. We assessed the prescription of GDMT-in particular, beta-blockers (BB), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), and mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRA)-at the time of the last HF evaluation and compared it between patients with and without incidental cancer. For those with incidental cancer, we also evaluated modifications of GDMT comparing the HF evaluations before and after cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 464 HF patients, 39 (8%) had incidental cancer. There were no statistical differences in GDMT between patients with and without incidental cancer at last evaluation. In the year following cancer diagnosis, of 33 patients with incidental cancer on BB, none stopped therapy, but two had a down-titration to a dosage <50%; of 27 patients on RASi, two patients stopped therapy and three had a down-titration to a dosage <50%; of 19 patients on MRA, four stopped therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although HF patients with incidental cancer may need to have GDMT down-titrated at the time of cancer diagnosis, this does not appear to significantly hinder the delivery of HF therapies during follow-up.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Neoplasms , Stroke Volume , Humans , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Stroke Volume/physiology , Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Italy/epidemiology , Incidence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
A comprehensive evaluation of risk, using multiple indices, is necessary to provide reliable prognostic information and guide therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The current ESC/ERS guidelines suggest using a three-strata model for incident (newly diagnosed) patients and a four-strata model for prevalent patients with PAH. The four-strata model serves as a fundamental risk-stratification tool and relies on a minimal dataset of indicators that must be considered during follow-up. Nevertheless, there are still areas of vagueness and ambiguity when classifying and managing patients in the intermediate-risk category. For these patients, considerations should include right heart imaging, hemodynamics, as well as individual factors such as age, sex, genetic profile, disease type, comorbidities, and kidney function. The aim of this report is to present case studies, with a specific focus on patients ultimately classified as intermediate risk. We aim to emphasize the challenges and complexities encountered in the realms of diagnosis, classification, and treatment for these particular patients.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension , Humans , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/diagnosis , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/physiopathology , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/therapy , Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension/epidemiology , Female , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , Clinical Decision-Making , Pulmonary Artery/physiopathology , Arterial Pressure/drug effects , Decision Support TechniquesABSTRACT
Heart failure (HF) patients have a significantly higher risk of new-onset cancer and cancer-associated mortality, compared to subjects free of HF. While both the prevention and treatment of new-onset HF in patients with cancer have been investigated extensively, less is known about the prevention and treatment of new-onset cancer in patients with HF, and whether and how guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF should be modified when cancer is diagnosed in HF patients. The purpose of this review is to elaborate and discuss the effects of pillar HF pharmacotherapies, as well as digoxin and diuretics on cancer, and to identify areas for further research and novel therapeutic strategies. To this end, in this review, (i) proposed effects and mechanisms of action of guideline-directed HF drugs on cancer derived from pre-clinical data will be described, (ii) the evidence from both observational studies and randomized controlled trials on the effects of guideline-directed medical therapy on cancer incidence and cancer-related outcomes, as synthetized by meta-analyses will be reviewed, and (iii) considerations for future pre-clinical and clinical investigations will be provided.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Neoplasms , Humans , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Neoplasms/epidemiologyABSTRACT
AIMS: To investigate the relationship between chronic low-grade inflammation, as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels, and incident heart failure (HF) or cancer. METHODS: We assessed the relationship between baseline hsCRP concentrations and subsequent HF or cancer in two community-based cohorts, the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3) and the Health, Aging and Body Composition (ABC) study. In the latter, the analysis was replicated with interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, or tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α instead of hsCRP. RESULTS: In HUNT3, hsCRP was measured in 47,163 subjects (mean age 52.3 ± 15.8 years). During a median follow-up of 12.1 years, 2,034 (4.3%) individuals developed HF and 5,024 (10.7%) cancer, with 442 (0.9%) being diagnosed with both. After adjusting for age, male sex, diabetes, obesity, previous or current smoking, and comorbidities, elevated baseline hsCRP was associated with a higher risk of HF or cancer (HR 1.09; 95%CI, 1.07-1.10). In the Health ABC study, hsCRP levels were assessed in 2,803 participants, who had a mean age of 72.6 ± 2.9 years and a higher burden of comorbidities than in HUNT3. During a median follow-up of 8.2 years, HF and cancer were diagnosed in 346 (12.3%) and 776 (27.7%) subjects, respectively, with 77 (2.7%) having both conditions. After adjusting for the same variables used for the HUNT3 cohort, hsCRP remained significantly associated with incident HF or cancer (HR 1.11; 95%CI, 1.05-1.18), as were IL-1 (HR 1.15; 1.07-1.24), IL-6 (HR 1.09; 1.02-1.17), and TNF-α (HR 1.15; 1.07-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: A state of chronic, low-grade inflammation captured by an increase in hsCRP levels is associated with an increased risk of developing HF or cancer, with potential implications for clinical trials with anti-inflammatory therapies.
There is an increasing recognition that cardiovascular (CV) risk factors portend an increased risk of both heart failure (HF) and cancer. Chronic, low-grade inflammation might represent a shared pathogenic pathway underlying the association between these risk factors, HF, and malignancy. The biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) might add prognostic information on CV and cancer risk by capturing this inflammatory state. In this study we analysed the association of inflammation, as assessed by baseline measurement of hsCRP, and the risk of developing HF and cancer in two community-based prospective studies, the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3) and the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study.In these cohorts, comprising more than 50,000 individuals, inflammation at baseline was associated with an increased risk of incident HF or cancer during a median follow-up of 8-12 years, after adjusting for traditional risk factors and comorbidities.In the Health ABC study sample, three inflammatory markers other than hsCRP, namely interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, or tumour necrosis factor α, performed similarly to hsCRP in predicting the risk of incident HF or cancer. These results provide insights into the interconnection between HF and cancer and reinforce the concept that low-grade, chronic inflammation promotes the development of both HF and cancer and, thereby, might be targeted for prevention of either condition. Furthermore, our findings confirm the reliability of hsCRP as a biomarker to select individuals who may benefit from anti-inflammatory treatments to reduce CV and cancer events.
ABSTRACT
In the last decade, extensive attention has been paid to the uremic toxin indoxyl sulphate (IS) as an inducer of cardiac fibroblast (cFib) activation and cardiac fibrosis in chronic kidney disease. At cellular level, IS engages aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and regulates many biological functions. We analysed how AhR inhibition by CH-223191 (CH) and overexpression of non-functional (dominant negative, DN) nuclear factor-erythroid-2-related factor 2 (NRF2), a transcription factor recruited by AhR, modulate the response of neonatal mouse (nm) cFib to IS. We also evaluated nm-cardiomyocytes after incubation with the conditioned medium (CM) of IS±CH-treated nm-cFib. IS induced activation, collagen synthesis, TLR4 and-downstream-MCP-1, and the genes encoding angiotensinogen, angiotensin-converting enzyme, angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1r) and neprilysin (Nepr) in nm-cFib. CH antagonized IS-initiated nm-cFib activation, but did not affect or even magnified the other features. IS promoted NRF2 nuclear translocation and expression the NRF2 target Nqo1. Both pre-incubation with CH and transfection of DN-NRF2 resulted in loss of NRF2 nuclear localization. Moreover, DN-NRF2 overexpression led to greater TLR4 and MCP-1 levels following exposure to IS. The CM of IS-primed nm-cFib and to a larger extent the CM of IS+CH-treated nm-cFib upregulated AT1r, Nepr and TNFα and myostatin genes in nm-cardiomyocytes. Hence, IS triggers pro-inflammatory activation of nm-cFib partly via AhR, and AhR-NRF2 counteract it. Strategies other than AhR inhibition are needed to target IS detrimental actions on cardiac cells.
Subject(s)
Indican , Signal Transduction , Mice , Animals , Indican/pharmacology , Indican/metabolism , Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon/genetics , Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon/metabolism , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/genetics , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/metabolism , Toll-Like Receptor 4/genetics , Fibroblasts/metabolismABSTRACT
Cardiologists are encountering a growing number of cancer patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Several factors account for the interrelationship between these two conditions, in addition to improving survival rates in the cancer population. Established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, such as hypercholesterolaemia and obesity, predispose to both IHD and cancer, through specific mechanisms and via low-grade, systemic inflammation. This latter is also fuelled by clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Furthermore, experimental work indicates that IHD and cancer can promote one another, and the CV or metabolic toxicity of anticancer therapies can lead to IHD. The connections between IHD and cancer are reinforced by social determinants of health, non-medical factors that modify health outcomes and comprise individual and societal domains, including economic stability, educational and healthcare access and quality, neighbourhood and built environment, and social and community context. Management of IHD in cancer patients is often challenging, due to atypical presentation, increased bleeding and ischaemic risk, and worse outcomes as compared to patients without cancer. The decision to proceed with coronary revascularization and the choice of antithrombotic therapy can be difficult, particularly in patients with chronic coronary syndromes, necessitating multidisciplinary discussion that considers both general guidelines and specific features on a case by case basis. Randomized controlled trial evidence in cancer patients is very limited and there is urgent need for more data to inform clinical practice. Therefore, coexistence of IHD and cancer raises important scientific and practical questions that call for collaborative efforts from the cardio-oncology, cardiology, and oncology communities.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Hyperlipidemias , Myocardial Ischemia , Neoplasms , Humans , Myocardial Ischemia/etiology , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Obesity/complications , Hyperlipidemias/complications , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium characterized by a great heterogeneity of presentation and evolution. Treatment of myocarditis is often supportive, and the evidence for immunosuppression is scarce and debated. Conventional treatment is based on clinical presentation, ranging from conservative to advanced mechanical assist devices. In this setting, immunosuppression and immunomodulation therapies are mostly reserved for patients presenting with major clinical syndromes. In this review, we will summarize the current evidence and strategies for conventional and immunosuppressive treatments for patients presenting with acute myocarditis.