ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess success and safety of CT-guided procedures with narrow window access for biopsy. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic CT-guided biopsy or fiducial placement between 01/2015 and 12/2018 were included (183 women, mean age 63⯱â¯14 years). Procedures were classified into "wide window" (width of the needle path between structures >â¯15 mm) and "narrow window" (≤â¯15 mm) based on intraprocedural images. Clinical information, complications, technical and clinical success, and outcomes were collected. The blunt needle approach is preferred by our interventional radiology team for narrow window access. RESULTS: There were 323 (81.5%) wide window procedures and 73 (18.5%) narrow window procedures with blunt needle approach. The median depth for the narrow window group was greater (97 mm, interquartile range (IQR) 82-113 mm) compared to the wide window group (84 mm, IQR 60-106 mm); pâ¯=â¯0.0017. Technical success was reached in 100% (73/73) of the narrow window and 99.7% (322/323) of the wide window procedures. There was no difference in clinical success rate between the two groups (narrow: 86.4%, 57/66; wide: 89.5%, 265/296; pâ¯=â¯0.46). There was no difference in immediate complication rate (narrow: 1.3%, 1/73; wide: 1.2%, 4/323; pâ¯=â¯0.73) or delayed complication rate (narrow: 1.3%, 1/73; wide: 0.6%, 1/323; pâ¯=â¯0.50). CONCLUSION: Narrow window (<â¯15 mm) access biopsy and fiducial placement with blunt needle approach under CT guidance is safe and successful. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT-guided biopsy and fiducial placement can be performed through narrow window access of less than 15 mm utilizing the blunt-tip technique. KEY POINTS: ⢠A narrow window for CT-guided abdominal and pelvic biopsies and fiducial placements was considered when width of the needle path between vital structures was ≤â¯15 mm. ⢠Seventy-three biopsies and fiducial placements performed through a narrow window with blunt needle approach had a similar rate of technical and clinical success and complications compared to 323 procedures performed through a wide window approach, with traditional approach (>â¯15 mm). ⢠This study confirmed the safety of the CT-guided percutaneous procedures through <â¯15 mm window with blunt-tip technique.
Subject(s)
Abdomen , Image-Guided Biopsy , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Pelvis/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Modern CT systems seek to evaluate patient-specific dose by converting the CT dose index generated during a procedure to a size-specific dose estimate using conversion factors that are related to patient attenuation properties. The most accurate way to measure patient attenuation is to evaluate a full-field-of-view reconstruction of the whole scan length and calculating the true water-equivalent diameter (Dw ) using CT numbers; however, due to time constraints, less accurate methods to estimate Dw using patient geometry measurements are used more widely. In this study we compared the accuracy of Dw values calculated from three different methods across 35 sample scans and compared them to the true Dw . These three estimation methods were: measurement of patient lateral dimension from a pre-scan localizer radiograph; measurement of the sum of anteroposterior and lateral dimensions from a reconstructed central slice; and using CT numbers from a central slice only. Using the localizer geometry method, 22 out of 35 (62%) samples estimated Dw within 20% of the true value. The middle slice attenuation and geometry methods gave estimations within the 20% margin for all 35 samples.