Association of Functional Outcomes in Tracheoesophageal Voicing With Intratracheal Pressures and Esophagram Findings.

Importance: Tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) is a commonly used device for alaryngeal voicing following total laryngectomy. Variability in TEP voice and speech production may be reflected in differences in intratracheal pressures. Objective: To examine the association between intratracheal manometric pressure (IMP), speech function, and proximal esophageal abnormalities in patients with TEP. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic institution and included all patients with a history of total laryngectomy and TEP who completed a radiographic esophagram and intratracheal manometry between September 9, 2019, and December 4, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Intratracheal manometric pressures during sustained phonation, conversational speech, and maximum loudness tasks were obtained for 22 patients. Pressure metrics, phonation duration time, and fluency of speech production were compared between patients with dysphagia with those without swallowing complaints. The association between pressure and speech metrics was also assessed. Results: Of 22 patients, 17 (77.2%) were men, 5 (22.7%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 66.6 (8.8) years. The mean (SD) sustained phonation duration time was 9.3 (5.2) seconds, and the mean (SD) IMP during sustained phonation was 50.5 (21.4) cm H20. The IMPs during sustained phonation were strongly correlated with conversational speech (r = 0.712; 95% CI, 0.384-1.039) and moderately correlated with maximum loudness tasks (r = 0.524; 95% CI, 0.127-0.921). The IMPs during conversational speech were moderately correlated with maximum loudness task (r = 0.538; 95% CI, 0.145-0.931). Increased IMP during sustained phonation was moderately correlated with decreased sustained phonation duration time (r = -0.450; 95% CI, -0.867 to -0.034) and conversational speech was moderately correlated with decreased sustained phonation duration time (r = -0.524; 95% CI, -0.921 to -0.127). Patients with subjective swallowing complaints and proximal esophagus abnormalities had a shorter maximum phonation time (mean [SD], 7.08 [5.03] seconds) compared with patients without subjective dysphagic complaints (mean [SD], 11.95 [4.40] seconds), with a large effect size (Cohen d = 1.031; 95% CI, 0.141-1.92). All patients with nonfluent TEP speech production had structural abnormalities of the proximal esophagus. No difference in pressure or speech metrics was observed for primary closure vs reconstructive flap type. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that increased IMP and abnormalities of the proximal esophagus were associated with worse TEP speech quality. Evaluation of the esophagus should be considered in patients who are experiencing difficulties with TEP voicing. Further investigation of intratracheal manometry as a biofeedback tool to improve TEP voicing is needed.

Endoscopic visualization for tracheoesophageal puncture tract sizing.

BACKGROUND: Accurate tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP) size is essential for optimal functioning. Current sizing techniques do not afford direct visualization. The clinical utility of direct visualization with unsedated transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) to improve TEP sizing accuracy has not been established. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to determine if endoscopic visualization with TNE during TEP fitting improves sizing accuracy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants undergoing secondary TEP placement had their TEP sized without visualization and with visualization during TNE. The effect of endoscopic visualization on TEP sizing was assessed. RESULTS: The mean age (SD) of the cohort (N = 15) was 61.20 (±10.19) years. The percent disagreement between non-visualized and endoscopic-visualized puncture tract measurement was 60%. The mean difference in puncture tract length with visualization compared to without visualization was 1.75 mm (±1.91). Discordance between non-visualized and endoscopic-visualized puncture tract length was worse for persons with a history of radiation (66.7%) than without radiation (33.3%) (p < .05). The overall test agreement between endoscopic and non-endoscopic sizing techniques was moderate (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.254; (p < .05). CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: The percent disagreement between non-visualized and endoscopic-visualized TEP sizing is high (60%). The data suggest that endoscopic visualization with TNE improves sizing accuracy during TEP placement.