Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 16(5): e59738, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841032

ABSTRACT

Background Post-acute care (PAC) centers are facilities used for recuperation, rehabilitation, and symptom management in an effort to improve the long-term outcomes of patients. PAC centers include skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term care hospitals. In the 1990s, Medicare payment reforms significantly increased the discharge rates to PAC centers and subsequently increased the length of stay (LOS) among these patient populations. Over the last several years, there have been national initiatives and multidisciplinary approaches to improve safe discharge rates to home. Multiple studies have shown that patients who are discharged to home have decreased rates of 30-day readmissions, reduced short-term mortality, and an improvement in their activities of daily living.  Objectives This study aimed to investigate how multidisciplinary approaches could improve a single institution's discharge rates to home. In doing so, we aim to lower hospital readmission rates, hospital length of stay, morbidity and mortality rates, and healthcare-associated costs. Methods A retrospective single-institution cohort study was implemented at Jersey Shore University Medical Center (JSUMC). Data from January 2015 to December 2019 served as the control period, compared to the intervention period from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were either admitted to JSUMC teaching faculty, hospitalists, or "others," which is composed of various medical and surgical subspecialists. Interventions performed to improve home discharge rates can be categorized into the following: physician education, patient education, electronic medical record (EMR) initiatives, accountability, and daily mobility initiatives. All interventions were performed equally across the three patient populations. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients discharged to home. Results There were 190,699 patients, divided into a pre-intervention group comprising 98,885 individuals and a post-intervention group comprising 91,814 patients. Within the pre-intervention group, the faculty attended to 8,495 patients, hospitalists cared for 39,145 patients, and others managed 51,245 patients. In the post-intervention period, the faculty oversaw 8,014 patients, hospitalists attended to 35,094 patients, and others were responsible for 48,706 patients. After implementing a series of multidisciplinary interventions, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients discharged home, rising from 74.9% to 80.2% across the entire patient population. Specifically, patients under the care of the faculty experienced a more substantial improvement, with a discharge rate increasing from 73.6% to 84.4%. Similarly, the hospitalists exhibited a rise from 69.4% to 74.3%, and the others demonstrated an increase from 79.3% to 83.7%. All observed changes yielded a p-value < 0.001. Conclusions By deploying a multifaceted strategy that emphasized physician education, patient education, EMR initiatives, accountability measures, and daily mobility, there was a statistically significant increase in the rate of patient discharges to home. These initiatives proved to be cost-effective and led to a tangible reduction in healthcare-associated costs and patient length of stay. Further studies are required to look into the effect on hospital readmission rates and morbidity and mortality rates. The comprehensive approach showcased its potential to optimize patient outcomes.

2.
J Nurs Adm ; 53(9): 481-489, 2023 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37624810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in stress and anxiety before and after the use of the nature-themed recharge room. BACKGROUND: Psychological support measures have been noted to be relevant to nurses; however, the effect of the pandemic on the healthcare workers' emotional and psychological well-being led to urgent calls to implement psychological support measures more widely. METHODS: The study utilized a 1-group pretest and posttest design. One hundred sixty hospital employees utilized the recharge room, with 131 completed questionnaires counted in the data analysis. Data were collected using the demographic form, Perceived Stress Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: Most participants were between 25 and 35 years old, female, worked the morning shift, had 3 to 5 years of experience, preferred a water feature theme, and used the room for 10 minutes. The mean stress preintervention score was 7.44, and postintervention score was 7.17, with the difference not statistically significant. The mean anxiety preintervention score was 14.17, and postintervention score was 8.48, with the difference statistically significant at a P < 0.05. Females working in the hospital for 1 to 5 years were physicians/residents, nursing support staff, and leaders with the highest mean stress (4-item Perceived Stress Scale) and anxiety (6-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) preintervention scores. Comparing the preintervention and postintervention anxiety levels, the highest reduction was noted among females working in the hospital for 1 to 3 years and nursing support staff who have used the room for 5 to 15 minutes with 2 or fewer people. CONCLUSION: Organizational leaders should offer psychological support programs, such as the nature-themed recharge room, to help reduce the healthcare workers' stress and anxiety.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff , Physicians , Female , Humans , Adult , Anxiety/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Emotions
3.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 9(6)2021 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34205327

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Jersey Shore University Medical Center (JSUMC) is a 646-bed tertiary medical center located in central New Jersey. Over the past several years, development and maturation of tertiary services at JSUMC has resulted in tremendous growth, with the inpatient volume increasing by 17% between 2016 and 2018. As hospital floors functioned at maximum capacity, the medical center was frequently forced into crisis mode with substantial increases in emergency department (ED) waiting times and a paradoxical increase in-hospital length of stay (hLOS). Prolonged hLOS can contribute to worse patient outcomes and satisfaction, as well as increased medical costs. (2) Methods: A root cause analysis was conducted to identify the factors leading to delays in providing in-hospital services. Four main bottlenecks were identified by the in-hospital phase sub-committee: incomplete orders, delays in placement to rehabilitation facilities, delays due to testing (mainly imaging), and delays in entering the discharge order. Similarly, the discharge process itself was analyzed, and obstacles were identified. Specific interventions to address each obstacle were implemented. Mean CMI-adjusted hospital LOS (CMI-hLOS) was the primary outcome measure. (3) Results: After interventions, CMI-hLOS decreased from 2.99 in 2017 to 2.84 and 2.76 days in 2018 and 2019, respectively. To correct for aberrations due to the COVID pandemic, we compared June-August 2019 to June-August 2020 and found a further decrease to 2.42 days after full implementation of all interventions. We estimate that the intervention led to an absolute reduction in costs of USD 3 million in the second half of 2019 and more than USD 7 million in 2020. On the other hand, the total expenses, represented by salaries for additional staffing, were USD 2,103,274, resulting in an estimated net saving for 2020 of USD 5,400,000. (4) Conclusions: At JSUMC, hLOS was found to be a complex and costly issue. A comprehensive approach, starting with the identification of all correctable delays followed by interventions to mitigate delays, led to a significant reduction in hLOS along with significant cost savings.

4.
HERD ; 14(3): 182-201, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33525917

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine changes in healthcare practitioners' perception of supportiveness of their physical work environment, and trend in patient fall, when moving from a centralized to a decentralized unit configuration. BACKGROUND: Previous studies on decentralization have not uniformly provided findings consistent with desired outcome. METHOD: A pretest-posttest study was conducted in an elective surgery medical-surgical unit in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. The independent variable was the physical design supporting centralized versus decentralized nursing models. Data were collected from healthcare staff with a self-report survey "before" (September 2017; n = 42) and "after" (June 2019; n = 22), and interviews. Before-after data were analyzed using both parametric and nonparametric tests to identify significant differences. Qualitative responses were analyzed to identify triangulating evidences. Monthly patient fall data were collected for a 3-year period and analyzed using log-linear Poisson Regression model. RESULTS: Results show favorable assessments in the areas of overall supportiveness of design, equipment and soiled utility location, peer support, process flow visualization, and overall satisfaction. A reduction in patient falls was observed. Unfavorable outcomes were found in the contexts of walking distance, multidisciplinary collaboration, alarm audibility, nurse station size, and PPE location. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores that the success of a unit cannot be achieved without coordinated and successful interventions in the areas of operations, processes, policies, culture, and the physical design.


Subject(s)
Hospital Design and Construction , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Nursing Stations , Humans , Politics , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...