Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 110: 102454, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35987149

ABSTRACT

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer (BC) increases surgical and conservative surgery chances. However, a significant proportion of patients will not be eligible for conservative surgery following NACT because of large tumor size and/or low chemosensitivity, especially for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors, for which pathological complete response rates are lower than for other BC subtypes. On the other hand, for luminal BC neoadjuvant endocrine therapy could represent a valid alternative. Several gene expression assays have been introduced into clinical practice in last decades, in order to define prognosis more accurately than clinico-pathological features alone and to predict the benefit of adjuvant treatments. A series of studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using core needle biopsy for gene expression risk testing, finding a high concordance rate in the risk result between biopsy sample and surgical samples. Based on these premises, recent efforts have focused on the utility of gene expression signatures to guide therapeutic decisions even in the neoadjuvant setting. Several prospective and retrospective studies have investigated the correlation between gene expression risk score from core needle biopsy before neoadjuvant therapy and the likelihood of 1) clinical and pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, 2) conservative surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, and 3) survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the potential clinical utility of the main commercially available gene expression panels (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, EndoPredict, Prosigna/PAM50 and Breast Cancer Index) in the neoadjuvant setting, in order to better inform decision making for luminal BC beyond the exclusive contribution of clinico-pathological features.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Gene Expression , Hormones/therapeutic use , Humans , Prospective Studies , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Retrospective Studies
2.
Future Sci OA ; 7(10): FSO750, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34840807

ABSTRACT

A retrospective analysis of 70 patients with triple-negative or hormone-resistant advanced breast carcinoma who had not previously received chemotherapy was carried out. Patients received oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Overall response rate was 53% with a 9% complete response rate. Stable disease was recorded in 27% of the cases. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 months and median overall survival was 29.2 months. Toxicity was generally mild and easily manageable. These data demonstrate that this combination is feasible, safe and active as first-line treatment of triple-negative fully hormone-resistant advanced breast carcinoma patients.

3.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 9(8): 1351-61, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18473709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a severe adverse event of long-term use of bisphosphonates that heavily affects the quality of life of cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: To review epidemiologic data, pathobiology, risk factors, diagnosis and management of BRONJ. METHODS: Articles were identified by searching the PubMed and MEDLINE databases and recent meetings abstracts. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: BRONJ pathobiology is thought to be related to bisphosphonate-induced suppression of normal bone remodeling and impairment of bone blood flow. Dental extractions, daily masticatory traumas, oral infections, chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs can also play an active role. Collaboration between oncologists and dentists is essential to prevent BRONJ. A conservative approach based on pain control, oral rinses, antibiotics and limited debridement represents the current management. Optimization of therapy based on reduction of bisphosphonate doses or exposure time, newer bisphosphonates and biomolecular agents could favorably impact on BRONJ incidence.


Subject(s)
Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Bone and Bones/blood supply , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Diagnosis, Differential , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Humans , Jaw Diseases/epidemiology , Jaw Diseases/pathology , Osteonecrosis/epidemiology , Osteonecrosis/pathology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL