Changing patterns in lung transplant for respiratory failure due to COVID-19 in the U.S.

Many patients with severe COVID-19 have been affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome, which has been associated with increased mortality, and up to 31% of these survivors had persistent interstitial lung abnormalities with impaired lung function and quality of life even after 6 to 24 months after initial disease. Lung transplantation quickly emerged as a viable therapy for select patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19 by mid-2020. In this report, we identified 477 patients who underwent lung transplantation for COVID-19 in the U.S. between March 2020 and December 2022. The number of patients waitlisted and undergoing lung transplantation for COVID-19 increased steadily in the early part of the pandemic with a peak of 97 patients waitlisted between October and December 2021, before steadily decreasing since. Notably, the procedure is now increasingly being done for survivors of COVID-19 with pulmonary fibrosis, rather than for refractory ARDS patients. The 1-year post-transplant mortality was 13.7%.

Development of the Lung Transplant Frailty Scale (LT-FS).

BACKGROUND: Existing measures of frailty developed in community dwelling older adults may misclassify frailty in lung transplant candidates. We aimed to develop a novel frailty scale for lung transplantation with improved performance characteristics. METHODS: We measured the short physical performance battery (SPPB), fried frailty phenotype (FFP), Body Composition, and serum Biomarkers representative of putative frailty mechanisms. We applied a 4-step established approach (identify frailty domain variable bivariate associations with the outcome of waitlist delisting or death; build models sequentially incorporating variables from each frailty domain cluster; retain variables that improved model performance ability by c-statistic or AIC) to develop 3 candidate "Lung Transplant Frailty Scale (LT-FS)" measures: 1 incorporating readily available clinical data; 1 adding muscle mass, and 1 adding muscle mass and research-grade Biomarkers. We compared construct and predictive validity of LT-FS models to the SPPB and FFP by ANOVA, ANCOVA, and Cox proportional-hazard modeling. RESULTS: In 342 lung transplant candidates, LT-FS models exhibited superior construct and predictive validity compared to the SPPB and FFP. The addition of muscle mass and Biomarkers improved model performance. Frailty by all measures was associated with waitlist disability, poorer HRQL, and waitlist delisting/death. LT-FS models exhibited stronger associations with waitlist delisting/death than SPPB or FFP (C-statistic range: 0.73-0.78 vs. 0.57 and 0.55 for SPPB and FFP, respectively). Compared to SPPB and FFP, LT-FS models were generally more strongly associated with delisting/death and improved delisting/death net reclassification, with greater improvements with increasing LT-FS model complexity (range: 0.11-0.34). For example, LT-FS-Body Composition hazard ratio for delisting/death: 6.0 (95%CI: 2.5, 14.2), SPPB HR: 2.5 (95%CI: 1.1, 5.8), FFP HR: 4.3 (95%CI: 1.8, 10.1). Pre-transplant LT-FS frailty, but not SPPB or FFP, was associated with mortality after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The LT-FS is a disease-specific physical frailty measure with face and construct validity that has superior predictive validity over established measures.

Subphenotypes of frailty in lung transplant candidates.

Heterogeneous frailty pathobiology might explain the inconsistent associations observed between frailty and lung transplant outcomes. A Subphenotype analysis could refine frailty measurement. In a 3-center pilot cohort study, we measured frailty by the Short Physical Performance Battery, body composition, and serum biomarkers reflecting causes of frailty. We applied latent class modeling for these baseline data. Next, we tested class construct validity with disability, waitlist delisting/death, and early postoperative complications. Among 422 lung transplant candidates, 2 class model fit the best (P = .01). Compared with Subphenotype 1 (n = 333), Subphenotype 2 (n = 89) was characterized by systemic and innate inflammation (higher IL-6, CRP, PTX3, TNF-R1, and IL-1RA); mitochondrial stress (higher GDF-15 and FGF-21); sarcopenia; malnutrition; and lower hemoglobin and walk distance. Subphenotype 2 had a worse disability and higher risk of waitlist delisting or death (hazards ratio: 4.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.8-9.1). Of the total cohort, 257 underwent transplant (Subphenotype 1: 196; Subphenotype 2: 61). Subphenotype 2 had a higher need for take back to the operating room (48% vs 28%; P = .005) and longer posttransplant hospital length of stay (21 days [interquartile range: 14-33] vs 18 days [14-28]; P = .04). Subphenotype 2 trended toward fewer ventilator-free days, needing more postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and dialysis, and higher need for discharge to rehabilitation facilities (P ≤ .20). In this early phase study, we identified biological frailty Subphenotypes in lung transplant candidates. A hyperinflammatory, sarcopenic Subphenotype seems to be associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Common Noninfectious Complications Following Lung Transplantation.

According to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, both transplant volume and survival among lung transplant recipients are improving over time. However, the outcomes of lung transplantation remain challenged by multiple thoracic and extrathoracic complications. With improving lung transplant survival, patients experience prolonged exposure to chronic immunosuppressive agents that can lead to multiple infectious and noninfectious complications. This article focuses on most common noninfectious complications with significant clinical impact.

BK DNAemia and native kidney polyomavirus nephropathy following lung transplantation.

BK virus DNAemia (BKPyV) and nephropathy are common after kidney transplant; however, there are limited data on BK infections in nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients. We examined the frequency, clinical and pathologic features, and kidney and lung outcomes of BKPyV and BK virus native kidney nephropathy (BKVN) in lung transplant recipients at our center. Among 878 recipients transplanted from 2003 to 2019, 56 (6%) developed BKPyV at a median of 30.1 months after transplant (range, 0.6-213) and 11 (1.3%) developed BKVN at a median of 46 months after transplant (range, 9-213). The incidence of end-stage kidney disease was significantly higher in patients with peak viral load ≥10 000 copies/mL (39% vs 8%, P < .001). All cases of BKVN were in patients with peak viral load of ≥10 000 copies/mL, and 55% of these patients developed end-stage kidney disease. Despite the reduction of immunosuppression to treat BKVN, only 1 patient developed acute rejection, and lung function was stable >1 year. BKPyV and nephropathy are more common after lung transplantation than previously reported. Routine screening for BKPyV should be considered in all lung transplant recipients.

Quality of Life Outcomes and Associated Symptoms Reported by Lung Transplant Recipients Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: Applying a Novel Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: There are 2 main aims of lung transplantation for people with end-stage lung disease: (1) to extend life and (2) to improve its quality. Much consideration is given to how to support the longevity and functioning of the allograft, though less robust studies have been done on the quality of the recipients' lives. With an interest in providing compassionate and holistic patient-centered care, it is vital that the treatment providers accurately understand their patients' lived experience. This study aimed to describe the health-related quality of life experiences of lung transplant recipients. An interest was held for where patients may struggle, thus informing where support might be needed to achieve the best possible outcomes. METHODS: This single-center study used a validated Lung Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire, which was sent in autumn of 2020 to all of the lung transplant recipients (n = 581) under the care of Columbia University Irving Medical Center (New York, NY). RESULTS: "Anxiety/Depression" had the highest concentration of struggle responses, followed closely by "Pulmonary Symptoms" and "Neuromuscular Symptoms." "Neuromuscular Problems" and "Sexual Problems" had the highest percentage of struggle responses. As the struggles increased, the overall quality of life rating dropped proportionately. There was no correlation between the overall quality of life and graft dysfunction, age, or time out from transplant date. All of the domains held an average rating of "Satisfactory," except "Treatment Burden," which was rated as "Favorable." Those ratings dropped for the cohort of patients who died during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: With the goal of providing comprehensive care at the forefront of transplant priorities, we found the newly developed questionnaire invaluable in targeting areas for quality improvements, mostly notably respecting recipient mental health.

Nonallograft Complications of Lung Transplantation.

Long-term exposure to immunosuppressive therapy may exacerbate pre-existing medical comorbidities or result in the development of new chronic medical conditions after lung transplantation. This article focuses on common nonallograft complications with the highest impact on short- and long-term outcomes after transplantation. These include diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, kidney disease (acute and chronic), and malignancy. We discuss evidence-based strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of these nonallograft complications in this article.

One Year Into the Pandemic: Evolving COVID-19 Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients, a Single-center Experience.

In the early months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our center reported a mortality rate of 34% in a cohort of 32 lung transplant recipients with COVID-19 between March and May 2020. Since then, there has been evolving knowledge in prevention and treatments of COVID-19. To evaluate the impact of these changes, we describe the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of a more recent cohort of lung transplant recipients during the second surge and provide a comparison with our first cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all consecutive lung transplant recipients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between November 2020 and February 28, 2021. We compared baseline demographics and major outcomes between the first- and second-surge cohorts. Results: We identified 47 lung transplant recipients (median age, 60; 51% female) who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between November 2020 and February 28, 2021. The current cohort had a higher proportion of patients with mild disease (34% versus 16%) and fewer patients with a history of obesity (4% versus 25%). Sixty-six percent (n = 31) required hospitalization and were treated with remdesivir (90%) and dexamethasone (84%). Among those hospitalized, 77% (n = 24) required supplemental oxygen, and 22% (n = 7) required invasive mechanical ventilation. The overall 90-d mortality decreased from 34% to 17% from the first cohort to the second (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.85; P = 0.026). Conclusions: Although COVID-19-associated mortality rate in lung transplant recipients at our center has decreased over time, COVID-19 continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

Lung Transplantation for Pulmonary Fibrosis Associated With Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome. A Single-center Experience.

Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by oculocutaneous albinism, platelet storage defect with resultant bleeding diathesis, and pulmonary fibrosis. The bleeding diathesis associated with HPS had long been considered a contraindication to lung transplantation; consequently, few reports of successful lung transplantation for HPS exist. Methods: In the largest case series on lung transplant for HPS, we describe the characteristics of 11 lung transplant candidates with HPS-related pulmonary fibrosis, and the management and outcomes of 7 patients who underwent lung transplantation. Results: Of the 7 patients transplanted, 30-d survival was 85.7% (6/7). Six patients had at least 2 y of follow-up available with a 1-y survival of 83.3% and a 2-y survival of 83.3% (5/6). The median age at referral was 48 y (range 29-62 y). Eight patients (72.7%) were of Puerto Rican ancestry with confirmed type 1 HPS mutation. Six out of 7 patients received prophylaxis for bleeding diathesis, with a majority receiving desmopressin; 1 patient was administered aminocaproic acid infusion, and another received 2 units of platelets before surgery. Estimated blood loss and the amount of intraoperative blood product administered was highly variable with or without prophylaxis. Median blood loss was 400 mL (range 125-750) and estimated blood products administered was 700 mL (range 490-4043). Conclusions: HPS should not be considered a contraindication for lung transplantation. Although patients with HPS seem to have an increased risk of massive hemorrhage, the risk is unpredictable. Transplant teams should prepare a preoperative plan in consultation with hematology and consider the use of prophylactic platelet transfusion and desmopressin.

Malakoplakia Presenting as a Lung Mass in a Lung Transplant Recipient: Case Report.

Lung nodules or masses due to a variety of malignant or benign conditions such as opportunistic infections are observed after lung transplant. Malakoplakia is a rare complication in immunocompromised patients. Here we describe the clinical course and management of a lung transplant recipient with pulmonary malakoplakia and provide a review of the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a case of pulmonary malakoplakia due to Escherichia coli infection in a lung allograft.

Early Mobilization during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiopulmonary Failure in Adults: Factors Associated with Intensity of Treatment.

Rationale: Early mobilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-supported patients is increasingly common, but it remains unknown whether there are factors predictive of achieving higher intensity mobilization among those able to participate in physical therapy. Additionally, data regarding the safety and feasibility of early mobilization with femoral cannulation, particularly ambulation, are sparse. Objectives: To determine whether there are factors associated with achieving out-of-bed versus in-bed physical therapy in ECMO-supported patients participating in physical therapy, and whether mobilization with femoral cannulation is safe and feasible. Methods: This large, single-center, retrospective study evaluated adult patients who performed active physical therapy while receiving ECMO. Mixed effects modeling was used to identify predictors of out-of-bed versus in-bed activity. Rates of mobilization with femoral cannulation and adverse events were also reported. Results: Between April 2009 and January 2020, 511 patients were supported with ECMO in a single medical intensive care unit, of whom 177 (35%) underwent active physical therapy and were included in the analysis, including 124 of 141 (88%) bridge to lung transplantation and 53 of 370 (14%) bridge to recovery. These 177 patients accounted for 2,706 active physical therapy sessions, with 138 patients (78%) achieving out-of-bed activity. In total, 108 (61%) patients ambulated (1,284 sessions), 34 of whom had femoral cannulae (250 sessions). Bridge-to-transplant (odds ratio [OR], 17.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.12-72.1), venovenous ECMO (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.29-6.22), later cannulation year (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.37-1.98) and higher Charlson comorbidity index (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.19) were associated with increased odds of achieving out-of-bed versus in-bed physical therapy, whereas invasive mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05-0.25) and femoral cannulation (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.92) were associated with decreased odds of performing out-of-bed activities. Adverse events occurred in 2% of sessions. Conclusions: Several patient- and ECMO-related factors were associated with achieving higher intensity of early mobilization in patients participating in rehabilitation. Physical therapy with femoral cannulation was safe and feasible, and complications related to mobilization were uncommon.

Geographic disparities in lung transplantation in the United States before and after the November 2017 allocation change.

BACKGROUND: The primary lung allocation unit was expanded from the donation service area to a 250-mile radius in 2017. Prior to the change, geographic disparities in donor lung availability impacted waitlist outcomes. We sought to determine if the new allocation system improved these disparities. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the 2-year period before and after the change. Donor lung availability was defined as the ratio of donor lungs to waitlist candidates in the primary allocation unit. Transplant centers were divided into quartiles by donor lung availability. Multivariable competing risk models were used to determine the association between lung availability and waitlist outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models compared post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Prior to the allocation change, the unadjusted transplant rate at centers in the lowest and highest quartiles was 132 and 607 transplants per 100 waitlist years. Candidates in the lowest quartile of donor lung availability had a 61% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to candidates in highest quartile (sub-hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.44). After the allocation change, the disparity decreased resulting in an unadjusted transplant rate of 141 and 309 among centers in the lowest and highest quartiles. Candidates in the lowest quartile had a 38% adjusted lower transplantation rate compared to those in the highest (sHR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68). There was no significant difference in 1-year post-transplant survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although the expansion of the primary allocation unit improved disparities in waitlist outcomes without any change in post-transplant survival, there still remain significant differences due to geography.

Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.

Telerehabilitation Using Fitness Application in Patients with Severe Cystic Fibrosis Awaiting Lung Transplant: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to pilot a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program administered via a telemedicine approach using a combination of fitness application and self-selected activity in lung transplant candidates with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: We recruited adult patients with CF. The main outcome was adherence, measured by number of sessions completed in 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, six-minute walk distance (6MWD), and dyspnea. Participants were provided a personalized exercise program and equipment including a fitness application that provided exercise videos, recorded exercise time, and corresponding heart rate. We reviewed data daily and provided text messages with feedback. We compared our study outcomes to a retrospective data set of CF patients who participated in a 24-session outpatient hospital-based PR program. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Eleven patients participated in the home PR program, 45% female, age 33 ± 7 years, FEV1 27 ± 5% predicted. Sessions completed were 19 ± 12 home-based PR vs. 9 ± 4 hospital-based PR, p = .03. Fifty percent of the home-based group completed ≥24 sessions in 12 weeks versus 0% of the hospital-based patients (p = .03). There were no adverse events during exercise. Completers of the home-based program demonstrated a clinically meaningful lower decline in 6 MWD than noncompleters (6MWD -7 ± 15 vs. -86 ± 108 meters). Only one participant performed a post 6 MWD in the hospital-based PR. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe CF demonstrated adherence to home PR delivered using fitness application and self-selected activity with no adverse events. This program style may be a viable solution for telerehabilitation in severe CF and is particularly relevant in the COVID era.

Construct and Predictive Validity of Sarcopenia in Lung Transplant Candidates.

Rationale: Sarcopenia is associated with disability and death. The optimal definition and clinical relevance of sarcopenia in lung transplantation remain unknown. Objectives: To assess the construct and predictive validity of sarcopenia definitions in lung transplant candidates. Methods: In a multicenter prospective cohort of 424 lung transplant candidates, we evaluated limited (muscle mass only) and expanded (muscle mass and quality) sarcopenia definitions from the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), and a cohort-specific distribution-based lowest quartile definition. We assessed construct validity using associations with conceptually related factors. We evaluated the relationship between sarcopenia and frailty using generalized additive models. We also evaluated associations between sarcopenia definitions and key pretransplant outcomes, including disability (quantified by the Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scale [range, 0-3; higher scores = worse disability; minimally important difference, 0.3]) and waitlist delisting/death, by multivariate linear and Cox regression, respectively. Results: Sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 6% to13% by definition used. The limited EWGSOP2 definition demonstrated the highest construct validity, followed by the expanded EWGSOP2 definition and both limited and expanded FNIH and lowest quartile definitions. Sarcopenia exhibited a linear association with the risk of frailty. The EWGSOP2 and expanded lowest quartile definitions were associated with disability, ranging from 0.20 to 0.25 higher Lung Transplant Valued Life Activities scores. Sarcopenia was associated with increased risk of waitlist delisting or death by the limited and expanded lowest quartile definitions (hazard ratio [HR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-9.9 and HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-11.0, respectively) and the EWGSOP2 limited definition (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.9-8.6) but not with the three other candidate definitions. Conclusions: The prevalence and validity of sarcopenia vary by definition; the EWGSOP2 limited definition exhibited the broadest validity in lung transplant candidates. The linear relationship between low muscle mass and frailty highlights sarcopenia's contribution to frailty and also questions the clinical utility of a sarcopenia cut-point in advanced lung disease. The associations between sarcopenia and important pretransplant outcomes support further investigation into using body composition for candidate risk stratification.

Cryptococcus neoformans infective endocarditis after lung transplantation: a case report and review of the literature.

Cryptococcus neoformans infective endocarditis is rarely reported. In this report, we present a case of infective endocarditis secondary to Cryptococcus neoformans in a lung-transplant recipient and review the relevant literature. A 65-year-old man was hospitalized with hypoxemic respiratory failure and underwent left-sided single lung transplantation. In the setting of worsening hypoxemia, blood cultures were drawn, which grew C. neoformans. Lumbar puncture was performed, and CSF PCR was also positive for Cryptococcus. Further exposure history revealed that he had raised chickens while living in Peru. Transesophageal echocardiography showed an aortic valve vegetation, and he was diagnosed with cryptococcal infective endocarditis. He received liposomal amphotericin B and flucytosine for two weeks and was later transitioned to fluconazole. This case highlights the need for thorough social history prior to lung transplantation, as pulmonary colonization with C. neoformans may result in infective endocarditis after immunosuppression.

The new allocation era and policy.

Since the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued the Final Rule in 1998 as a guideline for organ transplantation and allocation policies, the lung allocation system has undergone two major changes. The first change came with the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) instead of waiting time as the primary determinant for donor lung allocation. The LAS model helped allocate donor lungs based on medical urgency and likelihood of post-transplant success. The LAS has been successful in prioritizing the sickest candidates and reducing waitlist mortality in line with the Final Rule mandates. However, the LAS model did not address geographic variability in donor lung supply and demand, leading to disparities in waiting list survival based on a patient's listing location, which was inconsistent with the Final Rule. In an urgent response to a lawsuit filed by a patient demanding broader geographic access to lungs in November 2017, the second major change in lung allocation occurred when the primary allocation unit for donor lungs expanded from the local donation service area (DSA) to a 250-nautical mile radius around the donor hospital. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network has since undergone a review of the current organ allocation systems and has approved a continuous organ distribution framework to guide the creation of a new organ allocation system without rigid geographic borders. In this review, we will describe the history of lung allocation, the changes to the allocation system and their consequences, and the potential future of lung allocation policy in the U.S.

What Awaits on the Other Side: Post-Lung Transplant Morbidity and Mortality After Pre-Transplant Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND Morbidity and mortality rates after lung transplantation remain high compared to other solid organ transplants. In the lung allocation score era, patients given the highest priority on the waitlist are those with the greatest severity of illness, who often require preoperative hospitalization. MATERIAL AND METHODS To determine the association of pre-transplant hospitalization with post-transplant outcomes, we retrospectively evaluated 448 lung transplant recipients at our center between January 2010 and July 2017 (114 hospitalized; 334 outpatient). RESULTS Survival was similar between the groups (hazard ratio 0.93 [95% CI 0.61 to 1.42], p=0.738). However, hospitalized patients had longer hospital and intensive care unit length of stay compared to outpatients - 25 vs. 18 days, (p<0.001) and 9.5 vs. 6 days, (p<0.001), respectively. Hospitalized patients had higher rates of Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction - 29.8% vs. 9.6%, p<0.001 - and remained mechanically ventilated longer - 6 vs. 3 days, p<0.001. A greater percentage of hospitalized patients needed a tracheostomy and a re-operation within 30 days - 39.5% vs. 15.3% (p<0.001) and 22.8% vs. 12.0% (p=0.005) - respectively. After discharge, 28% of hospitalized patients required acute rehabilitation compared with 12% of outpatients (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS While pre-transplant hospitalization is not associated with mortality, it is associated with significant morbidity after transplant.