ABSTRACT
AIMS: To identify the best strategy to achieve complete revascularization (CR) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease (MVD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically reviewed the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IRA-only PCI and CR guided by angiography or fractional flow reserve (FFR) in MVD-STEMI. Both frequentist (classical) and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed, including a comparative hierarchy estimation of the probability to reduce the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death and new myocardial infarction (MI). We identified 11 RCTs, including 8193 STEMI patients. Compared with IRA-only strategy, CR significantly reduced the primary endpoint (OR: 0.73; 95%CI0.55-0.97). We observed non-significant difference between angiography and FFR guidance in reducing the primary endpoint (OR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.35-1.57). The Bayesian probability analysis ranked angio-guided CR as the best intervention yielding lowest risk of all-cause death or new MI (SUCRA92%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MVD-STEMI, CR is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality and new MI compared with IRA-only PCI. Angio-guided CR is associated with the lowest risk of all-cause death or new MI, therefore the role of FFR-guidance in this setting is questionable. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Both frequentist and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to compare infarct-related artery (IRA)-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and complete revascularization (CR) guided by angiography or fractional flow reserve (FFR) in multivessel disease (MVD) and acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Eleven randomized controlled trials were identified, including 8193 STEMI patients. Compared with IRA-only strategy, CR significantly reduced the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause death and new myocardial infarction without significant difference in angio-guided and FFR-guided CR. The Bayesian probability analysis ranked angio-guided CR as the best intervention yielding lowest risk of the composite endpoint and, therefore the role of FFR-guidance in this setting is questionable.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Coronary Angiography , Network Meta-Analysis , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Myocardial Infarction/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We aim to define whether the timing of microaxial left ventricular assist device (IMLVAD) implantation might impact on mortality in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cardiogenic shock (CS) patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of PPCI, mortality in patients with AMI and CS remains high. Mechanical circulatory support is a promising bridge to recovery strategy, but evidence on its benefit is still inconclusive and the optimal timing of its utilization remains poorly explored. METHODS: We compared clinical outcomes of upstream IMLVAD use before PPCI versus bailout use after PPCI in patients with AMI CS. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the two strategies were performed. Effect size was reported as odds ratio (OR) using bailout as reference group and a random effect model was used. Study-level risk estimates were pooled through the generic inverse variance method (random effect model). RESULTS: A total of 11 observational studies were identified, including a pooled population of 6759 AMI-CS patients. Compared with a bailout approach, upstream IMLVAD was associated with significant reduction of 30-day (OR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51-0.82; I2 = 43%, adjusted OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.37-0.59; I2 = 3%, test for subgroup difference p = 0.30), 6-month (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.27-0.96; I2 = 66%), and 1-year (OR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.39-0.79; I2 = 0%) all-cause mortality. Incidence of access-related bleeding, acute limb ischemia and transfusion outcomes were similar between the two strategies. CONCLUSION: In patients with AMI-CS undergoing PPCI, upstream IMLVAD was associated with reduced early and midterm all-cause mortality when compared with a bailout strategy.
Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Angioplasty/adverse effects , Heart-Assist Devices/adverse effects , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) can be challenging for high thrombus burden and catecholamine-induced vasoconstriction. The Xposition-S stent was designed to prevent stent undersizing and minimize strut malapposition. We evaluated 1-year clinical outcomes of a nitinol, self-apposing®, sirolimus-eluting stent, pre-mounted on a novel balloon delivery system, in de novo lesions of patients presenting with STEMI undergoing pPCI. METHODS: The iPOSITION is a prospective, multicenter, post-market, observational study. The primary endpoint, target lesion failure (TLF), was defined as the composite of cardiac death, recurrent target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: The study enrolled 247 STEMI patients from 7 Italian centers. Both device and procedural success occurred in 99.2% of patients, without any death, TV-MI, TLR, or stent thrombosis during the hospital stay and at 30-day follow-up. At 1 year, TLF occurred in 2.6%, cardiac death occurred in 1.7%, TV-MI occurred in 0.4%, and TLR in 0.4% of patients. The 1-year stent thrombosis rate was 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an X-position S self-apposing® stent is feasible in STEMI pPCI, with excellent post-procedural results and 1-year outcomes.
Subject(s)
Drug-Eluting Stents , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Thrombosis , Death , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Prospective Studies , Registries , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Stents , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Coronary Stenosis , Electrocardiography/methods , Exercise Test/methods , Heart Rate , Aged , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Area Under Curve , Asymptomatic Diseases , Comorbidity , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Stenosis/epidemiology , Coronary Stenosis/pathology , Correlation of Data , Exercise/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Severity of Illness Index , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
A 48-year-old male was admitted to our institution with an anteroseptal ST-elevation myocardial infarction and angiographic evidence of a thrombotic occlusion in the ostial segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery. The percutaneous coronary intervention resulted in "no-reflow" and cardiogenic shock. We describe our successful management strategy with sequentially combined implantation of Impella CP and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenator.