Developing a mechanistic understanding of the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of letermovir and prospective drug interaction with everolimus using physiological-based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Letermovir is approved for use in cytomegalovirus-seropositive hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and is investigated in other transplant settings. Nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PKs) were observed in clinical studies after intravenous and oral dosing across a wide dose range, including the efficacious doses of 240 and 480 mg. A physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model for letermovir was built to develop a plausible explanation for the nonlinear PKs observed in clinical studies. In vitro studies suggested that letermovir elimination and distribution are mediated by saturable uridine glucuronosyltransferases (UGT)-metabolism and by saturable hepatic uptake via organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATP) 1B. A sensitivity analysis of parameters describing the metabolism and distribution mechanisms indicated that the greater than dose-proportional increase in letermovir exposure is best described by a saturable OATP1B-mediated transport. This PBPK model was further used to evaluate the drug interaction potential between letermovir and everolimus, an immunosuppressant that may be co-administered with letermovir depending on regions. Because letermovir inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and everolimus is a known CYP3A substrate, an interaction when concomitantly administered is anticipated. The drug-drug interaction simulation confirmed that letermovir will likely increase everolimus are under the curve by 2.5-fold, consistent with the moderate increase in exposure observed with midazolam in the clinic. The output highlights the importance of drug monitoring, which is common clinical practice for everolimus to maintain safe and efficacious drug concentrations in the targeted patient population when concomitantly administered with letermovir.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Letermovir Following Single- and Multiple-Dose Administration in Healthy Japanese Subjects.

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus terminase inhibitor for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of letermovir were assessed in healthy Japanese subjects in 2 phase 1 trials: trial 1-single ascending oral doses (240, 480, and 720 mg) and intravenous (IV) doses (240, 480, and 960 mg), and trial 2-multiple oral doses (240 and 480 mg once daily for 7 days). Following administration of oral single and multiple doses, letermovir was absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 2 to 4 hours, and concentrations declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of ≈10 to 13 hours. The post absorption plasma concentration-time profile of letermovir following oral administration was similar to the profile observed with IV dosing. There was minimal accumulation with multiple-dose administration. Letermovir exposure in healthy Japanese subjects was ≈1.5- to 2.5-fold higher than that observed in non-Japanese subjects. Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, weight differences primarily accounted for the higher exposures observed in Asians. Letermovir was generally well tolerated following oral and IV administration to healthy Japanese subjects.

Proposal of a prediction model describing the metabolic interaction between warfarin and sorafenib using a population pharmacokinetic approach.

OBJECTIVE: We attempted to examine the applicability of a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model describing the metabolic interaction between warfarin and sorafenib due to CYP2C9 inhibition and to predict the plasma concentrations of sorafenib and S-warfarin, the international normalized ratio (INR), and the optimal maintenance dose of warfarin in the presence of sorafenib in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sorafenib inhibition constant for S-warfarin metabolism was determined in vitro, and the unbound fraction in the liver was estimated using the published equations. A population PK-PD model describing the interaction between warfarin and sorafenib assuming competitive metabolic inhibition of S-warfarin by sorafenib was developed using NONMEM. The model was evaluated using clinical data and INR collected from the literature. RESULTS: The observed time courses of INR retrieved from Japanese and Caucasian patients given warfarin and sorafenib were mostly within the 90% range of the predicted values. Then, we predicted the plasma sorafenib and S-warfarin concentrations and INR after administration of warfarin (3 mg/day) alone and warfarin + sorafenib (800 mg/day). The predicted mean plasma S-warfarin concentration and INR at steady state were almost 6 and 2 times greater, respectively, in the presence of sorafenib than those for warfarin alone. The predicted S-warfarin concentrations and INR after reduction of the warfarin dose (0.5 mg/day) in the presence of sorafenib were comparable to those after 3 mg/day warfarin alone. CONCLUSION: The proposed population PK-PD model has the potential to predict an increase in INR quantitatively after concurrent administration of warfarin and sorafenib.

Prediction of the impact of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes on warfarin-sorafenib interactions in whites and Asians.

Aim: To predict the impact of the different CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes on warfarin-sorafenib interactions in whites and Asians. Materials & methods: The influences of the CYP2C9*1/*3 and VKORC1 -1639 A/A genotypes on increases in anticoagulation responses (international normalized ratio [INR]) in the presence of sorafenib were predicted using the population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model in whites and Asians. Results: INRs were predicted to be 2.0-2.1- versus 1.8-1.9-times higher in the presence of sorafenib in the CYP2C9 (*1/*1 vs *1/*3) groups than those for warfarin alone in both whites and Asians. INRs were also predicted to be 2.1-2.2- versus 1.9-2.1-times higher in the VKORC1 (GG or GA vs AA) groups. Conclusion: Warfarin-sorafenib interactions might be similar irrespective of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes or ethnicity.

Comparison of pharmacodynamics between carvedilol and metoprolol in rats with isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy: effects of carvedilol enantiomers.

A recent clinical study has shown that carvedilol has a significantly more favorable effect than metoprolol on survival rate in patients with heart failure. This may be due to actions of carvedilol such as beta(2)-adrenoceptor blockade, alpha-adrenergic receptor blockade and other properties such as anti-oxidant effects that are not yet fully understood. We compared the effects of racemic carvedilol, metoprolol and carvedilol enantiomers on cardiac hypertrophy at similar heart rate in rats with isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Continuous administration of isoproterenol for 2 weeks produced heart failure, which is characterized by an increased heart rate, cardiac hypertrophy and downregulation of beta-adrenoceptors. The doses of racemic carvedilol and metoprolol were adjusted to obtain a similar heart rate in rats with isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy. The reduction of left ventricular weight and improvement of cAMP production induced by carvedilol were superior to those induced by metoprolol. Although heart rate, blood pressure and cAMP production were not affected by R-carvedilol, left ventricular weight was significantly reduced as a result of alpha-adrenoceptor blockade. The improvement of cAMP production by S-carvedilol was significantly higher than that induced by coadministration of R-carvedilol and metoprolol, suggesting that beta(2)-adrenoceptor blockade partly contributed to the improvement of signal transduction in rats with isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy. This study has demonstrated that the effects of carvedilol on cAMP production and cardiac hypertrophy in rats with isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy are superior to those induced by metoprolol at a similar heart rate.