A Prospective Clinical Study of a Percutaneous Vascular Access System for Hemodialysis Catheters.

INTRODUCTION: Dysfunctional or infected hemodialysis polyester-cuffed catheters often require removal and are dissected out. The DermaPort™, percutaneous vascular access system (PVAS) permanently integrates a titanium mesh with the skin forming a stable, sterile barrier that allows for catheter placement, adjustment, or catheter exchange. This study aimed to describe the use and clinical outcomes of the DermaPort PVAS. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who were receiving hemodialysis via a tunneled catheter were enrolled in this prospective open-label study. Assessments were performed biweekly for the first month and monthly thereafter, which included physical examination of the site of implantation for infection, catheter blood flow, and need for interventions to maintain catheter patency. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a visual analog score. RESULTS: Implantation of technical success was 100% with the implantation site demonstrating early tissue incorporation after 2 weeks and full incorporation within 4 weeks. The DermaPort™ successfully enabled 31 catheter exchanges and 10 repositions thru the port without dissection in 18 patients with nine repositions (90%) performed at bedside. The mean primary patency of the DermaPort™ was 172 ± 150 days, and mean secondary patency was 430 ± 203 days. There were no reportable serious adverse events in 12,100 catheter days of use and zero explantations of the device attributed to infection. The observed catheter infection rate was 0.33/1000 days. CONCLUSIONS: The DermaPort™ system can be effectively implanted and facilitates catheter interventions in hemodialysis patients requiring long-term catheter use and has a lower infection rate than historical catheter infection rates. Clinical Trial Protocol Number DermaPort-001 (no clinicaltrials.gov number as study was performed 9 years ago). Health Canada Reference Application Number: 118393.

Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital.

BACKGROUND: It is important for physicians to be aware of the radiation doses as well as the risks associated with diagnostic imaging procedures that they are ordering. METHODS: A survey was administered to patients, medical students, and referring physicians from a number of specialties to determine background knowledge regarding radiation exposure and risk associated with commonly ordered medical imaging tests. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients, 32 referring physicians, and 30 medical students completed the survey. The majority of patients (92%) were not informed of the radiation risks associated with tests that they were scheduled to receive and had false perceptions about the use of radiation and its associated risks. Physicians and medical students had misconceptions about the use of ionizing radiation in a number of radiologic examinations; for example, 25% and 43% of physicians and medical students, respectively, were unaware that interventional procedures used ionizing radiation, and 28% of physicians were unaware that mammography used ionizing radiation. Computed tomographies and barium studies were thought to be associated with the least ionizing radiation among physicians. CONCLUSION: There is a need for educating the public, medical students, and referring physicians about radiation exposure and associated risk so that (1) patients receiving multiple medical imaging tests are aware of the radiation that they are receiving and (2) physicians and future physicians will make informed decisions when ordering such tests to limit the amount of radiation that patients receive and to promote informed consent among patients.

Pathologic assessment of radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary metastases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pathologically the effectiveness of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the treatment of pulmonary metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with multiple pulmonary metastases scheduled for surgical resection were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent RF ablation of one percutaneously accessible tumor and within 2-4 weeks underwent surgical resection of the ablated tumor and any additional lesions. Resected tumors all were assessed by routine light microscopy, and selected tumors were assessed by immunohistochemistry with MIB1 and proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Relationship of ablation zone to the tumor and viability of the ablated tumors were assessed. RESULTS: Nine patients (four men and five women) 46-76 years of age were included in the study. Four patients had metastatic colorectal carcinoma, and five patients had metastases from soft tissue sarcomas. Ablated tumors ranged from 1.0-3.0 cm in diameter. Each target lesion was completely encompassed by the ablation zone. All tumor tissue within the ablation zone showed characteristic changes of coagulative necrosis with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Tumors showed preservation of MIB1 staining but loss of PCNA protein staining. RF ablation resulted in complete coagulative necrosis of all the pulmonary metastases treated in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although this series is small, it provides histologic support for RF ablation as an effective treatment for selected pulmonary metastases.

Imaging and transcatheter arterial embolization for traumatic splenic injuries: review of the literature.

The spleen is the most commonly injured visceral organ in blunt abdominal trauma in both adults and children. Nonoperative management is the current standard of practice for patients who are hemodynamically stable. However, simple observation alone has been reported to have a failure rate as high as 34%; the rate is even higher among patients with high-grade splenic injuries (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma [AAST] grade III-V). Over the past decade, angiography with transcatheter splenic artery embolization, an alternative nonoperative treatment for splenic injuries, has increased splenic salvage rates to as high as 97%. With the help of splenic artery embolization, success rates of more than 80% have also been described for high-grade splenic injuries. We discuss the role of computed tomography and transcatheter splenic artery embolization in the diagnosis and treatment of blunt splenic trauma. We review technical considerations, indications, efficacy and complication rates. We also propose an algorithm to guide the use of angiography and splenic embolization in patients with traumatic splenic injury.

Interdisciplinary Canadian guidelines on the use of metal stents in the gastrointestinal tract for oncological indications.

OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the appropriate use of gastrointestinal stents for oncologic indications. This document describes the use of gastrointestinal stents by appropriately trained physicians. METHODS: This document is based on a review of the published evidence and supplemented by consensus expert opinion. Gastrointestinal stenting has been evaluated in terms of technical success, complications, patient satisfaction, clinical outcome, and cost-benefit analysis. This document was approved by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association; approval from the other relevant Canadian societies is pending. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal stenting has a valuable role in the management of gastrointestinal malignancy. The decision to use such devices should be taken after comprehensive multidisciplinary clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic evaluation.

Safety and efficacy of gastrointestinal stents in cancer patients at a community hospital.

OBJECTIVE: Increasing scientific evidence supports the use of self-expanding metallic gastrointestinal (GI) stents. The commonly accepted primary indications are their usefulness as a bridge to surgery and for palliation to avoid surgery. These stents have been shown to have high technical success and low complication rates, leading to improved quality of life for patients. They have also been shown to be cost-effective when compared with alternative therapies. The objective of this study is to present a retrospective review of our local experience. METHODS: Attempts were made to place 23 GI stents in 16 patients for palliative cancer indications. RESULTS: Follow-up was 5-352 days (mean 81.9 d). Presenting symptoms included abdominal distention or pain (81%), nausea or vomiting (69%), constipation (31%) and weight loss (19%). Stents were placed in the colon (11 patients), duodenum (4 patients) or esophagus (1 patient). The technical success rate was 91.3%, the clinical success rate (defined as any improvement in symptoms in patients successfully receiving a stent) was 85.7%, and the complication rate was 21.4% among patients successfully receiving a stent, or 18.8% overall. Of 14 patients successfully receiving at least 1 stent, 10 (71%) were discharged home after a mean of 11.5 days (range 1-26 d). Of patients successfully receiving at least 1 stent, 12 (86%) had passed away at the time of last follow-up. Patients who successfully received a stent but who have since passed away (either in hospital or out of hospital) had their stent(s) in situ for a mean of 57 days (range 5-180 d). CONCLUSION: On the basis of our data, we believe that GI stents may be safely and effectively used in a community hospital setting and that they provide benefit in the palliative care population.

Performance of carotid stenting, vertebroplasty, and EVAR: how many are we doing and why are we not doing more? A survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of interventional radiologists who currently perform 3 interventional procedures: carotid stenting, vertebroplasty, and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in Canada, and impediments to their future performance by other interventional radiologists. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was emailed to all members of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA). The survey was open for a period of 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 75 survey responses were received (of an estimated 247). Carotid stenting, vertebroplasty, and EVAR were performed at 40%, 59%, and 46% of respondents' centres respectively. Wait times, from referral to consultation, and from consultation to procedure, were both typically between 2 to 4 weeks, longer for EVAR. Of respondents currently not performing these procedures, 26%, 28%, and 16% anticipated beginning to perform carotid stenting, vertebroplasty, and EVAR, respectively, in the proceeding year from time of survey. Of respondents who wished to perform the procedure, the greatest impediments were a lack of training, lack of a referral base, and lack of support from their radiology department and (or) colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Although carotid stenting, vertebroplasty, and EVAR were being performed at about one-half of respondent's centres, and there will likely be greater adoption of the procedures in the near future, there remain substantial impediments. The greatest impediments to additional radiologists performing these procedures were a lack of training, lack of referral base, and lack of support from their radiology department and (or) colleagues. The former impediment suggested an unmet need for additional training courses.

Uterine fibroid embolization: CME update for family physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To review evidence supporting the use of uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) as an alternative to hysterectomy and myomectomy for managing uterine fibroids. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: MEDLINE was searched using the MeSH terms embolization, therapeutic; leiomyoma; treatment outcome; pregnancy; and clinical trials. Most published studies on use of UFE for management of uterine fibroids provide level II evidence. MAIN MESSAGE: For 71% to 92% of patients, UFE is effective at alleviating fibroid-related symptoms. After UFE, fibroids are reduced in size by 42% to 83%. Patients' satisfaction with the procedure is high (>90%), and UFE is safe and has a low rate of major complications (1.25%). When compared with hysterectomy, UFE is associated with fewer major complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. Although successful pregnancy following UFE is possible, there is insufficient evidence to advocate use of UFE over myomectomy for management of uterine fibroids in women wishing to preserve fertility. CONCLUSION: For treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids, UFE is a safe and effective nonsurgical alternative to hysterectomy and myomectomy.

Back stab: percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence supporting use of percutaneous vertebroplasty for relief of pain and mechanical stability in patients with vertebral compression fractures unrelieved by conventional measures. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Ovid MEDLINE was searched from January 1966 to December2006 for all English-language papers on vertebroplasty. The quality of evidence in these papers was graded according to the 4-point classification system of evidence-based medicine. Level II evidence currently supports use of vertebroplasty. MAIN MESSAGE: Vertebroplasty alleviates pain from vertebral compression fractures that result from osteoporosis, hemangiomas, malignancies, and vertebral osteonecrosis. Vertebroplasty has provided substantial pain relief in 60% to 100% of patients; has decreasedanalgesic use in 34% to 91% of patients; and has improved physical mobility in 29% to 100% of patients. Contraindications to vertebroplasty include asymptomatic compression fractures of the vertebral body, vertebra plana, retropulsed bone fragments or tumours, active infection, uncorrectable coagulopathy, allergy to the bone cement or opacification agent, severe cardiopulmonary disease, pregnancy, and pre-existing radiculopathy. The short-term complication rate was found to be 0.5% to 54%. Rare but serious complications include compression of the spinal cord or nerve root, infection, cement embolization causing pulmonary infarct and clinical symptoms, paradoxical embolization of the cerebral artery, and severe hematomas. CONCLUSION: Vertebroplasty is a safe and effective treatment for vertebral fractures that cannot be treated using conservative measures.

Awareness of interventional radiology among patients referred to the interventional radiology department: a survey of patients in a large Canadian community hospital.

PURPOSE: To quantify the level of knowledge about interventional radiology (IR) among patients referred for an IR procedure and to develop recommendations on how to increase public awareness of IR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paper surveys were prospectively administered to consecutive patients scheduled to undergo an IR procedure at a community hospital. The study was terminated at the accrual of 100 completed surveys. RESULTS: Totals of 28% and 6% knew generally the job of a diagnostic radiologist and interventional radiologist, respectively, and 6% had heard of the field of IR before their referral (despite 21% having undergone a procedure previously). Before their arrival in the IR department, 87% had not received any information about IR. Three percent, 0%, 4%, 82%, and 82% had heard about uterine artery embolization, radiofrequency ablation, vertebroplasty, biopsy (any type), and angioplasty, respectively. After the procedures, 84% had a clearer view of what interventional radiologists do, but 98% believed that most others did not know what IR was. When asked how best to educate the public about IR, the responses were: unsure (39%), other (19%), pamphlets (12%), information from physicians (9%), television (8%), and Internet (7%). Overall, the mean satisfaction rate was 8.8 (with 0 representing the minimum and 10 representing the maximum), and 97% would choose IR over surgery for future treatments. CONCLUSIONS: These data quantify and strongly support the views that (1) even among patients specifically referred to IR for a procedure, the majority of people are unaware of what the field is or may offer; and (2) most patients were satisfied with their IR experience. Six results-based recommendations are made to increase public awareness about IR.

Limitations influencing interventional radiology in Canada: results of a national survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA).

PURPOSE: To describe the current state and limitations to interventional radiology (IR) in Canada through a large, national survey of Canadian interventional radiologists. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was offered to members of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA). Only staff radiologists were invited to participate. RESULTS: Seventy-five (75) responses were received from a total of 247, giving a response rate of 30%. Respondents were split approximately equally between academic centers (47%) and community practice (53%), and the majority of interventional radiologists worked in hospitals with either 200-500 (49%) or 500-1,000 (39%) beds. Procedures listed by respondents as most commonly performed in their practice included PICC line insertion (83%), angiography and stenting (65%), and percutaneous biopsy (37%). Procedures listed as not currently performed but which interventional radiologists believed would benefit their patient population included radiofrequency ablation (36%), carotid stenting (34%), and aortic stenting (21%); the majority of respondents noted that a lack of support from referring services was the main reason for not performing these procedures (56%). Impediments to increasing scope and volume of practice in Canadian IR were most commonly related to room or equipment shortage (35%), radiologist shortage (33%), and a lack of funding or administrative support (28%). CONCLUSION: Interventional radiology in Canada is limited by a number of factors including funding, manpower, and referral support. A concerted effort should be undertaken by individual interventional radiologists and IR organizations to increase training capacity, funding, remuneration, and public exposure to IR in order to help advance the subspecialty.

The clinical interventional radiologist: results of a national survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of clinical responsibility interventional radiologists in Canada currently have within their practice and would like to have within their future practices. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was e-mailed to all members of the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. The survey was open for a period of 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 75 surveys were received, of a possible 247, a response rate of 30.4%. Responses regarding general measures of clinical duties were collected. The current situation in Canada is mixed, in that while most (82%) respondents perform procedures that require an overnight admission, only 11% have a dedicated interventional radiology (IR) ward and 29% have admitting privileges. Most (73%) respondents stated that interventional radiologists in Canada should become more clinical. The most common reason cited for a lack of admitting privileges was a lack of time (44%), followed by a lack of hospital or administrative support (40%), "other" (20%), and inadequate remuneration (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents believe that interventional radiologists should become more clinically oriented. The most frequently noted obstacles to becoming more clinically oriented are reluctant administration, lack of time, and inadequate remuneration for clinical duties.

Successful recanalization of a longstanding complete left subclavian vein occlusion by radiofrequency perforation with use of a radiofrequency guide wire.

Treatment with radiofrequency (RF) energy can be used to ablate or perforate tissues. The latter involves lower power, higher voltage, and much shorter treatment time, and it is thought to induce much less collateral tissue damage. To date, RF perforation has been successfully used for various cardiac interventions; however, to our knowledge, there has not been a report of its use for peripheral vascular disease. This report describes the successful recanalization of a longstanding occlusion of a left subclavian vein in a 73-year-old woman with polycystic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease undergoing chronic hemodialysis treatment via an upper-extremity arteriovenous fistula. Multiple previous attempts at mechanical recanalization were unsuccessful. Recanalization was achieved by RF perforation with use of a PowerWire RF guide wire.

Uterine artery embolization--inpatient and outpatient therapy: a comparison of cost, safety, and patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether uterine artery embolization (UAE) can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure without increased complications and readmission rates or decreased patient satisfaction rates and to determine the Canadian cost difference between performing UAE as an outpatient, compared with inpatient, procedure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review and patient survey of 2 groups of patients, 132 patients who underwent inpatient UAE and 20 patients who underwent outpatient UAE. Of these, 82 and 18, respectively, were successfully surveyed by telephone. Variables examined included presenting complaints, postprocedural symptoms, patient satisfaction, and readmission or complication rates. We also performed a detailed Canadian cost analysis comparing inpatient with outpatient UAE. RESULTS: We did not find any statistically significant difference between inpatient and outpatient UAE on any of the patient variables measured, including presenting complaints, postprocedural symptoms, patient satisfaction, and readmission or complication rates. We also found that outpatient UAE costs significantly less than inpatient UAE, primarily owing to decreased hospital overhead costs for overnight admission. In Ontario, inpatient UAE costs per patient totalled dollars 3216.22, whereas outpatient costs totalled dollars 2194.53--a saving of dollars 1021.69, which represents a 31.8% cost reduction. CONCLUSION: Given these results, we recommend that centres consider performing UAE as an outpatient procedure. A key enabling factor is the ability to have several hours of close nursing supervision of the patient postprocedure, prior to discharge.

Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of uterine fibroids.

Four patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids measuring less than 6 cm underwent laparoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using multiprobe-array electrodes. Follow-up of the treated fibroids was performed with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and patients' symptoms were assessed by telephone interviews. The procedure was initially technically successful in 3 of the 4 patients and MRI studies at 1 month demonstrated complete fibroid ablation. Symptom improvement, including a decrease in menstrual bleeding and pain, was achieved in 2 patients at 3 months. At 7 months, 1 of these 2 patients experienced symptom worsening which correlated with recurrent fibroid on MRI. The third, initially technically successfully treated patient did not experience any symptom relief after the procedure and was ultimately diagnosed with adenomyosis. Our preliminary results suggest that RFA is a technically feasible treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids in appropriately selected patients.

Attitudes of and influences on residents in English Canadian radiology programs regarding interventional radiology: results of a national survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA).

PURPOSE: There has been a North American trend toward reduced application to the subspecialty of Interventional Radiology (IR). Out of fear of a looming manpower shortage, this survey was conducted to better understand awareness and attitudes toward IR by radiology residents-in-training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous online survey was emailed to the Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program Director/Department Chairperson of each of the 13 English medical schools in Canada, to be forwarded to each respective Radiology Residency Program's radiology residents. The survey was open for a period of 1 month. The survey consisted of 29 questions, which could be answered online using a web-based program. Responses to questions were tabulated and comments recorded. RESULTS: A total of 84 survey responses were received of a possible 333 (25%), including responses from each of the 13 English Programs. Responses regarding demographics, training, careers aspirations and motivations, and influences were collected. Fifty-one percent of respondents reported being either "moderately" or "very" interested in the field of IR; however, only 13% reported intention to perform an IR fellowship. A number of issues were identified as dissuading current radiology residents from pursuing IR, including income, work hours and hours of on-call, and turf issues. CONCLUSION: A number of issues were identified as factors which prevented residents with an interest in IR from applying to IR fellowships. These must be addressed to increase IR recruitment rates of radiology residents.