ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In adults, upfront intraoperative cholangiogram with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is well accepted for management of choledocholithiasis. Despite recent evidence supporting LCBDE utility in children, there has been hesitation to adopt this surgery first (SF) approach over ERCP first (EF) due to perceived technical challenges. We compared rates of successful stone clearance during LCBDE between adult and pediatric patients to evaluate if pediatric surgeons could anticipate similar rates of successful clearance. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review of pediatric (<18 years) and adult patients with choledocholithiasis managed from 2018 to 2024 was performed. Demographic and clinical data were obtained. Rate of successful duct clearance with LCBDE was compared. Surgical and endoscopic complications (infections, bleeding, pancreatitis, bile leak) were also compared. RESULTS: 724 patients, 333 (45.9%) pediatric and 391 (54.0%) adults, were included. The median age of pediatric vs adult patients was 15.2 years [13.1, 16.6] vs 55.5 years [34.1, 70.5], respectively. Of these, 201 (60.4%) pediatric vs 169 (43.2%) adult patients underwent SF, p < 0.001. LCBDE was attempted in 84 (41.7%) pediatric vs 140 (82.8%) adults, p = 0.002. LCBDE success was higher in pediatric vs adult patients (82.1% vs 71.4%, p = 0.004). Complications rates were similar however, pediatric patients who underwent EF had higher endoscopic complications (9.1% vs 3.6%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: LCBDE is highly successful in children vs adults with no increased surgical complications. This data, coupled with the limited ERCP access for children, supports that LCBDE is an equally effective tool for managing choledocholithiasis in children as is accepted in adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The anterior stove-in chest (ASIC) is a rare form of flail chest involving bilateral rib or sternal fractures resulting in an unstable chest wall that caves into the thoracic cavity. Given ASIC has only been described in a handful of case reports, this study sought to review our institution's experience in the surgical management of ASIC injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with ASIC was conducted at our level I trauma center from 1//2021 to 3//2023. Information pertaining to patient demographics, fracture pattern, operative management, and outcomes was obtained and compared across patients in the case series. RESULTS: 6 patients met inclusion criteria, all males aged 37-78 years. 5 suffered motor vehicle collisions, and 1 was a pedestrian struck by an automobile. The median injury severity score was 28. All received ORIF within 5 days of admission, most commonly for ongoing respiratory distress. Patients 2 and 4 underwent bilateral ORIF of the ribs and sternum while patients 1, 5, and 6 underwent left-sided repair. Patient 3 required ORIF of left ribs and the sternum to stabilize their injuries. 5 of 6 patients were liberated from the ventilator and survived to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates successful operative management of 6 patients with ASIC and suggests that early operative intervention with ORIF for affected segments may improve respiratory mechanics, ability to wean from the ventilator, and overall survival. Further research is needed to generate standardized guidelines for the management of this uncommon and complex thoracic injury.