Determinants of implementing reablement into research or practice: A concept mapping study.

PURPOSE: Reablement is a health and social model of care gaining international prominence. It is included in some publicly funded healthcare systems in Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden and other European countries. To advance reablement research and practice, we aimed to synthesize expert opinion on opportunities and challenges to delivering care with this model. METHODS: We invited authors of reablement publications and other experts from the field to take part in a three-step online concept mapping exercise: (i) brainstorming statements based on a focus prompt; followed by (ii) sorting and (iii) rating statements. We invited 63 participants, of whom 19 participants generated 114 statements. Two authors reviewed each statement independently then met three times to determine one main idea/statement and removed unrelated or duplicate ideas. The research team used concept mapping software and online and email discussion to generate clusters or groups of determinants. RESULTS: There were 58 statements for sorting and rating; 11 and 12 participants completed the sorting and rating steps, respectively. The five clusters were person and caregiver elements for participation; key reablement components for success; reablement content and delivery; organizational factors; and provider beliefs and training. Statements rated as both highly important and feasible to implement into practice were generally captured under the domains of goal setting and pursuit and person-centred care. CONCLUSION: These results generate hypotheses for future research and practice in reablement for older adults.

Exploring behavior change techniques for reablement: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Reablement is a team-based person-centered health and social care model, most commonly available for community-dwelling older adults. Understanding the components of reablement and how it is delivered, received, and enacted facilitates best evidence and practice. Determining behavior change techniques (BCTs) or strategies is an important step to operationalize implementation of reablement. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify BCTs used within reablement studies. METHODS: We registered our study with the Joanna Briggs Institute and conducted five database searches. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies focused on adults and older adults without significant cognitive impairment or dementia receiving reablement, and all study designs, years, and languages. We excluded studies focused on reablement for people with dementia or reablement training programs. The last search was on April 8, 2021. Two authors screened independently at Level 1 (title and abstract) and 2 (full text). Two authors adjudicated BCTs for each study, and a third author confirmed the final list. RESULTS: We identified 567 studies (591 publications) and included 21 studies (44 publications) from six global locations. We identified 27 different BCTs across all studies. The three most common BCTs for reablement were goal setting (behavior), social support (unspecified), and instruction on how to perform a behavior. CONCLUSIONS: We highlight some behavioral components of reablement and encourage detailed reporting to increase transparency and replication of the intervention. Future research should explore effective BCTs (or combinations of) to include within reablement to support health behavior adoption and maintenance.

Defining and implementing patient-centered care: An umbrella review.

OBJECTIVES: Patient- or person-centered care (PCC) integrates people's preferences, values, and beliefs into health decision-making. Gaps exist for defining and implementing PCC; therefore, we aimed to identify core elements of PCC and synthesize implementation facilitators and barriers. METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews (umbrella review) and included peer-reviewed literature for adults in community/primary care settings. Two reviewers independently screened at Level 1 and 2, extracted data and appraised the quality of reviews. Three reviewers conducted a thematic analysis, and we present a narrative synthesis of findings. RESULTS: There were 2371 citations screened, and 10 systematic reviews included. We identified 10 PCC definitions with common elements, such as patient empowerment, patient individuality, and a biopsychosocial approach. Implementation factors focused on communication, training healthcare providers, and organizational structure. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a synthesis of key PCC elements to include in a future definition, and an overview of elements to consider for implementing PCC into practice. We extend existing literature by identifying clinician empowerment and culture change at the systems-level as two future areas to prioritize to enable routine integration of PCC into practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings may be useful for researchers and or health providers delivering and evaluating PCC.