Clinical assessment and comparison of ACL reconstruction using synthetic graft (Neoligaments versus FiberTape).

BACKGROUND: Due to the low potential for primary biological healing of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the most popular approach is currently reconstruction using a graft. Recent research indicates that the technique of strengthening a damaged ligament with synthetic tapes (internal bracing) may be an alternative to reconstructive treatment, especially in cases of partial ACL damage. OBJECTIVES: To compare and evaluate the possibility of using a synthetic graft (Neoligaments or FiberTape) to treat partial lesions of the ACL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Selected from a pool of 128 patients undergoing primary unilateral intra-articular ACL reconstruction due to partial lesion of the ACL, group I (Neoligaments) and group II (FiberTape) each included 30 patients. Range of motion (ROM), the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test and the pivot-shift test, the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 scale were used for assessment. Follow-up was carried out after 2 years. RESULTS: The knee joint regained anterior stability in both the subjective and objective assessments in all patients in both groups. The subjective results were respectively: in group I, 97.2 ±3.2 points on the Lysholm scale and 93.9 ±6.1 points on the IKDC 2000 scale; in group II, 96.1 ±4.9 points on the Lysholm scale and 93.2 ±6.8 points on the IKDC 2000 scale. Group comparison of the results of the IKDC 2000 scale, Lysholm Scale and ROM obtained postoperatively showed no statistically significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of partial ACL lesions using a synthetic graft allows regained stability of the knee joint. The results of subjective assessment are comparable with the functional assessment results. The comparison between Neoligaments and FiberTape shows the same functional and objective results, although FiberTape is preferable from an economical perspective.

Treatment results and safety assessment of the LARS system for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the prevailing procedure in cases of ACL rupture. OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term safety of implementing a synthetic ligament with the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) in primary reconstruction of the ACL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective analysis involved 403 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction with the same results in clinical and functional assessments. The patients comprised 2 groups. In group I, a LARS graft was implemented, while in group II, an autograft was used. The Lachman test, anterior drawer test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm scale, IKDC 2000, pain posited to be experienced, the possibility of postoperative complications, the time required to return to work, and revision surgery were all considered and analyzed. RESULTS: The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score in group I ranged from 37.34 ±8.22 mm on day 3 to 17.21 ±5.45 mm on day 28. In group II, it ranged from 64.72 ±10.20 mm on day 3 (p < 0.05) to 18.67 ±6.57 mm on day 28. The period of time taken to return to office work in group I was 7.04 ±1.82 weeks, and 9.21 ±1.75 weeks in group II (p < 0.05). The time taken to return to physical work in group I was 20.50 ±2.91 weeks, and 21.12 ±3.12 weeks in group II. Postoperative scar and local complications were statistically less prominent in group I. The cost and number of revision surgeries were greater in the first group. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the ACL using a synthetic graft such as LARS yields similar results to an autograft in a cohort follow-up. Long-term results show a large number of revision surgeries when LARS is used. This method should be used with caution.