A Phase I Trial of Surgical Resection and Intraoperative Hyperthermic Cisplatin and Gemcitabine for Pleural Mesothelioma.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this single-institution phase I clinical trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine added to cisplatin and delivered as heated intraoperative chemotherapy after resection of malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: The extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) treatment arms were based on investigators' assessment of patient fitness and potential for macroscopic complete resection. Previously established intracavitary dosing of cisplatin (range 175-225 mg/m2) with systemic cytoprotection was used in combination with escalating doses of gemcitabine, following a 3-plus-3 design from 100 mg/m2 in 100-mg increments. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2011, 141 patients were enrolled and 104 completed treatment. The median age of those completing treatment was 65 years (range 43-85 years), and 22 (21%) were female. In the EPP arm (n = 59), 31 patients (53%) had the epithelioid histologic type and the median radiographic tumor volume was 236 cm3 (range 16-4285 cm3). In the P/D arm (n = 41), 29 patients (71%) had the epithelioid histologic type and the median tumor volume was 79 cm3 (range 6-1107 cm3). The operative mortality rate was 2%, and 35 and 22 serious adverse events were encountered among 27 patients (46%) and 16 patients (39%) in the EPP and P/D arms, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 leukopenia) was observed in two patients who were receiving 1100 mg/m2 of gemcitabine, thus establishing the maximum tolerated dose at 1000 mg/m2, in combination with 175 mg/m2 of cisplatin. The median overall and recurrence-free survival times in treated patients were 20.3 and 10.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combination cisplatin and gemcitabine heated intraoperative chemotherapy can be administered safely and feasibly in the context of complete surgical resection of malignant pleural mesothelioma by EPP or P/D.

Multicenter evaluation of a new closed system drug-transfer device in reducing surface contamination by antineoplastic hazardous drugs.

PURPOSE: Results of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of a recently introduced closed system drug-transfer device (CSTD) in reducing surface contamination during compounding and simulated administration of antineoplastic hazardous drugs (AHDs) are reported. METHODS: Wipe samples were collected from 6 predetermined surfaces in compounding and infusion areas of 13 U.S. cancer centers to establish preexisting levels of surface contamination by 2 marker AHDs (cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil). Stainless steel templates were placed over the 6 previously sampled surfaces, and the marker drugs were compounded and infused per a specific protocol using all components of the CSTD. Wipe samples were collected from the templates after completion of tasks and analyzed for both marker AHDs. RESULTS: Aggregated results of wipe sampling to detect preexisting contamination at the 13 study sites showed that overall, 66.7% of samples (104 of 156) had detectable levels of at least 1 marker AHD; subsequent testing after CSTD use per protocol found a sample contamination rate of 5.8% (9 of 156 samples). In the administration areas alone, the rate of preexisting contamination was 78% (61 of 78 samples); with use of the CSTD protocol, the contamination rate was 2.6%. Twenty-six participants rated the CSTD for ease of use, with 100% indicating that they were satisfied or extremely satisfied. CONCLUSION: A study involving a rigorous protocol and 13 cancer centers across the United States demonstrated that the CSTD reduced surface contamination by cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil during compounding and simulated administration. Participants reported that the CSTD was easy to use.

Denosumab in hypercalcemia of malignancy: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Denosumab is a nuclear factor-kappa ligand monoclonal antibody whose FDA-approved indications include treatment of osteoporosis, bone loss with certain anticancer hormonal agents, and prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. In clinical trials, the incidence of severe hypocalcemia has been reported as 3.1-10.8%. To date, case reports and two clinical trials have reported the use of denosumab in the management of hypercalcemia of malignancy. No reports of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia have been reported for the hypercalcemia of malignancy population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who received denosumab for hypercalcemia of malignancy to describe the effects of denosumab on calcium levels at our institution. RESULTS: Seven patients received doses of denosumab for hypercalcemia of malignancy. The most common tumor types were breast cancer (n = 3) and hematologic malignancies (n = 2). All patients had bone involvement. Two patients received single doses of 60 mg. The other five patients received 120 mg. The mean corrected calcium levels were 13.7 mg/dL and 12.24 mg/dL for the days of admission and denosumab administration, respectively (p = 0.1889). The mean corrected calcium level for the last known value was 9.92 mg/dL, while in house (p = 0.0016). Supportive care prior to denosumab included hydration (n = 7), bisphosphonates (n = 6), and calcitonin (n = 5). One patient had a calcium level of 6.6 mg/dL on day 4 after denosumab, requiring calcium supplementation and telemetry. Of the seven patients treated with denosumab for hypercalcemia of malignancy at our institution, six patients were discharged alive. Of these, one patient died two days after discharge. Last-known follow-up was a median of 26 days, range, 3-195, for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab helped decrease calcium in patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy. However, symptomatic hypocalcemia may result from denosumab in hypercalcemia of malignancy.

Predictive factors for all-trans retinoic acid-related differentiation syndrome in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia.

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) used for the treatment of APL can lead to the development of differentiation syndrome (DS), a potentially life threatening complication. Since ATRA is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, we sought to identify drug interactions that might be associated with a higher risk for the development of DS in addition to other predictive factors related to the incidence of DS. We identified 60 consecutive patients with APL treated at our institution with ATRA from May 2004 until January 2010. Of the 60 patients identified, 29 (48%) developed DS within a median of 5 days (range 1-31) of ATRA initiation. We did not find any difference in overall incidence of DS whether patients were on concurrent CYP 2C8, 2C9 or 3A4 inhibitors, inducers or substrates. In multivariable analysis, higher peripheral blood blast counts on admission (p=0.04) as well as higher body mass index (p=0.003) were associated with developing DS. Out of the 29 patients with DS, there were 4 early deaths of which 2 were attributed to DS compared to no early deaths in the patients who did not develop DS (p=0.05). Regarding disease-related outcomes, only CR rate was different between patients developing DS versus those who did not develop DS.

Medication errors involving oral chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Given the expanding use of oral chemotherapies, the authors set out to examine errors in the prescribing, dispensing, administration, and monitoring of these drugs. METHODS: Reports were collected of oral chemotherapy-associated medication errors from a medical literature and Internet search and review of reports to the Medication Errors Reporting Program and MEDMARX. The authors solicited incident reports from 14 comprehensive cancer centers, and also collected incident reports, pharmacy interventions, and prompted clinician reports from their own center. They classified the type of incident, severity, stage in the medication use process, and type of medication error. They examined the yield of the various reporting methods to identify oral chemotherapy-related medication errors. RESULTS: The authors identified 99 adverse drug events, 322 near misses, and 87 medical errors with low risk of harm. Of the 99 adverse drug events, 20 were serious or life-threatening, 52 were significant, and 25 were minor. The most common medication errors involved wrong dose (38.8%), wrong drug (13.6%), wrong number of days supplied (11.0%), and missed dose (10.0%). The majority of errors resulted in a near miss; however, 39.3% of reports involving the wrong number of days supplied resulted in adverse drug events. Incidents derived from the literature search and hospital incident reporting system included a larger percentage of adverse drug events (73.1% and 58.8%, respectively) compared with other sources. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring oral chemotherapy safety requires improvements in the way these drugs are ordered, dispensed, administered, and monitored.

Creating a fair and just culture: one institution's pat toward organizational change.

BACKGROUND: Health care organizations have begun to move toward a nonpunitive, or "blame-free," process when analyzing medical errors and near misses. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute's (Boston) "Principles of a Fair and Just Culture," define for staff and managers behavioral expectations when an error occurs. CREATING THE PRINCIPLES OF A FAIR AND JUST CULTURE: The principles focus not just on patient safety but on a culture of safety and transparency in all the organization's functional areas, including nonclinical departments such as information services, administration, and research. INCORPORATING THE PRINCIPLES INTO PRACTICE: Introducing the principles is a gradual process, one that requires continual education and discussion among staff at all levels and a commitment to examining and changing many of the systems, policies, and procedures that guide the organization's work. A survey conducted in January 2007 revealed that the clinical areas had sustained higher-than-average scores and that the nonclinical areas showed improvement. DISCUSSION: Changing a long-standing culture of blame, control, and disrespect to one that embraces principles of fairness and justice and standards of respectful behavior is a major undertaking. Educating and involving clinical and administrative leaders, who work directly with staff and play a pivotal role in translating the principles into practice, is especially important.

Safe practices and financial considerations in using oral chemotherapeutic agents.

PURPOSE: Safe handling practices and financial concerns associated with oral chemotherapy in non-traditional settings are discussed. SUMMARY: Oral chemotherapy may pose a risk to patients because of a narrow therapeutic index, complex dosing regimen, dispensing by community pharmacists without prescription order review by an oncology pharmacist or nurse, or self-administration in the home or another nontraditional setting, where patient monitoring is infrequent. Errors in prescribing, dispensing, and administration and patient or caregiver misunderstandings are potential problems with the use of oral chemotherapy that need to be addressed when developing safe practices. Changes in Medicare pharmaceutical reimbursement rates and rules need to be monitored because they have the potential to affect patient care and outcomes. Patient assistance programs and advocacy groups can help alleviate financial concerns associated with oral chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Consensus guidelines specific to safe handling of oral chemotherapy in the home or other nontraditional setting need to be developed. Also, healthcare providers must understand reimbursement and provide direction to patients when patient assistance programs or advocacy groups can assist with the financial challenges of oral chemotherapy.

Oral chemotherapy safety practices at US cancer centres: questionnaire survey.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise current safety practices for the use of oral chemotherapy. DESIGN: Written questionnaire survey of pharmacy directors of cancer centres. SETTING: Comprehensive cancer centres in the United States. RESULTS: Respondents from 42 (78%) of 54 eligible centres completed the survey, after consulting with 89 colleagues. Clinicians at 29 centres used handwritten prescriptions, two used preprinted paper prescriptions, and six used electronic systems for most oral chemotherapy prescribing. For six commonly used oral chemotherapies, on average 10 centres required a diagnosis on the prescription, 11 required the protocol number, four required the cycle number, nine required double checking by a second clinician, 14 required a calculation of body surface area, and 14 required a calculation of dose per square metre of body surface area. Only a third of centres requested patients' written informed consent when oral chemotherapy was given off protocol. Nearly a quarter (10) of centres had no formal process for monitoring patients' adherence. In the past year respondents at 10 centres reported at least one serious adverse drug event related to oral chemotherapy, and respondents at 13 centres reported a serious near miss. CONCLUSION: Few of the safeguards routinely used for infusion chemotherapy have been adopted for oral chemotherapy at US cancer centres. There is currently no consensus at these centres about safe medication practices for oral chemotherapy.

Medication safety in the ambulatory chemotherapy setting.

BACKGROUND: Little is known concerning the safety of the outpatient chemotherapy process. In the current study, the authors sought to identify medication error and potential adverse drug event (ADE) rates in the outpatient chemotherapy setting. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of two adult and one pediatric outpatient chemotherapy infusion units at one cancer institute was performed, involving the review of orders for patients receiving medication and/or chemotherapy and chart reviews. The adult infusion units used a computerized order entry writing system, whereas the pediatric infusion unit used handwritten orders. Data were collected between March and December 2000. RESULTS: The authors reviewed 10,112 medication orders (8008 adult unit orders and 2104 pediatric unit orders) from 1606 patients (1380 adults and 226 pediatric patients). The medication error rate was 3% (306 of 10,112 orders). Of these errors, 82% occurring in adults (203 of 249 orders) had the potential for harm and were potential ADEs, compared with 60% of orders occurring in pediatric patients (34 of 57 orders). Among these, approximately one-third were potentially serious. Pharmacists and nurses intercepted 45% of potential ADEs before they reached the patient. Several changes were implemented in the adult and pediatric settings as a result of these findings. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the authors found an ambulatory medication error rate of 3%, including 2% of orders with the potential to cause harm. Although these rates are relatively low, there is clearly the potential for serious patient harm. The current study identified strategies for prevention.

Lack of efficacy of streptozocin and doxorubicin in patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: The combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin has been considered the standard palliative chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs). However, a recent review failed to confirm high antitumor activity in patients with advanced PETs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 16 consecutive patients who received streptozocin and doxorubicin for advanced PETs at Dana Farber/Partners Cancer Care institutions. Baseline patient characteristics, radiographic response to therapy, treatment-related toxicity, progression-free and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: One patient demonstrated an objective partial response to therapy (objective response rate [ORR], 6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-18%). Six patients achieved stable disease (38%; 95% CI, 14-62%) and 9 patients demonstrated disease progression on initial restaging (56%; 95% CI, 33-77%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-8.8) and 20.2 months (95% CI, 9.7-37.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, the combination of streptozocin and doxorubicin failed to demonstrate substantial antitumor activity in patients with advanced PET. Our findings underscore the need for new therapeutic options in this patient population.