Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dent Mater ; 37(12): e523-e532, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34702558

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the volume loss after air abrasion with alumina particles with different morphology on bovine enamel and luting composite resin. METHODS: Air abrasion was performed on 12 unscathed bovine teeth and 72 luting composite resin discs with 85 µm round-shaped and 50 µm sharp-edged alumina particles applied for 20 s, 40 s and 60 s (n = 12). Air abrasion was standardized by uniform areas of 2 mm diameter, a pressure of 0.25 MPa and a distance of 3 mm. The volume loss was determined by using a laboratory scanner. RESULTS: Air abrasion with round-shaped alumina particles was mostly not measurable with the laboratory scanner, while sharp-edged alumina air abrasion resulted in significant loss of enamel. The median of volume loss by sharp-edged alumina particles ranged from 0.78 mm3 (20 s) to 2.52 mm3 (60 s). In contrast to round-shaped alumina the removal caused by sharp-edged alumina increased significantly with increasing application times (p ≤ 0.05). For air abrasion on luting composite resin the median of the removed volume ranged from 2.25 mm3 (20 s) to 6.18 mm3 (60 s), while round-shaped alumina showed a range from 0.45 mm3 (20 s) to 1.40mm3 (60 s). The round-shaped alumina produced a statistically significant lower volume loss than sharp-edged alumina for all three air abrasion times. SIGNIFICANCE: The 85 µm round-shaped alumina particles removed less composite resin than 50 µm sharp-edged alumina particles but barely any enamel, making it an option for removing composite resin residues from enamel.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Bonding , Air Abrasion, Dental , Aluminum Oxide , Animals , Cattle , Dental Enamel , Materials Testing , Resin Cements , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...