Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults following COVID-19 infection: A case report presenting with colitis.

BACKGROUND: Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A) is a recently emerging condition that occurs as a delayed complication of COVID-19 infection. It involves inflammation of multiple extra-pulmonary organ systems. Diagnostic criteria and treatment recommendations have yet to be clearly defined. We present a case of a young adult with suspected MIS-A who initially displayed symptoms and radiological findings of colitis.Case: A 22-year-old male with no past medical history suffered a minor respiratory illness for a few days and tested positive on SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Approximately 6 weeks later, he presents after 3 days of right-sided abdominal pain, diarrhoea and fever. He is initially admitted with a working diagnosis of gastroenteritis. Sustained fever and escalating blood markers of illness led to abdominal CT; showing inflammation of ascending colon as well as some loops of small bowel. Hypotension becomes increasingly pronounced and on the fourth day of admission he developed type 1 respiratory failure with evidence of fluid overload. He was transferred to critical care for vasopressor and respiratory support. All microbiological and autoimmune screens performed return negative results but inflammatory markers were significantly elevated, he was diagnosed as MIS-A. IVIg was added to the antibiotics on day 4. His clinical condition dramatically improved and he was discharged home after 10 days in hospital. His blood tests have returned to normal and he has no lasting complications from his illness. DISCUSSION: This case displays the potential for MIS-A to present in various ways, with this example a primarily gastroenterological illness. It therefore highlights the importance of physicians in different fields having an awareness of the condition, in order to identify when MDT input is required to guide treatment. We review the current literature on various presentations and treatments of MIS-A, and discuss the need for clear case definition.

Seronegative Coeliac Disease Masquerading as Irritable Bowel Syndrome type Symptoms.

Coeliac disease affects 1% of the population but internationally delays in diagnosis are frequent. A relationship between irritable bowel syndrome type symptoms and coeliac disease is well established and most IBS guidelines recommend that patients presenting with IBS type symptoms should be tested serologically for coeliac disease. Seronegative coeliac disease accounts for 3-5% of all cases of coeliac disease and it is a diagnostic challenge which requires a high level of clinical suspicion and consideration of duodenal biopsies prior to confidently excluding this diagnosis. We report the first case of seronegative coeliac disease masquerading as IBS type symptoms. We suggest that if patients have evidence of haematinic deficiency, subsequent weight loss, features of malabsorption or a family history of coeliac disease, then a duodenal biopsy should be considered irrespective of negative serology.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.

These guidelines on oesophageal manometry and gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring supersede those produced in 2006. Since 2006 there have been significant technological advances, in particular, the development of high resolution manometry (HRM) and oesophageal impedance monitoring. The guidelines were developed by a guideline development group of patients and representatives of all the relevant professional groups using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool. A systematic literature search was performed and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of the recommendations made. Key strong recommendations are made regarding the benefit of: (i) HRM over standard manometry in the investigation of dysphagia and, in particular, in characterising achalasia, (ii) adjunctive testing with larger volumes of water or solids during HRM, (iii) oesophageal manometry prior to antireflux surgery, (iv) pH/impedance monitoring in patients with reflux symptoms not responding to high dose proton pump inhibitors and (v) pH monitoring in all patients with reflux symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned, but combined pH/impedance monitoring in those not responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring

These guidelines on oesophageal manometry and gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring supersede those produced in 2006. Since 2006 there have been significant technological advances, in particular, the development of high resolution manometry (HRM) and oesophageal impedance monitoring. The guidelines were developed by a guideline development group of patients and representatives of all the relevant professional groups using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool. A systematic literature search was performed and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of the recommendations made. Key strong recommendations are made regarding the benefit of: (i) HRM over standard manometry in the investigation of dysphagia and, in particular, in characterising achalasia, (ii) adjunctive testing with larger volumes of water or solids during HRM, (iii) oesophageal manometry prior to antireflux surgery, (iv) pH/impedance monitoring in patients with reflux symptoms not responding to high dose proton pump inhibitors and (v) pH monitoring in all patients with reflux symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned, but combined pH/ impedance monitoring in those not responsive to proton pump inhibitors in whom surgery is planned. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG.

Sheffield Clinical Research Fellowship programme: a transferable model for UK gastroenterology.

Out of programme (OOP) opportunities are to be encouraged. This article gives an insightful view of the Sheffield Clinical Research Fellowship Programme. Unique trainee feedback is provided. The take home message is clear - trainees should grab OOP experiences with both hands! For consultants the logistics described are potentially transferrable to their own regions.

Effects of low-power argon plasma coagulation thermoablation of Barrett's epithelium on oesophageal motility.

INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal dysmotility contributes to the pathogenesis of Barrett's epithelium (BE) allowing prolonged mucosal contact with injurious refluxate. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is effective for BE ablation, but it is unknown whether the procedure affects oesophageal motility. AIM: To assess the effect of low power (30 W) APC therapy on oesophageal motility in patients with BE. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with at least 4 cm of BE underwent oesophageal manometry before and after APC ablation. All were on proton pump inhibitors. Oesophageal body peristaltic wave duration and amplitude, and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure and length were compared before and after treatment. RESULTS: In a total of 28 men and five women, with a mean age of 63.4 years (range 39-79) and mean BE length 6.5 cm (range 4-19), macroscopic clearance was achieved in 28 patients. A small statistically significant (P<0.05) increase in peristaltic wave amplitude was seen after APC [mean (SD) mmHg before versus after: 30.4 (15.2) versus 36.2 (20.1) at 13.5 cm, 47.6 (27.1) versus 54.5 (26.8) at 8.5 cm, and 51.2 (35.3) versus 58 (34.4) at 3.5 cm above the LOS]. No changes in either peristaltic wave duration or LOS parameters [mean (SD) pressure 10.6 (5.6) versus 10.3 (4.3) mmHg; length 2.8 (1.3) versus 2.8 (1.0) cm] were observed. CONCLUSION: APC ablation of BE at a power setting of 30 W does not impair oesophageal motility.

Persistent acid reflux and symptoms in patients with Barrett's oesophagus on proton-pump inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess both acid gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) suppression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and the predictive value of symptoms. DESIGN A prospective study of patients with Barrett's epithelium (> 3 cm, containing specialized intestinal metaplasia). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with Barrett's epithelium were recruited. Therapy was adjusted to omeprazole 20 mg twice daily. Oesophageal manometry and 24 h pH studies were performed on treatment. Heartburn score was calculated before and after PPI dose adjustment. In patients with persisting acid reflux, omeprazole dose was increased to 20 mg three times daily and pH studies repeated. Adequacy of GOR suppression, assessed by pH monitoring, was related to heartburn score (0-3). RESULTS: Twenty of the 45 patients were symptomatic (mean score 1.9) on pre-study treatment (mainly omeprazole < 20 mg once daily); on omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, only six patients remained symptomatic (mean score 1.6). Ten patients (22%) had persisting GOR on omeprazole 20 mg twice daily (median % total time with pH < 4 was 8%). Abnormal nocturnal reflux was found in nine and abnormal daytime reflux in only four patients. Heartburn persisted in three of these 10 patients (30%). Those remaining symptomatic had more daytime acid reflux than the asymptomatic patients with persistent reflux (median percentage daytime at pH < 4 was 13.6% vs 0.6%, respectively; P < 0.01). By increasing the omeprazole dose to 20 mg three times daily, only three of the 10 had persistent acid reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent acid reflux on PPI therapy is common in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Although nocturnal acid reflux is the most common finding, symptoms tended to occur in those with abnormal daytime reflux. Symptom resolution does not guarantee acid reflux control.