Articular Surface Damage Following Headless Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Proximal Phalanx Fractures.

PURPOSE: Offering the benefits of rigid fixation while minimizing soft tissue dissection, intramedullary implants have become a popular choice among hand surgeons. Their placement often requires traversing or passing in proximity to joint surfaces. This study aimed to assess the damage to the articular cartilage of the base of the proximal phalanx resulting from antegrade placement of threaded headless intramedullary nails. METHODS: A cadaveric study comparing two techniques for antegrade placement of threaded headless intramedullary nails was conducted in 56 digits. The first entailed a single 2.1 mm intramedullary nail placed via the dorsal base of the proximal phalanx, whereas the second used two 1.8 mm intramedullary nails inserted via the collateral recesses of the phalangeal base. All specimens were analyzed for articular surface damage with the cartilage defect measured as a percentage of total joint surface area. Damage to the extensor tendons was also assessed in a subset of specimens. RESULTS: No significant difference in the percentage of articular surface damage was observed, with an average 3.21% ± 2.34% defect in the single 2.1 mm nail group and a 2.71% ± 3.42% mean defect in the two 1.8 mm nails group. There was no articular surface injury in 18% of digits in each group. Damage to extensor tendons was seen in three (9.4%) specimens and in all cases involved either the extensor indicis proprius or extensor digiti minimi. CONCLUSIONS: Hardware insertion using either the dorsal base of the proximal phalanx or the collateral recesses of the phalangeal base both demonstrated minimal articular cartilage damage and infrequent injury to the extensor tendons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With proper technique for antegrade insertion into the proximal phalanx, the cartilage defect observed often encompasses only a small percentage of the overall joint surface area.

Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) presents unique benefits and challenges. The literature has compared outcomes among total submuscular (TSM), dual-plane (DP), and prepectoral (PP) planes; however, a dedicated meta-analysis relevant to NSM is lacking. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies on immediate breast reconstruction after NSM using TSM, DP, or PP prosthesis placement in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. In total, 1317 unique articles were identified, of which 49 were included in the systematic review and six met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Pooled descriptive outcomes were analyzed for each cohort for all 49 studies. Fixed-effects meta-analytic methods were used to compare PP with subpectoral (TSM and DP) reconstructions. Results: A total of 1432 TSM, 1546 DP, and 1668 PP reconstructions were identified for descriptive analysis. Demographics were similar between cohorts. Pooled descriptive outcomes demonstrated overall similar rates of reconstructive failure (3.3%-5.1%) as well as capsular contracture (0%-3.9%) among cohorts. Fixed-effects meta-analysis of six comparative studies demonstrated a significantly lower rate of mastectomy flap necrosis in the PP cohort compared with the subpectoral cohort (relative risk 0.24, 95% confidence interval [0.08-0.74]). All other consistently reported outcomes, including, hematoma, seroma, infection, mastectomy flap necrosis, nipple -areola complex necrosis, and explantation were comparable. Conclusions: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis demonstrated the safety of immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction after NSM, compared with submuscular techniques. Submuscular reconstruction had a higher risk of mastectomy flap necrosis, though potentially influenced by selection bias.

Differential preferences in breast aesthetics by self-identified demographics assessed on a national survey.

There is a paucity of literature examining how preferences differ amongst various demographic groups. This study aimed to assess how perceptions of the ideal breast differ between respondents stratified by self-identified demographic factors. A cohort of 25 patients from the senior surgeon's practice presenting for breast surgery was assembled. Pre-operative anteroposterior photographs of these patients were distributed via Qualtrics (Seattle, WA) to a large sample designed to be representative of the demographics of the United States. Survey questions aimed to measure respondents' impressions of 'breast attractiveness'. Respondents were asked to rate breasts on a Likert scale. Survey responses were analysed for differences in breast aesthetic preferences by sex, gender, sexual orientation, and race. Males rated all breasts higher on the Likert scale for attractiveness than females (2.8 vs 2.5, p < 0.001). Despite this discrepancy, ratings amongst male and female respondents were highly correlated with one another (R = 0.940; p < 0.0001). Considering sexual orientation, individuals attracted to women provided significantly higher attractiveness ratings to all breasts compared to individuals attracted to men only (2.8 vs 2.5, p < 0.001). White or Caucasian individuals ascribed significantly higher breast attractiveness ratings than Asian individuals (2.7 vs 2.2, p < 0.001), but not Black or African American individuals (2.7 vs 2.4, p = 0.23). Despite these racial discrepancies in mean breast attractiveness, ratings amongst the three groups were highly correlated. In a sample representative of the United States, a difference in breast aesthetic appraisal was observed by demographic factors. These findings merit further investigation to understand these trends and observations.

Artificial Intelligence as a Triage Tool during the Perioperative Period: Pilot Study of Accuracy and Accessibility for Clinical Application.

Background: Given the dialogistic properties of ChatGPT, we hypothesized that this artificial intelligence (AI) function can be used as a self-service tool where clinical questions can be directly answered by AI. Our objective was to assess the content, accuracy, and accessibility of AI-generated content regarding common perioperative questions for reduction mammaplasty. Methods: ChatGPT (OpenAI, February Version, San Francisco, Calif.) was used to query 20 common patient concerns that arise in the perioperative period of a reduction mammaplasty. Searches were performed in duplicate for both a general term and a specific clinical question. Query outputs were analyzed both objectively and subjectively. Descriptive statistics, t tests, and chi-square tests were performed where appropriate with a predetermined level of significance of P less than 0.05. Results: From a total of 40 AI-generated outputs, mean word length was 191.8 words. Readability was at the thirteenth grade level. Regarding content, of all query outputs, 97.5% were on the appropriate topic. Medical advice was deemed to be reasonable in 100% of cases. General queries more frequently reported overarching background information, whereas specific queries more frequently reported prescriptive information (P < 0.0001). AI outputs specifically recommended following surgeon provided postoperative instructions in 82.5% of instances. Conclusions: Currently available AI tools, in their nascent form, can provide recommendations for common perioperative questions and concerns for reduction mammaplasty. With further calibration, AI interfaces may serve as a tool for fielding patient queries in the future; however, patients must always retain the ability to bypass technology and be able to contact their surgeon.

Double-Barrel Vascularized Free Fibula Flap for Reconstruction of Sternal Nonunion with Bone Defect: A Case Report.

CASE: Given the rare incidence of sternal nonunion after traumatic injury, literature describing the management of posttraumatic sternal reconstruction is limited. We present a case of a 54-year-old man with a history of traumatic chest wall injury with multiple unsuccessful attempts at sternal repair who presented with chronic sternal nonunion and persistent bone defect. Sternal reconstruction using a vascularized double-barrel free fibula flap with rigid fixation in multiple planes was performed, with confirmed bony union at 6 months. CONCLUSION: This novel approach to sternal nonunion management allowed effective bridging of posttraumatic sternal bone defects while facilitating osseous integration and long-term stabilization.