ABSTRACT
Multiple studies have reported a significant treatment-free remission (TFR) rate of 50%-60% in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. However, the remaining half of these patients still require re-initiation of TKI therapy for leukaemia control. It remains unclear if TKI drugs should be switched for re-therapy in patients who failed the first TFR (TFR1) attempt. Our study attempted to determine whether dasatinib therapy after TFR1 failure post-imatinib discontinuation could improve the likelihood of TFR2. Of 59 patients who lost molecular response after imatinib discontinuation for TFR1, 55 patients (93.2%) were treated with dasatinib, of whom 49 (89.1%) regained MR4.5 or deeper response, with a median time of 1.85 months to achieve MR4.5. Dasatinib was discontinued in 35 patients for TFR2 attempt, of whom 26 patients (74.28%) lost MMR and 6 (17.14%) MR4. Risk factor analysis for the TFR2 after dasatinib discontinuation suggested three significant factors: (1) doubling time of BCR::ABL1 transcript following TFR1 attempt, (2) rapid regaining of molecular response following dasatinib therapy and (3) undetectable BCR::ABL1 transcript prior to TFR2 attempt. The present study showed that dasatinib does not increase the TFR2 rate in general, but a selected group of patients could benefit from this approach.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Dasatinib/therapeutic use , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options. METHODS: R/R DLBCL patients, who were mostly ineligible for ASCT due to age or comorbidities, were treated with maveropepimut-S (MVP-S, previously DPX-Survivac) a survivin directed T cell educating therapy, pembrolizumab, and intermittent low-dose cyclophosphamide. FINDINGS: We identified, using univariate analysis, a subset of patients with enhanced ORR, PFS and DOR. Patients with baseline CD20+/PD-L1 expression had an ORR of 46% (6/13) and the disease control rate was 10/13 (77%). The PFS and OS of the positive CD20+/PD-L1 patients were 7.1 months and 17.4 months, whereas in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of 25 enrolled patients, the ORR was 28% (7/25), median PFS and OS were 4.2 months and 10.1 months respectively. A total of 6/7 clinical responders occurred in CD20+/PD-L1 patients. The regimen was well-tolerated, requiring only minor dose modifications and one discontinuation. Grade 1 or 2 injection site reactions occurred in 14/25, (56%). Statistically significant associations were also seen between PFS and; injection site reactions; and ELISpot response to survivin peptides, both identifying the mechanistic importance of specific immune responses to survivin. INTERPRETATION: This immunotherapy combination was found to be active and safe in this clinically challenging patient population.
Subject(s)
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Humans , Survivin/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Injection Site Reaction , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is an indication for liver transplantation, but recurrence after liver transplantation is associated with poor outcomes often requiring repeat transplantation. We investigated whether autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) could be used to stop progression of recurrent PSC and promote operational tolerance. METHODS: Twelve patients with recurrent PSC were fully evaluated and 5 were selected for aHSCT. Autologous hematopoietic stem cells were collected, purified by CD34 immunomagnetic selection, and cryopreserved. Immunoablation using busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin was followed by aHSCT. The primary endpoint of the study was the establishment of operational tolerance defined as lack of biochemical, histologic, and clinical evidence of rejection while off immunosuppression at 2 y post-aHSCT. RESULTS: Two of the 5 patients achieved operational tolerance with no clinical or histologic evidence of PSC progression or allorejection. A third patient developed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome following aHSCT requiring repeat liver transplantation but has no evidence of PSC recurrence while on sirolimus monotherapy now >3 y after aHSCT. A fourth patient was weaned off immunosuppression but died 212 d after aHSCT from pericardial constriction. A fifth patient died from multiorgan failure. Immunosuppression-free allograft acceptance was associated with deletion of T-cell clones, loss of autoantibodies, and increases in regulatory T cells, transitional B cells, and programmed cell death protein-1 expressing CD8+ T cells in the 2 long-term survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Although operational tolerance occurred following aHSCT, the high morbidity and mortality observed render this specific protocol unsuitable for clinical adoption.
Subject(s)
Cholangitis, Sclerosing , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Liver Transplantation , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/surgery , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Pilot Projects , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
The doubling time (DT) of the BCR-ABL1 quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) transcript level reflects the re-growing fraction of leukaemic cells after discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The present study analyzed monthly DT within six months after imatinib discontinuation in 131 patients. Monthly DT was calculated as x = ln(2)/K, where x is the DT and K is the fold BCR-ABL1 change from the previous value divided by the number of days between each measurement. The optimal DT value was determined as 12·75 days at two months using a recursive partitioning method. The patients were stratified into three groups: the high-risk group (DT<12·75 days but >0, with rapidly proliferating chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) cells; n = 26) showed the lowest molecular relapse-free survival (mRFS) of 7·7% at 12 months, compared to 53·6% in the intermediate-risk group (DT≥12·75 days, with slowly proliferating CML cells; n = 16) or 90·0% in the low-risk group (DT≤0, i.e., without proliferating CML cells; n = 71; P < 0·001). Monthly assessment of DT helps identify high-risk patients for treatment-free remission failure with an imminent risk of molecular recurrence, and to define low-risk patients who can be spared the frequent monitoring of monthly molecular tests.
Subject(s)
Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/genetics , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor , Child , Female , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/administration & dosage , Imatinib Mesylate/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Chronic-Phase/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Treatment Failure , Young AdultABSTRACT
Although total duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and of molecular response at 4 log reduction or deeper (MR4) correlates with treatment-free remission (TFR) success after TKI discontinuation, the optimal cut-off values of the duration remain unresolved. Thus, 131 patients were enrolled into the Canadian TKI discontinuation study. The molecular relapse-free survival (mRFS) was defined from imatinib discontinuation till molecular recurrence, that is, major molecular response (MMR) loss and/or MR4 loss. We evaluated mRFS at 12 months after imatinib discontinuation, analyzed it according to the imatinib treatment duration and MR4 duration, and calculated P value, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) in the yearly cut-off period of time. The shortest cut-off was sought that met the joint criteria of a P value ≤ 0·05, PPV ≥ 60% and NPV ≥ 60%. We propose six years as the shortest imatinib duration cut-off with a P value 0·01, PPV 68% and NPV 62%: The patients treated with imatinib duration ≥ 6 years showed a superior mRFS rate (61·8%) compared to those with less treatment (36·0%). Also, 4·5 years MR4 duration as the shortest cut-off with a P value 0·003, PPV 63% and NPV 61%: those with MR4 duration ≥ 4·5 years showed a higher mRFS rate (64·2%) than those with a shorter MR4 duration (41·9%).
Subject(s)
Imatinib Mesylate/administration & dosage , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Survival RateABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a very rare type of malignancy with a poor prognosis. The role of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in PCNSL has been questioned due to the significant neurotoxicity and lack of convincing data for survival benefit. Even its role in a palliative setting remains to be clearly elucidated. Our study aims to investigate the benefit of WBRT in patients who are ineligible for systemic therapy. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 2002 and 2017. Patients were excluded if they received systemic therapy or focal radiation only. Data on patient demographics and WBRT were collected and correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were selected for analysis, among which 31 (64.6%) patients received WBRT and 17 (35.4%) patients received supportive care only. Patient baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Median overall survival (OS) was 4.3 months among the entire cohort. WBRT was associated with improved median OS (8.0 months, range 1.4-62.3 months) compared with supportive care only (3.3 months, range 0.7-18.3 months) (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.75, p = 0.005). Among patients who received WBRT, higher radiation dose to the whole brain was not associated with survival (p = 0.10), but higher radiation dose to the gross tumor was associated with improved survival (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Patients with PCNSL who are ineligible for systemic therapy may still benefit from WBRT with improvement in survival, compared with the best supportive care. Dose escalation through the addition of a gross tumor boost in these patients was associated with improved overall survival. Further studies in the prospective setting are necessary to confirm the findings from the study.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms/mortality , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Cranial Irradiation , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/mortality , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Brain Neoplasms/mortality , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Contraindications, Drug , Cranial Irradiation/methods , Cranial Irradiation/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Drug-induced hypertension is one of the commonest causes of secondary hypertension. In the last few years, secondary hypertension due to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, from the vascular endothelial growth factor class, has been recognized to be an important cause of hypertension, as well as proteinuria, and occasionally kidney dysfunction in some cases. Less well-recognized is that BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors also have adverse vascular effects. These manifest as vascular stenoses in large vessels, which may sometimes cause renal artery stenosis and subsequent hypertension. We describe a case report which presented as classical bilateral renal artery stenosis, and responded to revascularization. Increased awareness of these effects, as well as research into the pathogenesis, may provide more insight into vascular biology.
Subject(s)
Hypertension, Renovascular , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Pyridazines/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl , Humans , Hypertension, Renovascular/chemically induced , Hypertension, Renovascular/diagnosis , Hypertension, Renovascular/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor ASubject(s)
Imatinib Mesylate/pharmacokinetics , Intracellular Space/metabolism , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/metabolism , Biological Availability , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic/drug effects , Genes, abl/genetics , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/analysis , Imatinib Mesylate/blood , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Intracellular Space/chemistry , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/pathology , Male , Octamer Transcription Factor-1/genetics , Octamer Transcription Factor-1/metabolism , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Central nervous system (CNS) relapse carries a poor prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Integrating biomarkers into the CNS-International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) risk model may improve identification of patients at high risk for developing secondary CNS disease. CNS relapse was analyzed in 1418 DLBCL patients treated with obinutuzumab or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone chemotherapy in the phase 3 GOYA study. Cell of origin (COO) was assessed using gene-expression profiling. BCL2 and MYC protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The impact of CNS-IPI, COO, and BCL2/MYC dual-expression status on CNS relapse was assessed using a multivariate Cox regression model (data available in n = 1418, n = 933, and n = 688, respectively). High CNS-IPI score (hazard ratio [HR], 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-12.3; P = .02) and activated B-cellâlike (ABC) (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.1-12.9; P = .0004) or unclassified COO subtypes (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5-11.7; P = .006) were independently associated with CNS relapse. BCL2/MYC dual-expression status did not impact CNS relapse risk. Three risk subgroups were identified based on the presence of high CNS-IPI score and/or ABC/unclassified COO (CNS-IPI-C model): low risk (no risk factors, n = 450 [48.2%]), intermediate risk (1 factor, n = 408 [43.7%]), and high risk (both factors, n = 75 [8.0%]). Two-year CNS relapse rates were 0.5%, 4.4%, and 15.2% in the respective risk subgroups. Combining high CNS-IPI and ABC/unclassified COO improved CNS relapse prediction and identified a patient subgroup at high risk for developing CNS relapse. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01287741.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Mutation , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/genetics , Central Nervous System Neoplasms/secondary , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/genetics , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Predictive Value of Tests , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/genetics , Young AdultABSTRACT
The majority of patients with TKI failure respond to HCT. However, the relapse risk remains high. This study has evaluated transplant outcomes in 223 CML patients with TKI failure due to resistance (n = 132) or intolerance (n = 29), as well as those that were TKI naïve/responding with advanced disease (n = 35) or with chronic phase (CP, n = 27). We studied outcomes according to post-transplant BCR-ABL transcript level within 3 months. With respect to transplant outcomes according to the post-transplant BCR/ABLtranscript level within 3 months, the group failing to achieve a 1.3 log reduction (n = 14, 12.4%) showed the highest relapse rate of 78.6% at 5 years, compared to 26.2% and 24.1% in the groups achieving 1.3-4.0 log reduction (n = 45, 39.8%), and ≥4.1 log reduction (n = 54, 47.8%) respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the group failing to achieve a 1.3 log reduction had a 2.3-fold higher risk of death and 6.6 times higher risk of relapse. Poor overall survival after HCT was associated with advanced disease at diagnosis, but not disease status prior to HCT. Of 61 patients who relapsed after HCT, 47 were treated with post-transplant TKI therapy; those receiving TKI after loss of MR2 or MMR showed higher rates of response and survival compared to those receiving TKI after hematologic relapse (p < 0.001). QPCR log reduction level within 3 months post transplantation is prognostic in this population.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Canada/epidemiology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/antagonists & inhibitors , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/metabolism , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/genetics , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Survival RateABSTRACT
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive, incurable B-cell malignancy. Ibrutinib has been shown to be highly active for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. The RAY trial (MCL3001) was a phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study that compared ibrutinib with temsirolimus in patients with R/R MCL. Active disease is frequently associated with impaired functional status and reduced well-being. Therefore, the current study employed two patient-reported outcome instruments, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) and the EQ-5D-5L, to assess symptoms, well-being, health status, and health-related quality of life of patients on treatment within the RAY trial. We found that patients on ibrutinib had substantial improvement in FACT-Lym subscale and total scores, and had improvement in EQ-5D-5L utility and VAS scores compared with temsirolimus patients, indicating a superior well-being. These improvements in well-being correlated with clinical response, indicating that better health-related quality of life was associated with decreased disease burden.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/mortality , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Piperidines , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Retreatment , Sirolimus/administration & dosage , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Strong immunosuppression, including chemotherapy and immune-depleting antibodies followed by autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation (aHSCT), has been used to treat patients with multiple sclerosis, improving control of relapsing disease. We addressed whether near-complete immunoablation followed by immune cell depleted aHSCT would result in long-term control of multiple sclerosis. METHODS: We did this phase 2 single-arm trial at three hospitals in Canada. We enrolled patients with multiple sclerosis, aged 18-50 years with poor prognosis, ongoing disease activity, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 3.0-6.0. Autologous CD34 selected haemopoietic stem-cell grafts were collected after mobilisation with cyclophosphamide and filgrastim. Immunoablation with busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin was followed by aHSCT. The primary outcome was multiple sclerosis activity-free survival (events were clinical relapse, appearance of a new or Gd-enhancing lesion on MRI, and sustained progression of Expanded Disability Status Scale score). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01099930. FINDINGS: Between diagnosis and aHSCT, 24 patients had 167 clinical relapses over 140 patient-years with 188 Gd-enhancing lesions on 48 pre-aHSCT MRI scans. Median follow-up was 6.7 years (range 3.9-12.7). The primary outcome, multiple sclerosis activity-free survival at 3 years after transplantation was 69.6% (95% CI 46.6-84.2). With up to 13 years of follow-up after aHSCT, no relapses occurred and no Gd enhancing lesions or new T2 lesions were seen on 314 MRI sequential scans. The rate of brain atrophy decreased to that expected for healthy controls. One of 24 patients died of transplantation-related complications. 35% of patients had a sustained improvement in their Expanded Disability Status Scale score. INTERPRETATION: We describe the first treatment to fully halt all detectable CNS inflammatory activity in patients with multiple sclerosis for a prolonged period in the absence of any ongoing disease-modifying drugs. Furthermore, many of the patients had substantial recovery of neurological function despite their disease's aggressive nature. FUNDING: Multiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Autologous , Young AdultABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Some patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) do not respond to conventional treatment and have severe or life-threatening symptoms. Alternate and emerging therapies have not yet proved consistently or durably effective. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has been effective in treating other severe autoimmune neurologic conditions and may have similar application in MG. OBJECTIVE: To report 7 cases of severe MG treated with autologous HSCT in which consistent, durable, symptom-free, and treatment-free remission was achieved. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study reports outcomes at The Ottawa Hospital, a large, Canadian, tertiary care referral center with expertise in neurology and HSCT, from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2014, with a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 29-149 months). Data collection and analysis were performed from February 1 through August 31, 2015. All patients with MG treated with autologous HSCT at The Ottawa Hospital were included. All had persistent severe or life-threatening MG-related symptoms despite continued use of intensive immunosuppressive therapies. INTERVENTIONS: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell grafts were mobilized with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, collected by peripheral blood leukapheresis, and purified away from contaminating lymphocytes using CD34 immunomagnetic selection. Patients were treated with intensive conditioning chemotherapy regimens to destroy the autoreactive immune system followed by graft reinfusion for blood and immune reconstitution. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was MG disease activity after autologous HSCT measured by frequency of emergency department visits and hospitalizations and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification, MGFA therapy status, and MGFA postintervention status. Safety outcomes included all severe autologous HSCT-related complications. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent autologous HSCT, 6 for MG and 1 for follicular lymphoma with coincident active MG. Mean (SD) ages at MG diagnosis and at autologous HSCT were 37 (11) and 44 (10) years, respectively. Five patients (71%) had concurrent autoimmune or lymphoproliferative illnesses related to immune dysregulation. All patients had distinct clinical and electromyographic evidence of MG (MGFA clinical classification IIIb-V). All patients achieved durable MGFA complete stable remission with no residual MG symptoms and freedom from any ongoing MG therapy (MGFA postintervention status of complete stable remission). Three patients (43%) experienced transient viral reactivations, and 1 (14%) developed a secondary autoimmune disease after autologous HSCT, all of which resolved or stabilized with treatment. There were no treatment- or MG-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Autologous HSCT results in long-term symptom- and treatment-free remission in patients with severe MG. The application of autologous HSCT for this and other autoimmune neurologic conditions warrants prospective study.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Myasthenia Gravis/surgery , Adult , Antibodies/therapeutic use , Antigens, CD34/immunology , Antigens, CD34/metabolism , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Myasthenia Gravis/drug therapy , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (BuCyE) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This multicenter, phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of BuCyE with individually adjusted busulfan based on preconditioning pharmacokinetics. The study initially enrolled Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients ages 18 to 80 years but was amended due to high early treatment-related mortality (TRM) in patients > 65 years. BuCyE outcomes were compared with contemporaneous recipients of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Two hundred seven subjects with HL (n = 66) or NHL (n = 141) were enrolled from 32 centers in North America, and 203 underwent ASCT. Day 100 TRM for all subjects (n = 203), patients > 65 years (n = 17), and patients ≤ 65 years (n = 186) were 4.5%, 23.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 33% for HL and 58%, 77%, and 43% for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 63), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 29), and follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 23), respectively. The estimated rates of 2-year overall survival (OS) were 76% for HL and 65%, 89%, and 89% for DLBCL, MCL, and FL, respectively. In the matched analysis rates of 2-year TRM were 3.3% for BuCyE and 3.9% for BEAM, and there were no differences in outcomes for NHL. Patients with HL had lower rates of 2-year PFS with BuCyE, 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%), than with BEAM, 59% (95% CI, 52% to 66%), with no differences in TRM or OS. BuCyE provided adequate disease control and safety in B cell NHL patients ≤ 65 years but produced worse PFS in HL patients when compared with BEAM.
Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Lymphoma/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adult , Aged , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Carmustine/therapeutic use , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Lymphoma/mortality , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/mortality , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , North America , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mantle-cell lymphoma is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Both ibrutinib and temsirolimus have shown single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. We undertook a phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib versus temsirolimus in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma confirmed by central pathology in 21 countries who had received one or more rituximab-containing treatments. Patients were stratified by previous therapy and simplified mantle-cell lymphoma international prognostic index score, and were randomly assigned with a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive daily oral ibrutinib 560 mg or intravenous temsirolimus (175 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; 75 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of subsequent 21-day cycles). Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by a masked independent review committee with the primary hypothesis that ibrutinib compared with temsirolimus significantly improves progression-free survival. The analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01646021) and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT (number 2012-000601-74). FINDINGS: Between Dec 10, 2012, and Nov 26, 2013, 280 patients were randomised to ibrutinib (n=139) or temsirolimus (n=141). Primary efficacy analysis showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (p<0·0001) for patients treated with ibrutinib versus temsirolimus (hazard ratio 0·43 [95% CI 0·32-0·58]; median progression-free survival 14·6 months [95% CI 10·4-not estimable] vs 6·2 months [4·2-7·9], respectively). Ibrutinib was better tolerated than temsirolimus, with grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events reported for 94 (68%) versus 121 (87%) patients, and fewer discontinuations of study medication due to adverse events for ibrutinib versus temsirolimus (9 [6%] vs 36 [26%]). INTERPRETATION: Ibrutinib treatment resulted in significant improvement in progression-free survival and better tolerability versus temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. These data lend further support to the positive benefit-risk ratio for ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Sirolimus/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Piperidines , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Recurrence , Sirolimus/adverse effects , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients diagnosed with Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) between 01 January 2000 and 31 December 2009. Eighty eight patients with MCL were included in the analysis of whom 46 (52%) received abbreviated Hyper-CVAD (a total of two cycles; with addition of Rituximab since 2005) with an intention of proceeding to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT), with a median age of 58 years. Response rate to induction at auto-HCT time was 89% and complete response was 61%. Forty four patients received an auto-HCT with a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 31.2% and 62.5%, respectively. There were 42 nontransplant eligible patients with a median age of 72 years, and 5-year PFS and OS were 0.0% and 39.9%, respectively. The median survival and PFS in the auto-HCT eligible group were 68 and 33 months, compared to 32 and 12 months in nontransplant eligible group, without a plateauing of the survival curves in either group. Treatment-related mortality in the auto-HCT eligible group was 10.9% (n = 5); two patients died during R-Hyper-CVAD and 3 (6.8%) experienced transplant-related mortality. An abbreviated R-Hyper-CVAD-based induction strategy followed by consolidative auto-HCT is feasible and provides moderate potential of long-term survival. Further research to define risk-adapted strategies; to optimize disease control, is required.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/mortality , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Vincristine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Despite important advances in the treatment of first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) over the past decade, CLL remains an incurable disease with significant unmet needs. The combination of rituximab with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FCR) significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone in first-line treatment of CLL. However, because of its high toxicity, FCR is only recommended for younger, fit patients who can tolerate the treatment. This excludes a large fraction of CLL patients who are elderly and/or who have comorbidities. Thus, determining the appropriate treatment choices for this group of patients who are unfit for FCR treatment is a significant challenge in CLL. Current treatment choices in Canadian practice include bendamustine with rituximab, fludarabine with rituximab, and chlorambucil with rituximab. Two novel monoclonal antibodies, ofatumumab and obinutuzumab, have also recently received Health Canada approval for the first-line treatment of CLL patients in combination with chlorambucil. In addition, the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ibrutinib, has recently been approved by Health Canada for the first-line treatment of CLL patients with deletion 17p. In the coming years, several other novel agents that are being developed are likely to change the CLL treatment landscape dramatically, however, because these novel agents are currently unavailable, the purpose of this review is to recommend the best treatment approaches in Canada using currently available therapies.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Alemtuzumab , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bendamustine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Canada , Chlorambucil/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/genetics , Piperidines , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Rituximab/administration & dosage , Vidarabine/administration & dosage , Vidarabine/analogs & derivativesABSTRACT
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a potentially life-threatening clinical syndrome caused by uncontrolled activation of lymphocytes and histiocytes resulting in high levels of cytokines. Acquired HLH occurs in autoimmune, inflammatory, infectious, and immunosuppressive disorders. Prompt identification and treatment of an underlying triggering cause improves clinical outcome.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia occurs commonly after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) and is associated with potential morbidity and mortality. Few studies have examined the impact of platelet (PLT) transfusion on clinical outcomes in HPCT while optimal PLT transfusion strategies after HSCT remain uncertain. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on 522 patients undergoing HPCT between January 2002 and December 2007. Associations between PLT transfusion events and clinical characteristics with transplant-related outcomes were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Mean number of PLT transfusion events before Day +60 posttransplant was 7.5 (95% confidence interval, 6.7-8.4) with greater number of events after allogeneic compared with autologous HPCT (p < 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analysis confirmed that the number of PLT transfusion events was associated with increased 100-day nonrelapse mortality (p < 0.01), posttransplant length of hospital stay (p < 0.01), need for intensive care unit admission (p < 0.01), and number of organs affected by severe toxicity (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: HPCT-related toxicity and mortality are associated with increased PLT transfusion events. Alternative strategies to reduce PLT transfusions after HPCT may warrant future study.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Platelet Transfusion/mortality , Thrombocytopenia/mortality , Adult , Allografts , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Anthracyclines, a standard component of induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are known to be cardiotoxic. Existing evidence supporting routine baseline pre-induction cardiac function testing is limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 119 consecutive patients diagnosed with AML at our center from 2009 to 2012. In the 76 patients for whom induction chemotherapy was planned, baseline ejection fraction measurements were rarely abnormal (four cases), and in none of these abnormal cases did the result change management decisions. Awaiting LVEF evaluation results led to a delay in chemotherapy administration by a mean of approximately 2 days at significant additional costs to the healthcare system. Routine baseline ejection fraction measurement should be abandoned as it does not change management, results in treatment delay and unnecessary healthcare expenditures. More selective baseline testing, preferentially in patients in whom there is a clinical reason of cardiac disease, should be pursued.