Challenges of Assessing Resident Competency in Well-Being: Development of the Psychiatry Milestones 2.0 Well-Being Subcompetency.

Burnout and depression are major problems facing physicians, with 300-400 physicians dying by suicide each year. In an effort to address this issue, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) revised the Common Program Requirements for residency and fellowship programs to include a strong emphasis on well-being, and this revision has been extended to including a subcompetency on well-being in the Milestones 2.0. The Psychiatry Milestones 2.0 Work Group was convened to draft updated psychiatry milestones. As part of the open feedback period, the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training submitted an organizational letter outlining several points to consider regarding the original draft of the well-being subcompetency. The ACGME was receptive to this feedback and allowed the Psychiatry Milestones 2.0 Work Group to revise the subcompetency. Current research indicates that burnout is largely driven by systemic factors, but well-being literature and initiatives often focus on individual factors and responsibility for burnout rather than systemic change. Program directors tasked with assessing resident well-being can additionally encounter several professionalism concerns, including how to (1) define a subcompetency within a competency that itself has not been well defined; (2) decide the appropriate balance between individual and systemic responsibility for well-being; (3) consider mental health as a parameter of well-being; (4) balance roles as physicians, psychiatrists, and training directors in thinking about the mental health of residents without overstepping boundaries and while maintaining privacy, confidentiality, and resident safety; and (5) measure well-being in a sociocultural context. This article describes how these considerations were incorporated into the revision of the Psychiatry Milestones 2.0 version of the well-being subcompetency, which has subsequently been made available to other specialty work groups for potential use as they develop their specialty-specific Milestones 2.0.

General and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Resident Training in Integrated Care: a Survey of Program Directors.

OBJECTIVE: Integrated care models are an evidence-based approach for integrating physical and behavioral health services. The American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training Integrated Care Task Force sought to describe current practices for providing training in integrated care to general and child and adolescent psychiatry residents. METHODS: Directors of US general and child and adolescent psychiatric residency training programs were anonymously surveyed to examine current practices in educating their residents in integrated care. Based on themes that emerged from the survey, the authors make recommendations for integrated care education of general and child and adolescent psychiatry residents. RESULTS: Fifty-two of 197 (26%) general and 36 of 111 (32%) child and adolescent program directors responded. Results demonstrate that a majority of responding general psychiatry (78%) and child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) (72%) training programs offer integrated care rotations, many of which are electives for senior residents. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) and Federally Qualified Health Centers are common venues for such rotations. Sustainable funding of these rotations is a concern. Fewer than half of programs offer integrated care didactics. CONCLUSIONS: This report is intended to help program directors consider options for starting or optimizing their own integrated care curricula. Future research should examine the educational value, and the overall value to health care systems, of training in the integrated care model.