Differential impact of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy on quality of life of breast cancer survivors: a prospective patient-reported outcomes analysis.

BACKGROUND: In early breast cancer (BC), there has been a trend to escalate endocrine therapy (ET) and to de-escalate chemotherapy (CT). However, the impact of ET versus CT on the quality of life (QoL) of early BC patients is unknown. Here, we characterize the independent contribution of ET and CT on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 2 years after diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected PROs in 4262 eligible patients using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30/BR23 questionnaires inside CANTO trial (NCT01993498). The primary outcome was the C30 summary score (C30-SumSc) at 2 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: From eligible patients, 37.2% were premenopausal and 62.8% postmenopausal; 81.9% received ET and 52.8% CT. In the overall cohort, QoL worsened by 2 years after diagnosis in multiple functions and symptoms; exceptions included emotional function and future perspective, which improved over time. ET (Pint = 0.004), but not CT (Pint = 0.924), had a persistent negative impact on the C30-SumSc. In addition, ET negatively impacted role and social function, pain, insomnia, systemic therapy side-effects, breast symptoms and further limited emotional function and future perspective recovery. Although CT had no impact on the C30-SumSc at 2-years it was associated with deteriorated physical and cognitive function, dyspnea, financial difficulties, body image and breast symptoms. We found a differential effect of treatment by menopausal status; in premenopausal patients, CT, despite only a non-significant trend for deteriorated C30-SumSc (Pint = 0.100), was more frequently associated with QoL domains deterioration than ET, whereas in postmenopausal patients, ET was more frequently associated with QoL deterioration, namely using the C30-SumSc (Pint = 0.004). CONCLUSION(S): QoL deterioration persisted at 2 years after diagnosis with different trajectories by treatment received. ET, but not CT, had a major detrimental impact on C30-SumSc, especially in postmenopausal women. These findings highlight the need to properly select patients for adjuvant ET escalation.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the vinorelbine-lapatinib combination in the treatment of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of intra-venous vinorelbine combined with lapatinib as well as the effect of covariates in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Women with HER2 + locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer progressing after ≤ 2 lines of trastuzumab-based treatment were treated with lapatinib per os starting 7 days (D) (D-7 to D0) before adding vinorelbine on a D1 & D8 every 3 weeks intravenous schedule. Lapatinib was given everyday. Dose levels [DL, lapatinib (mg)/vinorelbine (mg/m(2))] ranged from 750/20 to 1,250/25. A total of 29 patients, 37-76 years old, were treated with the combination of lapatinib + vinorelbine. For pharmacokinetic analysis, 7 time point samples were collected on D1 of cycle 1 for lapatinib and vinorelbine assays. For vinorelbine and lapatinib, respectively, whole blood and plasma concentrations were measured using ultra performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry validated methods. Data analysis was performed using a non-linear mixed effect model program (Monolix version 3.1 s). RESULTS: A three-compartment open model adequately described vinorelbine pharmacokinetics. Body weight (BW) and platelet count significantly influenced blood vinorelbine clearance (CL). BW significantly influenced volume (V) and CL terms. Platelet count influenced vinorelbine elimination CL. The final parameter estimates were as follows: CL = 24.9 L/h, V1 = 8.48 L, Q2 = 50.7 L/h, V2 = 1,320 L, Q3 = 66.1 L/h, and V3 = 62.4 L (Qi and Vi denote inter-compartmental clearance and peripheral volume of distribution, respectively), normalized for a 70-kg patient according to BW allometric scaling (CL is normalized for a 250,000 platelet count). A one-compartment model with linear elimination adequately fitted the lapatinib plasma concentration-time data. The population pharmacokinetic parameters were CL = 27.7 L/h, V = 357 L, and the absorption constant, ka = 0.44 h(-1). The between-subject variabilities (BSV) could be well estimated for CL, V but not for ka. No covariate effect, including body surface area and vinorelbine dosage, could be identified for lapatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic modeling of vinorelbine and lapatinib was consistent with the results previously reported. BW and platelet count were confirmed as influencing blood CL of vinorelbine. A pharmacokinetic interaction occurred between vinorelbine and lapatinib probably due to lapatinib inhibition of CYP450-3A4. The combined lapatinib administration decreases statistically significant the vinorelbine CL. The maximal tolerated dose for the combination of lapatinib with vinorelbine on a q3w schedule is as follows: lapatinib 1,000 mg/day continuously and vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m(2) D1 & D8.

Phase I dose-escalation study of a novel antitumor agent, SR271425, administered intravenously in split doses (d1-d2-d3) in patients with refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: SR271425 is a novel DNA-binding cytotoxic agent with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity in preclinical models,across a variety of the schedule of administration. In toxicological studies, it has been reported to prolong QTc proportionally to C (max). In order to circumvent this C (max)-related QTc prolongation, 5 phase I studies were initiated to investigate 1-h, 24-h, weekly, and split iv infusions. This phase I study assessed a split-dose regimen (a 1-h infusion on each of Days 1 to 3, repeated every 3 weeks) to establish the dose limiting toxicities (DLT), to recommended a phase II dose, and to characterize PK/PD. METHODS: Patient with advanced solid tumors, adequate bone marrow, hepatic, renal function and on specific cardiac criteria were eligible and "3 + 3" design was used for dose escalation. That dose escalation was guided by PK data, toxicities observed and information from other ongoing phase I studies with SR271425. SR271425 plasma levels (PK samples) were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Careful monitoring of ECGs was done, and ECGs were read centrally. RESULTS: Three centers enrolled 19 heavily pretreated patients to six dose levels, from 75 to 450 mg/m(2)/day (i.e., 225-1,350 mg/m(2)/cycle): 12 males and 7 females. Median age 56. Median ECOG, PS = 1. Main tumor types were brain, breast, gynecological, and urological. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range: 1-6). NCI-CTC Grade 1-2 toxicities included nausea, vomiting, asthenia, rash, and yellow skin discoloration. No DLTs were reported, and there were no dose-limiting prolongations of QTc. Both C (end) and AUC increased in a dose-related manner, with no evidence of accumulation between Day 1 and Day 3, consistent with the mean (+/-SD) terminal elimination half-life of 5.11 +/- 1.21 h. Stable disease was observed in five cases. CONCLUSION: Split doses allow high cumulative exposure to SR271425 without significant toxicity, especially without QTc prolongation. MTD was not reached due to the early termination of the SR271425 program by the sponsor.

Phase II study of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in routine daily practice.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first- and second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) under routine clinical conditions. Two hundred and three patients with advanced NSCLC received docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks, with oral corticosteroid pre-medication, of whom 173 were eligible. Median age was 60 (29-78) years and median Karnofsky performance status was 80% (60-100). A total of 77% of patients had metastatic disease, 33% had bone metastases and 18% had liver metastases. The treatment was second-line or more for 72 patients (35%). Overall response rates in the eligible population were 19.7% [95% CI, 12.5-23.0] for both treatments, 22.6% for first-line treatment and 13.8% for second-line treatment. Median survival was 8.3 months and 1-year survival was 35% for the overall population (8.7 months and 38%, respectively, for patients receiving first-line treatment and 7.2 months and 27%, respectively, for patients receiving second-line treatment). Neutropenia, grade 3 and 4, occurred in 57% of the cycles and 5% of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Alopecia (62% of patients), neuro-sensory symptoms (32%), asthenia (28%), diarrhea (22%), nausea (22%) and nail disorders (20%) were the most common non-hematological adverse effects. A total of 33% of patients suffered fluid retention, despite the use of corticosteroid pre-medication, but this was only severe in 1.5% of patients. It was possible to confirm the efficacy of docetaxel as a single agent for first- and second-line chemotherapy in a large patient population treated in a community setting.

A phase II study of docetaxel and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and the safety of docetaxel combined with vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 39 patients, median age 54 years (range: 35-69), with stage IIIB (5 patients; 13%) or IV (34 patients; 87%) NSCLC were treated with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel given intravenously (i. v.) over 1 h on day 1 and with 20 mg/m(2) vinorelbine given i.v. over 15 to 30 min on days 1 and 5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. 9 of the 39 patients had a partial response (overall response rate 23.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.1-39.3%) with a median duration of response of 20 weeks (95% CI; 17-30). The median survival was 40 weeks (95% CI: 21-49 weeks) with a 1-year survival rate of 31% in the intent-to-treat population. Neutropenia grade IV occurred in 33 patients (92%). 16 patients (41%) experienced febrile neutropenia with a concomitant stomatitis in 9 patients (23%). One patient died due to febrile neutropenia associated with a grade 4 stomatitis and 1 patient due to a septicaemia concomitant with a grade 4 neutropenia. Although the combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine is feasible, the efficacy does not seem to be improved compared with single-agent docetaxel or vinorelbine and the rate of febrile neutropenia is unacceptable in this population with incurable disease. Therefore, different doses and/or schedules are to be explored.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether treatment with single-agent docetaxel would result in longer survival than would best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of response (docetaxel arm only), toxicity, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with performance statuses of 0 to 2 and stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer with either measurable or evaluable lesions were eligible for entry onto the study if they had undergone one or more platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and if they had adequate hematology and biochemistry parameters. They were excluded if they had symptomatic brain metastases or if they had previously been treated with paclitaxel. Patients were stratified by performance status and best response to cisplatin chemotherapy and were then randomized to treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (49 patients) or 75 mg/m(2) (55 patients) or best supportive care. Patients in both arms were assessed every 3 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred four patients (103 of whom were eligible for entry onto the study) were well balanced for prognostic factors. Of 84 patients with measurable lesions, six (7. 1%) achieved partial responses (three patients at each dose level). Time to progression was longer for docetaxel patients than for best supportive care patients (10.6 v 6.7 weeks, respectively; P <.001), as was median survival (7.0 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.047). The difference was more significant for docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) patients, compared with corresponding best supportive care patients (7.5 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.010; 1-year survival, 37% v 11%; chi(2) test, P =.003). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 patients treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), three of whom died, and in one patient treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity, with the exception of diarrhea, occurred at a similar rate in both the docetaxel and best supportive care groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with docetaxel is associated with significant prolongation of survival, and at a dose of 75 mg/m(2), the benefits of docetaxel therapy outweigh the risks.

Phase II study of docetaxel alternating with cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The objective of this study was to evaluate a regimen of full doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, using an alternating schedule, as first-line therapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard concomitant schedule does not allow full doses of both drugs to be administered. We wanted to see if there was an advantage to be gained by administering full doses of both docetaxel and cisplatin, using a different schedule. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was given once every 6 weeks from week 1 and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 for two doses and 100 mg/m2 thereafter) once every 6 weeks from week 4, for six cycles (three docetaxel and three cisplatin). Thirty-six of the 44 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Forty-eight percent of the patients had good (KPS 90-100%) performance status. A median of five cycles was administered, for which no dose reductions were necessary. There were 13 of 36 partial responses (36%; 95% CI 21-54%) and 15 of 36 patients achieved stable disease (42%). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, the median time to progression was 4.5 months and the median survival was 9 months. The 1 and 2 year survival rates were 39 and 16%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea (23% of patients), vomiting (18%) and neutropenia (77%). Infections were also common, but not severe. The alternating schedule produced response, toxicity and survival figures that compared favorable with those using the concomitant schedule. This study could serve as a model for future studies of non-cisplatin-containing regimens, in which full doses of docetaxel could alternate with full doses of other new agents active against NSCLC.

A multicenter, randomized, phase III study of docetaxel plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or non-resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

This was an open-label randomized Phase III study of 207 patients with either unresectable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with docetaxel plus best supportive care (BSC) or best supportive care alone. Patients in the chemotherapy arm of the study received docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) as a 1 h intravenous infusion every 21 days until they showed evidence of progressive disease, or estimated maximum benefit obtained or unacceptable side effects. Patients who received docetaxel were pretreated with oral dexamethasone. Patients in the BSC arm should not receive chemotherapy or anticancer therapy except for palliative radiotherapy. Overall survival obtained in the docetaxel arm was significantly longer than in the BSC arm (P=0.026). Two-year survival in the docetaxel arm was 12%, whereas none of the BSC patients survived after 20 months. The response rate was 13.1% (95% CI, 7.5-18.8%). There was a significantly longer time to progression in the docetaxel versus the BSC arm (P<0.001), and statistically significant improvement of clinical symptoms with docetaxel compared to BSC. The quality-of-life descriptors were in favor of docetaxel, and the difference was significant for pain, dyspnea and emotional functioning. The safety profile of docetaxel for this study was similar to that already reported in this patient population.

Overview of docetaxel (Taxotere)/cisplatin combination in non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although it prolongs survival only modestly. Single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) is highly active against NSCLC. The activity and tolerability of two docetaxel/ cisplatin regimens were therefore investigated in two multicenter phase II studies, one in Australia and one in France. Chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable NSCLC received either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 3 weekly (n = 47; Australian study) or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for three cycles then every 6 weeks (n = 51; French study). The majority of the population (74%) had metastatic disease. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for efficacy. Overall response rates were 36% (95% confidence interval, 25 to 47) in all evaluable patients and 34% in patients with metastases. Median duration of response was 6 months, with a 4-month median time to progression. Median survival time was 9 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 34%. A median of four (range, one to nine) treatment cycles were administered. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 14% of patients. Severe infection, which occurred in less than 7% of patients, led to two toxic deaths. Other severe toxicities were rare, with severe stomatitis and severe neurosensory side effects reported in 2% and 1%, respectively, of treated patients. No severe fluid retention occurred. Docetaxel/cisplatin, administered as two different schedules, is well tolerated and exhibits efficacy in the range of the most established combinations in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and cisplatin are two of the most active single agents used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recently reported phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin recommended a dose of 75 mg/m2 of both drugs every 3 weeks for subsequent phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC proven histologically or cytologically. Patients were not permitted to have received prior chemotherapy, extensive radiotherapy, or any radiotherapy to the target lesion and must have had measurable disease. Concurrent treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) or prophylactic antibiotics was not permitted. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in 250 mL 5% dextrose was given intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour immediately before cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in 500 mL normal saline given i.v. over 1 hour in 3-week cycles. Premedication included ondansetron, dexamethasone, promethazine, and standard hyperhydration with magnesium supplementation. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients, two thirds of whom had metastatic disease, were entered onto this phase II study. The majority of patients were male (72%) and of good (WHO 0 to 1) performance status (85%). All 47 patients were assessable for toxicity and 36 were for response. Three patients were ineligible and eight (17%) discontinued treatment because of significant toxicity. In assessable patients, the overall objective response rate was 38.9% (95% confidence limits [CL], 23.1% to 56.5%), 36.1% had stable disease, and 25% progressive disease. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 29.8%. Median survival was 9.6 months and estimated 1-year survival was 33%. Significant (grade 3/4) toxicities included nausea (26%), hypotension (15%), diarrhea (13%), and dyspnea mainly related to chest infection (13%). One patient experienced National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade 3 neurosensory toxicity after eight cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was common and occurred in 87% of patients, but thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 was rare (one patient). Significant (grade 3/4) abnormalities of magnesium levels were common (24%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13% of patients and neutropenic infection in 11%, contributing to two treatment-related deaths. No neutropenic enterocolitis or severe fluid retention was reported. CONCLUSION: Compared with other active regimens used in this setting, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC is an active regimen with a similar toxicity profile to other combination regimens.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) plus cisplatin: an active and well-tolerated combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The activity of the combination of intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks for 3 cycles then every 6 weeks was investigated in 51 chemotherapy naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The population was 92% male, with a median age of 54 years and median performance status of 1; 80% of patients had metastatic disease, including 37% with bone involvement. All patients received prophylactic premedication (ondansetron, dexamethasone plus cetirizine) and standard hyperhydration. With a median of 4 treatment cycles (range 1-9), 14 of 42 evaluable patients responded (overall response rate 33.3%, 95% CI 19.6-49.6%); the median response duration was 7.3 months, median survival 8.4 months, and 1-year survival rate 35%. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, occurring in two-thirds of patients. Neurosensory effects were cumulative but generally mild. No treatment-related deaths occurred. This combination of docetaxel/cisplatin showed activity in advanced NSCLC. While it was not clearly superior to single-agent docetaxel, due to differences in prognostic factors among the patients in open trials, a randomised study would be needed to demonstrate definitively whether cisplatin adds to the activity of docetaxel or not.

Phase II trial of docetaxel with dexamethasone premedication in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the Canadian experience.

We performed a Phase II trial to evaluate the activity and tolerability of docetaxel as a single agent in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-four patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC received i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a median of 4 (range 1-11) cycles. All patients received premedication with oral dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 5 days starting the day before chemotherapy. Seven partial responses were observed among 35 evaluable patients, and the overall response rate was 20% (95% CI 8-37). The median response duration was 5 months, median survival time was 10 months and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 42%. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 10 patients (23%); neutropenic infection occurred in 4 patients, and led to 2 toxic deaths (both patients had borderline exclusion criteria). The corticosteroid premedication effectively reduced the overall incidence (34%) and severity (4% severe) of fluid retention, and delayed the median time to onset from cycle 4 to cycle 7. This study shows the promising efficacy of docetaxel as monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and combination chemotherapy regimens incorporating docetaxel are now being evaluated in this clinical setting.

A phase II trial of fotemustine and cisplatin in central nervous system metastases from non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase II study was conducted in order to determine the feasibility and toxicity of cisplatin combined with the nitrosourea fotemustine in central nervous system metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. 31 chemotherapy-naïve patients were included between November 1990 and April 1993. Computed tomography scan-documented tumour regression in brain metastases was observed in 7 of the 25 evaluable patients, but only 4 of these (16%) lasted more than 4 weeks. In 2 of these 4 patients, the response on central nervous system metastases was considered as complete. The median duration of response was 20.5 weeks and the median survival was 16 weeks overall and 28.5 weeks for responding patients. The limiting toxicity of this regimen was haematological. 2 patients died from infectious pneumonitis while in neutropenia. Treatment delays due to haematological toxicity occurred in 57% of patients. Despite the rather encouraging response rate, such toxicity appears too high when compared to the overall bad prognosis of this population of patients. Cranial radiotherapy remains the standard treatment in this setting and should only be compared in the future to less aggressive schedules.

Phase I-II and pharmacokinetic study of a new fotemustine schedule in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

UNLABELLED: Fotemustine, a new nitrosourea derivative has already demonstrated activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In order to improve its therapeutic index, we designed a protocol in which Fotemustine was delivered with dose escalation on 3 consecutive days as induction therapy followed by a 5-week rest period. Maintenance therapy consisted of 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetic data were assessed during this Phase I-II study and reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with metastatic (17) or locally advanced (2) NSCLC were included in the present study. Ten of those with metastatic disease had brain metastases and 15 had previously received chemotherapy. Fotemustine was given at 50 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 1: four patients), 75 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 2: 16 patients including two who had already received 50 mg/m2) and 100 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (group 3: one patient). RESULTS: The maximal tolerated dose was 75 mg/m2 on day 1-2-3 (total cumulated dose 225 mg/m2). At this dose level, we observed 25% of Grade 3-4 neutropenia and 31% of Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. One patient died of pulmonary infection during aplasia. No other significant toxicity occurred. Of the 17 evaluable patients, one obtained a PR lasting 6 months in group 2 and 1 PR lasting 3 months in group 3. No significant difference was noted in the AUC between days 1, 2 or 3 in any of the seven patients in whom a pharmacokinetic study of Fotemustine was performed. CONCLUSION: Administered on 3 consecutive days, Fotemustine seems to be less effective and more toxic than other schedules tested in NSCLC. Despite the quality of the two responses observed, this protocol has been discontinued and the standard administration on days 1 and 8 remains the schedule of choice in NSCLC.

Summary of phase II data of docetaxel (Taxotere), an active agent in the first- and second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Six phase II studies have been conducted in the United States and Europe using docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. One hundred eighty chemotherapy-naive patients in four studies and 88 patients who failed prior platinum-containing chemotherapy in two studies were treated with docetaxel 75 to 100 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Fifty-nine percent of patients had adenocarcinoma and 82% had stage IV disease. At a dose of 100 mg/m2, 30% of evaluable chemotherapy-naive patients (27% of the intent-to-treat population) and 20% of evaluable platinum-refractory/resistant patients (17% of the intent-to-treat population) achieved a partial response; projected median survival is 9 months in both studies. Neutropenia was the primary dose-limiting acute side effect. Fluid retention, which occurred in patients who received multiple courses of treatment, was common but rarely dose-limiting, and may be ameliorated with prophylactic corticosteroids. Other toxic effects were relatively mild. Docetaxel has significant activity against advanced non-small cell lung cancer, producing a major response in both chemotherapy-naive patients and patients who had failed prior platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Phase II study of nitrosourea fotemustine as single-drug chemotherapy in poor-prognosis non-small-cell lung cancer.

A phase II study was designed to evaluate objective response rate and toxicity of fotemustine as single-drug chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Eighty-seven patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer took part in the study. Seventy-seven were evaluable for response. Of these, 60% had received prior chemotherapy and 74% had metastatic disease. Moreover, 22 patients had central nervous system metastases (of whom 12 were evaluable for this site). Treatment consisted of fotemustine 100 mg m-2 administered on days 1 and 8 followed by a 5 week rest period. Afterwards, responding or stabilised patients received fotemustine 100 mg m-2 every 3 weeks as a maintenance therapy. Toxicity and quality of life were recorded during therapy. Thirteen patients (17%; 95% CI 9-25%) had an objective response (11% for pretreated, 26% for non-pretreated) with a median duration of 22 weeks (range 7-41 weeks). Two objective responses were observed among the 12 patients with evaluable brain metastases. No response was observed among the 14 patients with adenocarcinoma. Haematological, gastrointestinal, hepatic and renal toxicities were mild to moderate and manageable. The most frequent biological adverse reactions were delayed thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Quality of life did not significantly decrease during the first 6 treatment weeks. Moreover, it remained stable during the study period in patients with response or stabilisation, whereas it significantly decreased in patients who experienced progression of the disease. Fotemustine is feasible for single-drug chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer even though poor prognostic variables such as brain metastases are present. It can be administered on an outpatient basis and toxicity is moderate and manageable. Thus, fotemustine can be considered as a putative drug in further combinations.

Fotemustine in the treatment of brain primary tumors and metastases.

Fotemustine is a new chloroethylnitrosourea characterized by the grafting of a phosphonoalanine group onto a nitrosourea radical. Clinical studies using fotemustine have been conducted in malignant glioma, brain metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer, and disseminated malignant melanoma. In recurrent malignant glioma, fotemustine has been used as a single agent: assessed by computed tomography scan, after 8 weeks, the objective response rate was 26.3% among 38 evaluable patients. Median duration of response was 33 weeks. The main toxicity was hematological (thrombocytopenia and leucopenia). A trial with high-dose fotemustine and autologous bone marrow rescue in newly diagnosed glioma was conducted in 26 patients, and 6 showed a partial response. The median overall survival was approximately 11 months. Myelosuppression was noted in all patients except 1, and other toxicity reported was central nervous system toxicity and epigastric pain. Combined with radiotherapy in 55 patients, a 29% response rate was observed, and this combination was well tolerated and easily manageable on an outpatient basis. Finally, fotemustine has been used intraarterially, with 10 objective responses observed among 26 evaluable patients. In brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer, fotemustine proved to be active with a response rate of 16.7%. Combined with cisplatinum, fotemustine is still under study, but preliminary results are promising. In cerebral metastases of disseminated malignant melanoma, fotemustine has been evaluated in a total of 140 patients in the various studies: median response rate is 24.3%, ranging from 8.3% to 60.0%. Fotemustine appears to be a good candidate in the treatment of primary brain tumors and metastases.

Phase II study of fotemustine in untreated inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

A total of 43 patients with advanced, previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a novel nitrosourea, fotemustine, given at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Maintenance treatment consisted of a single injection of 100 mg/m2 given every 21 days. 37 patients were evaluable for response. Of these, 5 patients had a partial response (13.5%; 95% confidence interval, 6%-28%). Toxicity comprised mainly anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities were mild. This phase II study confirms that fotemustine is a moderately active and well-tolerated drug in NSCLC.

Cisplatin-fotemustine combination in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary report of a French multicentre phase II trial.

Fotemustine is a new nitrosourea derivative whose activity has been demonstrated on metastatic melanoma with specific activity on brain metastases and also on poor prognosis lung cancers. Results of in vitro studies of a cisplatin-fotemustine combination seem promising. In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination, we performed two trials. 6 patients entered a preliminary study whose schedule was cisplatin 120 mg/m2 on day 1 and fotemustine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. 22 patients were enrolled in a second study which added 120 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 22 followed by a 4-week rest period. In both trials, maintenance therapy consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and fotemustine 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until progression. Despite the poor prognostic factors which characterised our population (metastatic disease 86%, brain metastases 59%, < or = 80% performance status 45%), the results remain attractive with a 23% partial response rate (29% in non-pretreated patients). Moreover, 3 out of 8 patients with evaluable cerebral metastases achieved a partial response (37.5%). Toxicity was mild and related to the cumulative dose of cisplatin (peripheral neuropathy and renal toxicity). We concluded that these results need to be confirmed in a randomised trial.

Phase II study of fotemustine as second-line treatment after failure of immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sixteen patients who after prior systemic immunotherapy had progressing disease received fotemustine (100 mg/m2) i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by a 5-week rest period. In responding or stabilized patients, maintenance therapy consisted of 100 mg/m2 fotemustine given once every 3 weeks until progression on toxicity occurred. No objective response was observed. Four patients showed stable disease (median duration: 4 months; range: 3-19). The main toxicities were neutropenia (WHO grade 3 and 4: 27%) and thrombocytopenia (WHO grade 3 and 4: 27%). Fotemustine was administered on an outpatient basis and was generally well tolerated, but in our series of patients it had no antitumour activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of immunotherapy.