ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of breathing at FIO2 < 0.21 on disease outcomes have been reported in previous preclinical and clinical studies. However, the safety and intra-hospital feasibility of breathing hypoxic gas for 5 d have not been established. In this study, we examined the physiologic effects of breathing a gas mixture with FIO2 as low as 0.11 in 5 healthy volunteers. METHODS: All 5 subjects completed the study, spending 5 consecutive days in a hypoxic tent, where the ambient oxygen level was lowered in a stepwise manner over 5 d, from FIO2 of 0.16 on the first day to FIO2 of 0.11 on the fifth day of the study. All the subjects returned to an environment at room air on the sixth day. The subjects' SpO2 , heart rate, and breathing frequency were continuously recorded, along with daily blood sampling, neurologic evaluations, transthoracic echocardiography, and mental status assessments. RESULTS: Breathing hypoxia concentration dependently caused profound physiologic changes, including decreased SpO2 and increased heart rate. At FIO2 of 0.14, the mean SpO2 was 92%; at FIO2 of 0.13, the mean SpO2 was 93%; at FIO2 of 0.12, the mean SpO2 was 88%; at FIO2 of 0.11, the mean SpO2 was 85%; and, finally, at an FIO2 of 0.21, the mean SpO2 was 98%. These changes were accompanied by increased erythropoietin levels and reticulocyte counts in blood. All 5 subjects concluded the study with no adverse events. No subjects exhibited signs of mental status changes or pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current physiologic study suggests that, within a hospital setting, delivering FIO2 as low as 0.11 is feasible and safe in healthy subjects, and provides the foundation for future studies in which therapeutic effects of hypoxia breathing are tested.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) showed to improve oxygenation at low doses by reducing intrapulmonary shunt and to display antiviral properties at high doses. To assess the safety and potential benefits, we designed an exploratory clinical trial comparing low-dose with intermittent high-dose iNO to only intermittent high-dose iNO in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this single-center interventional non-inferiority randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04476992), twenty oxygen-dependent COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to the high-dose (200 ppm for 30 min) + continuous low-dose (20 ppm) iNO group (iNO200/20) or the high-dose iNO group (iNO200). Methemoglobinemia (MetHb) assessed 48 h after iNO initiation was the primary endpoint. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2, inflammatory markers during hospitalization, and heart ultrasounds during the iNO200 treatments were evaluated. RESULTS: MetHb difference between iNO groups remained within the non-inferiority limit of 3 %, indicating comparable treatments despite being statistically different (p-value<0.01). Both groups presented similar SpO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 h (iNO200 vs. iNO200/20 341[334-356] vs. 359 [331-380], respectively, p-value = 0.436). Both groups showed the same time to SARS-CoV-2 negativization, hospital length of stay, and recovery time. iNO-treated patients showed quicker SARS-CoV-2 negativization compared to a similar group of non-iNO patients (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.04-6.33). During the 228 treatments, iNO200 and iNO200/20 groups were comparable for safety, hemodynamic stability, and respiratory function improvement. CONCLUSIONS: iNO200/20 and iNO200 are equally safe in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-induced respiratory failure with regards to MetHb and NO2. Larger studies should investigate whether iNO200/20 leads to better outcomes compared to non-iNO treated patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Nitric Oxide , Humans , Male , Nitric Oxide/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Female , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, DrugSubject(s)
Electric Impedance , Lung , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Male , Tomography/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with intravascular hemolysis which depletes endogenous nitric oxide (NO). The impact of hemolysis on pulmonary arterial compliance (PAC) and right ventricular systolic function has not been explored yet. We hypothesized that decreased NO availability is associated with worse PAC and right ventricular systolic function after CPB. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of an observational cohort study in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB at Massachusetts General Hospital, USA (2014-2015). We assessed PAC (stroke volume/pulmonary artery pulse pressure ratio), and right ventricular function index (RVFI) (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure/cardiac output), as well as NO consumption at 15 min, 4 h and 12 h after CPB. Patients were stratified by CPB duration. Further, we assessed the association between changes in NO consumption with PAC and RVFI between 15min and 4 h after CPB. RESULTS: PAC was lowest at 15min after CPB and improved over time (n = 50). RVFI was highest -worse right ventricular function- at CPB end and gradually decreased. Changes in hemolysis, PAC and RVFI differed over time by CPB duration. PAC inversely correlated with total pulmonary resistance (TPR). TPR and PAC positively and negatively correlated with RVFI, respectively. NO consumption between 15min and 4 h after CPB correlated with changes in PAC (-0.28 ml/mmHg, 95%CI -0.49 to -0.01, p = 0.012) and RVFI (0.14 mmHg*L-1*min, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.18, p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustments. CONCLUSION: PAC and RVFI are worse at CPB end and improve over time. Depletion of endogenous NO may contribute to explain changes in PAC and RVFI after CPB.
Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Hemolysis , Pulmonary Artery , Ventricular Function, Right , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Ventricular Function, Right/physiology , Aged , Pulmonary Artery/physiology , Pulmonary Artery/physiopathology , Nitric Oxide/metabolism , Systole/physiology , Cohort Studies , ComplianceSubject(s)
Electric Impedance , Humans , Male , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/physiopathology , Female , Adult , Respiration , Tomography/methods , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Circulation/physiology , KineticsSubject(s)
Esophagectomy , Respiratory Therapy , Humans , Uncertainty , Breathing Exercises , Muscles , Respiratory Muscles/physiology , Muscle StrengthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can potentially modulate inspiratory effort (ΔPes), which is the major determinant of self-inflicted lung injury. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does high PEEP reduce ΔPes in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS on assisted ventilation? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 200 mm Hg and ΔPes ≥ 10 cm H2O underwent a randomized sequence of four ventilator settings: PEEP = 5 cm H2O or PEEP = 15 cm H2O + synchronous (pressure support ventilation [PSV]) or asynchronous (pressure-controlled intermittent mandatory ventilation [PC-IMV]) inspiratory assistance. ΔPes and respiratory system, lung, and chest wall mechanics were assessed with esophageal manometry and occlusions. PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment and overinflation, lung dynamic strain, and tidal volume distribution were assessed with electrical impedance tomography. RESULTS: ΔPes was not systematically different at high vs low PEEP (pressure support ventilation: median, 20 cm H2O; interquartile range (IQR), 15-24 cm H2O vs median, 15 cm H2O; IQR, 13-23 cm H2O; P = .24; pressure-controlled intermittent mandatory ventilation: median, 20; IQR, 18-23 vs median, 19; IQR, 17-25; P = .67, respectively). Similarly, respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressures, tidal volume, lung/chest wall mechanics, and pendelluft extent were not different between study phases. High PEEP resulted in lower or higher ΔPes, respiratory system driving pressure, and transpulmonary driving pressure according to whether this increased or decreased respiratory system compliance (r = -0.85, P < .001; r = -0.75, P < .001; r = -0.80, P < .001, respectively). PEEP-induced changes in respiratory system compliance were driven by its lung component and were dependent on the extent of PEEP-induced alveolar overinflation (r = -0.66, P = .006). High PEEP caused variable recruitment and systematic redistribution of tidal volume toward dorsal lung regions, thereby reducing dynamic strain in ventral areas (pressure support ventilation: median, 0.49; IQR, 0.37-0.83 vs median, 0.96; IQR, 0.62-1.56; P = .003; pressure-controlled intermittent mandatory ventilation: median, 0.65; IQR, 0.42-1.31 vs median, 1.14; IQR, 0.79-1.52; P = .002). All results were consistent during synchronous and asynchronous inspiratory assistance. INTERPRETATION: The impact of high PEEP on ΔPes and lung stress is interindividually variable according to different effects on the respiratory system and lung compliance resulting from alveolar overinflation. High PEEP may help mitigate the risk of self-inflicted lung injury solely if it increases lung/respiratory system compliance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04241874; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Subject(s)
Cross-Over Studies , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Tidal Volume , Humans , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Male , Female , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Tidal Volume/physiology , Aged , Respiratory Mechanics/physiology , Adult , Inhalation/physiology , Manometry/methodsABSTRACT
Ultrasound evaluation of the upper airway has emerged as an essential instrument for clinicians, offering real-time assessment that can help to guide interventions and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to provide health care providers with a practical approach to performing ultrasound evaluation of the upper airway, covering basic physics relevant to upper airway ultrasound, the identification of key anatomical structures, and elucidating its various clinical applications, such as prediction of difficult airway, confirmation of endotracheal intubation, and guidance for surgical airway procedures and airway blocks. We also discuss evidence-based training programs, limitations, and future directions of ultrasound imaging of the upper airway.
Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Ultrasonography/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A protective intra-operative lung ventilation strategy has been widely recommended for laparoscopic surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and its effects during pneumoperitoneum. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has recently been introduced as a bedside tool to monitor lung ventilation in real-time. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that individually titrated EIT-PEEP adjusted to the surgical intervention would improve respiratory mechanics during and after surgery. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing. PATIENTS: Seventy-five patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned 2â:â1 to individualised EIT-titrated PEEP (PEEPEIT; nâ=â50) or traditional PEEP 5âcmH2O (PEEP5âcmH2O; nâ=â25). The PEEPEIT group received individually titrated EIT-PEEP during pneumoperitoneum. The PEEP5âcmH2O group received PEEP of 5âcmH2O during pneumoperitoneum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes were individualised PEEP levels, oxygenation, respiratory and haemodynamic status, and occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within 7âdays. RESULTS: Compared with PEEP5âcmH2O, patients who received PEEPEIT had higher respiratory system compliance (mean values during surgery of 44.3â±â11.3 vs. 31.9â±â6.6,âmlâcmH2O-1; Pâ<â0.001), lower driving pressure (11.5â±â2.1 vs. 14.0â±â2.4âcmH2O; Pâ<â0.001), better oxygenation (mean PaO2/FiO2 427.5â±â28.6 vs. 366.8â±â36.4; Pâ=â0.003), and less postoperative atelectasis (19.4â±â1.6 vs. 46.3â±â14.8âg of lung tissue mass; Pâ=â0.003). Haemodynamic values did not differ significantly between the groups. No adverse effects were observed during surgery. CONCLUSION: Individualised PEEP by EIT may improve intra-operative pulmonary mechanics and oxygenation without impairing haemodynamic stability, and decrease postoperative atelectasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) identifier: ChiCTR2100045166.
Subject(s)
Pneumoperitoneum , Pulmonary Atelectasis , Humans , Electric Impedance , Pneumoperitoneum/etiology , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Pulmonary Atelectasis/etiology , Pulmonary Atelectasis/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tomography/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Experimental models suggest that prone position and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) homogenize ventral-dorsal ventilation distribution and regional respiratory compliance. However, this response still needs confirmation on humans. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the changes in global and regional respiratory mechanics in supine and prone positions over a range of PEEP levels in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Twenty-two intubated patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 pneumonia. INTERVENTIONS: Electrical impedance tomography and esophageal manometry were applied during PEEP titrations from 20 cm H2O to 6 cm H2O in supine and prone positions. MEASUREMENTS: Global respiratory system compliance (Crs), chest wall compliance, regional lung compliance, ventilation distribution in supine and prone positions. MAIN RESULTS: Compared with supine position, the maximum level of Crs changed after prone position in 59% of ARDS patients (n = 13), of which the Crs decreased in 32% (n = 7) and increased in 27% (n = 6). To reach maximum Crs after pronation, PEEP was changed in 45% of the patients by at least 4 cm H2O. After pronation, the ventilation and compliance of the dorsal region did not consistently change in the entire sample of patients, increasing specifically in a subgroup of patients who showed a positive change in Crs when transitioning from supine to prone position. These combined changes in ventilation and compliance suggest dorsal recruitment postpronation. In addition, the subgroup with increased Crs postpronation demonstrated the most pronounced difference between dorsal and ventral ventilation distribution from supine to prone position (p = 0.01), indicating heterogeneous ventilation distribution in prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Prone position modifies global respiratory compliance in most patients with ARDS. Only a subgroup of patients with a positive change in Crs postpronation presented a consistent improvement in dorsal ventilation and compliance. These data suggest that the response to pronation on global and regional mechanics can vary among ARDS patients, with some patients presenting more dorsal lung recruitment than others.
ABSTRACT
Rationale: The effects of high-dose inhaled nitric oxide on hypoxemia in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) acute respiratory failure are unknown. Objectives: The primary outcome was the change in arterial oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2) at 48 hours. The secondary outcomes included: time to reach a PaO2/FiO2.300mmHg for at least 24 hours, the proportion of participants with a PaO2/FiO2.300mmHg at 28 days, and survival at 28 and at 90 days. Methods: Mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled in a phase II, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled parallel-arm trial. Participants in the intervention arm received inhaled nitric oxide at 80 ppm for 48 hours, compared with the control group receiving usual care (without placebo). Measurements and Main Results: A total of 193 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The mean change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 hours was 28.3mmHg in the intervention group and 21.4mmHg in the control group (mean difference, 39.1mmHg; 95% credible interval [CrI], 18.1 to 60.3). The mean time to reach a PaO2/FiO2.300mmHg in the interventional group was 8.7 days, compared with 8.4 days for the control group (mean difference, 0.44; 95% CrI, 23.63 to 4.53). At 28 days, the proportion of participants attaining a PaO2/FiO2.300mmHg was 27.7% in the inhaled nitric oxide group and 17.2% in the control subjects (risk ratio, 2.03; 95% CrI, 1.11 to 3.86). Duration of ventilation and mortality at 28 and 90 days did not differ. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The use of high-dose inhaled nitric oxide resulted in an improvement of PaO2/FiO2 at 48 hours compared with usual care in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency , Adult , Humans , Nitric Oxide/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Single-Blind Method , Respiratory Insufficiency/drug therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiration, Artificial , Administration, InhalationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bedside electrical impedance tomography could be useful to visualize evolving pulmonary perfusion distributions when acute respiratory distress syndrome worsens or in response to ventilatory and positional therapies. In experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome, this study evaluated the agreement of electrical impedance tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography perfusion distributions at two injury time points and in response to increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and prone position. METHODS: Eleven mechanically ventilated (VT 8 ml · kg-1) Yorkshire pigs (five male, six female) received bronchial hydrochloric acid (3.5 ml · kg-1) to invoke lung injury. Electrical impedance tomography and computed tomography perfusion images were obtained at 2 h (early injury) and 24 h (late injury) after injury in supine position with PEEP 5 and 10 cm H2O. In eight animals, electrical impedance tomography and computed tomography perfusion imaging were also conducted in the prone position. Electrical impedance tomography perfusion (QEIT) and computed tomography perfusion (QCT) values (as percentages of image total) were compared in eight vertical regions across injury stages, levels of PEEP, and body positions using mixed-effects linear regression. The primary outcome was agreement between QEIT and QCT, defined using limits of agreement and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Pao2/Fio2 decreased over the course of the experiment (healthy to early injury, -253 [95% CI, -317 to -189]; early to late injury, -88 [95% CI, -151 to -24]). The limits of agreement between QEIT and QCT were -4.66% and 4.73% for the middle 50% quantile of average regional perfusion, and the correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.90]; P < 0.001). Electrical impedance tomography and computed tomography showed similar perfusion redistributions over injury stages and in response to increased PEEP. QEIT redistributions after positional therapy underestimated QCT in ventral regions and overestimated QCT in dorsal regions. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical impedance tomography closely approximated computed tomography perfusion measures in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome, in the supine position, over injury progression and with increased PEEP. Further validation is needed to determine the accuracy of electrical impedance tomography in measuring perfusion redistributions after positional changes.
Subject(s)
Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Male , Female , Swine , Animals , Electric Impedance , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Lung , Perfusion , Tomography/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While prior studies of platelet transfusion in critical care have focused on transfusions given, proper analysis of clinical transfusion practice also requires consideration of the decision not to transfuse. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We introduce a new method to assess transfusion practice based on decision time intervals (DTIs). Each patient's intensive care (ICU) stay was segmented into a series of DTIs defined by a time interval following results of a complete blood count (CBC). We studied the presence of 17 clinical factors during each DTI whether transfusion was given or not. We used a generalized linear mixed model to assess the most influential clinical triggers for platelet transfusion. RESULTS: Among 6125 ICU patients treated between October 2016 and October 2021, we analyzed 39,745 DTIs among patients (n = 2921) who had at least one DTI with thrombocytopenia (≤150,000/µL). We found no association between platelet count and two markers of bleeding: drop in hemoglobin and chest tube drainage. We found that the majority of DTIs were associated with no platelet transfusion regardless of the platelet count; that no specific platelet value triggered transfusion; but rather that multiple clinical factors in conjunction with the platelet count influenced the decision to transfuse. DISCUSSION: DTI analysis represents a new method to assess transfusion practice that considers both transfusions given and not given, and that analyzes clinical circumstances present when decisions regarding transfusion are made. The method is easily adapted to blood components other than platelet transfusions and is easily extended to other ICU and other hospital settings.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , Platelet Transfusion , Humans , Critical Care , Blood Platelets , Platelet CountABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome is a critical modulator of host immunity and is linked to the immune response to respiratory viral infections. However, few studies have gone beyond describing broad compositional alterations in severe COVID-19, defined as acute respiratory or other organ failure. METHODS: We profiled 127 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (n = 79 with severe COVID-19 and 48 with moderate) who collectively provided 241 stool samples from April 2020 to May 2021 to identify links between COVID-19 severity and gut microbial taxa, their biochemical pathways, and stool metabolites. RESULTS: Forty-eight species were associated with severe disease after accounting for antibiotic use, age, sex, and various comorbidities. These included significant in-hospital depletions of Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans and Roseburia hominis, each previously linked to post-acute COVID syndrome or "long COVID," suggesting these microbes may serve as early biomarkers for the eventual development of long COVID. A random forest classifier achieved excellent performance when tasked with classifying whether stool was obtained from patients with severe vs. moderate COVID-19, a finding that was externally validated in an independent cohort. Dedicated network analyses demonstrated fragile microbial ecology in severe disease, characterized by fracturing of clusters and reduced negative selection. We also observed shifts in predicted stool metabolite pools, implicating perturbed bile acid metabolism in severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we show that the gut microbiome differentiates individuals with a more severe disease course after infection with COVID-19 and offer several tractable and biologically plausible mechanisms through which gut microbial communities may influence COVID-19 disease course. Further studies are needed to expand upon these observations to better leverage the gut microbiome as a potential biomarker for disease severity and as a target for therapeutic intervention.