ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic directly increased mortality and morbidity globally. In addition, it has had extensive indirect ill effects on healthcare service delivery across health systems worldwide. We aimed to describe how patient access to diabetes care was affected by the pandemic in Manila, the Philippines. We used an explanatory, sequential mixed method approach including a cross-sectional survey (n = 150) and in-depth interviews of patients (n = 19), focus group discussions of healthcare workers (n = 22), and key informant interviews of health facility administrators (n = 3) from October 2021 to January 2022. Larger proportions of patients reported absence of livelihood (67.3%), being in the lowest average monthly household income group (17.3%), and disruptions in diabetes care (54.0%) during the pandemic. They identified the imposition of lockdowns, covidization of the healthcare system, and financial instability as contributors to the reduced availability, accessibility, and affordability of diabetes-related consultations, medications, and diagnostics. At least a quarter of the patients experienced catastrophic health expenditures across all areas of diabetes care during the pandemic. Most healthcare workers and administrators identified telemedicine as a potential but incomplete tool for reaching more patients, especially those deemed lost to follow-up. In the Philippines, the pandemic negatively impacted access to essential diabetes care.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prolonged hospitalization leads to poorer health outcomes and consumes limited hospital resources. This study identified factors associated with prolonged length of stay (PLOS) among internal medicine patients admitted in a tertiary government hospital. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 386 adult patients admitted under the primary service of General Internal Medicine at the Philippine General Hospital from January 1 to December 31, 2019. PLOS was defined as at least 14 days for emergency admissions or 3 days for elective admissions. Sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, admission- and hospital system-related factors, disease-specific factors, outcome on the last day of hospitalization, and hospitalization costs were obtained. We determined the proportion with PLOS and reviewed reasons for discharge delays. We conducted multiple logistic regression analyses to assess associations between various factors and PLOS. RESULTS: The prevalence of PLOS is 19.17% (95% CI 15.54, 23.42). Positive predictors include being partially dependent on admission (aOR 2.61, 95% CI 0.99, 6.86), more co-managing services (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06, 1.50), and longer duration of intravenous antibiotics (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.22, 1.51). The only negative predictor is the need for intravenous antibiotics (aOR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04, 0.54). The most common reason for discharge delays was prolonged treatment. The median hospitalization cost of patients with PLOS was PHP 77,427.20 (IQR 102,596). CONCLUSIONS: Almost a fifth of emergency admissions and a quarter of elective admissions had PLOS. Addressing factors related to predictors such as functional status on admission, number of co-managing services, and use of intravenous antibiotics can guide clinical and administrative decisions, including careful attention to vulnerable patients and judicious use of resources.
