Outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in patients with t(11;14) light chain amyloidosis after failure of daratumumab-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab's incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections. CONCLUSION: These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure.

Safety and Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors for Amyloid Light-Chain Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated benefit in patients with heart failure, but minimal data exists around the use of these medications in amyloid light-chain cardiomyopathy (AL-CM). We performed a retrospective study assessing the safety and efficacy of SGLT2i in AL-CM. METHODS: We queried our institutional registry and identified 27 AL-CM patients who received SGLT2i. The safety analysis included all 27 patients and assessed SGLT2i-associated adverse events, hospitalizations, and deaths. To decrease confounding, the efficacy analysis included only a subset of patients with stable disease (on stable anti-plasma cell therapy for ≥2 months prior to baseline and achieved at least a hematologic Very Good Partial Response) and compared disease marker changes in these patients (n=17) with those of a contemporaneous untreated control cohort from our registry (n=21). RESULTS: The mean age of the overall population was 68.6 (standard deviation 9.4) years. Seven (14.6%) patients had diabetes, and 19 (39.6%) had chronic kidney disease. In the safety analysis, median follow-up time was 10.9 (interquartile range 7.2) months. Two (7.4%) patients discontinued SGLT2i due to hypovolemia and genital irritation, and 6 (22.2%) additional patients temporarily held SGLT2i due to an adverse event, commonly related to volume depletion. Thirteen hospitalizations, all considered unrelated to SGLT2i use, and no deaths occurred. In the efficacy analysis, SGLT2i-treated patients had more severe disease at baseline than controls, demonstrating significantly higher median troponin-T and loop diuretic dose (P<0.05). Compared with controls, SGLT2i treatment was associated with significantly greater reductions in loop diuretic dose (P<0.001) and NTproBNP (P=0.033) across 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up timepoints. SGLT2i treatment was also associated with a significantly greater reduction in mean arterial pressure at 12 months (P=0.031) but not at other timepoints. No significant differences were observed on changes in weight, eGFR, troponin-T, proteinuria, or albumin. CONCLUSIONS: In this small-scale retrospective study, we demonstrate that SGLT2i is well-tolerated by most patients with AL-CM, but volume depletion symptoms may limit continuous use. SGLT2i may aid management of congestion in AL-CM as evidenced by reduced diuretic dose and NTproBNP without adverse renal effects. Larger long-term studies are needed to build on our findings.

Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: multi-institutional real-world study.

The objective of our study was to report real-world data on the safety and efficacy of standard-of-care teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of teclistamab up until August 2023. One hundred and ten patients were included, of whom, 86% had triple-class refractory disease, 76% penta-refractory disease, and 35% had prior exposure to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting therapies. The overall response rate (ORR) in our cohort was 62%, with a ≥ very good partial remission (VGPR) rate of 51%. The ORR in patients with and without prior BCMA-targeted therapies was 54% vs 67%, respectively (p = 0.23). At a median follow-up of 3.5 months (range, 0.39-10.92), the estimated 3 month and 6 month progression free survival (PFS) was 57% (95% CI, 48%, 68%) and 52% (95% CI, 42%, 64%) respectively. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 56% and 11% respectively, with grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS noted in 3.5% and 4.6% of patients respectively. 78 unique infections were diagnosed in 44 patients, with the incidence of all-grade and grade ≥3 infections being 40% vs 26% respectively. Primary prophylaxis with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was associated with a significantly lower infection risk on multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.17, 0.64; p = 0.001).

The changing spectrum of infection with BCMA and GPRC5D targeting bispecific antibody (bsAb) therapy in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.

There is a paucity of granular data on infection risk with B-cell maturation antigen (BMCA) and GPRC5D bispecific antibodies (bsAb) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The aim of our multi-institutional study was to characterize the incidence, etiologies, and risk factors of infections from the start of therapy to the last follow-up or 90 days after study exit. A total of 66 patients received BCMA bsAb monotherapy, 15 GPRC5D bsAb monotherapy, and 15 GPRC5D bsAb combination therapy with daratumumab and/or pomalidomide. While the infection rate per 100 days was 0.57 for BCMA bsAb, it was 0.62 for GPRC5D bsAb combination and 0.13 for GPRC5D bsAb monotherapy; P=0.05. The proportion of infections that were grade ≥3 was higher in the BCMA bsAb group compared to the GPRC5D groups (58% vs. 36%; P=0.04). Grade 5 events were observed in 8% (n=8) of the patients, all treated with BCMA bsAb. The 9 month cumulative incidence of any grade of infection was similar in the BCMA and GPRC5D-combination groups (57% and 62%) and significantly higher than in the GPRC5D-mono group (16%); P=0.012. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 infections was highest in the BCMA group reaching 54% at 18 months; P=0.06. Multivariate analysis showed that BCMA bsAb therapy or GPRC5D combination therapy, history of previous infections, baseline lymphopenia, and baseline hypogammaglobulinemia were significantly associated with a higher risk of grade ≥3 infections. Our results indicate that BCMA bsAb and GPRC5D-combination therapies in RRMM are associated with higher cumulative incidence of infection and grade ≥3 infection compared to GPRC5D bsAb mono.

First report of outcomes in patients with stage IIIb AL amyloidosis treated with Dara-VCD front-line therapy.

Although Dara-VCD (daratumumab-bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone) has revolutionized the treatment of newly diagnosed Amyloid Light chain (AL) amyloidosis, patients with stage IIIb disease were excluded in the pivotal trial. We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study to investigate the outcomes of 19 consecutive patients treated with Dara-VCD front-line therapy who had stage IIIb AL at diagnosis. More than two thirds presented with New York Heart Association Class III/IV symptoms, and had a median of two organs involved (range, 2-4). The haematologic overall response rate was 100%, with 17/19 patients (89.5%) achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) or better. Haematologic responses were achieved rapidly, as evidenced by 63% of evaluable patients with involved serum free light chains (iFLC) < 2 mg/dl and the difference between involved and uninvolved serum free light chains (dFLC) <1 mg/dl at three months. Among 18 evaluable patients, 10 (56%) achieved a cardiac organ response and six (33%) cardiac VGPR or better. The median time to first cardiac response was 1.9 months (range, 0.4-7.3). At a median follow-up of 12 months for surviving patients, estimated one-year overall survival was 67.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43.8-84.7]. The incidence of grade 3 or higher infections was 21%, with no infection-related mortality thus far. In summary, Dara-VCD has a promising efficacy and safety profile in stage IIIb AL, and should be studied in prospective trials.

Dual targeting of protein translation and nuclear protein export results in enhanced antimyeloma effects.

Selinexor (KPT-330) is a small molecule inhibitor of XPO1, which mediates the transport of tumor suppressor proteins, oncogene messenger RNAs, and other proteins involved in governing cell growthfrom the cell nucleus to the cytoplasm. It is overexpressed in many cancer types. Because eukaryotic translation initiator factor 4E (eIF4E) plays a critical role in protein translation in cancer cells in multiple myeloma (MM), we evaluated the effectiveness of combined inhibition of protein translation and nuclear export in MM. Selinexor, an inhibitor of nuclear protein export, dose-dependently decreased eIF4E, IKZF1, and c-MYC protein levels. Using a doxycycline-inducible-pLKO-Tet-On vector, knockdown of eIF4E significantly enhanced the antiproliferative effects of selinexor, sensitized resistant MM cells to selinexor, and increased apoptosis in MM cells. Immunofluorescent analysis of MM cells showed that the combined treatment increased the localization of residual eIF4E to the nucleus compared with selinexor-only treatment. The overexpression of eIF4E at least partially rescued the effects of selinexor in MM cells by reducing G1 cell cycle arrest and increasing the selinexor-IC50 10-fold. Moreover, the combination of selinexor with pharmacologic inhibitors of protein translation showed synergistic anti-MM effects. These results suggest a synergistic anti-MM effect of selinexor combined with eIF4E inhibitors in vitro. Our work provides a better understanding of the potential mechanism of resistance to selinexor and a rationale for combining selinexor with eIF4E inhibitors for the treatment of MM.

Impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on treatment outcomes in patients with amyloid light-chain amyloidosis: subanalyses from the ANDROMEDA study.

BACKGROUND: Cytogenetic abnormalities are common in patients with amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis; some are associated with poorer outcomes. This post hoc analysis of ANDROMEDA evaluated the impact of certain cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes in this patient population. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis were randomised 1:1 to daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (D-VCd) or VCd. Outcomes were evaluated in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in patients with t(11;14), amp1q21, del13q14, and del17p13. RESULTS: Overall, 321 patients had cytogenetic testing (D-VCd, n = 155; VCd, n = 166); most common abnormalities were t(11;14) and amp1q21. At a median follow-up of 20.3 months, haematologic complete response rates were higher with D-VCd vs VCd across all cytogenetic subgroups and organ response rates were numerically higher with D-VCd vs VCd across most subgroups. Point estimates for hazard ratio of major organ deterioration-PFS and -EFS favoured D-VCd over VCd for all cytogenetic subgroups. Deep haematologic responses (involved minus uninvolved free light chains [FLC] <10 mg/L or involved FLC ≤20 mg/L) were seen in more patients with D-VCd than VCd in all ITT and t(11;14) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the use of D-VCd as standard of care in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis regardless of cytogenetic abnormalities.

How do we manage t(11;14) plasma cell disorders with venetoclax?

The oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with t(11;14) plasma cell disorders, both as a single-agent and in combination. However, there was an increased mortality signal in the randomized BELLINI trial that was primarily driven by non-t(11;14) patients. Based on current evidence, venetoclax is included as an option for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) plasma cell dyscrasias in NCCN guidelines and is being widely used in clinical practice. In this review, we aim to critically appraise the current literature and perform case-based illustration of our approach to management of t(11;14) plasma cell disorders with venetoclax.

Impact of light chain isotype on clinical features and outcomes in systemic AL amyloidosis.

We performed a retrospective cohort study in AL amyloidosis to investigate the impact of light chain (LC) isotype on clinical features in 112 consecutive patients. Patients with kappa LC isotype had a significantly higher difference in free light chain (dFLC) (median, 61.5 vs. 21.6 mg/dL, p = .02) and involved/uninvolved FLC ratio (median, 63.5 vs. 10.6, p < .01) compared to lambda. Patients with lambda LC had a higher kidney involvement (64% vs. 38%, p = .02) but similar cardiac involvement rate (75% vs 72%; p = .81) as kappa. The hematologic ≥ VGPR rate after first-line therapy was similar (kappa [61%] vs lambda [68%]; p = .46). At a median follow-up of 43 months for surviving patients, the hazard ratio (kappa/lambda) for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.43-1.38; p = .37) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.19-1.28; p = .14) respectively. Achievement of iFLC < 2 mg/dL and dFLC < 1 mg/dL was predictive of superior OS irrespective of LC isotype.

Patients Recently Treated for B-lymphoid Malignancies Show Increased Risk of Severe COVID-19.

Patients with B-lymphoid malignancies have been consistently identified as a population at high risk of severe COVID-19. Whether this is exclusively due to cancer-related deficits in humoral and cellular immunity, or whether risk of severe COVID-19 is increased by anticancer therapy, is uncertain. Using data derived from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19), we show that patients treated for B-lymphoid malignancies have an increased risk of severe COVID-19 compared with control populations of patients with non-B-lymphoid malignancies. Among patients with B-lymphoid malignancies, those who received anticancer therapy within 12 months of COVID-19 diagnosis experienced increased COVID-19 severity compared with patients with non-recently treated B-lymphoid malignancies, after adjustment for cancer status and several other prognostic factors. Our findings suggest that patients recently treated for a B-lymphoid malignancy are at uniquely high risk for severe COVID-19. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study suggests that recent therapy for a B-lymphoid malignancy is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 severity. These findings provide rationale to develop mitigation strategies targeted at the uniquely high-risk population of patients with recently treated B-lymphoid malignancies. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 171.

Pembrolizumab plus dinaciclib in patients with hematologic malignancies: the phase 1b KEYNOTE-155 study.

Preclinical data demonstrated that combining an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor with a cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibitor provided enhanced antitumor activity with no significant toxicities, suggesting this combination may be a potential therapeutic option. The multicohort, phase 1 KEYNOTE-155 study evaluated the safety and antitumor activity of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab plus the CDK9 inhibitor dinaciclib in patients with relapsed or refractory (rr) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and multiple myeloma (MM). Patients enrolled were ≥18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of CLL, DLBCL, or MM. The study included 2 phases: a dose-evaluation phase to determine dose-limiting toxicities and a signal-detection phase. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks plus dinaciclib 7 mg/m2 on day 1 and 10 mg/m2 on day 8 of cycle 1 and 14 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of cycles 2 and later. Primary endpoint was safety, and a key secondary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Seventy-two patients were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of study treatment (CLL, n = 17; DLBCL, n = 38; MM, n = 17). Pembrolizumab plus dinaciclib was generally well tolerated and produced no unexpected toxicities. The ORRs were 29.4% (5/17, rrCLL), 21.1% (8/38, rrDLBCL), and 0% (0/17, rrMM), respectively. At data cutoff, all 72 patients had discontinued treatment, 38 (52.8%) because of progressive disease. These findings demonstrate activity with combination pembrolizumab plus dinaciclib and suggest that a careful and comprehensive approach to explore anti-PD-1 and CDK9 inhibitor combinations is warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02684617.

Phase 1a/b study of monoclonal antibody CAEL-101 (11-1F4) in patients with AL amyloidosis.

Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis is characterized by pathologic deposition of immunoglobulin light chains as amyloid fibrils in vital organs, leading to organ impairment and eventual death. That the process is reversible was evidenced in an in vivo experimental model in which fibril-reactive chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) 11-1F4 directly targeted human light-chain amyloid deposits and affected their removal via a phagocyte-mediated response. To determine the tolerability and potential amyloidolytic effect of this agent (now designated mAb CAEL-101), we conducted a phase 1a/b study involving 27 patients, most of whom had manifestations of organ involvement. This was an open-label study in which phase 1a patients received mAb CAEL-101 as a single intravenous infusion with escalating dose levels from 0.5 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In phase 1b, the antibody was administered as a graded series of 4 weekly infusions. For both phases, there were no drug-related serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities among recipients, and the MTD was not reached. The majority of patients had deep hematologic responses but persistent organ disease prior to treatment. Fifteen of 24 patients (63%) who manifested cardiac, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, or soft tissue involvement had a therapeutic response to mAb CAEL-101 as evidenced by serum biomarkers or objective imaging modalities with a median time to response of 3 weeks. Infusions of mAb CAEL-101 were well tolerated and, for the majority, resulted in improved organ function, notably for those with cardiac impairment. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02245867.

Daratumumab-Based Treatment for Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils of light chains produced by clonal CD38+ plasma cells. Daratumumab, a human CD38-targeting antibody, may improve outcomes for this disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis to receive six cycles of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone either alone (control group) or with subcutaneous daratumumab followed by single-agent daratumumab every 4 weeks for up to 24 cycles (daratumumab group). The primary end point was a hematologic complete response. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 11.4 months. The percentage of patients who had a hematologic complete response was significantly higher in the daratumumab group than in the control group (53.3% vs. 18.1%) (relative risk ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 4.1; P<0.001). Survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression favored the daratumumab group (hazard ratio for major organ deterioration, hematologic progression, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; P = 0.02). At 6 months, more cardiac and renal responses occurred in the daratumumab group than in the control group (41.5% vs. 22.2% and 53.0% vs. 23.9%, respectively). The four most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (13.0% in the daratumumab group and 10.1% in the control group), pneumonia (7.8% and 4.3%, respectively), cardiac failure (6.2% and 4.8%), and diarrhea (5.7% and 3.7%). Systemic administration-related reactions to daratumumab occurred in 7.3% of the patients. A total of 56 patients died (27 in the daratumumab group and 29 in the control group), most due to amyloidosis-related cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone was associated with higher frequencies of hematologic complete response and survival free from major organ deterioration or hematologic progression. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ANDROMEDA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03201965.).