Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 244, 2024 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39014421

ABSTRACT

This review offers a comprehensive guide for general intensivists on the utility of continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring for critically ill patients. Beyond the primary role of EEG in detecting seizures, this review explores its utility in neuroprognostication, monitoring neurological deterioration, assessing treatment responses, and aiding rehabilitation in patients with encephalopathy, coma, or other consciousness disorders. Most seizures and status epilepticus (SE) events in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting are nonconvulsive or subtle, making cEEG essential for identifying these otherwise silent events. Imaging and invasive approaches can add to the diagnosis of seizures for specific populations, given that scalp electrodes may fail to identify seizures that may be detected by depth electrodes or electroradiologic findings. When cEEG identifies SE, the risk of secondary neuronal injury related to the time-intensity "burden" often prompts treatment with anti-seizure medications. Similarly, treatment may be administered for seizure-spectrum activity, such as periodic discharges or lateralized rhythmic delta slowing on the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC), even when frank seizures are not evident on the scalp. In this setting, cEEG is utilized empirically to monitor treatment response. Separately, cEEG has other versatile uses for neurotelemetry, including identifying the level of sedation or consciousness. Specific conditions such as sepsis, traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and cardiac arrest may each be associated with a unique application of cEEG; for example, predicting impending events of delayed cerebral ischemia, a feared complication in the first two weeks after subarachnoid hemorrhage. After brief training, non-neurophysiologists can learn to interpret quantitative EEG trends that summarize elements of EEG activity, enhancing clinical responsiveness in collaboration with clinical neurophysiologists. Intensivists and other healthcare professionals also play crucial roles in facilitating timely cEEG setup, preventing electrode-related skin injuries, and maintaining patient mobility during monitoring.


Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Intensive Care Units , Seizures , Humans , Electroencephalography/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Seizures/diagnosis , Seizures/physiopathology , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Critical Care/methods , Status Epilepticus/diagnosis , Status Epilepticus/physiopathology , Critical Illness/therapy
2.
Seizure ; 110: 69-77, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37327752

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to identify predictive factors of a two-year remission (2YR) in a cohort of children and adolescents with new-onset seizures based on baseline clinical characteristics, initial EEG and brain MRI findings. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 688 patients with new onset seizures, initiated on treatment with antiseizure medication was evaluated. 2YR was defined as achieving at least two years of seizure freedom during the follow-up period. Multivariable analysis was performed and recursive partition analysis was utilized to develop a decision tree. RESULTS: The median age at seizure onset was 6.7 years, and the median follow-up was 7.4 years. 548 (79.7%) patients achieved a 2YR during the follow up period. Multivariable analysis found that presence and degree of intellectual and developmental delay (IDD), epileptogenic lesion on brain MRI and a higher number of pretreatment seizures were significantly associated with a lower probability of achieving a 2YR. Recursive partition analysis showed that the absence of IDD was the most important predictor of remission. An epileptogenic lesion was a significant predictor of non-remission only in patients without evidence of IDD, and a high number of pretreatment seizures was a predictive factor in children without IDD and in the absence of an epileptogenic lesion. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that it is possible to identify patients at risk of not achieving a 2YR based on variables obtained at the initial evaluation. This could allow for a timely selection of patients who require close follow-up, consideration for neurosurgical intervention, or investigational treatments trials.


Subject(s)
Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Prospective Studies , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/chemically induced , Seizures/drug therapy
3.
ACG Case Rep J ; 7(7): e00423, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32766365

ABSTRACT

Benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis (BRIC) is a rare genetic disease often causing episodes of jaundice since childhood. Its triggering factors are still unknown. Hyperthyroidism solely is an infrequent cause of jaundice, and it was never described in association with BRIC. In this article, we reported a woman presenting with a new episode of BRIC and was found to have concomitant hyperthyroidism in the absence of any other potential trigger factor. We conclude that hyperthyroidism may trigger cholestasis in patients with BRIC.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL