Expanding access to substance misuse services through emergency medical services: envisioning a novel partnership for addiction medicine clinicians.

Emergency medical services (EMS) can be an invaluable ally of addiction medicine clinicians, but the potential role of EMS in combating the opioid epidemic has been under-realized. EMS has historically focused on emergency response and resuscitation in cases of overdose; however, EMS is also well-positioned to build rapport with persons who use drugs (PWUD), provide harm reduction services, and connect PWUD with additional treatment services and resources. A select number of EMS organizations have begun to offer substance-related programming that extends beyond resuscitation, but these offerings remain limited in scope and impact. This perspective argues that addiction medicine clinicians can bolster the ability of EMS to provide high quality substance-related services by engaging in prehospital care education, program development and research, and clinical care. This perspective shares practical strategies for addiction medicine clinicians to partner with EMS and considers several potential barriers that must be overcome, including bureaucratic challenges, variability in the scope of practice of EMS providers across different locations, and limited funding.

State-by-state estimates of avoidable trauma mortality with early and liberal versus delayed or restricted administration of tranexamic acid.

OBJECTIVE: Early administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to save lives in trauma patients, and some U.S. emergency medical systems (EMS) have begun providing this therapy prehospital. Treatment protocols vary from state to state: Some offer TXA broadly to major trauma patients, others reserve it for patients meeting vital sign criteria, and still others defer TXA entirely pending a hospital evaluation. The purpose of this study is to compare the avoidable mortality achievable under each of these strategies, and to report on the various approaches used by EMS. METHODS: We used the National Center for Health Statistics Underlying Cause of Death data to identify a TXA-naïve population of trauma patients who died from 2007 to 2012 due to hemorrhage. We estimated the proportion of deaths where the patient was hypotensive or tachycardic using the National Trauma Data Bank. We used avoidable mortality risk ratios from the landmark CRASH 2 study to calculate lives saved had TXA been given within one hour of injury based on a clinician's gestalt the patient was at risk for significant hemorrhage; had it been reserved only for hypotensive or tachycardic patients; or had it been given between hours one to three of injury, considered here as a surrogate for deferring the question to the receiving hospital. RESULTS: Had TXA been given within 1 hour of injury, an average of 3409 deaths per year could have been averted nationally. Had TXA been given between one and three hours after injury, 2236 deaths per year could have been averted. Had TXA only been given to either tachycardic or hypotensive trauma patients, 1371 deaths per year could have been averted. Had TXA only been given to hypotensive trauma patients, 616 deaths per year could have been averted. Similar trends are seen at the individual state level. A review of EMS practices found 15 statewide protocols that allow EMS providers to administer TXA for trauma. CONCLUSION: Providing early TXA to persons at risk of significant hemorrhage has the potential to prevent many deaths from trauma, yet most states do not offer it in statewide prehospital treatment protocols.

A comparison of command center activations versus disaster drills at three institutions from 2013 to 2015.

OBJECTIVE: Disaster exercises often simulate rare, worst-case scenario events that range from mass casualty incidents to severe weather events. In actuality, situations such as information system downtimes and physical plant failures may affect hospital continuity of operations far more significantly. The objective of this study is to evaluate disaster drills at two academic and one community hospital to compare the frequency of planned drills versus real-world events that led to emergency management command center activation. DESIGN: Emergency management exercise and command center activation data from January 1, 2013 to October 1, 2015 were collected from a database. The activations and drills were categorized according to the nature of the event. Frequency of each type of event was compared to determine if the drills were representative of actual activations. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2015, there were a total of 136 command center activations and 126 drills at the three hospital sites. The most common reasons for command center activations included severe weather (25 percent, n = 34), maintenance failure (19.9 percent, n = 27), and planned mass gathering events (16.9 percent, n = 23). The most frequent drills were process tests (32.5 percent, n = 41), hazardous material-related events (22.2 percent, n = 28), and in-house fires (15.10 percent, n = 19). CONCLUSION: Further study of the reasons behind why hospitals activate emergency management plans may inform better preparedness drills. There is no clear methodology used among all hospitals to create drills and their descriptions are often vague. There is an opportunity to better design drills to address specific purposes and events.

The relationship between age and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

AIM: To determine the association between age and outcome in a large multicenter cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, cohort study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the CARES registry between 2006 and 2013. Age was categorized into 5-year intervals and the association between age group and outcomes (return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival and good neurological outcome) was assessed in univariable and multivariable analysis. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients who had return of spontaneous circulation. RESULTS: A total of 101,968 people were included. The median age was 66 years (quartiles: 54, 78) and 39% were female. 31,236 (30.6%) of the included patients had sustained ROSC, 9761 (9.6%) survived to hospital discharge and 8058 (7.9%) survived with a good neurological outcome. The proportion of patients with ROSC was highest in those with age <20 years (34.1%) and lowest in those with age 95-99 years (23.5%). Patients with age <20 years had the highest proportion of survival (16.7%) and good neurological outcome (14.8%) whereas those with age 95-99 years had the lowest proportion of survival (1.7%) and good neurological outcome (1.2%). In the full cohort and in the patients with ROSC there appeared to be a progressive decline in survival and good neurological outcome after the age of approximately 45-64 years. Age alone was not a good predictor of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age is associated with outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We did not identify a specific age threshold beyond which the chance of a meaningful recovery was excluded.

Diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease in emergency medicine.

A popular saying holds that if one can hear a heart murmur in the middle of a loud and busy emergency department, then by definition the murmur is significant. Whether or not this is actually true, it does capture the frustration emergency physicians feel when trying to diagnose or manage valvular pathologic conditions with familiar yet limited tools. This article focuses on the valve-related issues the emergency physician will face, from the trauma patient with a mechanical valve who may need his or her anticoagulation reversed to the febrile patient with a new murmur.

International validation of the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest score in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Investigators in France have developed a risk score to predict death or poor neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The aim of this study is to externally validate this score in an independent patient population in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, cohort study. PATIENTS: Patients being admitted to the intensive care unit after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. SETTING: Two geographically distinct tertiary care hospitals in the United States. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was poor outcome, defined as either death or a Cerebral Performance Category score of 3-5. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality. Calibration was assessed by comparing the number of expected outcomes based on the logistic model of the French study with observed outcomes within this study using Hosmer-Lemeshow C test (goodness-of-fit). Discrimination was assessed by calculation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Of a total of 128 patients, 99 (77%) had a poor outcome, including 91 nonsurvivors (71%). The probability of poor neurologic outcome and mortality increased stepwise with increasing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest score. Graphic display of observed against predicted outcomes and goodness-of-fit test indicated good calibration of the score (p = .4). The score showed good discrimination for poor outcome (area under the receiving operating characteristic curve, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.92) and for mortality (area under the receiving operating characteristic curve, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.91). In patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest score >40 points and >60 points, the positive predictive value for poor outcome was 97% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study found good calibration and high discrimination of the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest score in two geographically distinct patient populations in the United States. Particularly, this score had a high positive predictive value and performed well in identifying high-risk patients for poor outcomes.