ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), before and after the use of methylphenidate, and a control group, using tests of working memory, inhibition capacity and mental flexibility. METHODS: Neuropsychological tests were administrated to 53 boys, 9-12 years old: the WISC-III digit span backward, and arithmetic; Stroop Color; and Trail Making Tests. The case group included 23 boys with ADHD, who were combined type, treatment-naive, and with normal intelligence without comorbidities. The control group (n = 30) were age and gender matched. After three months on methylphenidate, the ADHD children were retested. The control group was also retested after three months. RESULTS: Before treatment, ADHD children had lower scores than the control group on the tests (p ≤ 0.001) and after methylphenidate had fewer test errors than before (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Methylphenidate treatment improves the working memory, inhibitory control and mental flexibility of ADHD boys.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Memory/drug effects , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Child , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/pharmacology , Neuropsychological Tests , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective To compare children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), before and after the use of methylphenidate, and a control group, using tests of working memory, inhibition capacity and mental flexibility. Methods Neuropsychological tests were administrated to 53 boys, 9–12 years old: the WISC-III digit span backward, and arithmetic; Stroop Color; and Trail Making Tests. The case group included 23 boys with ADHD, who were combined type, treatment-naive, and with normal intelligence without comorbidities. The control group (n = 30) were age and gender matched. After three months on methylphenidate, the ADHD children were retested. The control group was also retested after three months. Results Before treatment, ADHD children had lower scores than the control group on the tests (p ≤ 0.001) and after methylphenidate had fewer test errors than before (p ≤ 0.001) Conclusion Methylphenidate treatment improves the working memory, inhibitory control and mental flexibility of ADHD boys.
RESUMO Objetivo Comparar crianças com transtorno de déficit de atenção/hiperatividade (TDAH) com controles, utilizando testes de memória de trabalho, capacidade inibitória e flexibilidade mental, em meninos de 9 a 12 anos. Métodos Testes neuropsicológicos administrados: teste de ordem inversa dos dígitos, teste aritmético (WISC-III), Teste Stroop e Teste de Trilhas. Grupo experimental meninos (n=23), com TDAH combinado, virgens de tratamento, inteligência normal sem comorbidades. Grupo controle (n = 30) com as mesmas características do grupo experimental em termos de idade e sexo. Após três meses com metilfenidato, os grupos TDAH e controle foram novamente testadas. Resultados Antes do tratamento, as crianças com TDAH apresentaram menor pontuação do que o grupo controle nos testes analisados (p≤ 0.001) e o grupo com TDAH apresentou menos erros nos testes após metilfenidato (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusão O tratamento com metilfenidato melhora a memória de trabalho, controle inibitório e flexibilidade mental de meninos com TDAH.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Memory/drug effects , Methylphenidate/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Treatment Outcome , Central Nervous System Stimulants/pharmacology , Methylphenidate/pharmacology , Neuropsychological TestsABSTRACT
OBJETIVOS: Analisar se os testes neuropsicológicos de atenção e funções executivas apresentam correlação, em crianças com TDAH subtipo combinado, com o diagnóstico e evolução clínica após tratamento com metilfenidato, e propor um protocolo, com testes mais significantes. MÉTODOS: Neste estudo longitudinal foram selecionados 23 meninos, nove a 12 anos de idade, diagnóstico de TDAH sem comorbidades, estabelecido segundo os critérios do DSM-IV, QI >= 89, não previamente medicados para TDAH, que soubessem ler e escrever e estivessem em acompanhamento no Ambulatório de Distúrbios de Aprendizagem do Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP. Foram utilizados os seguintes instrumentos: Escala de Inteligência Wechsler para Crianças (WISC III), Teste Psicofísico Para Atenção Visual Voluntária (TPAVV), Teste de Cancelamento, Teste das Trilhas partes A e B, Teste de Stroop e Teste de Atenção Visual - Terceira Edição (TAVIS 3R). O experimento corresponde a duas etapas: avaliações clínica e neuropsicológica da atenção e das funções executivas dos pacientes com TDAH; e reavaliação, com os mesmos testes, após três meses de terapia medicamentosa, usando-se metilfenidato. Comparou-se o desempenho dos testes, com o grupo controle (n=30), também avaliado em dois momentos, com mesmo intervalo de tempo. A escala SNAP-IV também foi comparada entre os pacientes e grupo controle nas mesmas condições. RESULTADOS: O desempenho dos pacientes, quando não medicados, foi inferior aos dos controles, nos seguintes testes: subtestes do WISC III código p < 0,001; dígitos p < 0,001 e span dígitos ordem inversa p < 0,001. TPAVV seta direita válida p < 0,001; seta fixa válida p < 0,001; seta alternada válida p < 0,001 e seta alternada inválida p < 0,001. Teste de Cancelamento, tempo de execução prancha II p=0,001 e erros por omissão pranchas I e III p=0,002. Teste das Trilhas, tempo de execução parte A p=0,032. Teste de Stroop, tempo de execução cartão retângulo p=0,016 e erros cartão cor p=0,017. TAVIS 3...
PURPOSES: To determine whether neuropsychological tests of attention and executive functions present correlations, in children with ADHD combined subtype, with the diagnosis and clinical outcome after treatment with methylphenidate, and to propose a protocol, with the most significant tests. METHODS: In this longitudinal study we selected 23 boys, aged between nine and 12 years old, with ADHD without comorbidities diagnosed according to the DSM-IV, IQ>=89, not previously treated for ADHD, who could read and write and were in monitoring in the Learning Disorders Ambulatory, at FMUSP Hospital das Clínicas. The following instruments were used: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC III), Voluntary Visual Attention Psychophysical Test (VVAPT), Cancellation Test, Trail Making Test Parts A and B, Stroop Test and Visual Attention Test - Third Edition (TAVIS 3R). The experiment corresponds to two stages: clinical and neuropsychological assessments of attention and executive functions in patients with ADHD; and reassessment, with the same tests after three months of drug therapy using methylphenidate. We compared the performance on the tests with that of the control group (n = 30) also evaluated in two stages, with the same time interval. SNAP-IV scale was also compared between subjects and control group under the same conditions. RESULTS: When the subjects were not medicated, their performance was poorer than the control group's, on the following tests: WISC III subtests coding p<0.001; digits p<0.001 and digits span backward p<0.001. VVAPT valid pointer to the right p<0.001; valid fixed pointer p<0.001; valid alternate pointer p<0.001 and invalid alternate pointer p<0.001. Cancellation Test, execution time on board II p=0.001 and omission errors on boards I and III p=0.002. Trail making Test, execution time part A p=0.032. Stroop Test, execution time dots card p=0.016 and errors color card p=0.017. TAVIS 3R, omission errors on task 1 p<0.001...
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Attention , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Executive Function , Methylphenidate , Neuropsychological TestsABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: Attention deficit, impulsivity and hyperactivity are the cardinal features of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but executive function (EF) disorders, as problems with inhibitory control, working memory and reaction time, besides others EFs, may underlie many of the disturbs associated with the disorder. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reaction time in a computerized test in children with ADHD and normal controls. METHOD: Twenty-three boys (aged 9 to 12) with ADHD diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, 2000 (DSM-IV) criteria clinical, without comorbidities, Intelligence Quotient (IQ) > or = 89, never treated with stimulant and fifteen normal controls, age matched were investigated during performance on a voluntary attention psychophysical test. RESULTS: Children with ADHD showed reaction time higher than normal controls. CONCLUSION: A slower reaction time occurred in our patients with ADHD. This findings may be related to problems with the attentional system, that could not maintain an adequate capacity of perceptual input processes and/or in motor output processes, to respond consistently during continuous or repetitive activity.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/physiopathology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Reaction Time/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological TestsABSTRACT
Attention deficit, impulsivity and hyperactivity are the cardinal features of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) but executive function (EF) disorders, as problems with inhibitory control, working memory and reaction time, besides others EFs, may underlie many of the disturbs associated with the disorder. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reaction time in a computerized test in children with ADHD and normal controls. METHOD: Twenty-three boys (aged 9 to 12) with ADHD diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, 2000 (DSM-IV) criteria clinical, without comorbidities, Intelligence Quotient (IQ) >89, never treated with stimulant and fifteen normal controls, age matched were investigated during performance on a voluntary attention psychophysical test. RESULTS: Children with ADHD showed reaction time higher than normal controls. CONCLUSION: A slower reaction time occurred in our patients with ADHD. This findings may be related to problems with the attentional system, that could not maintain an adequate capacity of perceptual input processes and/or in motor output processes, to respond consistently during continuous or repetitive activity.
Déficit de atenção, impulsividade e hiperatividade são os pontos cardinais do transtorno do déficit de atenção/hiperatividade (TDAH), mas as desordens da função executiva (FE) tais como os problemas no controle inibitório, memória operacional e tempo de reação, dentre outras funções executivas (FEs) podem estar subjacentes a muitos distúrbios associados a esta desordem. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o tempo de reação em meninos portadores do TDAH. MÉTODO: Participaram 23 pacientes do sexo masculino, de idade entre 9 a 12 anos de idade, com diagnóstico de TDAH sem co-morbidades, estabelecido segundo os critérios do Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), com Quoeficiente Intelectual (QI) >89, que não tivessem sido medicados para o TDAH. Grupo controle, seguindo os mesmos critérios em relação ao sexo, idade, QI. O teste utilizado foi o teste psicofísico da atenção voluntária (TPAV). RESULTADOS: Os pacientes do TDAH apresentaram maior tempo de reação na execução do teste em relação aos controles. CONCLUSÃO: O tempo de reação apresentou-se mais lento em nossos pacientes portadores de TDAH. Estes achados podem estar relacionados aos problemas do sistema atencional; este grupo não pôde manter uma adequada capacidade de percepção de dados processados e/ou, em responder regularmente durante atividades contínuas ou repetitivas.