Immune Evasion in Cancer Is Regulated by Tumor-Asociated Macrophages (TAMs): Targeting TAMs.

Recent advancements in cancer treatment have explored a variety of approaches to address the needs of patients. Recently, immunotherapy has evolved as an efficacious treatment for various cancers resistant to conventional therapies. Hence, significant milestones in immunotherapy were achieved clinically in a large subset of cancer patients. Unfortunately, some cancer types do not respond to treatment, and among the responsive cancers, some patients remain unresponsive to treatment. Consequently, there is a critical need to examine the mechanisms of immune resistance and devise strategies to target immune suppressor cells or factors, thereby allowing for tumor sensitivity to immune cytotoxic cells. M2 macrophages, also known as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), are of interest due to their role in suppressing the immune system and influencing antitumor immune responses through modulating T cell activity and immune checkpoint expression. TAMs are associated with signaling pathways that modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME), contributing to immune evasion. One approach targets TAMs, focusing on preventing the polarization of M1 macrophages into the protumoral M2 phenotype. Other strategies focus on direct or indirect targeting of M2 macrophages through understanding the interaction of TAMs with immune factors or signaling pathways. Clinically, biomarkers associated with TAMs' immune resistance in cancer patients have been identified, opening avenues for intervention using pharmacological agents or immunotherapeutic approaches. Ultimately, these multifaceted approaches are promising in overcoming immune resistance and improving cancer treatment outcomes.

Polarization of M2 Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs) in Cancer Immunotherapy.

We have witnessed in the last decade new milestones in the treatment of various resistant cancers with new immunotherapeutic modalities. These advances have resulted in significant objective durable clinical responses in a subset of cancer patients. These findings strongly suggested that immunotherapy should be considered for the treatment of all subsets of cancer patients. Accordingly, the mechanisms underlying resistance to immunotherapy must be explored and develop new means to target these resistant factors. One of the pivotal resistance mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment (TME) is the high infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) that are highly immunosuppressive and responsible, in large part, of cancer immune evasion. Thus, various approaches have been investigated to target the TAMs to restore the anti-tumor immune response. One approach is to polarize the M2 TAMS to the M1 phenotype that participates in the activation of the anti-tumor response. In this review, we discuss the various and differential properties of the M1 and M2 phenotypes, the molecular signaling pathways that participate in the polarization, and various approaches used to target the polarization of the M2 TAMs into the M1 anti-tumor phenotype. These approaches include inhibitors of histone deacetylases, PI3K inhibitors, STAT3 inhibitors, TLR agonists, and metabolic reprogramming. Clearly, due to the distinct features of various cancers and their heterogeneities, a single approach outlined above might only be effective against some cancers and not others. In addition, targeting by itself may not be efficacious unless used in combination with other therapeutic modalities.

Targeting the Depletion of M2 Macrophages: Implication in Cancer Immunotherapy.

We have witnessed the emergence of immunotherapy against various cancers that resulted in significant clinical responses and particularly in cancers that were resistant to chemotherapy. These milestones have ignited the development of novel strategies to boost the anti-tumor immune response for immune-suppressed tumors in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are the most abundant cells in the TME, and their frequency correlates with poor prognosis. Hence, several approaches have been developed to target TAMs in effort to restore the anti-tumor immune response and inhibit tumor growth and metastasis. One approach discussed herein is targeting TAMs via their depletion. Several methods have been reported for TAMs depletion including micro-RNAs, transcription factors (e.g., PPARγ, KLF4, STAT3, STAT6, NF-κB), chemokines and chemokine receptors, antibodies-mediated blocking the CSF-1/CSF-1R pathway, nanotechnology, and various combination treatments. In addition, various clinical trials are currently examining the targeting of TAMs. Many of these methods also have side effects that need to be monitored and reduced. Future perspectives and directions are discussed.

The Role of TAMs in the Regulation of Tumor Cell Resistance to Chemotherapy.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are the predominant cell infiltrate in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). TAMs are central to fostering pro-inflammatory conditions, tumor growth, metastasis, and inhibiting therapy responses. Many cancer patients are innately refractory to chemotherapy and or develop resistance following initial treatments. There is a clinical correlation between the level of TAMs in the TME and chemoresistance. Hence, the pivotal role of TAMs in contributing to chemoresistance has garnered significant attention toward targeting TAMs to reverse this resistance. A prerequisite for such an approach requires a thorough understanding of the various underlying mechanisms by which TAMs inhibit response to chemotherapeutic drugs. Such mechanisms include enhancing drug efflux, regulating drug metabolism and detoxification, supporting cancer stem cell (CSCs) resistance, promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), inhibiting drug penetration and its metabolism, stimulating angiogenesis, impacting inhibitory STAT3/NF-κB survival pathways, and releasing specific inhibitory cytokines including TGF-ß and IL-10. Accordingly, several strategies have been developed to overcome TAM-modulated chemoresistance. These include novel therapies that aim to deplete TAMs, repolarize them toward the anti-tumor M1-like phenotype, or block recruitment of monocytes into the TME. Current results from TAM-targeted treatments have been unimpressive; however, the use of TAM-targeted therapies in combination appears promising These include targeting TAMs with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, chemokine receptor inhibitors, immunotherapy, and loaded nanoparticles. The clinical limitations of these strategies are discussed.

Therapeutic Implications of Targeting YY1 in Glioblastoma.

The transcription factor Yin Yang 1 (YY1) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), an aggressive form of brain tumor. This review systematically explores the diverse roles of YY1 overexpression and activities in GBM, including its impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune evasion mechanisms. Due to the poor response of GBM to current therapies, various findings of YY1-associated pathways in the literature provide valuable insights into novel potential targeted therapeutic strategies. Moreover, YY1 acts as a significant regulator of immune checkpoint molecules and, thus, is a candidate therapeutic target in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Different therapeutic implications targeting YY1 in GBM and its inherent associated challenges encompass the use of nanoparticles, YY1 inhibitors, targeted gene therapy, and exosome-based delivery systems. Despite the inherent complexities of such methods, the successful targeting of YY1 emerges as a promising avenue for reshaping GBM treatment strategies, presenting opportunities for innovative therapeutic approaches and enhanced patient outcomes.

Cross-Talks between Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein and Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expressions in Cancer: Role in Immune Evasion and Therapeutic Implications.

Innovations in cancer immunotherapy have resulted in the development of several novel immunotherapeutic strategies that can disrupt immunosuppression. One key advancement lies in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have shown significant clinical efficacy and increased survival rates in patients with various therapy-resistant cancers. This immune intervention consists of monoclonal antibodies directed against inhibitory receptors (e.g., PD-1) on cytotoxic CD8 T cells or against corresponding ligands (e.g., PD-L1/PD-L2) overexpressed on cancer cells and other cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, not all cancer cells respond-there are still poor clinical responses, immune-related adverse effects, adaptive resistance, and vulnerability to ICIs in a subset of patients with cancer. This challenge showcases the heterogeneity of cancer, emphasizing the existence of additional immunoregulatory mechanisms in many patients. Therefore, it is essential to investigate PD-L1's interaction with other oncogenic genes and pathways to further advance targeted therapies and address resistance mechanisms. Accordingly, our aim was to investigate the mechanisms governing PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, given its correlation with immune evasion, to uncover novel mechanisms for decreasing PD-L1 expression and restoring anti-tumor immune responses. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the upregulation of Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP) in many cancers contributes to the suppression of key hyperactive pathways observed in malignant cells, alongside its broadening involvement in immune responses and the modulation of the TME. We, therefore, hypothesized that the role of PD-L1 in cancer immune surveillance may be inversely correlated with the low expression level of the tumor suppressor Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP) expression in cancer cells. This hypothesis was investigated and we found several signaling cross-talk pathways between the regulations of both RKIP and PD-L1 expressions. These pathways and regulatory factors include the MAPK and JAK/STAT pathways, GSK3ß, cytokines IFN-γ and IL-1ß, Sox2, and transcription factors YY1 and NFκB. The pathways that upregulated PD-L1 were inhibitory for RKIP expression and vice versa. Bioinformatic analyses in various human cancers demonstrated the inverse relationship between PD-L1 and RKIP expressions and their prognostic roles. Therefore, we suspect that the direct upregulation of RKIP and/or the use of targeted RKIP inducers in combination with ICIs could result in a more targeted anti-tumor immune response-addressing the therapeutic challenges related to PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy alone.

Regulation of PD-L1 Expression by YY1 in Cancer: Therapeutic Efficacy of Targeting YY1.

During the last decade, we have witnessed several milestones in the treatment of various resistant cancers including immunotherapeutic strategies that have proven to be superior to conventional treatment options, such as chemotherapy and radiation. This approach utilizes the host's immune response, which is triggered by cancer cells expressing tumor-associated antigens or neoantigens. The responsive immune cytotoxic CD8+ T cells specifically target and kill tumor cells, leading to tumor regression and prolongation of survival in some cancers; however, some cancers may exhibit resistance due to the inactivation of anti-tumor CD8+ T cells. One mechanism by which the anti-tumor CD8+ T cells become dysfunctional is through the activation of the inhibitory receptor programmed death-1 (PD-1) by the corresponding tumor cells (or other cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME)) that express the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). Hence, blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction via specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) restores the CD8+ T cells' functions, leading to tumor regression. Accordingly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several checkpoint antibodies which act as immune checkpoint inhibitors. Their clinical use in various resistant cancers, such as metastatic melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), has shown significant clinical responses. We have investigated an alternative approach to prevent the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells, through targeting the oncogenic transcription factor Yin Yang 1 (YY1), a known factor overexpressed in many cancers. We report the regulation of PD-L1 by YY1 at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational levels, resulting in the restoration of CD8+ T cells' anti-tumor functions. We have performed bioinformatic analyses to further explore the relationship between both YY1 and PD-L1 in cancer and to corroborate these findings. In addition to its regulation of PD-L1, YY1 has several other anti-cancer activities, such as the regulation of proliferation and cell viability, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), metastasis, and chemo-immuno-resistance. Thus, targeting YY1 will have a multitude of anti-tumor activities resulting in a significant obliteration of cancer oncogenic activities. Various strategies are proposed to selectively target YY1 in human cancers and present a promising novel therapeutic approach for treating unresponsive cancer phenotypes. These findings underscore the distinct regulatory roles of YY1 and PD-L1 (CD274) in cancer progression and therapeutic response.

Historical Perspectives of the Role of NO/NO Donors in Anti-Tumor Activities: Acknowledging Dr. Keefer's Pioneering Research.

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in cancer has been a continuous challenge and particularly the contradictory findings in the literature reporting NO with either anti-cancer properties or pro-cancer properties. This dilemma was largely resolved by the level of NO/inducible nitric oxide synthase in the tumor environment as well as other cancer-associated gene activations in different cancers. The initial findings on the role of NO as an anti-cancer agent was initiated in the late 1990's in Dr. Larry Keefer's laboratory, who had been studying and synthesizing many compounds with releasing NO under different conditions. Using an experimental model with selected NO compounds they demonstrated for the first time that NO can inhibit tumor cell proliferation and sensitizes drug-resistant cancer cells to chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity. This initial finding was the backbone and the foundation of subsequent reports by the Keefer's laboratory and followed by many others to date on NO-mediated anti-cancer activities and the clinical translation of NO donors in cancer therapy. Our laboratory initiated studies on NO-mediated anti-cancer therapy and chemo-immuno-sensitization following Keefer's findings and used one of his synthesized NO donors, namely, (Z)-1-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl)amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETANONOate), throughout most of our studies. Many of Keefer's collaborators and other investigators have reported on the selected compound, O2-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) 1-[(4-ethoxycarbonyl)piperazin-1-yl] diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (JS-K), and its therapeutic role in many tumor model systems. Several lines of evidence that investigated the treatment with NO donors in various cancer models revealed that a large number of gene products are modulated by NO, thus emphasizing the pleiotropic effects of NO on cancers and the identification of many targets of therapeutic significance. The present review reports historically of several examples reported in the literature that emanated on NO-mediated anti-cancer activities by the Keefer's laboratory and his collaborators and other investigators including my laboratory at the University of California at Los Angeles.

Role of YY1 in the Regulation of Anti-Apoptotic Gene Products in Drug-Resistant Cancer Cells.

Cancer is a leading cause of death among the various diseases encountered in humans. Cancer is not a single entity and consists of numerous different types and subtypes that require various treatment regimens. In the last decade, several milestones in cancer treatments were accomplished, such as specific targeting agents or revitalizing the dormant anti-tumor immune response. These milestones have resulted in significant positive clinical responses as well as tumor regression and the prolongation of survival in subsets of cancer patients. Hence, in non-responding patients and non-responding relapsed patients, cancers develop intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to cell death via the overexpression of anti-apoptotic gene products. In parallel, the majority of resistant cancers have been reported to overexpress a transcription factor, Yin Yang 1 (YY1), which regulates the chemo-immuno-resistance of cancer cells to therapeutic anticancer cytotoxic agents. The relationship between the overexpression of YY1 and several anti-apoptotic gene products, such as B-cell lymphoma 2 protein (Bcl-2), B-cell lymphoma extra-large (Bcl-xL), myeloid cell leukemia 1 (Mcl-1) and survivin, is investigated in this paper. The findings demonstrate that these anti-apoptotic gene products are regulated, in part, by YY1 at the transcriptional, epigenetic, post-transcriptional and translational levels. While targeting each of the anti-apoptotic gene products individually has been examined and clinically tested for some, this targeting strategy is not effective due to compensation by other overexpressed anti-apoptotic gene products. In contrast, targeting YY1 directly, through small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), gene editing or small molecule inhibitors, can be therapeutically more effective and generalized in YY1-overexpressed resistant cancers.

Cancer Resistance Is Mediated by the Upregulation of Several Anti-Apoptotic Gene Products via the Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase/Nitric Oxide Pathway: Therapeutic Implications.

Significance: Several therapeutic strategies for cancer treatments have been developed with time, and significant milestones have been achieved recently. However, with these novel therapies, not all cancer types respond and in the responding cancer types only a subset is affected. The failure to respond is principally the result that these cancers develop several mechanisms of resistance. Thus, a focus of current research investigations is to unravel the various mechanisms that regulate resistance and identify suitable targets for new therapeutics. Recent Advances: Hence, many human cancer types have been reported to overexpress the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and it has been suggested that iNOS/nitric oxide (NO) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of resistance. We have postulated that iNOS overexpression or NO regulates the overexpression of pivotal anti-apoptotic gene products such as B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), B-cell lymphoma extra large (Bcl-xL), myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1), and survivin. In this report, we describe the various mechanisms, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational, by which iNOS/NO regulates the expression of the above anti-apoptotic gene products. Critical Issues: The iNOS/NO-mediated regulation of the four gene products is not the same with both specific and overlapping pathways. Our findings are, in large part, validated by bioinformatic analyses demonstrating, in several cancers, several direct correlations between the expression of iNOS and each of the four examined anti-apoptotic gene products. Future Directions: We have proposed that targeting iNOS may be highly efficient since it will result in the underexpression of multiple anti-apoptotic proteins and shifting the balance toward the proapoptotic gene products and reversal of resistance. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 39, 853-889.

Cancer resistance via the downregulation of the tumor suppressors RKIP and PTEN expressions: therapeutic implications.

The Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) has been reported to be underexpressed in many cancers and plays a role in the regulation of tumor cells' survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, hence, a tumor suppressor. RKIP also regulates tumor cell resistance to cytotoxic drugs/cells. Likewise, the tumor suppressor, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), which inhibits the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, is either mutated, underexpressed, or deleted in many cancers and shares with RKIP its anti-tumor properties and its regulation in resistance. The transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulations of RKIP and PTEN expressions and their roles in resistance were reviewed. The underlying mechanism of the interrelationship between the signaling expressions of RKIP and PTEN in cancer is not clear. Several pathways are regulated by RKIP and PTEN and the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulations of RKIP and PTEN is significantly altered in cancers. In addition, RKIP and PTEN play a key role in the regulation of tumor cells response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In addition, molecular and bioinformatic data revealed crosstalk signaling networks that regulate the expressions of both RKIP and PTEN. These crosstalks involved the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/PI3K pathways and the dysregulated nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-κB)/Snail/Yin Yang 1 (YY1)/RKIP/PTEN loop in many cancers. Furthermore, further bioinformatic analyses were performed to investigate the correlations (positive or negative) and the prognostic significance of the expressions of RKIP or PTEN in 31 different human cancers. These analyses were not uniform and only revealed that there was a positive correlation between the expression of RKIP and PTEN only in few cancers. These findings demonstrated the existence of signaling cross-talks between RKIP and PTEN and both regulate resistance. Targeting either RKIP or PTEN (alone or in combination with other therapies) may be sufficient to therapeutically inhibit tumor growth and reverse the tumor resistance to cytotoxic therapies.

RKIP: A Pivotal Gene Product in the Pathogenesis of Cancer.

Raf kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP), previously known as a phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP), was cloned by Yeung et al [...].

The Role of RKIP in the Regulation of EMT in the Tumor Microenvironment.

The Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP) is a unique gene product that directly inhibits the Raf/Mek/Erk and NF-kB pathways in cancer cells and resulting in the inhibition of cell proliferation, viability, EMT, and metastasis. Additionally, RKIP is involved in the regulation of cancer cell resistance to both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The low expression of RKIP expression in many cancer types is responsible, in part, for the pathogenesis of cancer and its multiple properties. The inhibition of EMT and metastasis by RKIP led to its classification as a tumor suppressor. However, the mechanism by which RKIP mediates its inhibitory effects on EMT and metastases was not clear. We have proposed that one mechanism involves the negative regulation by RKIP of the expression of various gene products that mediate the mesenchymal phenotype as well as the positive regulation of gene products that mediate the epithelial phenotype via signaling cross talks between RKIP and each gene product. We examined several EMT mesenchymal gene products such as Snail, vimentin, N-cadherin, laminin and EPCAM and epithelial gene products such as E-cadherin and laminin. We have found that indeed these negative and positive correlations were detected in the signaling cross-talks. In addition, we have also examined bioinformatic data sets on different human cancers and the findings corroborated, in large part, the findings observed in the signaling cross-talks with few exceptions in some cancer types. The overall findings support the underlying mechanism by which the tumor suppressor RKIP regulates the expression of gene products involved in EMT and metastasis. Hence, the development of agent that can selectively induce RKIP expression in cancers with low expressions should result in the activation of the pleiotropic anti-cancer activities of RKIP and resulting in multiple effects including inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, EMT, metastasis and sensitization of resistant tumor cells to respond to both chemotherapeutics and immunotherapeutics.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) signaling in cancer chemoresistance: From prediction to druggability.

The acquisition of cancer cell resistance to conventional chemotherapeutics is considered the major driver of treatment failure and disease recurrence in most solid and hematological malignancies. The molecular basis of tumor chemoresistance has been extensively investigated and newly identified gene signatures have eventually paved the way towards the development of novel therapeutic interventions in the era of precision medicine in oncology. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are defined as a class of transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides that lack translational activities and are highly abundant across the human genome. LncRNAs show higher tissue and cell subtype specificities than most mRNAs, while their biological relevance has been associated with the regulation of coding gene expression at the epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional levels, regulation of DNA replication timing and chromosome stability, as well as aging and disease. Given their specific expression and functional diversities in a variety of human cancers, lncRNAs have currently received extensive attention regarding their implications in the disease pathophysiology and their potential applications as diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets in cancer. Over the last decade, different lncRNAs were found to play pivotal regulatory roles in drug resistance of certain cancer cell types via mechanisms that include among others, alterations in drug efflux, metabolism and targeting, cell death machinery, DNA damage repair, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), autophagy and oxidative stress management, as well as modifications in epigenetic regulators, oncogenes, and miRNAs. The present review discusses the current state of knowledge on the emerging research into lncRNAs as drug resistance regulators and predictors in various tumors, emphasizing lncRNA patterns associated with cancer stemness, certain drug classes and common underlying mechanisms of action. The review further reveals cutting edge strategies for lncRNA modulation and the current progress on lncRNA-targeting molecules designed to overcome cancer resistance. Our input is a reference for future research investigations on cancer chemosensitivity and provides new insights into the clinical development of lncRNA-targeted pharmacological interventions.

The Breast Cancer Protooncogenes HER2, BRCA1 and BRCA2 and Their Regulation by the iNOS/NOS2 Axis.

The expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS; NOS2) and derived NO in various cancers was reported to exert pro- and anti-tumorigenic effects depending on the levels of expression and the tumor types. In humans, the breast cancer level of iNOS was reported to be overexpressed, to exhibit pro-tumorigenic activities, and to be of prognostic significance. Likewise, the expression of the oncogenes HER2, BRCA1, and BRCA2 has been associated with malignancy. The interrelationship between the expression of these protooncogenes and oncogenes and the expression of iNOS is not clear. We have hypothesized that there exist cross-talk signaling pathways between the breast cancer protooncogenes, the iNOS axis, and iNOS-mediated NO mutations of these protooncogenes into oncogenes. We review the molecular regulation of the expression of the protooncogenes in breast cancer and their interrelationships with iNOS expression and activities. In addition, we discuss the roles of iNOS, HER2, BRCA1/2, and NO metabolism in the pathophysiology of cancer stem cells. Bioinformatic analyses have been performed and have found suggested molecular alterations responsible for breast cancer aggressiveness. These include the association of BRCA1/2 mutations and HER2 amplifications with the dysregulation of the NOS pathway. We propose that future studies should be undertaken to investigate the regulatory mechanisms underlying the expression of iNOS and various breast cancer oncogenes, with the aim of identifying new therapeutic targets for the treatment of breast cancers that are refractory to current treatments.

Computational Analyses of YY1 and Its Target RKIP Reveal Their Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles in Lung Cancer.

Lung cancer (LC) represents a global threat, being the tumor with the highest mortality rate. Despite the introduction of novel therapies (e.g., targeted inhibitors, immune-checkpoint inhibitors), relapses are still very frequent. Accordingly, there is an urgent need for reliable predictive biomarkers and therapeutically druggable targets. Yin-Yang 1 (YY1) is a transcription factor that may work either as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor, depending on the genotype and the phenotype of the tumor. The Raf Kinase Inhibitory Protein (RKIP), is a tumor suppressor and immune enhancer often found downregulated in the majority of the examined cancers. In the present report, the role of both YY1 and RKIP in LC is thoroughly explored through the analysis of several deposited RNA and protein expression datasets. The computational analyses revealed that YY1 negatively regulates RKIP expression in LC, as corroborated by the deposited YY1-ChIP-Seq experiments and validated by their robust negative correlation. Additionally, YY1 expression is significantly higher in LC samples compared to normal matching ones, whereas RKIP expression is lower in LC and high in normal matching tissues. These observed differences, unlike many current biomarkers, bear a diagnostic significance, as proven by the ROC analyses. Finally, the survival data support the notion that both YY1 and RKIP might represent strong prognostic biomarkers. Overall, the reported findings indicate that YY1 and RKIP expression levels may play a role in LC as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. However, further studies will be necessary to validate the in silico results.