Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J Comp Eff Res ; 9(8): 537-551, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32223298

ABSTRACT

Aim: To describe the direct healthcare costs associated with repeated cytotoxic chemotherapy treatments for recurrent high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) of the ovaries. Patients & methods: Retrospective review of 66 women with recurrent stage III/IV HGSC ovarian cancer treated with repeated lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy in a Canadian University Tertiary Center. Results: Mean cost of treatment of first relapse was CAD$52,227 increasing by 38% for two, and 86% for three or more relapses with median overall survival of 36.0, 50.7 and 42.8 months, respectively. In-hospital care accounted for 71% and chemotherapy drugs accounted for 17% of the total costs. Conclusion: After the third relapse of HGSC, cytotoxic chemotherapy did not prolong survival but was associated with substantially increased healthcare costs.


Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/economics , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/economics , Aged , Canada , Cytotoxins/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(7): 2453-2457, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29429005

ABSTRACT

Cancer pain is a multi-dimensional experience, varies from person to person both physically and psycho-socially, and impacts all aspects of the patients' quality of life. Majority of patients with an advanced or metastatic cancer will experience pain. It is estimated that as many as half of cancer patients are under-treated and as many as 20% experience pain refractory to the conventional WHO ladder of pain management. The McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) Cancer Pain Clinic (CPC) was created to meet the needs of those patients with a diagnosis of cancer whose pain had become a main symptom and those who failed to respond to conventional treatment. The clinic offers a unique interdisciplinary approach with a core team that includes an anesthesiologist, a palliative care physician, a radiation oncologist, a nurse clinician specialist in oncology and palliative care, and, recently, also an interventional radiologist. A cancer pain clinical fellowship was offered for the first time in July 2016. It provides intense training in the classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of cancer pain. Through our education program, the fellow learns to appreciate, weigh, and respond to the full spectrum of factors influencing a specific patient's condition and to develop a tailor-made care plan. To our knowledge, it is the only fellowship program in existence that focuses exclusively on cancer pain. We see it as a beacon and hope that our graduate fellows become professional leaders with a quest not only to provide the best possible care but also to raise awareness of the humanitarian need to control cancer pain.


Subject(s)
Cancer Pain/therapy , Fellowships and Scholarships/methods , Pain Management/methods , Palliative Care/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Cancer Pain/pathology , Humans
3.
Clin Nutr ; 36(5): 1378-1390, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27793524

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cachexia is a highly prevalent syndrome in cancer and chronic diseases. However, due to the heterogeneous features of cancer cachexia, its identification and classification challenge clinical practitioners. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical relevance of a cancer cachexia classification system in advanced cancer patients. DESIGN: Beginning with the four-stage classification system proposed for cachexia [non-cachexia (NCa), pre-cachexia (PCa), cachexia (Ca) and refractory cachexia (RCa)], we assigned patients to these cachexia stages according to five classification criteria available in clinical practice: 1) biochemistry (high C-reactive protein or leukocytes, or hypoalbuminemia, or anemia), 2) food intake (normal/decreased), weight loss: 3) moderate (≤5%) or 4) significant (>5%/past six months) and 5) performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥ 3). We then determined if symptom severity, body composition changes, functional levels, hospitalizations and survival rates varied significantly across cachexia stages. RESULTS: Two-hundred and ninety-seven advanced cancer patients with primary gastrointestinal and lung tumors were included. Patients were classified into Ca (36%), PCa and RCa (21%, respectively) and NCa (15%). Significant (p < 0.05) differences were observed among cachexia stages for most of the outcome measures (symptoms, body composition, handgrip strength, emergency room visits and length of hospital stays) according to cachexia severity. Survival also differed between cachexia stages (except between PCa and Ca). CONCLUSION: Five clinical criteria can be used to stage cancer cachexia patients and predict important clinical, nutritional and functional outcomes. The lack of statistical difference between PCa and Ca in almost all clinical outcomes examined suggests either that the PCa group includes patients already affected by early cachexia or that more precise criteria are needed to differentiate PCa from Ca patients. More studies are required to validate these findings.


Subject(s)
Cachexia/diagnosis , Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/diagnosis , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Body Composition , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Cachexia/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Strength , Humans , Hypoalbuminemia/diagnosis , Hypoalbuminemia/etiology , Leukocytes/cytology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Retrospective Studies , Weight Loss
4.
Pain Res Manag ; 2016: 2157950, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27445602

ABSTRACT

Context. The McGill University Health Center (MUHC) Cancer Pain Clinic offers an interdisciplinary approach to cancer pain management for patients. The core team includes a nurse clinician specialist in oncology and palliative care, a palliativist, an anaesthetist, and a radiation oncologist. This tailored approach includes pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies offered concurrently in an interdisciplinary fashion. Objectives. Description of the interdisciplinary MUHC cancer pain approach and analysis of treatments and outcomes. Methods. A retrospective analysis of new outpatients completing two subsequent visits (baseline and follow-ups: FU1, FU2) was conducted. Variables included (a) symptom severity measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, (b) pain and disability measured with the Brief Pain Inventory, and (c) analgesic plan implementation including pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. Results. 71 charts were reviewed. Significant pain relief was achieved consistently at FU1 and FU2. The average pain severity decreased by 2 points between initial assessment and FU2. More than half (53%) of patients responded with a pain reduction greater than 30%. Severity of other symptoms (i.e., fatigue, nausea, depression, and anxiety) and disability also decreased significantly at FU2. The total consumption of opioids remained stable; however, the consumption of short acting preparations decreased by 52% whereas the prescription of nonopioid agents increased. Beyond drug management, 60% of patients received other analgesic therapies, being the most common interventional pain procedures and psychosocial approaches. Conclusion. The MUHC interdisciplinary approach to cancer pain management provides meaningful relief of pain and other cancer-related symptoms and decreases patients' disability.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Cancer Pain/diagnosis , Cancer Pain/therapy , Pain Clinics/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/methods , Aged , Canada , Cancer Pain/classification , Cancer Pain/complications , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Ecancermedicalscience ; 9: 561, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26316882

ABSTRACT

With the availability of a potential treatment to reverse male hypogonadism (MH), the primary aim of this case series study was to determine independent relationships between this condition and the nutritional, functional, and quality of life characteristics of advanced cancer patients (ACP). Free testosterone levels were measured in 100 male patients with advanced lung and gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Routine blood markers of nutrition and inflammation, self-reporting questionnaires for symptom, nutrition, and functional status along with handgrip dynamometry were assessed for all patients at bedside. Almost half of this cohort underwent further assessments (body composition, lower body strength, in depth quality of life and fatigue questionnaires) at the McGill Nutrition and Performance Laboratory (mnupal.mcgill.ca). Multiple regression analyses were performed to identify independent correlations between free testosterone and the above measures. Seventy-six percent of patients were diagnosed with MH. Using multiple linear regression, low free testosterone (31.2 pmol/L) was independently associated with lower albumin (B = -3.8 g/L; 95% confidence interval CI -6.8:-0.8), muscle strength (-11.7 lbs; -20.4: -3.0) and mass in upper limbs (-0.8 kg; -1.4: -0.1), overall performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale, ECOG PS 0.6; 0.1:1.1), cancer-related fatigue (Brief Fatigue Inventory, BFI 16.7; 2.0: 31.3), and overall quality of life (MQoL total score -1.42; -2.5: -0.3). Thus MH seems to be highly prevalent in ACP, and it is independently associated with important nutritional, functional, and quality of life characteristics in this patient population.

6.
CMAJ ; 186(9): 697, 2014 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24914228
7.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 114(7): 1088-1098, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24462323

ABSTRACT

Cancer cachexia (CC) is a syndrome characterized by wasting of lean body mass and fat, often driven by decreased food intake, hypermetabolism, and inflammation resulting in decreased lifespan and quality of life. Classification of cancer cachexia has improved, but few clinically relevant diagnostic tools exist for its early identification and characterization. The abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (aPG-SGA) is a modification of the original Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, and consists of a four-part questionnaire that scores patients' weight history, food intake, appetite, and performance status. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the aPG-SGA is associated with both features and clinical sequelae of cancer cachexia. In this prospective cohort study, 207 advanced lung and gastrointestinal cancer patients completed the following tests: aPG-SGA, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, handgrip strength, a complete blood count, albumin, apolipoprotein A and B, and C-reactive protein. Ninety-four participants with good performance status as assessed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status completed additional questionnaires and underwent body composition testing. Of these, 68 patients tested for quadriceps strength and completed a 3-day food recall. Multivariable regression models revealed that higher aPG-SGA scores (≥9 vs 0 to 1) are significantly associated (P<0.05) with the following: unfavorable biological markers of cancer cachexia, such as higher white blood cell counts (10.0 vs 6.7×10(9)/L; lower hemoglobin (115.6 vs 127.7 g/L), elevated C-reactive protein (42.7 vs 18.2 mg/L [406.7 vs 173.3 nmol/L]); decreased anthropometric and physical measures, such as body mass index (22.5 vs 27.1); fat mass (14.4 vs 26.0 kg), handgrip (24.7 vs 34.9 kg) and leg strength; an average 12% greater length of hospital stay; a dose reduction in chemotherapy; and increased mortality. Given its association with the main features of cancer cachexia and its ease of use, the aPG-SGA appears to be a useful tool for detecting and predicting outcomes of cancer cachexia. Additional research is required to determine what impact the aPG-SGA has on quality of care when used in the clinical setting.


Subject(s)
Cachexia/diagnosis , Neoplasms/complications , Adolescent , Anthropometry , Apolipoproteins A/blood , Apolipoproteins B/blood , Body Composition , Body Mass Index , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Cachexia/etiology , Energy Intake , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Nutritional Status , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Weight Loss
8.
Crit Rev Oncog ; 17(3): 293-303, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22831160

ABSTRACT

Panels of experts have agreed on the definition of cancer cachexia stages (CCS). We evaluated the clinical relevance of these stages and proposed ways to apply the CCSs to the clinical practice via standardized methods. The CCS were applied to 207 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung or gastrointestinal cancers from the Human Cancer Cachexia Database via consensus among the coauthors. Patients were categorized as noncachectic, precachectic, cachectic, and in refractory cachexia. Through analysis of variance, χ2, and Kaplan-Meier analyses, we tested the relationships between CCSs and selected outcomes. The CCS were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with patient-centered indicators, including overall symptom burden, quality of life, tolerability to chemotherapy, body composition, hospital stay, and survival. However, precachectic and cachectic patients behaved similarly in all these outcomes but were significantly different from noncachectic and refractory cachectic patients. The average scores for the abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (aPG-SGA) corresponded well with the CCSs and reflected nicely the cut-off scores recommended for the nutritional triage of cancer patients. In addition to the aPG-SGA, we proposed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and routine laboratory tests for the triage of patients with refractory cachexia, for whom comfort care is the primary goal. The cachexia clinic hosted by the McGill Nutrition and Performance Laboratory offers a model for diagnosing more precisely the pathophysiology and severity of precachectic and cachectic conditions. The cachexia clinic, by working closely with palliative care programs, may offer the best environment for a comprehensive and personalized approach to the nutritional and functional problems in advanced cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Cachexia/therapy , Malnutrition/therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Adult , Aged , Cachexia/etiology , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Malnutrition/etiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/pathology
9.
J Cancer Educ ; 21(1): 30-4, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16918287

ABSTRACT

Humor and laughter have been thought to be beneficial for thousands of years. Although much has been written on this subject, there is very little written about the actual use of humor in practice. This article reviews the role that humor and laughter may play in medicine in general and palliative care in particular. In addition, it introduces a model that clinicians can follow when trying to introduce humor into their daily encounters with patients.


Subject(s)
Laughter Therapy , Neoplasms , Palliative Care , Smiling , Wit and Humor as Topic , Attitude to Death , Humans , Neoplasms/nursing , Neoplasms/psychology , Professional-Patient Relations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...