The M-Point A Novel Landmark in Middle Fossa Surgery: A Cadaveric Morphometric Study.

BACKGROUND: The arcuate eminence (AE) is an anatomically consistent bony protrusion located on the upper surface of the petrous bone that has been previously studied as a reference for lateral skull base approaches. There is a paucity of information in the neurosurgical literature seeking to improve the safety of the extended middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach using detailed morphometric analysis of the AE. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the AE as an anatomical landmark to help with early identification of the internal acoustic canal (IAC) in MCF approaches by means of a cadaveric study, using a new morphometric reference termed the "M-point." METHODS: A total of 40 dry temporal bones and 2 formalin-preserved, latex-injected cadaveric heads were used. The M-point was established as a new anatomic reference by identifying the intersection of a line perpendicular to the alignment of the petrous ridge (PR), originating from the midpoint of the AE, with the PR itself. Subsequent anatomical measurements were performed to measure the distance between M-point and IAC. Additional distances, including PR length and the anteroposterior and lateral AE surfaces, were also measured. RESULTS: The mean distance between the M-point and the center of the IAC was 14.9 mm (SD ± 2.09), offering a safe drilling area during an MCF approach. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel information on identification of a new anatomic reference point known as the M-point that that can be used to improve early surgical identification of the IAC.

The Hibiscus Model: A Feasible Cadaveric Model Using Continuous Arterial Circulation for Intracranial Bypass Training and Its Validation.

OBJECTIVE: The frequency of intracranial bypass procedures has declined. Thus it is difficult for neurosurgeons to develop the necessary skills for this complex procedure. We present a perfusion-based cadaveric model to provide a realistic training experience with high anatomic and physiological fidelity, as well as instantaneous assessment of bypass patency. Validation was assessed by evaluating the educational impact and skill improvement of the participants. METHODS: Fourteen participants attended a hands-on revascularization course with 7 cadaveric models connected to a continuous arterial circulation system pumping a red-colored solution through the entire cranial vasculature, mimicking blood circulation. The ability to perform a vascular anastomosis was evaluated initially. Further, a questionnaire on prior experience was provided. At the end of the 36-hour course, the ability to perform an intracranial bypass was reexamined and the participants completed a self-assessment questionnaire. RESULTS: Initially, only 3 attendees were able to perform an end-to-end anastomosis within the time limit, and only 2 of these anastomoses showed adequate patency. After having accomplished the course, all participants were able to complete a patent end-to-end anastomosis within the time limit, thus demonstrating a significant improvement. Further, both overall educational gain and surgical skills were regarded as remarkable (n = 11 and n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based education is considered an important aspect of medical and surgical development. The presented model is a feasible and accessible alternative to the prior models used for cerebral bypass training. This training may serve as a helpful and widely available tool to improve neurosurgeons' development irrespective of financial resources.