The Role of Microvascular Obstruction and Intra-Myocardial Hemorrhage in Reperfusion Cardiac Injury. Analysis of Clinical Data.

Microvascular obstruction (MVO) of coronary arteries promotes an increase in mortality and major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) is observed in 41-50% of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and PCI. The occurrence of IMH is accompanied by inflammation. There is evidence that microthrombi are not involved in the development of MVO. The appearance of MVO is associated with infarct size, the duration of ischemia of the heart, and myocardial edema. However, there is no conclusive evidence that myocardial edema plays an important role in the development of MVO. There is evidence that platelets, inflammation, Ca 2 + overload, neuropeptide Y, and endothelin-1 could be involved in the pathogenesis of MVO. The role of endothelial cell damage in MVO formation remains unclear in patients with AMI and PCI. It is unclear whether nitric oxide production is reduced in patients with MVO. Only indirect evidence on the involvement of inflammation in the development of MVO has been obtained. The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the pathogenesis of MVO is not studied. The role of necroptosis and pyroptosis in the pathogenesis of MVO in patients with AMI and PCI is also not studied. The significance of the balance of thromboxane A2, vasopressin, angiotensin II, and prostacyclin in the formation of MVO is currently unknown. Conclusive evidence regarding the role of coronary artery spasm in the development of MVhasn't been established. Correlation analysis of the neuropeptide Y, endothelin-1 levels and the MVO size in patients with AMI and PCI has not previously been performed. It is unclear whether epinephrine aggravates reperfusion necrosis of cardiomyocytes. Dual antiplatelet therapy improves the efficacy of PCI in prevention of MVO. It is unknown whether epinephrine or L-type Ca 2 + channel blockers result in the long-term improvement of coronary blood flow in patients with MVO.

Assessment of continuous low-dose and high-dose burst of inhaled nitric oxide in spontaneously breathing COVID-19 patients: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) showed to improve oxygenation at low doses by reducing intrapulmonary shunt and to display antiviral properties at high doses. To assess the safety and potential benefits, we designed an exploratory clinical trial comparing low-dose with intermittent high-dose iNO to only intermittent high-dose iNO in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this single-center interventional non-inferiority randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04476992), twenty oxygen-dependent COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned to the high-dose (200 ppm for 30 min) + continuous low-dose (20 ppm) iNO group (iNO200/20) or the high-dose iNO group (iNO200). Methemoglobinemia (MetHb) assessed 48 h after iNO initiation was the primary endpoint. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2, inflammatory markers during hospitalization, and heart ultrasounds during the iNO200 treatments were evaluated. RESULTS: MetHb difference between iNO groups remained within the non-inferiority limit of 3 %, indicating comparable treatments despite being statistically different (p-value<0.01). Both groups presented similar SpO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 h (iNO200 vs. iNO200/20 341[334-356] vs. 359 [331-380], respectively, p-value = 0.436). Both groups showed the same time to SARS-CoV-2 negativization, hospital length of stay, and recovery time. iNO-treated patients showed quicker SARS-CoV-2 negativization compared to a similar group of non-iNO patients (HR 2.57, 95%CI 1.04-6.33). During the 228 treatments, iNO200 and iNO200/20 groups were comparable for safety, hemodynamic stability, and respiratory function improvement. CONCLUSIONS: iNO200/20 and iNO200 are equally safe in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-induced respiratory failure with regards to MetHb and NO2. Larger studies should investigate whether iNO200/20 leads to better outcomes compared to non-iNO treated patients.

The Nephroprotective Effect of Nitric Oxide during Extracorporeal Circulation: An Experimental Study.

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of administering 80 ppm nitric oxide in reducing kidney injury, mitochondrial dysfunction and regulated cell death in kidneys during experimental perfusion. Twenty-four sheep were randomized into four groups: two groups received 80 ppm NO conditioning with 90 min of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB + NO) or 90 min of CPB and hypothermic circulatory arrest (CPB + CA + NO), while two groups received sham protocols (CPB and CPB + CA). Kidney injury was assessed using laboratory (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, an acute kidney injury biomarker) and morphological methods (morphometric histological changes in kidney biopsy specimens). A kidney biopsy was performed 60 min after weaning from mechanical perfusion. NO did not increase the concentrations of inhaled NO2 and methemoglobin significantly. The NO-conditioning groups showed less severe kidney injury and mitochondrial dysfunction, with statistical significance in the CPB + NO group and reduced tumor necrosis factor-α expression as a trigger of apoptosis and necroptosis in renal tissue in the CPB + CA + NO group compared to the CPB + CA group. The severity of mitochondrial dysfunction in renal tissue was insignificantly lower in the NO-conditioning groups. We conclude that NO administration is safe and effective at reducing kidney injury, mitochondrial dysfunction and regulated cell death in kidneys during experimental CPB.

Peptides Are Cardioprotective Drugs of the Future: The Receptor and Signaling Mechanisms of the Cardioprotective Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.

The high mortality rate among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the main problems of modern cardiology. It is quite obvious that there is an urgent need to create more effective drugs for the treatment of AMI than those currently used in the clinic. Such drugs could be enzyme-resistant peptide analogs of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). GLP-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists can prevent ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) cardiac injury. In addition, chronic administration of GLP1R agonists can alleviate the development of adverse cardiac remodeling in myocardial infarction, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. GLP1R agonists can protect the heart against oxidative stress and reduce proinflammatory cytokine (IL-1ß, TNF-α, IL-6, and MCP-1) expression in the myocardium. GLP1R stimulation inhibits apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis of cardiomyocytes. The activation of the GLP1R augments autophagy and mitophagy in the myocardium. GLP1R agonists downregulate reactive species generation through the activation of Epac and the GLP1R/PI3K/Akt/survivin pathway. The GLP1R, kinases (PKCε, PKA, Akt, AMPK, PI3K, ERK1/2, mTOR, GSK-3ß, PKG, MEK1/2, and MKK3), enzymes (HO-1 and eNOS), transcription factors (STAT3, CREB, Nrf2, and FoxO3), KATP channel opening, and MPT pore closing are involved in the cardioprotective effect of GLP1R agonists.