Impact of prophylactic central lymph node dissection on the complications and recurrence rates in papillary thyroid carcinoma-An AFCE (French-speaking Association of Endocrine Surgery) multicentre study based on the EUROCRINE® national data.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) remains controversial during the initial surgery for preoperative and intraoperative node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). METHODS: Patients undergoing thyroidectomy with or without pCND (Nx) for PTC in nine French surgical departments, registered in the EUROCRINE® national data in France between January 2015 and June 2021, were included in a cohort study. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics, complications, and recurrence rates were compared using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1905 patients with cN0 PTC were enrolled, including 1534 who had undergone pCND and 371 who hadn't (Nx). Of these, 1546 (81.2%) were female, and the median age was 49 years (range: 15-89 years). Patients who had undergone pCND were more likely to have multifocal tumors (n = 524 [34.2%] vs. n = 68 [18.3%], p < .001) and larger tumors (15.3 vs. 10.2 mm, p = .01) than patients with Nx. Of the patients with pCND, 553 (36%) had positive central LN (N1a), with a median of 1 N1 (IQR 0-5). pCND was associated with a higher temporary hypocalcemia rate (n = 25 [8%] vs. n = 15 [4%], p < .001). The rates of permanent hypocalcemia and temporary and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy were not significantly different between the two groups (p > .2). After adjusting for covariates (age, sex, multifocality, and pathological T stage) in a multivariable Cox PH model, the performance of lymph node dissection (pCND vs. no-pCND) was not associated with PTC recurrence (p = .2). CONCLUSION: pCND in PTC does not reduce recurrence and is associated with a two-fold increase in the incidence of transient hypoparathyroidism. These data should be considered while issuing further guidelines regarding the treatment of patients with cN0 PTC.

Liver resection for colorectal metastases: results and prognostic factors with 10-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Actual 5-year survival rates after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are 25-45%, whereas 10-year survival rates are extrapolated from survival curves. Few studies have reported long-term survivors with 10 years of actual follow-up. Therefore, no recurrences occurring after 10-plus years have been reported. The aim of our study was to analyze actual 10-year survival rates and prognostic factors. METHODS: Clinical data of patients with CLM who had undergone first liver resection in our center between January 1990 and December 2000 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients of mean age 64 years were studied. Three patients were excluded from the study: one because of postoperative death, and two from being lost to follow-up. All other subjects had a potential 10-year follow-up. Only 33% patients received perioperative chemotherapy. The actual 10-year overall and disease-free survival rate were 22 and 19%, respectively. Poor prognostic factors were disease-free interval less than 1 year, wedge liver resection, clinical risk score>2, segment 1 CLM location, and peritumoral lymphangitis. Good prognostic factors were tumors having mucinous components in primary tumor and CLM located in the right lobe. CONCLUSIONS: With actual long-term follow-up for 10 years, disease-free survival rate is 19% and mainly depends on surgical management. Recurrence continues to occur more than 5 years after liver resection for CLM; cure cannot be assumed at this time. Clinical risk score is a good predictor of cure and should be taken into account when choosing perioperative treatment.