Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 6 de 6
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 32(2): 223-234, 2024 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38293720

PURPOSE: The aim of this consensus project was to give recommendations regarding surgical treatment of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured patient. METHODS: For this consensus process, an expert, steering and rating group was formed. In an initial online meeting, the steering group, together with the expert group, formed various key topic complexes for which multiple questions were formulated. For each key topic, a structured literature search was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Sufficient consensus was defined as 80% agreement. RESULTS: During this consensus process, 30 topics regarding the surgical management and technique of ACL reconstruction were identified. The literature search for each key question resulted in 30 final statements. Of these 30 final statements, all achieved consensus. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus process has shown that surgical treatment of ACL injury is a complex process. Various surgical factors influence patient outcomes. The proposed treatment algorithm can be used as a decision aid for the surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Humans , Algorithms , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Consensus
2.
J Clin Med ; 12(5)2023 Feb 25.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36902631

(1) Background: The treatment of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) is debated controversially. Current clinical knowledge is mainly based on small single-center cohorts. The goal of this study was to evaluate the predictability of risk factors for complications after the treatment of a PHF in a large clinical cohort in a multicentric setting. (2) Methods: Clinical data of 4019 patients with PHFs were retrospectively collected from 9 participating hospitals. Risk factors for local complications of the affected shoulder were assessed using bi- and multivariate analyses. (3) Results: Fracture complexity with n = 3 or more fragments, cigarette smoking, age over 65 years, and female sex were identified as predictable individual risk factors for local complications after surgical therapy as well as the combination of female sex and smoking and the combination of age 65 years or older and ASA class 2 or higher. (4) Conclusion: Humeral head preserving reconstructive surgical therapy should critically be evaluated for patients with the risk factors abovementioned.

3.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 22(1): 531, 2021 Jun 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34107953

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs in 3-10 % of patients with surgically treated tibial plateau fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SSI on patients' outcome after fixation of tibial plateau fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in seven participating level I trauma centers between January 2005 and December 2014. All participating centers followed up with patients with SSI. In addition, three centers followed up with patients without SSI as a reference group. Descriptive data and follow-up data with patient-reported outcome scores (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] and Lysholm knee scoring scale score) were evaluated. RESULTS: In summary, 287 patients (41 with SSI and 246 without SSI; average 50.7 years) with an average follow-up of 75.9 ± 35.9 months were included in this study. Patients with SSI had a significantly poorer overall KOOS (KOOS5) (48.7 ± 23.2 versus [vs.] 71.5 ± 23.5; p < 0.001) and Lysholm knee scoring scale score (51.4 ± 24.0 vs. 71.4 ± 23.5; p < 0.001) than patients without SSI. This significant difference was also evident in the KOOS subscores for pain, symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), and quality of life (QoL). SSI remained an important factor in multivariable models after adjusting for potential confounders. Clinically relevant differences in the KOOS5 and KOOS subscores for symptoms, pain, and ADL were found between those with SSI and without SSI even after adjustment. Furthermore, the number of previous diseases, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Foundation (AO) C fractures, and compartment syndrome were found to be additional factors related to poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous studies, validated patient-reported outcome scores demonstrated that the impact of SSI in patients with surgically treated tibial plateau fractures is dramatic, in terms of not only pain and symptoms but also in ADL and QoL, compared to that in patients without SSI.


Quality of Life , Tibial Fractures , Activities of Daily Living , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Tibial Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(7): 371-377, 2021 07 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33177429

OBJECTIVES: To identify the potential controllable risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven Level-I trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with OTA/AO 41 B or C tibial plateau fractures (n = 2106). INTERVENTION: Various surgical treatments for tibial plateau fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was SSI after the index operation. The secondary outcomes were the risk factors for SSI, identified using backward stepwise generalized multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2106 enrolled patients, 94 had deep SSIs. The average SSI rate was 4.5%. Fracture morphology revealed type B injuries in 57.5% and type C in 42.5% of the patients. Univariate regression analysis revealed that several factors, namely, number of comorbidities [>6 vs. none; odds ratio (OR) 8.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-22.8, P < 0.001], diabetes mellitus (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.0-6.3, P < 0.001), high body mass index (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, P = 0.001), OTA/AO fracture type C (OR 5.6, 95% CI 3.3-9.5, P < 0.001), compartment syndrome (OR 9.1, 95% CI 5.7-14.8, P < 0.001), and open fracture (OR 6.6, 95% CI 3.7-11.7, P < 0.001), were associated with a significantly higher SSI risk. Analysis of microbial sensitivity tests revealed that 55.1% of the pathogens were resistant to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the identified risk factors cannot be controlled or are subject to other factors that are difficult to control. However, our data suggest that the choice of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis may influence the rate of SSI. This possibility should be investigated in a prospective randomized controlled trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Surgical Wound Infection , Tibial Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Tibial Fractures/complications , Tibial Fractures/epidemiology , Tibial Fractures/surgery
6.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 46(6): 1249-1255, 2020 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32935161

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of tibial plateau fracture (TPF) is common. Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most serious complications of TPF. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the effect of fracturoscopy on the incidence of surgical site infections in patients with TPF. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre study. All patients with an AO/OTA 41 B and C TPF from January 2005 to December 2014 were included. Patients were divided into three groups: those who underwent arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF), and those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with fracturoscopy, and those treated with ORIF without fracturoscopy. The groups were compared to assess the effect of fracturoscopy. We characterised our cohort and the subgroups using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, we fitted a logistic regression model which was reduced and simplified by a selection procedure (both directions) using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). From the final model, odds ratios and inclusive 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 52 patients who underwent fracturoscopy, 48 patients who underwent ARIF, and 2000 patients treated with ORIF were identified. The rate of SSI was 0% (0/48) in the ARIF group and 1.9% (1/52) in the fracturoscopy group compared to 4.7% (93/2000) in the ORIF group (OR = 0.40, p = 0.37). Regression analyses indicated a potential positive effect of fracturoscopy (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.07-5.68; p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that fracturoscopy is associated with reduced rates of SSI. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to investigate this. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Arthroscopy/methods , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Knee Joint/surgery , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Switzerland/epidemiology
...