Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Pediatr ; 263: 113687, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37611735

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of an inpatient standardized developmental screener for early identification of developmental risk in infants with a congenital heart defect (CHD). STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective, observational study with convenience sample of postoperative infants with CHD (aged 3-12 months) who underwent neurodevelopmental screening with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development Screening Test, Third Edition (Bayley-III Screener) just before discharge. Follow-up testing included outpatient Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III) (12-42 mo). RESULTS: The Bayley-III Screener was administered to 325 infants at a median of 5 months, 8 days (IQR 3 months, 28 days, to 7 months, 17 days). Infants scored below age expectations on the Gross Motor (79%), Fine Motor (63%), Receptive Communication (50%), Expressive Communication (38%), and Cognitive (38%) domains. In each domain, children with CHD had greater rates of scores below expectations than the normative sample (each P <.001). The odds of scoring in a greater risk category were increased for infants with genetic syndromes and longer length of hospital stay across all domains. The outpatient Bayley-III (n = 74, 23% follow-up) was completed at a median of 19 months, 9 days (IQR: 17 months, 3 days, to 23 months, 37 days). Individuals falling in greater-risk categories on their initial Bayley-III Screener were significantly more likely to have worse performance on their follow-up outpatient Bayley-III (each domain P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient standardized neurodevelopmental screening provides important clinical utility in identifying infants at risk for developmental concern, allows for provision of recommendations for developmental services, and potentially overcomes barriers often noted in returning for outpatient post-discharge assessments.


Subject(s)
Developmental Disabilities , Heart Defects, Congenital , Humans , Infant , Aftercare , Child Development , Developmental Disabilities/diagnosis , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Inpatients , Patient Discharge
3.
J Pediatr ; 252: 198-203.e2, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029823

ABSTRACT

Sleep patterns of 419 toddlers with congenital heart disease were comparable with the normative population except for increased likelihood across the cohort of sleeping in parents' room and increased disrupted sleep in children aged 18-23 months. Disrupted sleep patterns were associated with lower maternal education and increased medical complexity.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Sleep Wake Disorders , Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Sleep , Parents , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology
4.
J Pediatr ; 220: 93-100, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32147219

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assess differences in approaches to and provision of developmental care for infants undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. STUDY DESIGN: A collaborative learning approach was used to stratify, assess, and compare individualized developmental care practices among multidisciplinary teams at 6 pediatric heart centers. Round robin site visits were completed with structured site visit goals and postvisit reporting. Practices of the hosting site were assessed by the visiting team and reviewed along with center self-assessments across specific domains including pain management, environment, cue-based care, and family based care coordination. RESULTS: Developmental care for infants in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) varies at both a center and individual level. Differences in care are primarily driven by variations in infrastructure and resources, composition of multidisciplinary teams, education of team members, and use of developmental care champions. Management of pain follows a protocol in most cardiac intensive care units, but the environment varies across centers, and the provision of cue-based infant care and family-based care coordination varies widely both within and across centers. The project led to proposed changes in clinical care and center infrastructure at each participating site. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative learning design fostered rapid dissemination, comparison, and sharing of strategies to approach a complex multidisciplinary care paradigm. Our assessment of experiences revealed marked variability across and within centers. The collaborative findings were a first step toward strategies to quantify and measure developmental care practices in the cardiac intensive care unit to assess the association of complex inpatient practices with long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Critical Care/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Learning , Models, Educational , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Patient Care Team , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL