Management of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current perspectives.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare disease in Western countries. Nevertheless, its incidence in China, Singapore, and other Eastern countries reaches 20 cases per 100,000 people. Being an extremely chemo- and radiosensitive disease, upfront treatment often consists in the association of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin. Unfortunately, about 20% of the patients suffer from a radioresistant disease which recurs after upfront therapy. For these patients, mainly available therapeutic options consist in systemic therapy, in particular poly-chemotherapy. In those showing a single locoregional recurrence, chemotherapy is not considered to be the preferred approach and other different strategies may be employed. Re-irradiation and surgery are strategies that are always used more often, albeit related to high risk of morbidity. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy, such as heavy ions-based re-irradiations, are experimental but very intriguing options.

Translational Research: A Future Strategy for Managing Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck?

BACKGROUND: Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN) are neoplasms arising from the epithelium of the first aero-digestive tract. They are very heterogeneous both clinically and biologically. Classic and well acknowledged risk factors are alcohol and tobacco consumption and other forms of smokeless tobacco assumption, although lately the incidence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-related SCCHN is rapidly increasing. HPV-related tumors are very different from their alcohol and tobacco-associated counterpart, as they show strong chemo and radio sensitivity and thus can often be treated with conservative treatment strategies. Moreover, peculiar biologic features characterize HPV-related tumors, such as wild type TP53, low expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), wild type CCND1 and high expression of P16. In contrast, alcohol and tobacco related SCCHN show opposite features, together with higher number of chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, conferring them chemo and radio resistance. METHODS: We have performed a narrative review of the PubMed database with the aim to study the mutational landscape of SCCHN. RESULTS: Several lines of evidence support the existence of at least two genetically different types of SCCHN, one virus-related and the other alcohol and/or tobacco-related, characterized by both clinical and biological opposite features. Virus related SCCHN are very chemo and radiosensitive, so suitable for organ preserving strategy, which in the near future may be induction chemotherapy followed by association of chemotherapy and underpowered radiotherapy. Alcohol and tobacco related SCCHN are themselves strongly heterogeneous and can be divided in different entities on the basis of the "Driver" genetic aberration, responsible for carcinogenesis. The most frequently mutated genes in alcohol and tobacco-related SCCHN are TP53, NOTCH1, CCND1, CDKN2A, EGFR and PI3KCA. CONCLUSIONS: Virus-related SCCHN can be managed with chemo-radiotherapy. Alcohol and tobacco-related tumors should be further characterized on the basis of their "Driver Mutations" in order to select effective targeted therapies.

A randomized, phase 2 study of cetuximab plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: B490 (EudraCT# 2011-002564-24) is a randomized, phase 2b, noninferiority study investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line cetuximab plus cisplatin with/without paclitaxel (CetCis versus CetCisPac) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had confirmed R/M SCCHN (oral cavity/oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx/paranasal sinus) and no prior therapy for R/M disease. Cetuximab was administered on day 1 (2-h infusion, 400 mg/m2), then weekly (1-h infusions, 250 mg/m2). Cisplatin was given as a 1-h infusion (CetCis arm: 100 mg/m2; CetCisPac arm: 75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h infusion (175 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle. After six cycles, maintenance cetuximab was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We assumed a noninferiority margin of 1.40 as compatible with efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to each regimen; 191 were assessable. PFS with CetCis (median, 6 months) was noninferior to PFS with CetCisPac (median, 7 months) [HR for CetCis versus CetCisPac 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72-1.36, P = 0.906; margin of noninferiority (90% CI of 1.4) not reached]. Median overall survival was 13 versus 11 months (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53-1.11, P = 0.117). The overall response rates were 41.8% versus 51.7%, respectively (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.38-1.20, P = 0.181). Grade ≥3 adverse event rates were 76% and 73% for CetCis versus CetCisPac, respectively, while grade 4 toxicities were lower in the two-drug versus three-drug arm (14% versus 33%, P = 0.015). No toxic death or sepsis were reported and cardiac events were negligible (1%). CONCLUSION: The two-drug CetCis regimen proved to be noninferior in PFS to a three-drug combination with CetCisPac. The median OS of both regimens is comparable with that observed in EXTREME, while the life-threatening toxicity rate appeared reduced. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: EudraCT# 2011-002564-24.

Afatinib versus methotrexate in older patients with second-line recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis of the LUX-Head & Neck 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the phase III LUX-Head & Neck 1 (LHN1) trial, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus methotrexate in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients progressing on/after platinum-based therapy. This report evaluates afatinib efficacy and safety in prespecified subgroups of patients aged ≥65 and <65 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized (2:1) to 40 mg/day oral afatinib or 40 mg/m(2)/week intravenous methotrexate. PFS was the primary end point; overall survival (OS) was the key secondary end point. Other end points included: objective response rate (ORR), patient-reported outcomes, tumor shrinkage, and safety. Disease control rate (DCR) was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 483 randomized patients, 27% (83 afatinib; 45 methotrexate) were aged ≥65 years (older) and 73% (239 afatinib; 116 methotrexate) <65 years (younger) at study entry. Similar PFS benefit with afatinib versus methotrexate was observed in older {median 2.8 versus 2.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-1.03], P = 0.061} and younger patients [2.6 versus 1.6 months, HR = 0.79 (0.62-1.01), P = 0.052]. In older and younger patients, the median OS with afatinib versus methotrexate was 7.3 versus 6.4 months [HR = 0.84 (0.54-1.31)] and 6.7 versus 6.2 months [HR = 0.98 (0.76-1.28)]. ORRs with afatinib versus methotrexate were 10.8% versus 6.7% and 10.0% versus 5.2%; DCRs were 53.0% versus 37.8% and 47.7% versus 38.8% in older and younger patients, respectively. In both subgroups, the most frequent treatment-related adverse events were rash/acne (73%-77%) and diarrhea (70%-80%) with afatinib, and stomatitis (43%) and fatigue (31%-34%) with methotrexate. Fewer treatment-related discontinuations were observed with afatinib (each subgroup 7% versus 16%). A trend toward improved time to deterioration of global health status, pain, and swallowing with afatinib was observed in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age (≥65 years) did not adversely affect clinical outcomes or safety with afatinib versus methotrexate in second-line R/M HNSCC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01345682 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Phase I dose-escalation study of brostallicin, a minor groove binder, in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Brostallicin is a DNA minor groove binder which shows enhanced antitumor activity in cells which are resistant to several anticancer agents due to their high glutathione S-transferase (GST)/glutathione content. Phase I and II clinical trials of single-agent brostallicin have shown that myelotoxicity is the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), while hints of antitumor activity were mainly observed in soft tissue sarcoma. Preclinical studies showing a more than additive antitumor effect of the cisplatin-brostallicin combination paved the way to clinical combination studies. In particular, we set up the first clinical combination study of brostallicin and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. This study was to be followed by a phase II study in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Escalating doses of brostallicin were administered in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) in patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced solid tumors who had previously received a cumulative dose of cisplatin not higher than 475 mg/m(2). The recommended dose of brostallicin was expanded in order to have a better estimate of antitumor activity and to better define the safety profile of the combination. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated. Two DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and febrile neutropenia) were observed at dose level 3 (brostallicin 9 mg/m(2)). Dose level 2 (brostallicin 7 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)) was recommended for future phase II studies. Main toxicity was hematologic; in fact, only 1 patient out of 21 did not develop neutropenia and only 2 patients did not have thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 90.5% of patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 38.1%, grade 3-4 anemia in 23.8%. The cycle 1 nadir (ANC < 500 x 10(9)/L) for neutrophils was Day 14 (median; range 11-17) with recovery to an ANC of >1,500 3.5 days after nadir (median; range 2-4) at dose level 3. The cycle 1 nadir (median of 51,000 x 10(9)/L) for platelets occurred on Day 13 (median; range 10-15) with recovery to a platelet count of >100,000 4 days after nadir (median; range 2-8). No objective responses were observed, but seven patients had a long lasting (>18 weeks) stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies of the combination of brostallicin and cisplatin are warranted.

An EORTC phase I study of Bortezomib in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

The combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) is still a reference regimen in advanced colorectal cancer; however, the addition of new biologic compounds represents a significant way forward. Bortezomib is an inhibitor of proteasome, a multicatalytic enzyme complex that degrades several intracellular proteins. In this study, escalating doses of Bortezomib were administered along with the standard FOLFOX-4 doses, in order to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicity profile and activity of the combination. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer, unpretreated for metastatic disease, were enroled in the study. Bortezomib starting dose was 1.3mg/m(2), which was to be escalated in the subsequent steps according to the toxicities observed after first cycle. Exploratory pharmacogenetics research was conducted by analysing the association between clinical outcomes and polymorphisms in candidate genes for response to each of the used drugs. Correlation between tumour marker changes and response was also investigated. One mg/m(2) (DL-1) was defined as being the maximum tolerated dose since only 1 DLT was observed in 6 patients. The main toxicities were haematologic, neuropathy, diarrhoea and fatigue. Amongst 13 evaluable patients, five had a partial response, five had a stable disease and three patients progressed. Two patients are long-term survivors after a combined chemosurgical approach. Further trials of the current combination may be justified.

The ubiquitin-proteasome system as a molecular target in solid tumors: an update on bortezomib.

The ubiquitin-proteasome system has become a promising molecular target in cancer therapy due to its critical role in cellular protein degradation, interaction with cell cycle and apoptosis regulation, and unique mechanism of action. Bortezomib (PS-341) is a potent and specific reversible proteasome inhibitor, which has shown strong in vitro antitumor activity as single agent and in combination with other cytotoxic drugs in a broad spectrum of hematological and solid malignancies. In preclinical studies, bortezomib induced apoptosis of malignant cells through the inhibition of NF-|B and stabilization of pro-apoptotic proteins. Bortezomib also promotes chemo- and radiosensitization of malignant cells in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in murine xenograft models. The proteasome has been established as a relevant target in hematologic malignancies and bortezomib has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. This review summarizes recent data from clinical trials in solid tumors.

Therapy of metastatic bladder carcinoma.

The methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin (M-VAC) regimen has been considered as standard treatment of metastatic bladder carcinoma till recent years. The superiority of M-VAC both to cisplatin alone and to another cisplatin combination regimen has been demonstrated in randomized studies. During the last years, the use of gemcitabine in metastatic bladder carcinoma has considerably increased, mainly in combination with cisplatin (CG). A phase III trial comparing M-VAC and CG demonstrated similar activity and less toxicity for CG, which has now become the new standard of care for patients with metastatic bladder carcinoma. The substitution of cisplatin with carboplatin, the combination of platinum and taxanes, and the addition of a third drug to basal CG combination represent possible ways to improve outcome. Among the novel cytotoxic compounds, pemetrexed has raised interest, since a phase II second-line study showed a 28% response rate with a manageable toxicity profile. Vinflunine is a novel antitubulin agent with a relevant clinical activity in pretreated metastatic bladder carcinoma (18% response rate, 6.6 months median survival). Novel biologic compounds (in particular drugs targeting epidermal growth factor receptor) are being tested in metastatic bladder carcinoma also and much effort is being pursued in understanding the determinants of tumor response. Crucial mutations to which the tumor becomes addicted have to be discovered so that more effective and specific drugs or combinations can be delivered.

Docetaxel induces p53-dependent apoptosis and synergizes with farnesyl transferase inhibitor r115777 in human epithelial cancer cells.

Docetaxel (Taxotere, DTX) is a promoter of apoptosis in cancer cells. Since cytotoxic mechanisms of DTX are not yet fully understood, we have investigated the effects of DTX on apoptosis and ras-->Erk-mediated signal transduction in human epidermoid KB, colon HT-29 and breast HCC1937 cancer cells. We have found that the exposure to 0.78 or 1.56 or 2.5 ng/ml DTX for 48 h induced apoptosis and growth inhibition in about 50 % of KB, HCC1937 and HT-29 cell population, respectively. In these experimental conditions, PARP and caspase 3 cleavage was also showed in all cell lines. KB and HCC1937 cells express a wild type p53 while HT-29 display a mutated form. Interestingly, we have found that DTX reduces the expression of mutated p53 in HT-29 and increases the expression of wild type in KB and HCC1937 cells. Moreover, DTX reduces ubiquitination of the wild type p53 in KB and HCC1937 cells and increases the ubiquitin-conjugated form of mutated p53 in HT-29 cells. Furthermore, exposure of cancer cells to DTX for 48 h increases the expression and activity of Ras and up-regulates Raf-1 and the phosphorylated isoforms of Erk-1/2. On the bases of these data, we have hypothesized that the increased activity of the ras-->erk-dependent pathway induced by DTX could be a protective signalling from the apoptosis caused by the drug. Therefore, we have used R115777, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor that inactivates ras, in combination with DTX. The combined treatment with DTX and R115777 resulted in a strong synergism in growth inhibition in the three cell lines. These data suggest the use of the combination in these therapeutic settings even if further experiments are required for the clinical translation.

Multicentre EORTC study 16997: feasibility and phase II trial of farnesyl transferase inhibitor & gemcitabine combination in salvage treatment of advanced urothelial tract cancers.

In this study, the feasibility and activity of combined chemotherapy of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH66336 and gemcitabine was evaluated. This therapy was used as second-line treatment in patients with advanced urothelial tract cancer and the influence of SCH66336 exposure on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine was also determined. Patients who had received one previous chemotherapy regime for advanced urothelial cancer were treated with a combination of SCH66336 (150 mg in the morning and 100 mg in the evening) and Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 per 28-day cycle). Dosages of gemcitabine and its metabolite dFdU were performed on day one of cycle 1 before exposure to SCH66336 and day one of cycle 2. A total of 152 cycles were administered in 33 patients (median 3, range: 1-15). No patients had severe hematological toxicity, defined as Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or febrile neutropenia. Nine partial responses and one complete response were achieved in 31 assessable patients and corresponded to an overall response rate of 32.3% [95% CI:17%-51%]. There was no influence of exposure to SCH66336 on the level of gemcitabine or dFdU in 11 assessable patients. In conclusion, a combination of SCH66336 and gemcitabine is feasible in terms of toxicity and active as second-line treatment in patients with advanced urothelial tract cancer. SCH66336 had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine. Randomised trials should be undertaken to clarify the role of SCH66336 in combination with gemcitabine in cancer treatment.

The ErbB receptors and their ligands in cancer: an overview.

This review article provides an overview on the most recent advances on the role of ErbB receptors and growth factors of the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-family of peptides in cancer pathogenesis and progression. The ErbB tyrosine kinases and the EGF-like peptides form a complex system. In fact, the interactions occurring between receptors and ligands of these families affect the type and the duration of the intracellular signals that derive from receptor activation. Interestingly, activation of ErbB receptors is also driven by different classes of membrane receptor, suggesting that ErbB kinases can amplify growth promoting signals carried by different pathways. The importance of ErbB receptors and EGF-like peptides in development of organs and tissues has been demonstrated by using different mouse models. In vitro and in vivo studies have also shown that ErbB receptors and their ligands can act as transforming genes. However, evidence suggests that cooperation of different receptors and ligands is necessary to induce a fully transformed phenotype. Indeed, co-expression of different ErbB receptors and EGF-like growth factors is a common phenomenon in human primary carcinomas. This observation suggests that the growth and the survival of carcinoma cells is sustained by a network of receptors/ligands of the ErbB family. In this respect, the contemporary expression of different ErbB tyrosine kinases and/or EGF-like growth factors in human carcinomas might also affect tumor response to target based agents directed against the ErbB receptor/ligand system.

Isoprenylation of intracellular proteins as a new target for the therapy of human neoplasms: preclinical and clinical implications.

Cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival are regulated by a number of extracellular hormones, growth factors, and cytokines in complex organisms. The transduction of the signals by these factors from the outside to the nucleus often requires the presence of small intracellular proteins (i.e. ras and other small G proteins) that are linked to the plasma membrane through a isoprenyl residue that functions as hydrophobic anchor. Isoprenylation is a complex process regulated by different enzymatic steps that could represent potential molecular targets for anti-cancer strategies. In the present paper the different transduction pathways regulated by some isoprenylated proteins such as ras and other small G proteins are described. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms of the isoprenylation process and the mode of action of the different isoprenylation inhibitors are discussed with attention to statins, farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTI) and aminobisphosphonates. The role of different candidate targets in the determination of anti-tumour effects by FTIs is also described in order to define potential molecular markers predictor of clinical response. On the basis of several preclinical data, new strategies based on multi-step enzyme inhibition or on target prioritization are proposed in order to enhance the anti-tumour activity of agents inhibiting isoprenylation. Finally, a summary of the principal data on clinical trials based on the use of FTIs and statins is given. In conclusion, the inhibition of isoprenylation is an attractive, but still not completely investigated therapeutic alternative that requires optimization for the translation in the current treatment of neoplasms.

Phase II study of E7070 in patients with metastatic melanoma.

E7070 is a synthetic chloro-indolyl sulphonamide that is being developed as an anti cancer agent. In this phase II study, 28 patients with metastatic melanoma received 700 mg/m(2) of E7070 as a 60-min infusion repeated every 3 weeks. Although therapy was well tolerated, with one patient receiving 14 courses of treatment, there were only minor responses on independent radiological review. E7070 does not warrant further development as a single agent for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Results of randomised phase II studies comparing S16020 with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to carry out two randomised phase II trials of S16020, a new olivacine derivative, tested as a single agent in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, using methotrexate as the control arm to validate the results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: S16020 at either 80 or 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Methotrexate, 40 or 50 mg/m2, was given by bolus injection, weekly for a minimum of 6 weeks. In total, 36 patients were entered in the randomised studies (25 in an initial study, 11 in a confirmatory study) of whom 24 received S16020 and 12 received methotrexate. RESULTS: A scheduled interim analysis showed one patient having a non-confirmed objective response with S16020 and three patients having a confirmed objective response with methotrexate. In the methotrexate group, there were no patients with severe non-haematological toxicity. With S16020, there was a high incidence of severe non-haematological toxicities, including asthenia, oedema of the face, oedema and pain at the tumour sites and erythematous rash; consequently, both studies were stopped. CONCLUSIONS: Both studies were stopped due to the poor anticipated benefit/risk ratio for S16020, although time to progression and overall survival time were similar in both treatment arms.

Phase II study of XR 5000 (DACA), an inhibitor of topoisomerase I and II, administered as a 120-h infusion in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

XR5000 is a tricyclic carboxamide-based cytotoxic agent that binds to DNA by intercalation and stimulates DNA cleavage by inhibition of both topoisomerase I and II. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antitumoral activity and safety profile of XR5000 given as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received XR5000 at the dose of 3010 mg/m(2) as a 120-h central venous infusion every 3 weeks. The 15 patients (median age 56 years, range 48-71 years) enrolled had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 (3 patients), 1 (11 patients) or 2 (1 patient). A total of 32 cycles of XR5000 (median 2, range 1-6) were given to 14 patients. No objective response (assessed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria) was documented in the 12 evaluable patients by an external review panel; in 4 out of the 12 patients disease stabilisation was recorded. The following toxicities graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0. were observed: one grade 3 and two grade 4 granulocytopenia, one grade 3 and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia, one grade 3 deep venous thrombosis, one grade 3 fatigue, and grade 3 undocumented epileptic seizures which led to death in 2 patients. With only 4 out of 12 patients reaching stable disease when using this dose and regimen, further evaluation of XR5000 in advanced NSCLC is not justified.

Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer.

The aim of this study was to determine the patient's preference for oral UFT/leucovorin (LV) or intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and to compare 5-FU exposure with these two treatment options. A total of 37 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomised to start treatment with either oral UFT 300 mg/m2/day plus oral LV 90 mg/day for 28 days every 5 weeks or i.v. 5-FU 425 mg/m2/day plus LV 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. For the second treatment cycle, patients were crossed-over to the alternative treatment regimen. Prior to the first and after the second therapy cycle, patients were required to complete a therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU were determined by taking blood samples on days 8, 15 or 22 and 28 for UFT and on days 1 and 5 for i.v. 5-FU. 36 patients were eligible. 84% of the patients preferred oral UFT over i.v. 5-FU. After having experienced both treatment modalities, patients indicated taking the medication at home, less stomatitis and diarrhoea, and pill over injection as the most important reasons for their preference. The area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) for 5-FU after UFT administration was 113 microM x min on day 8, 114 on day 15 and 98 on day 28; the peak levels (Cmax) were 1.2, 1.3 and 1.0 microM, respectively. The AUC for the 5-FU/LV courses was 3083 microM x min for day 1 and 3809 for day 5 (P=0.002). The Cmax was 170.1 and 196.2 microM (P=0.06) and the clearance 2.6 and 1.9 l/min, respectively (P=0.002). Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer clearly preferred oral over i.v. chemotherapy treatment. This choice was most importantly influenced by convenience and toxicity considerations. Although i.v. bolus 5-FU leads to higher peak 5-FU concentrations and AUC values compared with oral UFT, this pharmacokinetic advantage of i.v. 5-FU seems to translate mainly into higher toxicity as seen in large randomised studies comparing oral UFT/LV with i.v. 5-FU/LV. Oral UFT/LV compares favourably with i.v. 5-FU/LV in terms of toxicity and patient's preference and leads to prolonged 5-FU exposure, which is comparable to continuous i.v. 5-FU treatment.

Phase II study of XR 5000, an inhibitor of topoisomerases I and II, in advanced colorectal cancer.

XR 5000 is one of a series of tricyclic carboxamide-based cytotoxic agents. It binds to DNA by intercalation and stimulates DNA cleavage by inhibition of both topoisomerase I and II, thus possibly overcoming the resistance resulting from downregulation of either enzyme. Twenty patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, unpretreated for metastatic disease, received XR 5000 at the dose of 3010 mg/m(2) in a 120-h central intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks. Response was evaluated every two cycles. No complete (CR) or partial responses (PR) were observed in eligible patients (response rate, 0 of 19, 0%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0-18%). 5 patients had stable disease, which lasted from 79 to 157 days. Haematological toxicity was low, since only one grade 4 neutropenia and two grade 3 anaemia were observed. Other treatment-related grade 3-4 toxicities were: deep venous thrombosis (2 cases), liver toxicity, diarrhoea, anorexia, dyspnoea, chest pain, infection (1 case each). Despite the good toxicity profile, these results do not support further trials with XR 5000 in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Raltitrexed/5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy.

Preclinical evidence of a schedule-dependent synergism between raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has prompted clinical studies of this combination. We review the main preclinical and clinical results of raltitrexed/5-FU-based combination chemotherapy regimens in anticancer therapy. Promising results include: response rates of 25 and 23% with combinations of raltitrexed/5-FU/levofolinic acid (LFA) as first-line treatment and oxaliplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, respectively; and a 67% response rate in a phase I study of cisplatin/raltitrexed/5-FU/LFA as first-line treatment of advanced head and neck cancer, including a 100% response rate at the recommended dose. These combinations were well tolerated, with neutropenia as the main dose-limiting toxicity, allowing the drugs to be combined at the doses used in monotherapy. These results suggest a role for raltitrexed within combination regimens in colorectal cancer therapy, as well as other tumors such as head and neck cancer. A further potential application of raltitrexed in combination therapies is within multidisciplinary chemo-radiotherapy strategies, mainly in rectal cancer. Phase II studies are planned/ongoing to investigate these interesting possibilities.