Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J AOAC Int ; 86(5): 983-9, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632401

ABSTRACT

An interlaboratory trial was conducted to validate photostimulated luminescence (PSL) detection of irradiated shellfish. Five species of shellfish (Nephrops norvegicus, mussels, black tiger prawns, brown shrimps, and king scallops) were presented blind as nonirradiated and irradiated to 0.5 and 2.5 kGy. Precharacterization analysis of each product and treatment was performed on both whole (including shell) and intestinal samples. The results for whole samples (including shell) confirmed that the method was able to distinguish between nonirradiated and irradiated samples, regardless of dose. Intestinal data have identified that the method is dependent on the quantity and sensitivity of grits present within the intestinal tract, which can be assessed using calibration by normalization to 1 kGy. Five laboratories returned both initial screening and calibrated data and sample classification. All laboratories correctly identified all irradiated products using the screening criteria. There were no false positives. The results confirm the validity of the PSL method for shellfish, which has been adopted as a European standard method and by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Calibration is required where only intestinal material is available. For whole samples with shell, screening alone is sufficient.


Subject(s)
Food Analysis/methods , Food Irradiation , Light , Luminescent Measurements , Shellfish , Calibration , Intestines/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Silicates/analysis
2.
J AOAC Int ; 86(5): 971-5, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632399

ABSTRACT

An international interlaboratory trial was conducted to validate thermoluminescence methods for detecting irradiated fruits and vegetables. Five products were used in this study. This paper presents the results from prestudy material, homogeneity testing, details of sample preparation, and participants' results. Prestudy results provided a basis for cross comparison of instruments in different laboratories. A wide range of sensitivities, reproducibilities, and signal-to-background ratios were observed. Homogeneity testing showed that the method can distinguish between nonirradiated and irradiated products, including those bleached with 100 J/cm2 artificial daylight, provided that sensitivity rejection criteria are rigorously applied. Blind results were returned by 9 participants in the form of first and second glow integrals and glow ratios for all samples and a qualitative classification for each product. Of the 387 results reported, 327 valid results were obtained from participants. Where valid data were obtained, correct qualitative identifications were made by participants in all cases. Participants' results and homogeneity testing both confirm the validity of the thermoluminescence method for detecting irradiated fruits and vegetables.


Subject(s)
Food Irradiation , Fruit , Laboratories , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Vegetables , Fruit/classification , Light , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Silicates/analysis , Vegetables/classification
3.
J AOAC Int ; 86(5): 990-7, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632402

ABSTRACT

An interlaboratory trial was conducted to validate photostimulated luminescence (PSL) methods for herbs, spices, and seasonings. Forty products (11 herbs, 17 spices, and 12 seasonings) were purchased from a local commercial source, and randomly selected samples were irradiated with 10 kGy. Four blended products were prepared at Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre, mixing varying proportions of irradiated material with the untreated product. Precharacterization against a predefined threshold identified low sensitivity products (black and white peppers) and products with high natural signals (thyme, sage, parsley, and mixed herbs), both of which might be susceptible to misclassification. Precharacterization also revealed whether calibration was likely to resolve overlap between classification categories. Eight sets of screening data and 5 sets of calibrated data were returned by participants. Of the 840 samples sent, 1593 screening measurements and 788 calibrated measurements were received from 662 samples. In screening mode, participants reached definitive conclusions in 87% of cases, 99% of which were correct. Of the remaining 13%, calibration to identify low-sensitivity resolved 60% of cases. Overall, 94% of samples were correctly identified by either screening alone, or screening plus calibration; 6% remained unclassified and therefore required further investigation by thermoluminescence. The results confirm the validity of the PSL method for herbs, spices, seasonings, and blends, and emphasize the need for calibration to identify low-sensitivity samples. This method has now been adopted by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and the Codex Alimentarius Commission.


Subject(s)
Food Analysis/methods , Food Irradiation , Light , Luminescent Measurements , Plant Preparations , Spices , Calibration , Laboratories , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
J AOAC Int ; 86(5): 976-82, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14632400

ABSTRACT

An international interlaboratory trial was conducted using thermoluminescence for the detection of irradiated shellfish, aimed at validating the method for routine use. Nephrops norvegicus, mussels, brown shrimps, black tiger prawns, and king scallops were presented as nonirradiated and irradiated to 0.5 and 2.5 kGy. The protocol called for the use of 3 preparation methods: extraction of silicates from whole shellfish by acid hydrolysis and physical separation, and of carbonates from powdered shells. Homogeneity was tested on each product and each treatment. Results verified that all methods were able to distinguish between nonirradiated and irradiated samples regardless of dose. Silicate methods produced better discrimination than powdered shell, and acid hydrolysis showed some evidence of better separation between the 2 doses than the physical method. Participants received each product in each treatment category for blind analysis. Six participants returned results for acid hydrolysis, 7 for physical separation, and 5 for the powdered shell method. Their results confirmed the homogeneity testing. Qualitative results gave 100% correct classification for both silicate methods and 85.3% for powdered shell. Silicate methods are therefore preferable unless only shell is available. Overall, the results confirmed the case for validation.


Subject(s)
Food Irradiation , Laboratories , Shellfish , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Carbonates/analysis , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Hydrolysis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Silicates/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL