ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Celiac disease (CD) affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients suffering it. The exclusion of gluten from the diet (GFD) improves HRQOL, but involves difficulties in following the diet that could adversely affect HRQOL. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of adherence to the diet on HRQOL of adult CD patients. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study of CD patients treated with a GFD for longer than 1 year. Adherence to the GFD was measured using the Morisky scale, and health status using the specific CD-QOL questionnaire and the generic EuroQol-5D questionnaire. RESULTS: 366 patients from 7 hospitals were included: 71.5% of patients reported a perfect treatment adherence, 23.5% unintentional poor adherence and 5% intentional poor adherence. Good adherence to a GFD was related to a higher mean score onthe CD-QOL (75 vs. 68, respectively, p < 0.05) and EuroQol-5D (0.9 vs. 0.8, respectively, p < 0.05). Ease of adherence to a GFD was also related to a better HRQOL (total CD-QOL score of 82 vs. 67 in patients who consider the GFD difficult to follow, p < 0.05). Good symptom control was also related to a better HRQOL (total CD-QOL score of 78 vs. 67 in asymptomatic vs. symptomatic patients, p < 0.01). The worse scored dimension of CD-QOL was related to "inadequate treatment". CONCLUSIONS: In CD, good adherence to a GFD and adequate symptom control result in improved HRQOL. Many patients consider that the lack of therapeutic alternatives to diet worsens their quality of life.
Subject(s)
Celiac Disease/diet therapy , Diet, Gluten-Free/psychology , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Celiac Disease/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Celiac disease (CD) affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients suffering it. The exclusion of gluten from the diet (GFD) improves HRQOL, but involves difficulties in following the diet that could adversely affect HRQOL. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of adherence to the diet on HRQOL of adult CD patients. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study of CD patients treated with a GFD for longer than 1 year. Adherence to the GFD was measured using the Morisky scale, and health status using the specific CD-QOL questionnaire and the generic EuroQol-5D questionnaire. RESULTS: 366 patients from 7 hospitals were included: 71.5% of patients reported a perfect treatment adherence, 23.5% unintentional poor adherence and 5% intentional poor adherence. Good adherence to a GFD was related to a higher mean score on the CD-QOL (75 vs. 68, respectively, p < 0.05) and EuroQol-5D (0.9 vs. 0.8, respectively, p < 0.05). Ease of adherence to a GFD was also related to a better HRQOL (total CD-QOL score of 82 vs. 67 in patients who consider the GFD difficult to follow, p < 0.05). Good symptom control was also related to a better HRQOL (total CD-QOL score of 78 vs. 67 in asymptomatic vs. symptomatic patients, p < 0.01). The worse scored dimension of CD-QOL was related to 'inadequate treatment.' CONCLUSIONS: In CD, good adherence to a GFD and adequate symptom control result in improved HRQOL. Many patients consider that the lack of therapeutic alternatives to diet worsens their quality of life
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Celiac Disease/diet therapy , Diet, Gluten-Free/methods , Glutens/adverse effects , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Sickness Impact Profile , Informed ConsentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of quality of care programs is to improve patient outcomes. In programs targeting patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), nurses play a key role. AIM: To know the available scientific evidence on the quality of care in IBD management, at the levels of structure, process and outcome, in relation to nurses. METHODS: Systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Índice Médico Español, Cochrane Library, and grey literature. Inclusion criteria were: 1) documents referring IBD; 2) documents providing relevant information on nurses' involvement in the management of IBD; and 3) an original article. RESULTS: A total of 284 documents were identified, 15 of which were included: 8 related with structure, 12 with process, and 6 with outcomes. Some documents treated more than one level. At the level of structure, services should incorporate specialist nurses as part of the multidisciplinary team, as well as resources to facilitate patient access to nursing care. Notable at the process level, organizational aspects and nurses' competencies and skills in the management of IBD have been described. Among the outcomes mentioned are clinical outcomes, quality of life, and patient satisfaction attributable to nursing staff. No evidence was found about the association between structure or process issues with patient outcomes. Most of the studies reviewed have methodological limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence provide useful information for the design of standards of structure and process relating to nurses' management of IBD. The IBD nurses' challenge is to provide evidence that these standards help improve health outcomes in patients.