ABSTRACT
We present the case of a 34-year-old man with daily vomiting and 20% weight loss in a year. A gastroduodenoscopy was performed, noticing 2nd and 3rd duodenal portion dilatation and inflammatory involvement of the 3rd and 4th portion, causing luminal stenosis. These findings are the same than in the magnetic resonance . The biopsy proves the histological diagnosis of Crohn's disease. At the beginning the patient was treated with Prednisone, Adalimumab and Ustekinumab. After 9 months, surgery was decided because the disease was refractory to treatment and there was corticosteroid dependence. A partial resection of 3rd and 4th portion of the duodenum and the first loop of jejunum was performed, with duodenojejunal anastomosis. The patient presents good postoperative evolution and after 1 year he remained asymptomatic under treatment with Ustekinumab.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Constriction, Pathologic , Gastrointestinal Tract/abnormalities , Duodenum/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Inpatients , Physical Examination , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Adalimumab/administration & dosage , Ustekinumab/administration & dosage , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imagingSubject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Hemangiosarcoma/surgery , Back Muscles/surgery , Mastectomy , Breast NeoplasmsSubject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Humans , Female , Mastectomy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , MusclesSubject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Inpatients , Physical Examination , Symptom Assessment , Sarcoma , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pancreatic Diseases , Gastroenterology , NeoplasmsABSTRACT
We present the case of a 34-year-old man with daily vomiting and 20% weight loss in a year. A gastroduodenoscopy was performed, noticing 2nd and 3rd duodenal portion dilatation and inflammatory involvement of the 3rd and 4th portion, causing luminal stenosis. These findings are the same than in the magnetic resonance . The biopsy proves the histological diagnosis of Crohn's disease. At the beginning the patient was treated with Prednisone, Adalimumab and Ustekinumab. After 9 months, surgery was decided because the disease was refractory to treatment and there was corticosteroid dependence. A partial resection of 3rd and 4th portion of the duodenum and the first loop of jejunum was performed, with duodenojejunal anastomosis. The patient presents good postoperative evolution and after 1 year he remained asymptomatic under treatment with Ustekinumab.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Male , Humans , Adult , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , Ustekinumab , Adalimumab , Constriction, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging , Constriction, Pathologic/etiology , Constriction, Pathologic/surgerySubject(s)
Esophageal Perforation , Foreign Bodies , Humans , Thyroid Gland/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Perforation/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Esophageal Perforation/surgery , Neck , Foreign Bodies/complications , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/surgeryABSTRACT
Introducción. Los tumores desmoides son lesiones de los tejidos blandos, histológicamente benignas, poco frecuentes y con gran agresividad local y carencia de potencial metastásico. Se relacionan estrechamente con antecedentes traumáticos o quirúrgicos, como la cesárea, y su tratamiento generalmente es quirúrgico. Métodos. Presentamos una serie de tres pacientes intervenidas en nuestro centro durante el año 2020. Se revisan sus antecedentes y se describe su tratamiento. Resultados. En todas nuestras pacientes se encontró algún antecedente quirúrgico, dos cesáreas y una resección de un disgerminoma. El tratamiento empleado fue la resección quirúrgica con márgenes libres y reparación del defecto mediante malla. Conclusiones. El tumor desmoide es una patología poco frecuente, su diagnóstico se realiza mediante exámenes imagenológicos y se confirma con el estudio histológico; es importante hacer el diagnóstico diferencial con el sarcoma. La cirugía radical sigue siendo el tratamiento de elección, aunque algunos autores proponen el tratamiento conservador.
Introduction. Desmoid tumors are soft tissue lesions, histologically benign, rare and with great local aggressiveness and lack of metastatic potential. They are closely related to traumatic or surgical history such as caesarean section. Their treatment is generally surgical. Methods. We present a case series of three patients operated on in our center during the year 2020. Their history is reviewed and their type of treatment is presented. Results. In all our patients, surgical history was found (two caesarean sections and one resection of a dysgerminoma). The treatment used was surgical resection with free margins and mesh repair of the defect. Conclusions. Desmoid tumor is a rare pathology; its diagnosis is made by imaging studies, and confirmed by histology. It is important to make a differential diagnosis with sarcoma. Radical surgery remains the treatment of choice, although some authors propose conservative treatment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cesarean Section , Fibromatosis, Aggressive , General Surgery , Abdominal Wall , NeoplasmsABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La mastectomía contralateral profiláctica (MCP) reduce el riesgo de cáncer contralateral en al menos un 90%. Además, las portadoras de mutación BRCA tienen mayor riesgo de recurrencia ipsilateral y de un segundo tumor primario. El objetivo es evaluar el riesgo de cáncer contralateral y la recurrencia, y analizar factores predictivos en pacientes con cáncer de mama y mutaciones BRCA1/2 y no portadoras con alto riesgo de cáncer hereditario. MÉTODOS: Análisis observacional retrospectivo de 46 pacientes sometidas a mastectomía bilateral durante 2004-2018. Nueve pacientes BRCA1, 12 BRCA2 y 25 con alto riesgo sin mutación. RESULTADOS: Dieciséis pacientes con diagnóstico de novo y 30 tratadas previamente por cáncer de mama a las que realizamos MCP de manera diferida (en 10 de ellas por detección de mutación en BRCA a posteriori); mediana de seguimiento 79 meses. La técnica quirúrgica más usada fue la incisión lateral externa. En todas las pacientes se realizó reconstrucción inmediata. En las piezas de MCP se encontraron 4 tumores in situ, 3 invasivos y una hiperplasia atípica. La incidencia de cáncer contralateral oculto fue del 15,2%. Cinco pacientes presentaron recidiva 21,2 meses de media tras la intervención; SLE 83,74 meses y SG 84,33 meses. Los modelos de regresión identificaron mutación BRCA1/2 y alto riesgo sin mutación como factores predictivos significativos para tumor oculto, mientras que el tamaño tumoral ≥ 2 cm fue predictivo de recidiva. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestra serie 7 pacientes (15,2%) habrían desarrollado un tumor contralateral en los años posteriores, y un 10,8% presentaron recurrencia a pesar de MCP
INTRODUCTION: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has been reported to reduce risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) by at least 90%.In addition, BRCA carriers presents higher risk of ipsilateral recurrence and a second primary tumor. The aim is to evaluate risk of CBC and recurrence and to analyze predictive factors in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers at high-risk of hereditary breast cancer patients. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. 46 patients underwent bilateral mastectomy during 2004-2018. RESULTS: Cohort comprised 9 patients BRCA1,12 BRCA2 and 25 at high-risk without mutation. Median follow-up 79 months. 16 patients recently diagnosed and 30 previously treated by breast cancer whom underwent CPM at second time (because of later detection of BRCA mutation in 10 cases). The external lateral incision was most frequent surgical technique. In all patients immediate reconstruction was performed. In CPM pieces, 4 in situ carcinoma, 3 invasive and 1 atypical hyperplasia were found. The incidence of occult contralateral cancer was 15.2%. Recurrence was observed in 5 patients a media of 21.2 months after surgery. FSD was 83.74 months and OS 84.33 months. Regression models identified BRCA1/2 mutation and high risk without mutation as significant occult tumor predictive factors while tumor size ≥ 2 cm was predictive of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In our series we found a10.8% recurrence despite CPM and 7 patients (15.2%) would have developed a CBC in subsequent years
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Mutation , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Prophylactic Mastectomy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Tumor Burden , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has been reported to reduce risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) by at least 90%.In addition, BRCA carriers presents higher risk of ipsilateral recurrence and a second primary tumor. The aim is to evaluate risk of CBC and recurrence and to analyze predictive factors in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers at high-risk of hereditary breast cancer patients. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. 46 patients underwent bilateral mastectomy during 2004-2018. RESULTS: Cohort comprised 9 patients BRCA1,12 BRCA2 and 25 at high-risk without mutation. Median follow-up 79 months. 16 patients recently diagnosed and 30 previously treated by breast cancer whom underwent CPM at second time (because of later detection of BRCA mutation in 10 cases). The external lateral incision was most frequent surgical technique. In all patients immediate reconstruction was performed. In CPM pieces, 4 in situ carcinoma, 3 invasive and 1 atypical hyperplasia were found. The incidence of occult contralateral cancer was 15.2%. Recurrence was observed in 5 patients a media of 21.2 months after surgery. FSD was 83.74 months and OS 84.33 months. Regression models identified BRCA1/2 mutation and high risk without mutation as significant occult tumor predictive factors while tumor size≥2cm was predictive of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In our series we found a10.8% recurrence despite CPM and 7 patients (15.2%) would have developed a CBC in subsequent years.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Mastectomy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Prophylactic Mastectomy/methods , Adult , BRCA1 Protein , BRCA2 Protein , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Causality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heterozygote , Humans , Mastectomy/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/prevention & control , Neoplasms, Second Primary/surgery , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: El objetivo es evaluar la seguridad oncológica a 10 años de la mastectomía ahorradora de piel y pezón (MAP) en pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ (CDIS). MÉTODO: Análisis observacional retrospectivo. Se realizaron 35 MAP en pacientes con CDIS durante 2005-2018. Evaluamos resultados histológicos, oncológicos y de morbilidad. RESULTADOS: Las indicaciones más frecuentes fueron márgenes afectos tras tumorectomía (31,5%), multifocalidad/multicéntricidad (22,8%), tumor >3 cm (8,6%) correlación desfavorable tamaño tumoral/mama (8,6%) y decisión de la paciente (8,6%). La técnica más usada fue incisión lateral externa en 11 pacientes, seguida de técnica de Spira en nueve casos. La presencia de CDIS se confirmó en 22 pacientes y en 11 no se encontró tumor en la pieza de mastectomía. La tasa de complicaciones fue 22,8%. Tras una mediana de seguimiento de 104 meses (DE 69,9) no se observó necrosis del pezón. Un 20% de pacientes precisó reintervención a largo plazo. Once pacientes (31,4%) recibieron tratamiento adyuvante (QT y/o RT). Solamente una paciente presentó recurrencia local (2,8%) 28 meses tras la intervención. Una paciente presentó metástasis tras 78 meses de SLE. Las tasas de SLE y SG fueron 94,3% y 97,22%. El análisis univariante mostró dos factores de riesgo de recurrencia: edad <40 [OR (IC95) 2,529 (1,230 - 5,199)] y márgenes afectos [OR (IC95) 5,242 (2,041 - 13,464)]. CONCLUSIÓN: La MAP es factible y segura en pacientes con CDIS no candidatas a cirugía conservadora
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in patients with ductal in situ carcinoma (DCIS) over a 10-year period. METHOD: Retrospective observational analysis. A total of 35 NSM were performed in patients with DCIS from 2005 - 2018. We assessed the histological, oncological and morbidity results. RESULTS: The most frequent indications were margin involvement after lumpectomy (31.5%), multifocality / multicentricity (22.8%), tumour size >3 cm (8.6%) unfavourable tumour / breast size correlation (8.6%) and patient choice (8.6%). The most commonly used technique was external lateral incision in 11 patients, followed by the Spira technique in 9 patients. DCIS was confirmed in 22 patients and no tumour was found in mastectomy specimen in 11 patients. The complication rate was 22.8%. After a median follow-up of 104 months (SD 69.9) there was no nipple necrosis. In all, 20% of the patients required long-term reintervention. Eleven patients (31.4%) underwent adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and / or radiotherapy). Only one patient showed local recurrence (2.8%) 28 months after the intervention. One patient developed metastases after 78 months of disease-free survival (DFS). DFS and overall survival rates were 94.3% and 97.22%. Univariate analysis showed two risk factors for recurrence: age <40 years [OR (95% CI) 2.529 (1.230-5.199)] and margin involvement [OR (95% CI) 5.242 (2.041 - 13.464)]. CONCLUSION: NSM is safe and feasible in patients with DCIS who are not candidates for conservative surgery
