Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 5 de 5
1.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 93: 163-169, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696870

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) leads to a substantial loss of tissue and a high rate of complications. The Taylor flap is a musculocutaneous flap used in reconstruction after APR. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze the short and long-term morbidity of reconstruction with a Taylor flap (oblique rectus abdominis flap) after APR and to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications. METHODS: We retrospectively included all patients who had undergone APR with immediate reconstruction with a Taylor flap in our department between July 2000 and June 2018. Demographics, oncological data, treatment, and short- and long-term morbidity were reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 140 patients included, we identified early minor complications in 42 patients (30%) and 14 early major complications (10%). Total necrosis of the flap requiring its removal occurred in four patients (2.8%). Eleven patients (7.9%) presented with a midline incision hernia, and seven (5%) presented with a subcostal incision hernia. No perineal hernia was found. No risk factors for the complications were identified. CONCLUSION: The Taylor flap is a safe procedure with few complications and limited donor site morbidity. Moreover, it prevents perineal hernias. These results confirm that the Taylor flap is a well-suited procedure for reconstruction after APR.


Perineum , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Proctectomy , Rectus Abdominis , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Proctectomy/methods , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Perineum/surgery , Middle Aged , Aged , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Rectus Abdominis/transplantation , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Myocutaneous Flap/transplantation , Surgical Flaps
2.
J Wound Care ; 30(3): 184-190, 2021 Mar 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33729847

OBJECTIVE: There are few means to treat large keloid scars, as exeresis-even if partial-impedes direct closure without tension in the absence of a flap or a skin graft. This study evaluates the efficacy, indications for use and limitations of a new therapeutic protocol, combining an extralesional keloid excision left to heal by secondary intention with a paraffin dressing and glucocorticoid ointment, followed by monthly intrascar injections of corticosteroids upon full re-epithelialisation. METHOD: A retrospective study of patients treated for keloid scars by using the new therapeutic protocol. Scars were categorised as either healed or recurring. Their recurrence was scored according to the changes in functional signs and the scar volume. RESULTS: A total of 36 scars were studied. The mean follow-up was 14.1 months. Healing occurred in a mean of 6.8 weeks. The mean surface area was 21.6cm2. Healing rate was 30.5%. Scar volume was improved in 60% of recurrent cases and functional signs in 56%. Based on adherence with the corticotherapy, two patient groups could be discerned. For patients in the 'adherent' group, the healing rate was 40%, and scar volume was improved in 75% of recurrent cases and the functional signs in 83% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The healing rate in this study was close to that reported in the literature. Excision-healing by secondary intention could therefore be offered to patients for whom adherence is uncertain. The protocol in this study offers a straightforward, fast, accessible solution that does not appear to entail any risk of additional keloids. It could potentially offer a treatment option in case of failure of other treatments, large keloid scars or scalp keloids.


Cicatrix/therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Keloid/therapy , Surgical Flaps , Wound Healing , Cicatrix/surgery , Humans , Keloid/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Burn Care Res ; 41(3): 700-704, 2020 05 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006424

Restoration of a good hand function and limitation of the sequelae are the main concerns in burns treatment. The intrinsic plus position is known as the safe position for hand splinting. This article aims at describing the technique of external fixation that have been developed in Saint Louis' Burn Center in management of burned hands during the acute phase. Since 2013, a technique of external fixation has been developed in our burn center using Hoffmann II External Fixation System from Stryker® and pins from Medicalex®. External fixation of a deep burned hand is an efficient and safe way to immobilize the hand in a correct intrinsic plus position, to secure the skin grafts to improve graft take and to permit changes of the dressings without removing the immobilization device.


Burns/therapy , External Fixators , Hand Injuries/therapy , Bandages , Burn Units , Female , Humans , Male , Skin Transplantation , Wound Healing
...