Aggressive treatment may be needed for idiopathic membranous nephropathy with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical, pathological, prognostic features and treatment response of the coexistence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. METHODS: This is a two-center retrospective cohort study. Patients of idiopathic membranous nephropathy were enrolled and divided into two groups with or without focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions according to the renal biopsy. Laboratory data and pathological manifestation were compared. Renal phospholipase A2 receptor was detected by immunofluorescence. During the follow-up, the effects of different therapies and renal function were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were finally enrolled in this study, of which 60 and 176 idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients were enrolled in the FSGS+ and FSGS- groups, respectively. The FSGS+ group showed a higher percentage of hypertension history (38.3 vs. 20.0%, p=0.004), with a significantly higher level of systolic pressure [137 (120, 160) mmHg vs. 130 (120, 140) mmHg, p=0.009]. Main laboratory findings, including serial albumin (20.4±7.8 g/L vs. 24.5±6.7 g/L, p<0.001), 24-h proteinuria [5.61 (3.10, 7.87) g/day vs. 3.82 (2.31, 5.79) g/day, p=0.002], serial creatinine [80.8 (65.8, 97.9) µmol/L vs. 72.0 (58.7, 84.9) µmol/L, p=0.003], and estimated glomerular filtration rate [86 (66, 101) mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 95 (81, 108) mL/min/1.73 m2, p=0.007] showed significant differences between the two groups. Pathologically, patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions appeared with a higher percentage of crescents, a more severe degree of interstitial fibrosis, and a higher level of membranous nephropathy stage. Renal phospholipase A2 receptor showed a relatively lower positive rate of only 75.0% in the FSGS+ group in comparison with the positive rate of 90.3% in the FSGS- group (p=0.031). The prognosis was generally similar between the two groups. Among patients who were given non-immunosuppression treatment, those with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions took a relatively longer period of time to achieve complete remission (29.3±7.0 m vs. 15.4±8.9 m, p=0.025) and experienced a higher rate of renal function deterioration (37.5 vs. 5.4%, p=0.033) compared with the other ones. While among those receiving immunosuppression treatment, both groups received similar remission rates. CONCLUSION: Compared with FSGS- group, idiopathic membranous nephropathy with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions represented more severe nephrotic syndrome and worse renal function. In view of the renal function decline during the follow-up, more aggressive treatment with the use of immunosuppressants should be considered for idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions.

Aggressive treatment may be needed for idiopathic membranous nephropathy with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical, pathological, prognostic features and treatment response of the coexistence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. METHODS: This is a two-center retrospective cohort study. Patients of idiopathic membranous nephropathy were enrolled and divided into two groups with or without focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions according to the renal biopsy. Laboratory data and pathological manifestation were compared. Renal phospholipase A2 receptor was detected by immunofluorescence. During the follow-up, the effects of different therapies and renal function were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 236 patients were finally enrolled in this study, of which 60 and 176 idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients were enrolled in the FSGS+ and FSGS- groups, respectively. The FSGS+ group showed a higher percentage of hypertension history (38.3 vs. 20.0%, p=0.004), with a significantly higher level of systolic pressure [137 (120, 160) mmHg vs. 130 (120, 140) mmHg, p=0.009]. Main laboratory findings, including serial albumin (20.4±7.8 g/L vs. 24.5±6.7 g/L, p<0.001), 24-h proteinuria [5.61 (3.10, 7.87) g/day vs. 3.82 (2.31, 5.79) g/day, p=0.002], serial creatinine [80.8 (65.8, 97.9) μmol/L vs. 72.0 (58.7, 84.9) μmol/L, p=0.003], and estimated glomerular filtration rate [86 (66, 101) mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 95 (81, 108) mL/min/1.73 m2, p=0.007] showed significant differences between the two groups. Pathologically, patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions appeared with a higher percentage of crescents, a more severe degree of interstitial fibrosis, and a higher level of membranous nephropathy stage. Renal phospholipase A2 receptor showed a relatively lower positive rate of only 75.0% in the FSGS+ group in comparison with the positive rate of 90.3% in the FSGS- group (p=0.031). The prognosis was generally similar between the two groups. Among patients who were given non-immunosuppression treatment, those with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions took a relatively longer period of time to achieve complete remission (29.3±7.0 m vs. 15.4±8.9 m, p=0.025) and experienced a higher rate of renal function deterioration (37.5 vs. 5.4%, p=0.033) compared with the other ones. While among those receiving immunosuppression treatment, both groups received similar remission rates. CONCLUSION: Compared with FSGS- group, idiopathic membranous nephropathy with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions represented more severe nephrotic syndrome and worse renal function. In view of the renal function decline during the follow-up, more aggressive treatment with the use of immunosuppressants should be considered for idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions.