Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gastroenterol ; 2024 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The real-world efficacy, prognostic factors, and adverse events of second-line nivolumab monotherapy and subsequent third-line therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer have not been fully evaluated. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study evaluated 184 consecutive patients treated with second-line nivolumab monotherapy for esophageal cancer between March 2021 and December 2022. We assessed tumor response, adverse events, long-term survival, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 128 patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 23% and the disease control rate for all enrolled patients was 45%. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 14%, but no treatment-related deaths presented. Median progression-free survival was 5.1 months and overall survival was 14 months, respectively. C-reactive protein level and performance status were identified as significant prognostic factors of overall survival through Cox proportional hazards analysis. The group with two favorable prognostic factors showed better overall survival than the groups with either one or zero prognostic factors (median overall survival: 22, 15, and 4.4 months, respectively). Among 69 patients who received third-line taxane anticancer agents, the progression-free survival was 6.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the real-world outcomes of second-line nivolumab monotherapy were comparable to those of previous randomized clinical trials in terms of tumor response, safety, and long-term survival. Furthermore, a good performance status and low C-reactive protein levels may identify patients who are likely to benefit from therapy. Third-line chemotherapy after nivolumab treatment may have an enhanced effect; however, further prospective studies are required to confirm this finding.

2.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58851, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784335

ABSTRACT

Strongyloidiasis is a parasitic infection caused by the nematode Strongyloides stercoralis that presents with a variety of nonspecific symptoms. Diagnosis is challenging unless physicians suspect this disease and perform sensitivity tests. We report a case of strongyloidiasis with protein-losing gastroenteropathy-like symptoms in a 92-year-old Japanese female with lower extremity edema and hypoalbuminemia. In this case, the patient refused invasive tests for a complete examination; however, an agar plate culture of a stool sample was used to diagnose strongyloidiasis. The patient was treated with ivermectin during the second visit. One month later, leg edema and hypoproteinemia improved. When the cause of the symptoms is unclear, physicians should be aware of the possibility of strongyloidiasis in a person residing in a tropical or subtropical environment, where human feces are used as fertilizer and individuals frequently go barefoot in agricultural settings.

3.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 29(7): 994-1001, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The real-world efficacy, feasibility, and prognostic factors of immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer are not fully established. METHODS: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study evaluated 71 consecutive patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for esophageal cancer between March 2021 and December 2022. We assessed tumor response, safety, and long-term survival. RESULTS: In patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 58%, and the disease control rate for all enrolled patients was 80%. Five patients (7.0%) underwent successful conversion surgery. Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events occurred in 13% of patients, and one patient (1.4%) died due to cholangitis. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 6.5-not reached). C-reactive protein levels and performance status were identified as significant predictors of progression-free survival through Cox proportional hazards analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy for esophageal cancer demonstrated comparable tumor response, safety, and long-term survival to previous randomized clinical trials. Patients with good performance status and low C-reactive protein levels may be suitable candidates for this treatment.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Progression-Free Survival , C-Reactive Protein/analysis
4.
J Thorac Dis ; 16(1): 391-400, 2024 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38410613

ABSTRACT

Background: Adjuvant nivolumab therapy has become the standard therapy for patients with localized advanced esophageal cancer with non-pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery. However, the necessity of this therapy for patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen followed by surgery is unclear, and the prognosis of grouping based on the presence or absence of pathological tumor and lymph node findings has not been analyzed. Therefore, our study aimed to address these questions. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with cT1N1-3M0 and cT2-3N0-3M0 esophageal cancer according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th edition, who received NAC with DCF followed by curative surgery between 2008 and 2020 at Jichi Medical University Hospital. We divided patients with ypT0-3N0-3M0 into four histological groups, namely ypT0N0, ypT+N0, ypT0N+, and ypT+N+, and we evaluated overall survival as the primary outcome and the prognostic relationship of lymph node metastasis as the secondary outcome. Results: A total of 101 patients were included in this study. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the curves of the ypT0N0 and ypT+N0 groups were almost identical, while they differed from the other two groups. The hazard ratio of ypN+ was 4.44 (95% confidence interval: 2.03-9.71; P<0.001). Conclusions: The prognosis of the ypT+N0 group after NAC with DCF followed by surgery was similar to that of pathological complete remission. Grouping patients according to pathological lymph node status is a reasonable predictor of prognosis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL