Opportunities for Improving the Transplant Assessment and Education Process in British Columbia: Patient and Health Care Provider Perspective.

Background: There are several steps patients and their health care providers must navigate to access kidney transplantation in British Columbia (BC). Objective: We explored perceptions and experiences with the pretransplant process across BC to determine where process improvements can be made to enhance access to transplantation. Design: Anonymous surveys were sent online and via post to health care providers (including nephrologists, registered nurses, and coordinators) and patients across BC. Setting: Kidney care clinics, transplant regional clinics, and provincial transplant centers in BC. Measurements: Surveys included Likert scale questions on the current pretransplant process and transplant education available in BC. The health provider survey focused on understanding the pretransplant process, knowledge, roles, and communication while the patient survey focused on patient education and experience of the pretransplant processes. Results: A total of 100 health care providers and 146 patients responded. Seventy-six percent of health care providers understood their role and responsibility in the pretransplant process, while only 47% understood others' roles in the process. Fifty-nine percent of health care respondents felt adequately supported by the provincial donor and transplant teams. Seventy-one percent of registered nurses and 92% of nephrologists understood transplant eligibility. About 68% and 77% of nurses and nephrologists, respectively, reported having enough knowledge to discuss living donation with patients. Fifty percent of patients had received transplant education, of which 60% had a good grasp of the pretransplant clinical processes. Sixty-three percent felt their respective kidney teams had provided enough advice and tools to support them in finding a living donor. Fifty percent of patients reported feeling up to date with their status in the evaluation process. Limitations: This analysis was conducted between December 2021 and June 2022 and may need to account for practice changes that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses are from a selection of health care providers, thus acknowledging a risk of selection bias. Furthermore, we are not able to verify patients who reported receiving formal transplant education from their health care providers. Conclusions: Exploring these themes suggests communication with regional clinics and transplant centers can be improved. In addition, patient and staff education can benefit from education on kidney transplantation and the pretransplant clinical processes. Our findings provide opportunities to develop strategies to actively address modifiable barriers in a patient's kidney transplantation journey.

Contexte: En Colombie-Britannique (C.-B.), pour accéder à la transplantation, les patients et leurs prestataires de soins doivent traverser plusieurs étapes. Objectif: Nous avons exploré les perceptions et expériences en lien avec le processus de pré-transplantation dans toute la Colombie-Britannique, afin de cibler les améliorations qui pourraient y être apportées pour faciliter l'accès à la transplantation. Conception: Des sondages anonymes ont été envoyés en ligne et par la poste aux prestataires de soins de santé (notamment des néphrologues, des infirmières autorisées et des coordonnateurs) et aux patients de partout en Colombie-Britannique. Cadre de l'étude: Cliniques de soins rénaux, cliniques régionales de transplantation et centres provinciaux de transplantation en Colombie-Britannique. Mesures: Les sondages comprenaient des questions à échelles de Likert portant sur le processus actuel de pré-transplantation et l'éducation offerte sur la transplantation en Colombie-Britannique. Le sondage destiné aux prestataires de soins portait sur leur compréhension du processus de pré-transplantation, leurs connaissances, leurs rôles et la communication; le sondage destiné aux patients portait sur l'éducation reçue et leur expérience des processus de pré-transplantation. Résultats: En tout, 100 prestataires de soins et 146 patients ont répondu au sondage. Parmi les prestataires de soins, 76 % comprenaient leur rôle et leurs responsabilités dans le processus de pré-transplantation, mais 47 % seulement comprenaient le rôle des autres prestataires de soins dans le processus. Une proportion de 59 % des intervenants en santé se sentait adéquatement appuyée par les équipes provinciales de dons d'organes et de transplantation. Une grande majorité des infirmières autorisées (71 %) et des néphrologues (92 %) comprenaient les critères d'admissibilité à la transplantation. Les infirmières (68 %) et les néphrologues (77 %) estimaient avoir suffisamment de connaissances pour discuter du don vivant avec les patients. Quant aux patients, 50 % avaient reçu de l'éducation sur la transplantation et, de ceux-ci, 60 % avaient une bonne compréhension des processus cliniques de pré-transplantation. La majorité des patients (63 %) estimaient avoir reçu suffisamment de conseils et d'outils de la part de leurs équipes de soins rénaux pour les aider à trouver un donneur vivant. La moitié des patients (50 %) pensaient connaître leur statut dans le processus d'évaluation. Limites: Cette étude a été réalisée entre décembre 2021 et juin 2022 et pourrait devoir tenir compte des changements de pratiques survenus pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. Les réponses provenant d'une sélection de prestataires de soins de santé, nous reconnaissons ainsi un possible biais de sélection. Enfin, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'évaluer les patients qui ont déclaré avoir reçu de l'éducation formelle sur la transplantation de la part de leurs prestataires de soins. Conclusion: L'exploration de ces thèmes a suggéré que la communication avec les cliniques régionales et les centres de transplantation peut être améliorée. De plus, les patients et le personnel soignant pourraient tirer profit d'éducation sur la transplantation rénale et les processus cliniques de pré-transplantation. Nos résultats offrent des occasions d'élaborer des stratégies pour s'attaquer activement aux obstacles modifiables dans le parcours de transplantation rénale d'un patient.

Growing a provincial patient and family engagement network to optimize kidney care.

Patient and family engagement is crucial for a responsive health system and improves patient outcomes. However, few practical resources for purposeful engagement are available to health leaders. Over the past five years, BC Renal, the provincial kidney care network in British Columbia, developed, operationalized, and implemented a framework to enable meaningful patient and family engagement. An advisory committee, comprising patient partners and representatives from health authorities and the community, directs the outreach, resource development, and evaluation of patient and family engagement at BC Renal. Here, we describe how our network-wide patient engagement strategy was developed and expanded upon, and the progress so far. A 2022 survey reports that 95% were satisfied with the engagement opportunities, and narrative feedback suggests network members continue to adopt practical ways to collaborate more effectively. Health leaders, patient partners, and others continue to align operational and strategic activities to advance culture change in kidney care provincially.

Patient and Clinician Experiences With the Combination of Virtual and In-Person Chronic Kidney Disease Care Since the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Following onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics in BC shifted from established methods of mostly in-person care delivery to virtual care (VC) and thereafter a hybrid of the two. Objectives: To determine strengths, weaknesses, quality-of-care delivery, and key considerations associated with VC usage to inform optimal way(s) of integrating virtual and traditional methods of care delivery in multidisciplinary kidney clinics. Design: Qualitative evaluation. Setting: British Columbia, Canada. Participants: Patients and health care providers associated with multidisciplinary kidney care clinics. Methods: Development and delivery of semi-structured interviews of patients and health care providers. Results: 11 patients and/or caregivers and 12 health care providers participated in the interviews. Participants reported mixed experiences with VC usage. All participants foresaw a future where both VC and in-person care was offered. A reported benefit of VC was convenience for patients. Challenges identified with VC included difficulty establishing new therapeutic relationships, and variable of abilities of both patients and health care providers to engage and communicate in a virtual format. Participants noted a preference for in-person care for more complex situations. Four themes were identified as considerations when selecting between in-person and VC: person's nonmedical context, support available, clinical parameters and tasks to be completed, and clinic operations. Participants indicated that visit modality selection is an individualized and ongoing process involving the patient and their preferences which may change over time. Health care provider participants noted that new workflow challenges were created when using both VC and in-person care in the same clinic session. Limitations: Limited sample size in the setting of one-on-one interviews and use of convenience sampling which may result in missing perspectives, including those already facing challenges accessing care who could potentially be most disadvantaged by implementation of VC. Conclusions: A list of key considerations, aligned with quality care delivery was identified for health care providers and programs to consider as they continue to utilize VC and refine how best to use different visit modalities in different patient and clinical situations. Further work will be needed to validate these findings and evaluate clinical outcomes with the combination of virtual and traditional modes of care delivery. Trial registration: Not registered.

Contexte: Après le début de la pandémie de COVID-19, les cliniques d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) de la Colombie-Britannique sont passées d'une prestation de soins traditionnelle fondée principalement sur les visites en personne à des soins en mode virtuel, puis à un modèle hybride combinant les deux méthodes. Objectifs: Déterminer les avantages et les faiblesses des soins en mode virtuel, ainsi que la qualité de la prestation des soins et les principaux facteurs à considérer relativement à l'utilization des soins en mode virtuel, afin d'informer sur les meilleurs moyens d'intégrer les méthodes virtuelles et traditionnelles de prestation des soins dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires de néphrologie. Conception: Évaluation qualitative. Cadre: Colombie-Britannique (Canada). Sujets: Patients et prestataires de soins associés à des cliniques multidisciplinaires de soins rénaux. Méthodologie: Élaboration et réalisation d'entrevues semi-structurées auprès de patients et de prestataires de soins de santé. Résultats: En tout, 11 patients et/ou soignants et 12 prestataires de soins de santé ont participé aux entrevues. Les participants ont fait état d'expériences mitigées avec les soins en mode virtuel. Tous les participants envisageaient un futur où les soins seront offerts tant en mode virtuel qu'en personne. Un des avantages mentionnés des soins en mode virtuel est la commodité pour les patients. Parmi les défis mentionnés figuraient la difficulté à établir de nouvelles relations thérapeutiques et les capacités variables des patients et des prestataires de soins de santé à établir une relation et à communiquer en mode virtuel. Les participants ont noté une préférence pour les soins en personne dans les situations plus complexes. Quatre thèmes ont été identifiés comme facteurs à prendre en compte dans le choix entre les soins virtuels ou en personne: le contexte non médical de la personne, l'aide disponible, les paramètres cliniques et les tâches à accomplir, et les opérations de la clinique. Les participants ont indiqué que le choix de la modalité pour les visites est un processus individualisé et continu impliquant le patient et ses préférences, lesquelles peuvent changer au fil du temps. Les prestataires de soins ont indiqué que le fait d'offrir à la fois des soins virtuels et en personne dans une même séance clinique créait de nouveaux défis en matière de flux de travail. Limites: La taille limitée de l'échantillon pour les entrevues individuelles et l'utilization d'un échantillonnage de commodité pourraient avoir manqué certains points de vue, notamment celui de personnes déjà confrontées à des difficultés d'accès aux soins et qui pourraient être les plus désavantagées par la mise en œuvre de soins en mode virtuel. Conclusion: Une liste de facteurs-clé à prendre en compte pour une prestation de soins de qualité a été établie à l'attention des prestataires de soins de santé et des programs qui continuent à utiliser les soins en mode virtuel, et décrit la meilleure façon d'utiliser les différentes modalités de visites dans différentes situations cliniques et pour différents patients. D'autres travaux seront nécessaires pour valider ces résultats et évaluer les résultats cliniques lorsqu'il y a combinaison des modes virtuel et traditionnel pour la prestation des soins.

Ensuring Indigenous co-leadership in health research: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous people are insightful and informed about their own health and wellness, yet their visions, strengths and knowledge are rarely incorporated into health research. This can lead to subpar engagement or irrelevant research practices, which exacerbates the existing health inequities Indigenous people experience compared to the non-Indigenous population. Data consistently underscores the importance of Indigenous self-determination in research as a means to address health inequities. However, there are few formal methods to support this goal within the existing research context, which is dominated by Western perspectives. MAIN TEXT: Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) is a patient-oriented research network in Canada that recognizes the need to create the space to facilitate Indigenous self-determination in research. Indigenous members of the network therefore created and evolved a unique group, called the Indigenous Peoples' Engagement and Research Council (IPERC). IPERC plays a critical role in informing Can-SOLVE CKD research priorities, as well as creating tools to support Indigenous-specific research and engagement. This approach ensures that Indigenous voices and knowledge are critical threads within the fabric of the network's operations and research projects. Here, we describe the methods taken to create a council such as IPERC, and provide examples of initiatives by the council that aim to increase Indigenous representation, participation and partnership in research. We share lessons learned on what factors contribute to the success of IPERC, which could be valuable for other organizations interested in creating Indigenous-led research councils. CONCLUSION: Indigenous self-determination in research is critical for addressing health inequities. Here, we present a unique model, led by a council of diverse Indigenous people, which could help reduce health equities and lead to a better era of research for everyone.

Storytelling for impact: the creation of a storytelling program for patient partners in research.

Storytelling is a powerful means to evoke empathy and understanding among people. When patient partners, which include patients, family members, caregivers and organ donors, share their stories with health professionals, this can prompt listeners to reflect on their practice and consider new ways of driving change in the healthcare system. However, a growing number of patient partners are asked to 'share their story' within health care and research settings without adequate support to do so. This may ultimately widen, rather than close, the gap between healthcare practitioners and people affected by chronic disease in this new era of patient and public involvement in research. To better support patient partners with storytelling in the context of a patient-oriented research network, Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) Network adapted an existing in-person storytelling workshop for patient educators within a hospital setting. The result is a 6-week virtual program called Storytelling for Impact, which guides patients, family members, caregivers and organ donors in developing impactful stories and sharing them at health care and research events, e.g., conferences. The online series of synchronous workshops is co-facilitated by story coaches, who are program alumni and Can-SOLVE CKD staff with trained storytelling experience. Each story follows a structure that includes a call to action, which aims to positively impact the priority-setting and delivery of care and research in Canada. The program has been a transformational process for many who have completed it, and numerous other health organizations have expressed interest in sharing this tool with their own patient partners. As result, we have also created an asynchronous online program that can be used by other interested parties outside our network. Patient partners who share their stories can be powerful mediators for inspiring changes in the health care and research landscape, with adequate structured support. We describe two novel programs to support patient partners in impactful storytelling, which are applicable across all health research disciplines. Additional resources are required for sustainability and scale up of training, by having alumni train future storytellers.

Storytelling is a powerful means to evoke empathy and understanding among people. When patient partners share their stories with health professionals, this can prompt listeners to reflect on their practice and consider new ways of improving the healthcare system. However, as a growing number of patient partners are asked to 'share their story' within health care and research settings, there is often not enough tools and resources to support them in preparing their stories in a way that will be impactful for the audience members. Our kidney research network sought to create a novel in-person storytelling program to address this gap within our health research context. The result is a 6-week program called Storytelling for Impact, which guides patient partners­which includes patients, family members, caregivers and organ donors­in developing impactful stories and sharing them in a formal setting. The program is led by story coaches, who are patient partners and staff with trained storytelling experience. Participants are encouraged to include a call to action in their story, which aims to outline clear ways in which health professionals can facilitate positive change in health research or care. Many participants have described the program as transformational, and numerous other health organizations have expressed interest in sharing this tool with their own patient partners. As a result, we have also created a second online program that can be used by other interested parties outside our network. This paper highlights the adaptation process, content, participant feedback and next steps for the program.

Relationship between left-behind status and cognitive function in older Chinese adults: a prospective 3-year cohort study.

Background: Due to the inaccuracy of the traditional geographical distance-based definition of left-behind status, data on the negative effect of left-behind status on cognitive function among older adults are controversial. Aims: This study examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of left-behind status with cognitive function in older Chinese adults. The left-behind status definition was based on the frequency of face-to-face parent-child meetings. Methods: Data from a nationally representative sample of 8 682 older adults (60+ years) in 2015 (5 658 left behind and 3 024 non-left behind), of which 6 933 completed the follow-up in 2018, were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Left-behind older adults were broadly defined as those aged 60+ years who had living adult children and saw their children less than once per month. The cognitive function was assessed with a composite cognitive test with higher total scores indicating better cognitive function. Results: Left-behind older adults had significantly lower cognitive test scores than non-left-behind older adults in both 2015 (11.1 (6.0) vs 13.2 (5.9), t=15.863, p<0.001) and 2018 (10.0 (6.6) vs 12.4 (6.7), t=14.177, p<0.001). After adjusting for demographic factors, lifestyle factors, chronic medical conditions and the baseline cognitive test score (in the longitudinal analysis only), on average, the cognitive test score of left-behind older adults was 0.628 lower than their non-left-behind counterparts in 2015 (t=5.689, p<0.001). This difference in cognitive test scores attenuated to 0.322 but remained significant in 2018 (t=2.733, p=0.006). Conclusions: Left-behind older Chinese adults have a higher risk of poor cognitive function and cognitive decline than their non-left-behind counterparts. Specific efforts targeting left-behind older adults, such as encouraging adult children to visit their parents more regularly, are warranted to maintain or delay the progression of cognitive decline.

Dementia and risk of visual impairment in Chinese older adults.

We had previously identified visual impairment increasing risk of incident dementia. While a bi-directional vision-cognition association has subsequently been proposed, no study has specifically examined the longitudinal association between dementia and incidence of clinically defined visual impairment. In this territory-wide community cohort study of 10,806 visually unimpaired older adults, we examined their visual acuity annually for 6 years and tested if dementia at baseline was independently associated with higher risk of incident visual impairment (LogMAR ≥ 0.50 in the better eye despite best correction, which is equivalent to moderate visual impairment according to the World Health Organization definition). By the end of Year 6, a total of 3151 (29.2%) participants developed visual impairment. However, we did not find baseline dementia associating with higher risk of incident visual impairment, after controlling for baseline visual acuity, cataract, glaucoma, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, heart diseases, stroke, Parkinson's disease, depression, hearing and physical impairments, physical, intellectual and social activities, diet, smoking, age, sex, educational level, and socioeconomic status. Among different covariables, baseline visual acuity appears to be more important than dementia in contributing to the development of visual impairment. Our present findings highlight the need for re-evaluating whether dementia is indeed a risk factor for visual impairment.

Network analysis of psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia: Findings from the Research on Asian Psychotropic Prescription Patterns for Antipsychotics (REAP-AP).

AIMS: Schizophrenia is a major mental disorder with a wide range of psychiatric symptoms. This study explored the structure of psychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia using network analysis in a large representative Asian sample based on a survey of clinical features and treatment used in schizophrenia patients across 15 countries/territories in Asia. METHODS: Data on the demographic characteristics and psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia patients were extracted from the dataset of the fourth Research on Asia Psychotropic Prescription for Antipsychotics (REAP-AP) project. The presence of the following psychiatric symptoms including delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior, negative symptoms, social/occupational dysfunction, verbal aggression, physical aggression, and affective symptoms were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 3681 patients were included. The network analysis revealed that verbal aggression, hallucinations, and social/occupational dysfunction were the most central symptoms, while the connections between social/occupational dysfunction and verbal aggression, and between hallucinations and disorganized speech were the two strongest edges. There were significant gender differences in the network structure based on the network structure invariance test (M=0.74, P = 0.03) and invariant edge strength test. The positive correlation between verbal aggression and hallucinations was significantly stronger in the female network than that in the male network (P = 0.03), while a negative correlation between affective symptoms and negative symptoms was found in the female, but not the male network (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Central symptoms including verbal aggression, hallucinations, and socio-occupational dysfunction should be addressed in developing targeted treatment strategy for schizophrenia patients.

Protocol for a Multistage Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Chronic Kidney Disease Care Quality Following Integration of Virtual and In-Person Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Multidisciplinary care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) as it previously existed was predicated on an evidence and experience base of improved patient outcomes within an established and well-described service delivery model. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic brought with it a departure from this established care delivery model toward integration of virtual care and in-person care. Objective: To develop an evaluation framework to determine whether this shift in service delivery models has affected quality of multidisciplinary kidney care and/or patient-clinician interactions and relationships. Design: A sequential multiphase, mixed-methods evaluation. Setting: All 15 British Columbia (BC) multidisciplinary kidney care clinics (KCCs). Participants: All patients and all clinicians in all KCCs across BC will be invited to participate in the planned evaluation. Measurements: Qualitative and quantitative feedback from patients and families living with CKD and KCC clinicians. Methods: The planned multiphase evaluation of virtual care integration in KCCs will be conducted across all 15 KCCs in the province of BC, Canada. The following phases are proposed: (1) review of current virtual care integration and practices, (2) assessment of patient and clinician experiences and perspectives via semi-structured interviews, (3) validation of those patient and clinician perspectives via survey of a larger sample, (4) compilation and analysis of all phases to provide informed recommendations for patient and visit format selection in a mixed in-person and virtual multidisciplinary clinic setting. Limitations: This work will not capture any information about the relationship between differences in virtual usage parameters and clinical outcomes or financial implications. Conclusions: There is no existing framework for either evaluation of multidisciplinary CKD care quality in a virtual setting or evaluation of care quality following a substantial change in service delivery models. The proposed evaluation protocol will enable better understanding of the nuances in kidney care delivery in this new format and inform how best to optimize the integration of virtual and pre-existing formats into kidney clinic care delivery beyond the pandemic. Beyond the current evaluation, this protocol may be of use for other jurisdictions to evaluate their own local instances of virtual care implementation and integration. The model may be adapted to evaluate quality of multidisciplinary kidney care delivery following other changes to clinic service delivery models.

Contexte: Les soins multidisciplinaires prodigués aux patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC), tels qu'ils existaient auparavant, étaient fondés sur une base de preuves et d'expérience de l'amélioration des résultats pour les patients dans le cadre d'un modèle de prestation de services établi et bien décrit. Le début de la pandémie COVID-19 a créé une fracture par rapport à ce modèle établi de prestation de soins, à la faveur d'une intégration des soins virtuels et des soins en personne. Objectif: Élaborer un cadre d'évaluation permettant de déterminer si ce changement dans les modèles de prestation de services a eu une incidence sur la qualité des soins multidisciplinaires en santé rénale et/ou sur les interactions et les relations entre le patient et le clinicien. Type d'étude: Une évaluation multiphase séquentielle à méthodes mixtes. Cadre: Les 15 cliniques multidisciplinaires de soins rénaux (CMSR) de la C.-B. Participants: Tous les patients et cliniciens de toutes les CMSR de la Colombie-Britannique seront invités à participer à l'évaluation. Mesures: Les rétroactions qualitative et quantitative des patients atteints d'IRC et de leurs familles, ainsi que celles des cliniciens des CMSR. Méthodologie: L'évaluation multiphase prévue de l'intégration des soins virtuels dans les soins prodigués dans les CMSR sera menée dans les 15 CMSR de la Colombie-Britannique (C.-B.), au Canada. Les phases suivantes sont proposées: (1) examen de l'intégration et des pratiques actuelles en matière de soins virtuels, (2) évaluation des expériences et des perspectives des patients et des cliniciens par le biais d'entrevues semi-structurées, (3) validation de ces mêmes perspectives par le biais d'un sondage sur un échantillon plus large, (4) compilation et analyze des données recueillies lors de toutes les phases afin de fournir des recommandations éclairées pour le choix des patients et du format de la visite dans un contexte de clinique multidisciplinaire intégrant les consultations en personne et virtuelles. Limites: Ces travaux ne permettront pas de recueillir des informations sur la relation entre les différences dans les paramètres d'utilization virtuelle et les résultats cliniques ou les implications financières. Conclusion: En ce moment, il n'existe pas de cadre pour évaluer la qualité des soins multidisciplinaires en IRC dans un cadre virtuel ni pour évaluer la qualité des soins après un changement important dans les modèles de prestation de services. Le protocole d'évaluation proposé permettra de mieux comprendre les nuances dans la prestation des soins rénaux dans ce nouveau format et d'indiquer la meilleure façon d'optimiser l'intégration des formats virtuels et préexistants dans la prestation des soins en clinique rénale au-delà de la pandémie. Au-delà de l'évaluation actuelle, ce protocole pourra être utilisé par d'autres provinces pour évaluer leurs propres instances locales de mise en œuvre et d'intégration des soins virtuels. Le modèle peut être adapté pour évaluer la qualité de la prestation de soins multidisciplinaires aux reins à la suite d'autres changements apportés aux modèles de prestation de services en clinique.

Program Report: Can-SOLVE CKD Network Presents an Inclusive Method for Developing Patient-Oriented Research Tools.

PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: Given the growing interest in patient-oriented research (POR) initiatives, there is a need to provide relevant training and education on how to engage with patients as partners on research teams. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: As part of its mandate to develop appropriate training materials, the patient-oriented renal research network, Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD), established a training and Mentorship Committee (TMC). METHODS: The committee brings together a unique combination of Indigenous and non-Indigenous patient partners (including caregivers, family members, and living donors), researchers, as well as patient engagement and knowledge translation experts, combining a multitude of perspectives and expertise. Following an assessment of training needs within the network, the TMC undertook the co-development of 5 learning modules to address the identified gaps. Subsequently, the committee divided into working groups tasked with developing content using a consultive and iterative approach informed by the DoTTI framework for building web-based tools for patients. In addition, the TMC embodied the guiding principles of inclusiveness, support, mutual respect, and co-building as set out by the Patient Engagement Framework through the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. KEY FINDINGS: The 5 new modules include: A Patient Engagement Toolkit, Storytelling for Impact, Promoting Kidney Research in Canada (KidneyPRO), Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj Learning Pathway, and Knowledge Translation. The TMC's approach to developing these modules demonstrates how a diverse group of stakeholders working together can create tools to support high-quality POR. This also provides a roadmap for other health research entities interested in developing similar tools within their unique domains. LIMITATIONS: The landscape of patient engagement in research is constantly evolving. This underscores the need for sustained resources to keep POR tools and training relevant and up-to-date. Sustaining such resources may not be feasible for all research entities. IMPLICATIONS: Collaborative approaches integrating patients in the development of POR tools ensure the content is relevant and meaningful to patients. Broader adoption of such approaches has great potential to address existing gaps and enhance the Canadian POR landscape.

OBJECTIF DU PROGRAM: L'intérêt croissant pour les initiatives de recherche axée sur le patient met en évidence le besoin de sensibiliser les chercheurs et d'offrir une formation pertinente sur les façons d'impliquer les patients comme partenaires dans les équipes de recherche. SOURCES: Dans le cadre de son mandat consistant à élaborer des documents de formation appropriés, le réseau dédié à l'avancement de la recherche en santé rénale axée sur le patient, le réseau CAN-SOLVE CKD (Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease), a créé un Comité de formation et de mentorat (CFM). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le CFM réunit une combinaison unique de patients partenaires autochtones et non autochtones (incluant soignants, membres des familles, donneurs vivants), des chercheurs et des experts de l'application des connaissances et de l'implication des patients à la recherche, ce qui permet de conjuguer une multitude de points de vue et d'expertises. Après une évaluation des besoins en formation dans le réseau, le CFM a entrepris l'élaboration conjointe de cinq modules d'apprentissage pour combler les lacunes mises en évidence. Le comité s'est ensuite divisé en groupes de travail chargés d'en élaborer les contenus par le biais d'une approche consultative et itérative guidée par le cadre de perfectionnement DoTTI pour la création d'outils Web destinés aux patients. De plus, le CFM a intégré les principes directeurs d'inclusion, de soutien, de respect mutuel et de co-création énoncés dans le Cadre d'engagement des patients de la stratégie de recherche axée sur le patient (RAP) des Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: Les cinq nouveaux modules sont: une trousse d'outils sur l'implication des patients, le partage de récits qui ont un impact, la promotion de la recherche dans le domaine rénal au Canada (KidneyPRO -Promoting Kidney Research in Canada), le cheminement d'apprentissage Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj et l'application des connaissances. L'approche adoptée par le CFM pour développer ces modules a montré comment un groupe diversifié d'intervenants qui travaille ensemble peut mener à la création d'outils pour soutenir une RAP d'excellente qualité. Ces travaux ont également fourni une feuille de route pour d'autres entités de recherche en santé qui souhaiteraient élaborer des outils similaires dans leurs domaines respectifs. LIMITES: L'implication des patients dans la recherche est en constante évolution. Cette étude souligne le besoin de ressources durables pour garder les outils et les formations en RAP pertinents et à jour. Le maintien de telles ressources pourrait ne pas être possible pour toutes les entités de recherche. IMPLICATIONS: Les approches collaboratives qui impliquent les patients dans le développement d'outils de RAP garantissent que les contenus soient pertinents et significatifs pour les patients. L'adoption à plus grande échelle de telles approches a le potentiel de combler les lacunes existantes et d'améliorer le domaine de la RAP au Canada.

Late-life longitudinal blood pressure trajectories as predictor of dementia.

While hypertension is widely recognized as a risk factor for dementia, few observational studies and clinical trials fully accounted for the effect of age on blood pressure (BP) changes prior to dementia onset. In this territory-wide population-based longitudinal study of 16,591 community-living dementia-free older adults, we followed their BP and cognitive status and tested if loss of longitudinal increase in BP in late life was associated with higher dementia risk in 6 years, with consideration of the confounding effects of hypertension, hypotension, BP variability, and other health problems and behaviours and, in the data analysis, exclusion of individuals who developed dementia within 3 years after baseline to minimize risk of reverse causality. Over 72,997 person-years of follow-up, 1429 participants developed dementia. We found that loss of longitudinal increase in systolic BP (defined as SBP increased by either < 10 mmHg or 10%) from baseline to Year 3 was independently associated with higher risk of incident dementia at Years 4 to 6 (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.45, p = 0.03; adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50, p = 0.02; respectively). Our findings suggest that late-life SBP trajectory changes might independently predict dementia onset and highlight the importance of including longitudinal BP monitoring in dementia risk assessment.

COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, Acceptance, and Hesitancy Among Persons With Mental Disorders During the Second Stage of China's Nationwide Vaccine Rollout.

Persons with mental disorders (PwMDs) are a priority group for COVID-19 vaccination, but empirical data on PwMDs' vaccine uptake and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines are lacking. This study examined the uptake, acceptance, and hesitancy associated with COVID-19 vaccines among Chinese PwMDs during China's nationwide vaccine rollout. In total, 906 adult PwMDs were consecutively recruited from a large psychiatric hospital in Wuhan, China, and administered a self-report questionnaire, which comprised standardized questions regarding sociodemographics, COVID-19 vaccination status, attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines, and psychopathology. Vaccine-recipients were additionally asked to report adverse events that occurred following vaccination. PwMDs had a much lower rate of vaccination than Wuhan residents (10.8 vs. 40.0%). The rates of vaccine acceptance and hesitancy were 58.1 and 31.1%, respectively. Factors associated with vaccine uptake included having other mental disorders [odds ratio (OR) = 3.63], believing that ≥50% of vaccine-recipients would be immune to COVID-19 (OR = 3.27), being not worried about the side effects (OR = 2.59), and being an outpatient (OR = 2.24). Factors associated with vaccine acceptance included perceiving a good preventive effect of vaccines (OR = 12.92), believing that vaccines are safe (OR = 4.08), believing that ≥50% of vaccine-recipients would be immune to COVID-19 (OR = 2.20), and good insight into the mental illness (OR = 1.71). Adverse events occurred in 21.4% of vaccine-recipients and exacerbated pre-existing psychiatric symptoms in 2.0% of vaccine-recipients. Nevertheless, 95.2% of vaccine-recipients rated adverse events as acceptable. Compared to the 58.1% vaccine acceptance rate and the 40.0% vaccination rate in the general population, the 10.8% vaccine coverage rate suggested a large unmet need for COVID-19 vaccination in Chinese PwMDs. Strategies to increase vaccination coverage among PwMDs may include provision of reliable sources of information on vaccines, health education to foster positive attitudes toward vaccines, a practical guideline to facilitate clinical decision-making for vaccination, and the involvement of psychiatrists in vaccine consultation and post-vaccination follow-up services.

The healthier healthcare management models for COVID-19.

The worldwide pandemic situation of COVID-19 generates a situation in which healthcare resources such as diagnostic kits, drugs and basic healthcare infrastructure were on shortage throughout the period, along with negative impact on socio-economic system. Standardized public healthcare models were missing in pandemic situation, covering from hospitalized patient care to local resident's healthcare managements in terms of monitoring, assess to diagnosis and medicines. This exploratory and intervention-based study with the objective of proposing COVID-19 Care Management Model representing comprehensive care of society including patients (COVID-19 and other diseases) and healthy subjects under integrated framework of healthier management model. Shifting policy towards technology-oriented models with well-aligned infrastructure can achieve better outcomes in COVID-19 prevention and care. The planned development of technical healthcare models for prognosis and improved treatment outcomes that take into account not only genomics, proteomics, nanotechnology, materials science perspectives but also the possible contribution of advanced digital technologies is best strategies for early diagnosis and infections control. In view of current pandemic, a Healthier Healthcare Management Model is proposed here as a source of standardized care having technology support, medical consultation, along with public health model of sanitization, distancing and contact less behaviours practices. Effective healthcare managements have been the main driver of healthier society where, positive action at identified research, technology and management segment more specifically public health, patient health, technology selection and political influence has great potential to enhanced the global response to COVID-19. The implementation of such practices will deliver effective diagnosis and control mechanism and make healthier society.

Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj: a learning pathway to foster better Indigenous cultural competence in Canadian health research.

OBJECTIVE: In Canada, Indigenous people experience racism across diverse settings, including within the health sector. This has negatively impacted both the quality of care that Indigenous people receive as well as how research related to Indigenous populations is conducted. Therefore, an Indigenous-led council at a kidney research network, in partnership with other key stakeholders, sought to create a learning pathway that aims to distill the racism that Indigenous people face, and build cultural competence, within the health sector. PARTICIPANTS: The learning pathway was designed for researchers, health care providers, patient partners and administrators. SETTING: Various components of the pathway are established trainings in healthcare and research settings at provincial and national levels. Provincially, some components are implemented in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario. INTERVENTION: The pathway, called Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj (meaning "White Horse" in Anishinaabemowin), involves six key steps: a culturally tailored blanket exercise that walks participants through the history of local Indigenous Nations/peoples; a more detailed online training program (San'yas); a series of webinars on Indigenous research ethics and protocols; an educational booklet about engaging Knowledge Keepers in research, as well as sharing details about their traditional knowledge and culture; two certification programs about Indigenous ownership of data; and a "book club," wherein the conversation of racism-and the goal for finding solutions-is continually discussed. OUTCOMES: Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj is working to build cultural competence in the Canadian health sector. IMPLICATIONS: This learning pathway has the potential to address racial disparities across the country and improve health outcomes for Indigenous peoples.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Au Canada, les autochtones font face au racisme dans divers milieux, y compris dans le secteur de la santé. Cela a eu une incidence négative sur la qualité des soins que reçoivent les peuples autochtones, ainsi que sur la façon dont la recherche sur les populations autochtones est menée. Par conséquent, un conseil dirigé par des Autochtones dans un réseau de recherche sur les reins, en partenariat avec d'autres parties prenantes, a cherché à créer une voie d'apprentissage visant à réduire le racisme auquel les peuples autochtones sont confrontés et à renforcer les compétences culturelles au sein du secteur de la santé. PARTICIPANTS: La voie d'apprentissage a été conçue pour les chercheurs, les fournisseurs de soins de santé, les patients partenaires et les administrateurs. CADRE: Cette voie d'apprentissage est composée de formations établies dans le milieu de la santé et de la recherche au niveau provincial et national. À l'échelle provinciale, il y a des programmes ayant lieu en Colombie-Britannique, en Alberta, en Ontario, en Saskatchewan et au Manitoba. INTERVENTION: La voie d'apprentissage, appelée Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj (qui signifie « cheval blanc ¼ en Anishinaabemowin), comporte six étapes clés : un exercice culturel sur mesure qui guide les participants à travers l'histoire des nations/peuples autochtones locaux à l'aide de diverses couvertures culturelles; un programme de formation en ligne détaillé (San'yas); une série de webinaires sur l'éthique et les protocoles autochtones en matière de recherche; un livret pédagogique sur l'engagement des gardiens de la connaissance en recherche ainsi que le partage d'informations sur leur connaissance et leur culture traditionnelle; deux programmes de certification sur la propriété autochtone des données; et un « club de lecture ¼ dans lequel nous ne cessons de discuter du racisme tout en cherchant des solutions. RéSULTATS: Wabishki Bizhiko Skaanj s'efforce de renforcer les compétences culturelles dans le secteur de la santé au Canada. IMPLICATIONS: Cette voie d'apprentissage a le potentiel de s'attaquer aux disparités raciales à l'échelle nationale et d'améliorer les résultats en matière de santé pour les peuples autochtones.

Prevalence of depressive symptoms among Chinese university students amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Chinese university students are at high risk for depressive symptoms and the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have exacerbated the mental health of university students. However, existing studies on depressive symptoms in Chinese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic reported a wide range of prevalence estimates, making mental health planning for this population difficult. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys that assessed the prevalence of depressive symptoms in Chinese university students amid the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Major Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP) and English (PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo) databases and preprint platforms were searched to identify cross-sectional studies containing data on the prevalence of depressive symptoms in Chinese university students during the pandemic. Two authors independently retrieved the literature, evaluated the eligibility of potential studies, assessed the risk of bias (RoB) of included studies, and extracted data. RoB was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. RESULTS: In total, 1177 records were retrieved, and 84 studies involving 1 292 811 Chinese university students during the pandemic were included. None of the included studies were rated as completely low RoB. Statistically significant heterogeneity in the prevalence estimates of included studies was detected (I2 = 99.9%, p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms was 26.0% (95%CI: 23.3-28.9%), which was significantly higher in female than in male students (30.8% v. 28.6%, p < 0.001), in postgraduates than in undergraduates (29.3% v. 22.9%, p < 0.001), in students living inside than in those living outside the COVID-19 epicentre (27.5% v. 22.3%, P < 0.001), in students from universities at the epicentre than in those from universities outside the epicentre (26.2% v. 23.1%, p < 0.001), in students who had close contact with COVID-19 than in those who did not (46.0% v. 25.0%, p < 0.001), and in students who had acquaintances or relatives infected with COVID-19 (39.7% v. 24.0%, p < 0.001) than in those who did not. Five sources of heterogeneity were identified from the subgroup analysis: survey period, % of males among the survey sample, scale of depressive symptoms, cutoff score of the scale and level of RoB. CONCLUSIONS: Over one-fourth of Chinese university students experienced depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health services for this population should include periodic evaluation of depressive symptoms, expanded social support and psychiatric assessment and treatment when necessary. It is also necessary to design depression prevention programmes that target higher-risk cohorts of university students.